Home  About us  Contact
 

One Community (one + community)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences60%
Life Sciences40%

Selected Abstracts

Dispersal and life span spectra in plant communities: a key to safe site dynamics, species coexistence and conservation

ECOGRAPHY, Issue 2 2002
Roel J. Strykstra
Dispersal and life span of individual plant species within five plant communities were assessed to obtain a characterization of these communities in this respect. Such a characterization is important in the context of restoration and maintenance. The most frequent species of five communities were ranked in eight classes according to their level of seed dispersal capability, their seed bank formation (dispersal in time and space) and their individual life span. In the communities, all eight classes were found, but communities differed in the distribution of the species over the classes. A theoretical framework was constructed to use the level of specialization of plant species in terms of dispersal in space and time, and life span, to define the characteristics of safe site dynamics within communities. Following simple rules, the relative reliability of the occurrence of safe sites in space and time was defined. After that, the relative reliability of the habitat was linked to the best fitting combination of trait specialization level. Having defined this link, communities could be characterized in a comparative way by their level and pattern of reliability of the opportunities for recruitment in space and time. The meaning of the coexistence of a range of trait combinations in one community was discussed. It was postulated that habitat reliability can explain this by assuming that the habitat of the community is part of a larger system, or consists of several "subsystems". These insights need to be considered in nature conservation. Succession and also specializations beyond the scope of dispersal and life span may influence the occurrence of species in a seemingly unfit habitat (for instance the occurrence of semi parasitic annuals in a community of perennials, because they use the perennial root system of other species). Finally, the meaning of safe site reliability in space and time in the context of restoration of communities was discussed. The reliability in space and time may be different today from that of the past, which restricts the feasibility of restoration of communities. [source]

ESTIMATING EFFECTS OF SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT ON RENAL FAILURE AND DEATH WITHOUT A PARALLEL PLACEBO CONTROL GROUP

NEPHROLOGY, Issue 3 2000
Hoy We
Background: Chronic disease programs are poorly developed in most Aboriginal communities. Much disease is unrecognised or inadequately treated, although appropriate interventions profoundly reduce morbidity and mortality in nonAboriginal populations. Programs of improved management must aspire to best practice for all, so that maintaining parallel untreated control groups is unethical. This poses challenges for evaluating effect. Methods: We identified a large burden of chronic disease in a 1990-1995 screening program in one community, and started a renal & cardiovascular-protection program in Nov 1995. This centred around use of ACE inhibitors, rigorous BP control, better control of glycemia and lipids, & health education. By late 1999 about 275 people, or 30% of all adults had enrolled. The courses of BP, albuminuria and GFR was compared with those in the pre-program era (ANZSN, 1999). Treatment effects on renal failure & natural death were estimated in 3 ways. 1) Comparison of these endpoints in the "intention to treat" group with those in persons potentially eligible for treatment on their 1990-1995 screening results, ,controls'. There was 50% overlap between the groups, & controls were younger and had less severe disease than the treatment group. 2.Community-based trends in endpoints. 3. Comparison of these trends with those in other NT Top End communities. Results: 1. Risk ratios of rates, Kaplan Meier survivals, and Cox hazard ratios all showed better survival of the treated group over controls, with estimates of 41%-64% reductions in endpoints, after accounting for disease severity. 2. Dialysis starts in the entire community have fallen by at least 38% and natural deaths by 32%. 3. In contrast dialysis continue to increase at 11% per yr in other communities and deaths have not fallen. These results all suggest a marked benefit from the treatment program. Similar methods might be used where truly controlled observations are not feasible. [source]

ESTIMATING EFFECTS OF SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT ON RENAL FAILURE AND DEATH WITHOUT A PARALLEL PLACEBO CONTROL GROUP

