Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Morning Dose (morning + dose)
Selected AbstractsLong-term efficacy and safety of insulin detemir compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with Type 1 diabetes using a treat-to-target basal,bolus regimen with insulin aspart at meals: a 2-year, randomized, controlled trialDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 4 2008P. C. Bartley Abstract Aims This 24-month, multi-national, open-label, parallel group trial investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of insulin detemir and Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin in combination with mealtime insulin aspart in patients with Type 1 diabetes using a treat-to-target concept. Methods Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to detemir (n = 331) or NPH (n = 166) groups. Basal insulin was initiated once daily (evening) and titrated individually based on self-measured plasma glucose (PG) levels, aiming for pre-breakfast and pre-dinner targets , 6.0 mmol/l. A second basal morning dose could be added according to pre-defined criteria. Results After 24 months, superiority of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was achieved with detemir compared to NPH (detemir 7.36%, NPH 7.58%, mean difference ,0.22% points) [95% confidence interval (CI) ,0.41 to ,0.03%], with reductions of 0.94% and 0.72% points, respectively. Fasting PG (FPGlab) was also lower with detemir (detemir 8.35 mmol/l, NPH 9.43 mmol/l; P = 0.019). Twenty-two per cent of patients treated with detemir reached an HbA1c , 7.0% in the absence of confirmed hypoglycaemia during the last month of treatment vs. 13% on NPH (P = 0.019). Risk of major and nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 69% and 46% lower with detemir than with NPH (P < 0.001), respectively; patients treated with detemir gained less weight (detemir 1.7 kg, NPH 2.7 kg; P = 0.024). The overall safety profile was similar in the two groups and treatment with detemir did not result in any unexpected findings. Conclusions Long-term treatment with the insulin analogues detemir + aspart was superior to NPH + aspart in reducing HbA1c, with added benefits of less major and nocturnal hypoglycaemia and less weight gain. [source] Clinical benefit of interventions driven by therapeutic drug monitoringHIV MEDICINE, Issue 5 2005AL Rendón Background Adequate plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs are key to achieving and maintaining long-term suppression of HIV replication. Multiple factors may influence drug levels, causing increases or reductions that may, respectively, result in toxicity or virological failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) might help to detect and correct such abnormalities. Objective To evaluate the usefulness of TDM in the care of HIV-infected patients in an out-patient clinical setting. Methods All the requests for TDM of protease inhibitors (PIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) for patients attending our HIV out-patient clinic from October 2000 to August 2003 were analysed. Blood samples were collected before the morning dose. Drug concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography by ultraviolet waves (HPLC-UV). Results A total of 151 requests from 137 patients were assessed. The reasons for requesting TDM were drug toxicity (59%), virological failure (39%) and possible drug interactions (2%). NNRTI levels were more often requested because of toxicity, while PI levels were more often requested because of virological failure. Elevated drug levels were confirmed in 36% of patients with suspected drug toxicity, while subtherapeutic levels were found in 37% of patients failing virologically. Based on the results of TDM, dose modifications were made in 37% of patients, allowing correction of such abnormalities in 80% of cases. Moreover, adequate plasma concentrations were confirmed in 79% of patients whose levels were assessed again. Conclusions Therapeutic drug monitoring may be a useful tool to identify toxic levels of NNRTI and subtherapeutic concentrations of PI. Dose adjustments following TDM may ameliorate drug-related toxicities or improve virological response rates. [source] Short-term effects of tetrabenazine on chorea associated with Huntington's diseaseMOVEMENT DISORDERS, Issue 1 2007Christopher Kenney MD Abstract We sought to assess the short-term clinical effects of tetrabenazine (TBZ) on choreic movements in Huntington's disease patients. A total of 10 patients on stable doses of TBZ were enrolled in this observational study. Patients took their evening dose of TBZ and presented the next day to the Baylor College of Medicine Movement Disorders Clinic without taking the usual morning dose. They were assessed using the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) motor assessment and Beck Depression Inventory. The usual morning dose of TBZ was then administered and patients were followed with serial UHDRS motor examinations approximately every 2 hours until choreic movements subsided and then returned. TBZ decreased the UHDRS chorea score on average 42.4% ± 17.8%. The duration of effect varied from a minimum of 3.2 hours to a maximum of 8.1 hours (mean = 5.4 ± 1.3). No patient experienced an adverse event related to TBZ or its withdrawal. During short-term follow-up after a single dose, TBZ improves chorea for approximately 5 hours. © 2006 Movement Disorder Society [source] Effect of nebulized albuterol on blood glucose in patients with diabetes mellitus with and without cystic fibrosisPEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, Issue 2 2005P. König MD Abstract Over 90% of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are treated with bronchodilators, and 6% have diabetes. Some with asthma also have diabetes, and most are treated with bronchodilators. Systemic administration of adrenergic agents can cause increases in blood glucose, but the effect of inhaled agents is unclear. A double-blind study was performed on 10 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) without CF (3 male, 7 female, mean age 25.5 years) and 9 patients with insulin-dependent CF-related diabetes (CFRD) (8 male, 1 female, mean age 21.9 years). On 2 separate days before 9 AM fasting and the morning dose of insulin, 2.5 mg of albuterol or nebulized placebo were given. Blood glucose was measured by finger stick with a glucose reflectance meter before and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after treatment. No significant changes from baseline or differences between placebo and albuterol occurred in either group. The mean maximum increase from baseline in DM was 20 mg/dl on placebo, and 38 mg/dl on albuterol; in the CFRD, the respective changes were 7 and 7 mg/dl. Two DM patients had a >,50 mg/dl increase on albuterol vs. placebo; no CFRD patients had differences of such magnitude. DM patients had greater increases from baseline than CFRD patients on placebo and albuterol. Differences reached statistical significance at 30 and 45 min on placebo, and 45 min on albuterol. Albuterol 2.5 mg by nebulizer causes no clinically significant increases in blood glucose in DM or CFRD patients. Diabetes patients without CF have a significantly greater increase of glucose with time (placebo or albuterol) than CFRD patients. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005; 40:105,108. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The present role of corticosteroids in uveitisACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2009M KHAIRALLAH Corticosteroids are the most widely used anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant drugs in ophthalmology in general, and remain the mainstay of therapy for patients with uveitis. An infectious etiology for intraocular inflammation should be adequately excluded or appropriately covered with anti-infectious therapy before administration of corticosteroid therapy. Topical corticosteroids alone are usually effective in the management of anterior uveitis and have little activity against intermediate or posterior uveitis. Ocular adverse effects of topical steroid therapy mainly include ocular hypertension and cataract. The use of periocular steroid injections (subconjunctival, anterior or posterior subtenon, orbital floor) are important modalities in the management of anterior uveitis refractory to topical treatment and intermediate or posterior uveitis, particularly unilateral cases. Systemic corticosteroids remain the initial drug of choice for most patients with severe bilateral intermediate or posterior uveitis. Therapy is initiated with 1.0 to 2.0 mg/Kg of oral prednisone or prednisolone as a single morning dose, followed by a slow taper. Use of intravenous pulse steroid therapy is an important option in acute, severe, bilateral posterior segment inflammation. In several cases, the level of systemic steroid required to control the inflammation is too high and unacceptable. Immunosuppressive drugs as steroid-sparing agents are indicated is such cases. Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide and slow-release intraocular devices are therapeutic options that can be used in selected uveitis cases refractory to conventional therapy and biologic agents. [source] | ||||||||||