Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Multiplanar Reconstruction (multiplanar + reconstruction)
Selected AbstractsIs 3-dimensional volume sonography an effective alternative method to the standard 2-dimensional technique of measuring the nuchal translucency?JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, Issue 3 2006Thomas D. Shipp MD Abstract Purpose: To determine whether 3-dimensional (3D) volume scanning is an effective alternative method of measuring nuchal translucency in first-trimester fetuses compared with the standard 2-dimensional (2D) technique, and to report a standardized method of evaluation. Methods: We measured the nuchal translucency of 29 fetuses between 11.4 and 13.9 weeks of age using the standard 2D sonographic technique with the fetus in a sagittal view. We then rescanned the fetus in a coronal orientation and obtained a 3D volume of the fetal neck area from crown to rump using a consistent technique. The sagittal orientation was reconstructed, and the width of the nuchal translucency was measured electronically using the reconstructed midsagittal view. The measurements using a conventional 2D sagittal view were then compared with the 3D reconstructed sagittal view. The nuchal translucency was adequately measured in all fetuses in which the 3D assessment was attempted. Results: The nuchal translucencies of 29 consecutive fetuses were measured using both 2D and 3D multiplanar reconstruction of the fetal neck. The mean ± standard deviation for the standard 2D assessment of the nuchal translucency was 1.7 ± 1.4 mm. Using 3D reconstruction of the Z plane, the measurement was 1.8 ± 1.6 mm. This was not a statistically significant difference (P = 0.4). There was a very high correlation between the two techniques (r = 0.984, P < 0.001). Conclusions: There is an excellent correlation between the measurements of the nuchal translucency using standard 2D scanning and those obtained from 3D multiplanar reconstruction of the Z plane. Using a consistent technique, the nuchal translucency can be accurately and reliably measured with a 3D rendering. This technique is potentially useful in fetuses that are not in an optimal position for standard 2D nuchal translucency measurement. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 34:118,122, 2006 [source] Comparison of conventional fast spin echo, single-shot two-dimensional and three-dimensional half-fourier RARE for T2-weighted female pelvic imagingJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 3 2004Hiroshi Sugimura MD Abstract Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the three-dimensional half-Fourier RARE sequence in comparison with single-shot two-dimensional half-Fourier RARE and conventional fast spin echo (FSE) for female pelvic imaging. Materials and Methods Imaging with all sequences was performed in 146 patients with 166 focal lesions on a 1.5-T system. The images were compared on the basis of quality, lesion conspicuity, and lesion to the uterus contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Results The sharpness of intrapelvic organs on the three-dimensional half-Fourier RARE sequence was better than that on two-dimensional half-Fourier RARE and worse than that on FSE. Motion-related artifacts for three-dimensional half-Fourier RARE were more frequent than those for two-dimensional half-Fourier RARE. There was no statistical difference between the three-dimensional half-Fourier RARE sequence and FSE in regard to lesion conspicuity and overall image quality. The CNR of leiomyoma to myometrium and cervical cancer to cervical stroma was the highest with three-dimensional half-Fourier RARE (P< 0.05). Conclusion The three-dimensional half-Fourier RARE sequence generates images with higher contrast and better image resolution than two-dimensional-RARE. The three-dimensional data set provided images that can be observed in any orientation without acquiring an additional scan by using the multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:349,355. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Insidious Extension of Pituitary Prolactinoma: Two Can't-Miss Findings Depicted on a 3.0-T MR SystemJOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, Issue 3 2010Yuichiro Yoneoka MD ABSTRACT BACKGROUND In this article, we present two can't-miss findings on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a 3.0-T MR system resulting in a better surgical option in prolactinoma treatment after emergent of dopamine agonists. METHODS We reviewed six cases of pituitary prolactinoma; each had vague or occult bulk of adenoma on 1.5-T MR imaging, which were finally confirmed by surgery. Four cases were preoperatively examined with a 3.0-T MR imaging system. With the 3.0-T MR system, 3-dimension-anisotropy-contrast (3DAC) MR imaging and 3-dimension fast spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state (3D-FSPGR) imaging were used for depiction of the adenoma. RESULTS 3DAC imaging revealed cavernous sinus (CS) pathology in three cases, and multiplanar reconstruction of 3D-FSPGR imaging revealed normal pituitary gland and invasive adenoma into the CS in three cases and creeping extension up to the contralateral side of the CS invasion in four cases. CONCLUSIONS Two can't-miss findings: (1) intrasellar creeping extension up to the opposite side of the adenoma main body and (2) intracavernous-localized adenoma with indistinct intrasellar mass should be carefully considered when neurosurgeons perform adenomectomy for patients with prolactinoma, even in cases of microprolactinoma. [source] Focal Cortical Dysplasia: Improving Diagnosis and Localization With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Multiplanar and Curvilinear ReconstructionJOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, Issue 3 2002Maria Augusta Montenegro MD ABSTRACT Objective. To establish the contribution of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and curvilinear reformatting (CR) to the MRI investigation of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Methods. From a group of patients with intractable frontal lobe epilepsy, we selected patients with neuroimaging diagnosis of FCD. The diagnosis of FCD was based on the neuroimaging findings after a three step evaluation, always in the same order: (a) plain MRI films, (b) MPR, and (c) CR. After the selection of patients, the process of reviewing all the images in the three stages described above was performed by one of us, who did not take part on the selection of patients nor on the initial evaluation, and who was blind to the clinical and EEG findings of the patients. For data analysis, we first assessed the contribution of the additional findings of MPR analysis compared to the results of the evaluation using only plain MRI films, as is usually done in routine practice. Second, we assessed the contribution of CR to the findings of plain MRI films plus MPR. After completing the multistep evaluation, we all went back to review the plain MRI films with knowledge of lesion topography, in order to identify possible subtle features associated with FCD. Results. Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria. Twelve had imaging diagnosis of FCD and were included in the second step of this project. Plain films of high resolution MRI showed the lesion in 6 (50%) of the 12 patients. By adding MPR to the plain MRI films, we identified lesions in all 12 patients. Furthermore, we found that MPR provided a better lesion localization and ascertainment of its relationship to other cerebral structures in 5 of 6 (83%) patients who had a lesion identified on plain films. By adding CR to the plain MRI films plus MPR analysis, we observed that (a) CR also allowed the identification of the dysplastic lesion in all patients, (b) CR improved lesion localization in one patient, and (c) CR provided a better visualization of the lesion extent in 4 patients (33%), showed a larger lesion in 3, and demonstrated that part of the area suspected as abnormal was more likely volume averaging in 2. Conclusion. MPR and CR analysis add to the neuroimaging evaluation of FCD by improving the lesion diagnosis and localization. CR helps to establish the extent of the lesion more precisely, allowing the visualization of some areas not shown on high resolution MRI and MPR. These techniques are complementary and do not replace the conventional wisdom of MRI analysis. [source] | ||||||||||