Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
NSTE-ACS Patients (NSTE-AC + patient)
Selected AbstractsBaseline Clinical Characteristics and Midterm Prognosis of STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS Patients with Normal Coronary ArteriesANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Lukasz Mazurkiewicz M.D. Objective: We sought to compare clinical profiles and midterm prognosis of patients with normal coronary arteries presenting with ST-elevation ACS (STE-ACS) versus non-ST-elevation ACS (nSTE-ACS). Background: There are limited data regarding ACS in patients with normal coronary arteries, and especially clinical differences between ST-ACS and nSTE-ACS patients have not been evaluated sufficiently. Methods: The study group comprised 190 patients (mean age: 53.2 years, 63.1% males, 63.6% STE-ACS) presenting with ACS and normal coronary angiograms. The participants were evaluated in terms of 42 clinical variables. MACE [cardiac death (CD) and hospitalization for angina (HA)] were the study end points. Results: STE-ACS in comparison to nSTE-ACS patients were younger (P < 0.01), were more frequently males (P < 0.01), had more often infection prior to ACS (P < 0.01), higher hsCRP on admission (P < 0.01), and greater infarct size, measured by maximal troponin I (P < 0.01). By multivariate analysis in this subgroup, predictors of outcome were hsCRP (P = 0.03) and raised troponin I (P = 0.02). nSTE-ACS in comparison to STE-ACS patients were more obese (BMI, P < 0.01), had higher LDL cholesterol (P < 0.01), fasting glucose (P = 0.03). LDL cholesterol (P = 0.02) and fasting glucose (P = 0.03) emerged as independent predictors of outcome in these patients. Mean follow-up period was 25.4 months. STE-ACS patients had twice fewer MACE rate than nSTE-ACS patients [(1-CD, 12-HA; 11%) vs (1-CD, 16-HA; 25%), respectively, log rank P < 0.01]. Conclusions: STE-ACS and nSTE-ACS patients with normal coronary arteriography have different clinical profiles. In nSTE-ACS patients more pronounced metabolic abnormalities were identified, while in STE-ACS patients inflammatory background was more significant. [source] Electrocardiographic Differentiation between Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes at the BedsideANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010Krzysztof Jankowski M.D., Ph.D. Background: Clinical picture of acute pulmonary embolism (APE), with wide range of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities can mimic acute coronary syndromes. Objectives: Assessment of standard 12-lead ECG usefulness in differentiation at the bedside between APE and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 143 patients: 98 consecutive patients (mean age 63.4 ± 19.4 year, 45 M) with APE and 45 consecutive patients (mean age 72.8 ± 10.8 year, 44 M) with NSTE-ACS. Standard ECGs recorded on admission were compared in separated groups. Results: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) and S1S2S3 or S1Q3T3 pattern were found in similar frequency in both groups (10 [11%] APE patients vs 6 [14%] NSTE-ACS patients, 27 [28%] patients vs 7 [16%] patients, respectively, NS). Negative T waves in leads V1-3 together with negative T waves in inferior wall leads II, III, aVF (OR 1.3 [1.14,1.68]) significantly indicated APE with a positive predictive value of 85% and specificity of 87%. However, counterclockwise axis rotation (OR 4.57 [2.74,7.61]), ventricular premature beats (OR 2.60 [1.60,4.19]), ST depression in leads V1-3 (OR 2.25 [1.43,3.56]), and negative T waves in leads V5-6 (OR 2.08 [1.31,3.29]) significantly predicted NSTE-ACS. Conclusions: RBBB, S1S2S3, or S1Q3T3 pattern described as characteristic for APE were not helpful in the differentiation between APE and NSTE-ACS in studied group. Coexistence of negative T waves in precordial leads V1-3 and inferior wall leads may suggest APE diagnosis. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(2):145,150 [source] Utilization of catheterization and revascularization procedures in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome over the last decadeCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2005Glenn N. Levine MD Abstract The degree to which catheterization and revascularization procedures are utilized in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) during hospitalization has broad implications with respect to initial pharmacotherapeutic decisions (upfront therapies), treatment and hospital transfer protocols, guideline recommendations, and allocation of training, material, and financial resources. Analysis of data from multiple trials and registries of patients with NSTE-ACS has the potential to assess more broadly utilization of invasive and revascularization procedures and provide a wide angle or bird's-eye view of the management of such patients, complementing the data obtained from any one trial or registry. We therefore undertook a systematic overview of all large trials and registries of patients with NSTE-ACS conducted over the last decade that were deemed appropriate to provide information on catheterization and revascularization procedures. Although not unexpectedly the percentage of patients with NSTE-ACS managed with cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting varies in different clinical trials and registries, general findings and trends were still discernable from these studies. During the initial treatment period, the majority of patients were ultimately treated with medical therapy alone (e.g., without revascularization). The percentage of those NSTE-ACS patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization who were then managed with PCI increased over the last decade and now stands at approximately 50%. Of NSTE-ACS patients who undergo revascularization, the percentage of those patients who are revascularized via PCI similarly increased, and PCI is currently the revascularization procedure utilized in approximately three-fourths of patients undergoing revascularization. The percentages of patients undergoing invasive and revascularization procedures were consistently higher in the U.S. cohorts of study subjects when compared to non-U.S. cohorts of study subjects. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Impact of Point-of-care Testing in the Emergency Department Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary SyndromesACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 3 2008Bertrand Renaud MD Abstract Objectives:, To assess the impact of point-of-care testing (POCT) for troponin I (cTnI) measurement on the time to anti-ischemic therapy (TAIT) for patients with suspected non,ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods:, This was an open-label, randomized, single-center trial conducted in a university-affiliated hospital. cTnI measurement of patients with suspicion of NSTE-ACS coming to the ED was randomly allocated to POCT or central hospital laboratory testing (CHLT). The authors compared patients' baseline characteristics, time to anti-ischemic therapy, and medical outcomes between the randomized groups, in all study participants and in high-risk NSTE-ACS (cTnI level , 0.10 ,g/mL), and in those with low suspicion ACS (no chest pain and no ST deviation). Results:, Of the 860 patients enrolled, 113 were high-risk NSTE-ACS patients, including 53 (46.9%) allocated to POCT and 60 (53.1%) to CHLT. POCT was associated with decreased time to anti-ischemic therapy of about three-quarters of an hour, which was due to a shorter time to physician notification of cTnI level, in both all and subgroup participants. In contrast, neither ED length of stay nor medical outcomes differed between study groups. Conclusions:, Point-of-care testing for cTnI measurement might be clinically relevant for ED patients with a suspicion of NSTE-ACS, particularly for high-risk patients with a low suspicion of ACS. [source] | ||||||||||