Home  About us  Contact
 

Mucosa Graft (mucosa + graft)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

The Use of Buccal Mucosa Graft at Posterior Cricoid Splitting for Subglottic Stenosis Repair,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 12 2001
Robert Thomé PhD
Abstract Background Since 1955, when Réthi established the posterior cricoid split augmentation (PCSA) method, several authors have published supporting reports of the validity and proven efficacy of its basic principles. A 27-year prospective, retrospective study. Objectives To report on experience in performing the PCSA method for subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis repair using buccal mucosa interposition grafting at posterior cricoid split and stenting for 8 weeks, and to assess the impact on vocal function. Methods From 1972 on, 60 patients (45 adults, 15 children, aged 8 mo to 72 y) with subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis were operated on using a modified PCSA method. The surgical technique consisted of posterior cricoid splitting, including or not the interarytenoid muscle; wide lateral retraction of the posterior cricoid halves; buccal mucosa interposition grafting and stenting for 8 weeks. The factors evaluated included the subglottic remodeling rate, donor and recipient sites morbidity, time to decannulation, rate of graft take, and phonatory function tests. Results The modified PCSA procedure resulted in a decannulation rate of 90%, 18 (30%) of which had further procedure to achieve decannulation, and 6 adult patients (10%) were considered failures because of restenosis. The rate of take of the mucosa graft was 100% in both children and adults, with complete epithelialization of the grafted area, the mucosa not becoming dry and crusty. No interarytenoid muscle division resulted in near-normal to normal glottic voicing. Interarytenoid muscle division determined supraglottic voicing with inspiratory noise and pneumophonic incoordination, breathy and hoarse voice, low fundamental frequency, limited dynamic range, and shortened phonation time. Conclusion The PCSA procedure with buccal mucosa graft is reliable, safe, and highly successful with respect to the graft incorporation and subglottic remodeling. The division or not of the interarytenoid muscle is the most important factor influencing the postoperative vocal function. [source]

Use of bladder mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 10 2000
ar Özgök
Background: The ideal tissue for complex urethral reconstruction has yet to be determined, especially in patients with deficient preputium. The use of bladder mucosa as a free graft could be an alternative in these problem cases. Methods: Bladder mucosa graft urethroplasty was performed on 14 patients with penoscrotal or scrotal hypospadias. The mean age of the patients was 18.7 (range 14,23) years. Ten cases were subjected to primary urethral reconstruction while four cases had previous hypospadias repair. Results: Complete urethral replacement by the bladder mucosa tube was performed in six patients. Meatal problems occurred in two (33.33%) patients and proximal fistula formed in one (16.67%) patient. A bladder mucosa graft was combined with preputial or tunica vaginalis grafts distally in eight cases, and one patient in the tunica vaginalis group developed fistula at the anastomosis of the bladder mucosa and tunica vaginalis grafts. The overall complication rate was 28.6%. Conclusions: Our initial results showed that bladder mucosa grafts can be used successfully for urethral reconstruction especially when combined with preputial or tunica vaginalis grafts distally. [source]

The Use of Buccal Mucosa Graft at Posterior Cricoid Splitting for Subglottic Stenosis Repair,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 12 2001
Robert Thomé PhD
Abstract Background Since 1955, when Réthi established the posterior cricoid split augmentation (PCSA) method, several authors have published supporting reports of the validity and proven efficacy of its basic principles. A 27-year prospective, retrospective study. Objectives To report on experience in performing the PCSA method for subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis repair using buccal mucosa interposition grafting at posterior cricoid split and stenting for 8 weeks, and to assess the impact on vocal function. Methods From 1972 on, 60 patients (45 adults, 15 children, aged 8 mo to 72 y) with subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis were operated on using a modified PCSA method. The surgical technique consisted of posterior cricoid splitting, including or not the interarytenoid muscle; wide lateral retraction of the posterior cricoid halves; buccal mucosa interposition grafting and stenting for 8 weeks. The factors evaluated included the subglottic remodeling rate, donor and recipient sites morbidity, time to decannulation, rate of graft take, and phonatory function tests. Results The modified PCSA procedure resulted in a decannulation rate of 90%, 18 (30%) of which had further procedure to achieve decannulation, and 6 adult patients (10%) were considered failures because of restenosis. The rate of take of the mucosa graft was 100% in both children and adults, with complete epithelialization of the grafted area, the mucosa not becoming dry and crusty. No interarytenoid muscle division resulted in near-normal to normal glottic voicing. Interarytenoid muscle division determined supraglottic voicing with inspiratory noise and pneumophonic incoordination, breathy and hoarse voice, low fundamental frequency, limited dynamic range, and shortened phonation time. Conclusion The PCSA procedure with buccal mucosa graft is reliable, safe, and highly successful with respect to the graft incorporation and subglottic remodeling. The division or not of the interarytenoid muscle is the most important factor influencing the postoperative vocal function. [source]

Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek?

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2005
Stefan Kamp
Authors from Germany debate the issue as to whether the donor site for oral mucosa used in urethroplasty should be taken from the inner cheek or the lower lip, using morbidity as a deciding factor. As a result of their study they have changed their technique, now using the inner cheek as the donor site whenever possible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate donor-site complications of buccal mucosa urethroplasty and whether there is a difference in morbidity between harvesting the mucosa graft from the inner cheek or the lower lip. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-four consecutive patients with recurrent urethral strictures were treated with buccal mucosa urethroplasty in our department between September 2002 and April 2004. In 12 patients the graft was harvested from the lower lip or cheek and lower lip (group 1), and in 12 patients from the cheek (group 2). The mean (range) age of patients was 51 (26,66) years in group 1 and 53 (32,75) years in group 2. The mean (range) graft length was 6.2 (2,16) cm in group 1 and 5.7 (2,13) cm in group 2. All patients were followed up using a mailed questionnaire that asked about pain, numbness, difficulties in mouth opening or ingestion, and satisfaction, monthly for the first 3 months and then every 6 months. The mean (range) follow-up was 12.5 (6,23) months. RESULTS There were no bleeding complications or disturbances in wound healing. All of the patients reported numbness in the area of the mental and buccal nerves, and graft-site tenderness after surgery. In group 1, the pain lasted for a mean (range) of 5.9 (0.5,22) months, compared to 1 (0.1,7) months in group 2 (P = 0.022). Perioral numbness lasted for a mean (range) of 10.3 (0.5,23) months in group 1 and 0.85 (0.1,3) months (P = 0.0027) in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in problems with mouth opening or food intake between the two groups, but the patients in group 1 seemed to be less satisfied (6/12 patients satisfied) than those in group 2 (11/12 patients satisfied). CONCLUSIONS Buccal mucosa graft harvesting from the lower lip and the inner cheek are both feasible, but harvesting from the lower lip resulted in a significantly greater long-term morbidity, which resulted in a lower proportion of satisfied patients. This seems to be due to a long-lasting neuropathy of the mental nerve. We therefore have changed our technique entirely from lower lip to inner cheek graft harvesting, whenever possible. [source]

Use of bladder mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 10 2000
ar Özgök
Background: The ideal tissue for complex urethral reconstruction has yet to be determined, especially in patients with deficient preputium. The use of bladder mucosa as a free graft could be an alternative in these problem cases. Methods: Bladder mucosa graft urethroplasty was performed on 14 patients with penoscrotal or scrotal hypospadias. The mean age of the patients was 18.7 (range 14,23) years. Ten cases were subjected to primary urethral reconstruction while four cases had previous hypospadias repair. Results: Complete urethral replacement by the bladder mucosa tube was performed in six patients. Meatal problems occurred in two (33.33%) patients and proximal fistula formed in one (16.67%) patient. A bladder mucosa graft was combined with preputial or tunica vaginalis grafts distally in eight cases, and one patient in the tunica vaginalis group developed fistula at the anastomosis of the bladder mucosa and tunica vaginalis grafts. The overall complication rate was 28.6%. Conclusions: Our initial results showed that bladder mucosa grafts can be used successfully for urethral reconstruction especially when combined with preputial or tunica vaginalis grafts distally. [source]