			Home About us Contact

Object Location (object + location)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Psychology	40%

Selected Abstracts

Developmental profiles for multiple object tracking and spatial memory: typically developing preschoolers and people with Williams syndrome

DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, Issue 3 2010
Kirsten O'Hearn
The ability to track moving objects, a crucial skill for mature performance on everyday spatial tasks, has been hypothesized to require a specialized mechanism that may be available in infancy (i.e. indexes). Consistent with the idea of specialization, our previous work showed that object tracking was more impaired than a matched spatial memory task in individuals with Williams syndrome (WS), a genetic disorder characterized by severe visuo-spatial impairment. We now ask whether this unusual pattern of performance is a reflection of general immaturity or of true abnormality, possibly reflecting the atypical brain development in WS. To examine these two possibilities, we tested typically developing 3- and 4-year-olds and people with WS on multiple object tracking (MOT) and memory for static spatial location. The maximum number of objects that could be correctly tracked or remembered (estimated from the k -statistic) showed similar developmental profiles in typically developing 3- and 4-year-old children, but the WS profile differed from either age group. People with WS could track more objects than 3-year-olds, and the same number as 4-year-olds, but they could remember the locations of more static objects than both 3- and 4-year-olds. Combining these data with those from our previous studies, we found that typically developing children show increases in the number of objects they can track or remember between the ages of 3 and 6, and these increases grow in parallel across the two tasks. In contrast, object tracking in older children and adults with WS remains at the level of 4-year-olds, whereas the ability to remember multiple locations of static objects develops further. As a whole, the evidence suggests that MOT and memory for static location develop in tandem typically, but not in WS. Atypical development of the parietal lobe in people with WS could play a causal role in the abnormal, uneven pattern of performance in WS. This interpretation is consistent with the idea that multiple object tracking engages different mechanisms from those involved in memory for static object location, and that the former can be particularly disrupted by atypical development. [source]

PKM, maintains 1-day- and 6-day-old long-term object location but not object identity memory in dorsal hippocampus

HIPPOCAMPUS, Issue 6 2010
Oliver Hardt
Abstract Continuous activity of the atypical protein kinase C isoform M zeta (PKM,) is necessary for maintaining long-term memory acquired in aversively or appetitively motivated associative learning tasks, such as active avoidance, aversive taste conditioning, auditory and contextual fear conditioning, radial arm maze, and watermaze. Whether unreinforced, nonassociative memory will also require PKM, for long-term maintenance is not known. Using recognition memory for object location and object identity, we found that inactivating PKM, in dorsal hippocampus abolishes 1-day and 6-day-old long-term recognition memory for object location, while recognition memory for object identity was not affected by this treatment. Memory for object location persisted for no more than 35 days after training. These results suggest that the dorsal hippocampus mediates long-term memory for where, but not what things have been encountered, and that PKM, maintains this type of spatial knowledge as long as the memory exists. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Pulfrich's phenonenon in a case of optic nerve hypoplasia

OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 1 2008
Gordon Heron
Introduction:, Optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) is a congenital deficiency of retinal ganglion cells and their axons that form the optic nerve. This condition is associated with visual deficits ranging from no light perception in severe cases to vision within normal ranges in mild cases of ONH. In mild cases, deficits can be limited to sectoral anomalies in the visual field and normal vision with colour vision anomalies have been reported. We report here a case of mild ONH with visual symptoms relating to Pulfrich phenomenon (PP) occurring spontaneously. Methods:, A 12 year girl presented with typical visual symptoms (bumping into objects when walking, poor object location at tennis) associated with the spontaneous PP. A simple pendulum revealed a perceived anticlockwise ellipse indicative of a left eye defect. This was neutralised by an 85% transmission filter placed before the right eye. The inter-ocular latency difference was calculated to be 0.88 (S.D., 0.55) ms. Results:, Fundus biometry showed an asymmetry in optic nerve size, the left being smaller than the right. Visual fields, anomaloscope and other colour vision tests, and both flash and pattern-reversal stimuli Visually Evoked Potentials showed no difference in visual function between the right and left eyes. Conclusions:, A case of very mild ONH gives inter-ocular normal vision and visual function and yet a subtle inter-ocular delay occurs resulting in visual symptoms associated with PP. These were completely removed with tinted spectacles. [source]

Location of a missing object and detection of its absence by infants: Contribution of an eye-tracking system to the understanding of infants' strategies

INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, Issue 4 2004
Roger Lécuyer
Abstract Previous research has demonstrated infants' capacity to discriminate between situations in which all the objects successively hidden behind a screen are present, or not, after the removal of the screen. Two types of interpretation have been proposed: counting capacity or object memorization capacity. In the usual paradigm, the missing object in the impossible event is usually the last object which is placed behind the screen. Following this, a third interpretation can be offered: infants' exploration is first directed to this object's location, and its presence or absence is noticed. Two experiments using Wynn's (Nature 1992; 358:749) paradigm were performed to test the third hypothesis. The first experiment involved four objects (teddy bears) placed in four squares. Infants looked longer at the impossible event (3 objects, the last one missing) than at the possible event (4 objects) when the impossible event was presented first. No difference in looking duration was observed for the opposite order. In the second experiment, the four objects were disposed in a line and an eye-tracking system was used. No difference in the number of looks was observed between the impossible event (3 objects, the second one missing) and the possible event (4 objects). Therefore, it appears that at least in this complex situation (4 objects used instead of 2 usually), the location of the missing object is a key factor for event discrimination. Eye-tracking also indicated in the second experiment that infants looked less at the second location during an impossible event (object missing) than during the possible event (object present), indicating that the impossibility of the event was not a determining factor for looking durations. Altogether, the data indicate the potential usefulness of eye-tracking analysis in this type of situation. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]