Multidrug Transporter (multidrug + transporter)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Evaluation of detergents for the soluble expression of ,-helical and ,-barrel-type integral membrane proteins by a preparative scale individual cell-free expression system

FEBS JOURNAL, Issue 23 2005
Christian Klammt
Cell-free expression has become a highly promising tool for the fast and efficient production of integral membrane proteins. The proteins can be produced as precipitates that solubilize in mild detergents usually without any prior denaturation sttif. Alternatively, membrane proteins can be synthesized in a soluble form by adding detergents to the cell-free system. However, the effects of a representative variety of detergents on the production, solubility and activity of a wider range of membrane proteins upon cell-free expression are currently unknown. We therefore analyzed the cell-free expression of three structurally very different membrane proteins, namely the bacterial ,-helical multidrug transporter, EmrE, the ,-barrel nucleoside transporter, Tsx, and the porcine vasopressin receptor of the eukaryotic superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors. All three membrane proteins could be produced in amounts of several mg per one ml of reaction mixture. In general, the detergent 1-myristoyl-2-hydroxy- sn -glycero-3-[phospho- rac -(1-glycerol)] was found to be most effective for the resolubilization of membrane protein precipitates, while long chain polyoxyethylene-alkyl-ethers proved to be most suitable for the soluble expression of all three types of membrane proteins. The yield of soluble expressed membrane protein remained relatively stable above a certain threshold concentration of the detergents. We report, for the first time, the high-level cell-free expression of a ,-barrel type membrane protein in a functional form. Structural and functional variations of the analyzed membrane proteins are evident that correspond with the mode of expression and that depend on the supplied detergent. [source]


Simvastatin and lovastatin, but not pravastatin, interact with MDR1

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY: AN INTERNATI ONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE, Issue 3 2002
Toshiyuki Sakaeda
The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, pravastatin, was compared with simvastatin and lovastatin from the viewpoint of susceptibility to interaction with or via the multidrug transporter, MDR1 (P-glycoprotein). This was carried out using the MDR1-overexpressing cell line LLC-GA5-COL150, established by transfection of MDR1 cDNA into porcine kidney epithelial LLC-PK1 cells, and [3H]digoxin, which is a well-documented substrate for MDR1. Pravastatin, at 25,100 ,M, had no effect on the transcellular transport of [3H]digoxin whereas simvastatin and lovastatin suppressed the basal-to-apical transport of [3H]digoxin and increased the apical-to-basal transport. It was suggested that recognition by MDR1 was due to the hydrophobicity. In conclusion, simvastatin and lovastatin are susceptible to interaction with or via MDR1, but pravastatin is not. This is important information when selecting the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for patients taking drugs that are MDR1 substrates. [source]


The drug transporter MgMfs1 can modulate sensitivity of field strains of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola to the strobilurin fungicide trifloxystrobin

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (FORMERLY: PESTICIDE SCIENCE), Issue 7 2008
Ramin Roohparvar
Abstract BACKGROUND: The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) drug transporter MgMfs1 of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola (Fuckel) J Schroeter is a potent multidrug transporter with high capacity to transport strobilurin fungicides in vitro. The data presented in this paper indicate that, in addition to the predominant cause of strobilurin resistance, cytochrome b G143A subsititution, MgMfs1 can play a role in sensitivity of field strains of this pathogen to trifloxystrobin. RESULTS: In a major part of field strains of M. graminicola (collected in the Netherlands in 2004) containing the cytochrome b G143A substitution, the basal level of expression of MgMfs1 was elevated as compared with sensitive strains lacking the G143A substitution. Induction of MgMfs1 expression in wild-type isolates upon treatment with trifloxystrobin at sublethal concentrations proceeded rapidly. Furthermore, in disease control experiments on wheat seedlings, disruption mutants of MgMfs1 displayed an increased sensitivity to trifloxystrobin. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the drug transporter MgMfs1 is a determinant of strobilurin sensitivity of field strains of M. graminicola. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry [source]