NEPHROLOGY, Issue 3 2000
Hoy We
Background: Chronic disease programs are poorly developed in most Aboriginal communities. Much disease is unrecognised or inadequately treated, although appropriate interventions profoundly reduce morbidity and mortality in nonAboriginal populations. Programs of improved management must aspire to best practice for all, so that maintaining parallel untreated control groups is unethical. This poses challenges for evaluating effect. Methods: We identified a large burden of chronic disease in a 1990-1995 screening program in one community, and started a renal & cardiovascular-protection program in Nov 1995. This centred around use of ACE inhibitors, rigorous BP control, better control of glycemia and lipids, & health education. By late 1999 about 275 people, or 30% of all adults had enrolled. The courses of BP, albuminuria and GFR was compared with those in the pre-program era (ANZSN, 1999). Treatment effects on renal failure & natural death were estimated in 3 ways. 1) Comparison of these endpoints in the "intention to treat" group with those in persons potentially eligible for treatment on their 1990-1995 screening results, ,controls'. There was 50% overlap between the groups, & controls were younger and had less severe disease than the treatment group. 2.Community-based trends in endpoints. 3. Comparison of these trends with those in other NT Top End communities. Results: 1. Risk ratios of rates, Kaplan Meier survivals, and Cox hazard ratios all showed better survival of the treated group over controls, with estimates of 41%-64% reductions in endpoints, after accounting for disease severity. 2. Dialysis starts in the entire community have fallen by at least 38% and natural deaths by 32%. 3. In contrast dialysis continue to increase at 11% per yr in other communities and deaths have not fallen. These results all suggest a marked benefit from the treatment program. Similar methods might be used where truly controlled observations are not feasible. [source]

Graduate Students and Knowledge Exchange with Local Stakeholders: Possibilities and Preparation

BIOTROPICA, Issue 5 2009
Amy E. Duchelle
ABSTRACT Tropical biologists are exploring ways to expand their role as researchers through knowledge exchange with local stakeholders. Graduate students are well positioned for this broader role, particularly when supported by graduate programs. We ask: (1) how can graduate students effectively engage in knowledge exchange during their research; and (2) how can university programs prepare young scientists to take on this partnership role? We present a conceptual framework with three levels at which graduate students can exchange knowledge with stakeholders (information sharing, skill building, and knowledge generation) and discuss limitations of each. Examples of these strategies included disseminating preliminary research results to southern African villages, building research skills of Brazilian undergraduate students through semester-long internships, and jointly developing and implementing a forest ecology research and training program with one community in the Amazon estuary. Students chose strategies based on stakeholders' interests, research goals, and a realistic evaluation of student capacity and skill set. As strategies became more complex, time invested, skills mobilized, and strength of relationships between students and stakeholders increased. Graduate programs can prepare students for knowledge exchange with partners by developing specialized skills training, nurturing external networks, offering funding, maximizing strengths of universities in developed and developing regions through partnership, and evaluating knowledge exchange experiences. While balancing the needs of academia with those of stakeholders is challenging, the benefits of enhancing local scientific capacity and generating more locally relevant research for improved conservation may be worth the risks associated with implementing this type of graduate training model. [source]

Urban-Rural Differences in Motivation to Control Prejudice Toward People With HIV/AIDS: The Impact of Perceived Identifiability in the Community

THE JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, Issue 3 2008
Janice Yanushka Bunn PhD
ABSTRACT:,Context:HIV/AIDS is occurring with increasing frequency in rural areas of the United States, and people living with HIV/AIDS in rural communities report higher levels of perceived stigma than their more urban counterparts. The extent to which stigmatized individuals perceive stigma could be influenced, in part, by prevailing community attitudes. Differences between rural and more metropolitan community members' attitudes toward people with HIV/AIDS, however, have rarely been examined. Purpose: This study investigated motivation to control prejudice toward people with HIV/AIDS among non-infected residents of metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas of rural New England. Methods: A total of 2,444 individuals were identified through a random digit dialing sampling scheme, and completed a telephone interview to determine attitudes and concerns about a variety of health issues. Internal or external motivation to control prejudice was examined using a general linear mixed model approach, with independent variables including age, gender, community size, and perceived indentifiability within one's community. Findings: Results showed that community size, by itself, was not related to motivation to control prejudice. However, there was a significant interaction between community size and community residents' perceptions about the extent to which people in their communities know who they are. Conclusion: Our results indicate that residents of rural areas, in general, may not show a higher level of bias toward people with HIV/AIDS. The interaction between community size and perceived identifiability, however, suggests that motivation to control prejudice, and potentially the subsequent expression of that prejudice, is more complex than originally thought. [source]