			Home About us Contact

Norwegian Version (norwegian + version)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Psychometric properties of a Norwegian version of Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2010
T. Smedal
Smedal T, Johansen HH, Myhr K-M, Strand LI. Psychometric properties of a Norwegian version of Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29). Acta Neurol Scand: 2010: 122: 244,251. © 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. Objectives,,, To examine psychometric properties of Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) for use in Norwegian patients with multiple sclerosis. Methods,,, Translation was performed according to international guidelines. The questionnaire was answered by 64 patients prior to and at a screening session, and re-answered by 59 patients before and after 4 weeks of physiotherapy. Results,,, Internal consistency (,) was 0.92 for the physical and 0.85 for the psychological subscales. Reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.86 for the physical and 0.81 for the psychological subscales, smallest detectable change being 18.4 and 21.1, respectively. The physical but not the psychological subscale demonstrated mostly satisfactory associations with other physical measures. Responsiveness by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.83 and 0.76, respectively. As hypothesized, effect size was larger for the physical (1.01) than for the psychological (0.76) subscale after treatment. Conclusions,,, MSIS-29, Norwegian Version demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. [source]

Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, Issue 9 2008
Sverre Bergh
Abstract Objective The Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) is developed to test cognitive function in patients with dementia of moderate to severe degree. We have conducted a study to assess the inter-rater reliability and the validity of the Norwegian version of SIB. Methods The reliability study comprised 30 patients, and the validity study 59 patients in nursing homes. We assessed Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale and the inter-rater reliability for the total SIB score and its nine sub scores between two testers by means of the Spearman's correlation coefficients. In the validity study we compared the SIB scores with the scores on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Results The mean SIB score was 72.10 (SD 25.37). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.97, and the inter-rater reliability of total SIB score was Spearman's rho 0.85, and ranged from 0.46 to 0.76 for the nine sub-scores. The mean SIB score for patients with a CDR score,<,2 was 84.2(13.4), whereas total scores for patients with CDR 2 and 3 were 74 (18.9) and 48.4 (33.3), respectively. A cut-off point of 80.5 points gave the highest accuracy in discriminating between patients with CDR 2 and CDR 3, while a cut-off point of 87.5 best discriminated between CDR,<,2 and CDR 3. Conclusion The study indicates that the Norwegian version of SIB is a reliable and valid test with which to evaluate the cognition in patients with dementia of moderate to severe degree. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Stages of Change , Continuous Measure (URICA-E2): psychometrics of a Norwegian version

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, Issue 1 2009
Anners Lerdal
Abstract Title.,Stages of Change , Continuous Measure (URICA-E2): psychometrics of a Norwegian version. Aim., This paper is a report of research to translate the English version of the Stages of Change continuous measure questionnaire (URICA-E2) into Norwegian and to test the validity of the questionnaire and its usefulness in predicting behavioural change. Background., While the psychometric properties of the Stages of Change categorical measure have been tested extensively, evaluation of the psychometric properties of the continuous questionnaire has not been described elsewhere in the literature. Method., Cross-sectional data were collected with a convenience sample of 198 undergraduate nursing students in 2005 and 2006. The English version of URICA-E2 was translated into Norwegian according to standardized procedures. Findings., Principal components analysis clearly confirmed five of the dimensions of readiness to change (Precontemplation Non-Believers, Precontemplation Believers, Contemplation, Preparation and Maintenance), while the sixth dimension, Action, showed the lowest Eigenvalue (0·93). Findings from the cluster analysis indicate distinct profiles among the respondents in terms of readiness to change their exercise behaviour. Conclusion., The URICA-E2 was for the most part replicated from Reed's original work. The result of the cluster analysis of the items associated with the factor ,Action' suggests that these do not adequately measure the factor. [source]

The Norwegian version of the American pain society patient outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of three subscales

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 15 2008
Alfhild Dihle MSc
Aims and objectives., To examine some psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the American Pain Society's Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-N). Background., This study is part of an investigation of Norwegian orthopaedic surgical patients, where the overall aim is to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management. Therefore, an adequate questionnaire on the quality of postoperative pain management was needed. Methods., The sample included 114 orthopaedic postoperative patients. The instrument consists of three main subscales, namely the modified Brief Pain Inventory (modified BPI subscale), the subscale on satisfaction with pain management (Satisfaction subscale) and the subscale on beliefs about pain management (Beliefs subscale), together with six single items about pain management. The reliability of these three main subscales was estimated using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and the construct validity was evaluated using principal-axis factor analysis with oblimin rotation. Results., Face and content validity of the APS-POQ-N were satisfactory, while the modified BPI and the Beliefs subscales showed acceptable internal consistency but the Satisfaction subscale did not. Factor analyses yielded a three-factor solution for the modified BPI, a one-factor solution for the Satisfaction subscale and a two-factor solution for the Beliefs subscale. Conclusions., The APS-POQ-N appears, in general, to be an acceptable method of evaluating postoperative pain management in orthopaedic postoperative patients. However, the alpha value of the Satisfaction subscale was low, and thus the subscale is not recommended for this purpose. Relevance to clinical practice., Reliable and valid instruments are important when performing clinical research. This instrument is applicable as an indicator of quality of postoperative pain management in clinical practice and research. [source]