An emerging consensus for the structure of EmrE

ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D, Issue 2 2009
Vladimir M. Korkhov
The archetypical member of the small multidrug-resistance family is EmrE, a multidrug transporter that extrudes toxic polyaromatic cations from the cell coupled to the inward movement of protons down a concentration gradient. The architecture of EmrE was first defined from the analysis of two-dimensional crystals by cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), which showed that EmrE was an unusual asymmetric dimer formed from a bundle of eight ,-helices. The most favoured interpretation of the structure was that the monomers were oriented in opposite orientations in the membrane in an antiparallel orientation. A model was subsequently built based upon the cryo-EM data and evolutionary constraints and this model was consistent with mutagenic data indicating which amino-acid residues were important for substrate binding and transport. Two X-ray structures that differed significantly from the cryo-EM structure were subsequently retracted owing to a data-analysis error. However, the revised X-ray structure with substrate bound is extremely similar to the model built from the cryo-EM structure (r.m.s.d. of 1.4,Å), suggesting that the proposed antiparallel orientation of the monomers is indeed correct; this represents a new structural paradigm in membrane-protein structures. The vast majority of mutagenic and biochemical data corroborate this structure, although cross-linking studies and recent EPR data apparently support a model of EmrE that contains parallel dimers. [source]


Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the regulator AcrR from Escherichia coli

ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F (ELECTRONIC), Issue 11 2006
Ming Li
This paper describes the cloning, expression, purification and preliminary X-ray data analysis of the AcrR regulatory protein. The Escherichia coli AcrR is a member of the TetR family of transcriptional regulators. It regulates the expression of the AcrAB multidrug transporter. Recombinant AcrR with a 6×His tag at the C-terminus was expressed in E. coli and purified by metal-affinity chromatography. The protein was crystallized using hanging-drop vapor diffusion. X-ray diffraction data were collected from cryocooled crystals at a synchrotron light source. The best crystal diffracted to 2.5,Å. The space group was determined to be P32, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 46.61, c = 166.16,Å. [source]


Drug Resistance in Epilepsy: Putative Neurobiologic and Clinical Mechanisms

EPILEPSIA, Issue 6 2005
Dieter Schmidt
Summary:, Drug-resistant epilepsy with uncontrolled severe seizures despite state-of-the-art medical treatment continues to be a major clinical problem for up to one in three patients with epilepsy. Although drug resistance may emerge or remit in the course of epilepsy or its treatment, in most patients, drug resistance seems to be continuous and to occur de novo. Unfortunately, current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) do not seem to prevent or to reverse drug resistance in most patients, but add-on therapy with novel AEDs is able to exert a modest seizure reduction in as many as 50% of patients in short-term clinical trials, and a few become seizure free during the trial. It is not known why and how epilepsy becomes drug resistant, while other patients with seemingly identical seizure types can achieve seizure control with medication. Several putative mechanisms underlying drug resistance in epilepsy have been identified in recent years. Based on experimental and clinical studies, two major neurobiologic theories have been put forward: (a) removal of AEDs from the epileptogenic tissue through excessive expression of multidrug transporters, and (b) reduced drug-target sensitivity in epileptogenic brain tissue. On the clinical side, genetic and clinical features and structural brain lesions have been associated with drug resistance in epilepsy. In this article, we review the laboratory and clinical evidence to date supporting the drug-transport and the drug-target hypotheses and provide directions for future research, to define more clearly the role of these hypotheses in the clinical spectrum of drug-resistant epilepsy. [source]


Expression of the Multidrug Transporter P-glycoprotein in Brain Capillary Endothelial Cells and Brain Parenchyma of Amygdala-kindled Rats

EPILEPSIA, Issue 7 2002
Ulrike Seegers
Summary: ,Purpose: Based on data from brain biopsy samples of patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy, overexpression of the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein (PGP) in brain capillary endothelium has recently been proposed as a potential mechanism of resistance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). We examined whether PGP is overexpressed in brain regions of amygdala-kindled rats, a widely used model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), which is often resistant to AEDs. Methods: Rats were kindled by stimulation of the basolateral amygdala (BLA); electrode-implanted but nonkindled rats and naive (not implanted) rats served as controls. PGP was determined by immunohistochemistry either 1 or 2 weeks after the last kindled seizure, by using a monoclonal anti-PGP antibody. Six brain regions were examined ipsi- and contralateral to the BLA electrode: the BLA, the hippocampal formation, the piriform cortex, the substantia nigra, the frontal and parietal cortex, and the cerebellum. Results: In both kindled rats and controls, PGP staining was observed mainly in microvessel endothelial cells and, to a much lesser extent, in parenchymal cells. The distribution of PGP expression across brain regions was not homogeneous, but significant differences were found in both the endothelial and parenchymal expression of this protein. In kindled rats, ipsilateral PGP expression tended to be higher than contralateral expression in several brain regions, which was statistically significant in the piriform cortex and parietal cortex. However, compared with controls, no significant overexpression of PGP in capillary endothelial cells or brain parenchyma of kindled rats was seen in any ipsilateral brain region, including the BLA. For comparison with kindled rats, kainate-treated rats were used as positive controls. As reported previously, kainate-induced seizures significantly increased PGP expression in the hippocampus and other limbic brain regions. Conclusions: Amygdala-kindling does not induce any lasting overexpression of PGP in several brain regions previously involved in the kindling process. In view of the many pathophysiologic and pharmacologic similarities between the kindling model and TLE, these data may indicate that PGP overexpression in pharmacoresistant patients with TLE is a result of uncontrolled seizures but not of the processes underlying epilepsy. It remains to be determined whether transient PGP overexpression is present in kindled rats shortly after a seizure, and whether pharmacoresistant subgroups of kindled rats exhibit an increased expression of PGP. Furthermore, other multidrug transporters, such as multidrug resistance,associated protein, might be involved in the resistance of kindled rats to AEDs. [source]


Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, Issue 5 2004
Stefan Schwarz
Abstract Chloramphenicol (Cm) and its fluorinated derivative florfenicol (Ff) represent highly potent inhibitors of bacterial protein biosynthesis. As a consequence of the use of Cm in human and veterinary medicine, bacterial pathogens of various species and genera have developed and/or acquired Cm resistance. Ff is solely used in veterinary medicine and has been introduced into clinical use in the mid-1990s. Of the Cm resistance genes known to date, only a small number also mediates resistance to Ff. In this review, we present an overview of the different mechanisms responsible for resistance to Cm and Ff with particular focus on the two different types of chloramphenicol acetyltransferases (CATs), specific exporters and multidrug transporters. Phylogenetic trees of the different CAT proteins and exporter proteins were constructed on the basis of a multisequence alignment. Moreover, information is provided on the mobile genetic elements carrying Cm or Cm/Ff resistance genes to provide a basis for the understanding of the distribution and the spread of Cm resistance , even in the absence of a selective pressure imposed by the use of Cm or Ff. [source]


PDR16 -mediated azole resistance in Candida albicans

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 6 2006
Saloua Saidane
Summary Many Candida albicans azole-resistant (AR) clinical isolates overexpress the CDR1 and CDR2 genes encoding homologous multidrug transporters of the ATP-binding cassette family. We show here that these strains also overexpress the PDR16 gene, the orthologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PDR16 encoding a phosphatidylinositol transfer protein of the Sec14p family. It has been reported that S. cerevisiae pdr16, mutants are hypersusceptible to azoles, suggesting that C. albicans PDR16 may contribute to azole resistance in these isolates. To address this question, we deleted both alleles of PDR16 in an AR clinical strain overexpressing the three genes, using the mycophenolic acid resistance flipper strategy. Our results show that the homozygous pdr16,/pdr16, mutant is approximately twofold less resistant to azoles than the parental strain whereas reintroducing a copy of PDR16 in the mutant restored azole resistance, demonstrating that this gene contributes to the AR phenotype of the cells. In addition, overexpression of PDR16 in azole-susceptible (AS) C. albicans and S. cerevisiae strains increased azole resistance by about twofold, indicating that an increased dosage of Pdr16p can confer low levels of azole resistance in the absence of additional molecular alterations. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PDR16 plays a role in C. albicans azole resistance. [source]


Structural mechanisms of multidrug recognition and regulation by bacterial multidrug transcription factors

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 4 2002
Maria A. Schumacher
Summary The increase in bacterial resistance to multiple drugs represents a serious and growing health risk. One component of multidrug resistance (MDR) is a group of multidrug transporters that are often regulated at the transcriptional level by repressors and/or activators. Some of these transcription factors are also multidrug-binding proteins, frequently recognizing the same array of drugs that are effluxed by the transporters that they regulate. How a single protein can recognize such chemically disparate compounds is an intriguing question from a structural standpoint and an important question in future drug development endeavours. Unlike the multidrug transporters, the cytosolic multidrug-binding regulatory proteins are more tractable systems for structural analyses. Here, we describe recent crystallographic studies on MarR, BmrR and QacR, three bacterial transcription regulators that are also multidrug-binding proteins. Although our understanding of multidrug binding and transcriptional regulation by MarR is in its initial stages, the structure of a BmrR,TPP+,DNA complex has revealed important insights into the novel transcription activation mechanism of the MerR family, and the structures of a QacR,DNA complex and QacR bound to six different drugs have revealed not only the mechanism of induction of this repressor but has afforded the first view of any MDR protein bound to multiple drugs. [source]