Home  About us  Contact
 

Mechanical Ventilator (mechanical + ventilator)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Clients' experiences of living at home with a mechanical ventilator

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, Issue 2 2009
Randi Ballangrud
Abstract Title.,Clients' experiences of living at home with a mechanical ventilator. Aim., This paper reports on a study of how clients experience living with home mechanical ventilation and how they experience care and supervision of healthcare personnel. Background., The number of people living at home with mechanical ventilators is increasing, and this is considered a successful approach to reducing incapacity and mortality. Method., Qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 service users in 2006. The informants were 18,75 years old and had varying diagnoses and levels of functioning. The interviews were tape recorded, transcribed and analysed by qualitative content analysis. Findings., Two main themes emerged: Theme 1. Having a home ventilator enhances quality of life , a life worth living. The ventilator treatment builds up strength and improves well-being. Participants emphasized that it was important to feel in control of their own situation and had an overriding wish to live a normal and active life; Theme 2. Competence and continuity of healthcare personnel are factors for success. The experience was that competence and follow-up by healthcare personnel varied, and that good quality teaching and information were important. Conclusion., Users of home mechanical ventilators should be active partners in their own care so that their experience is taken into account. It is important for clients having home mechanical ventilation to be empowered and have control in their daily lives, as well as having competent caregivers and continuity of care. [source]

Exposure to noise during continuous positive airway pressure: influence of interfaces and delivery systems

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2008
F. CAVALIERE
Background: We measured noise intensity and perceived noisiness during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) performed with two interfaces (face-mask, helmet) and four delivery systems. Methods: Eight healthy volunteers received CPAP in random order with: two systems provided with a flow generator using the Venturi effect and a mechanical expiratory valve (A: Venturi, Starmed; B: Whisperflow-2, Caradyne Ltd); one ,free-flow' system provided with high flow O2 and air flowmeters, an inspiratory gas reservoir, and a water valve (C: CF800, Drägerwerk, AG); and a standard mechanical ventilator (Servoventilator 300, Siemens-Elema). Systems A, B, and C were tested with a face-mask and a helmet at a CPAP value of 10 cm H2O; the mechanical ventilator was only tested with the face mask. Noise intensity was measured with a sound-level meter. After each test, participants scored noisiness on a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The noise levels measured ranged from 57±11 dBA (mechanical ventilator plus mask) to 93±1 and 94±2 dBA (systems A and B plus helmet) and were significantly affected by CPAP systems (A and B noisier than C and D) and interfaces (helmet CPAP noisier than mask CPAP). Subjective evaluation showed that systems A and B plus helmet were perceived as noisier than system C plus mask or helmet. Conclusions: Maximum noise levels observed in this study may potentially cause patient discomfort. Less noisy CPAP systems (not using Venturi effect) and interfaces (facial mask better than helmet) should be preferred, particularly for long or nocturnal treatments. [source]

Clients' experiences of living at home with a mechanical ventilator

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, Issue 2 2009
Randi Ballangrud
Abstract Title.,Clients' experiences of living at home with a mechanical ventilator. Aim., This paper reports on a study of how clients experience living with home mechanical ventilation and how they experience care and supervision of healthcare personnel. Background., The number of people living at home with mechanical ventilators is increasing, and this is considered a successful approach to reducing incapacity and mortality. Method., Qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 service users in 2006. The informants were 18,75 years old and had varying diagnoses and levels of functioning. The interviews were tape recorded, transcribed and analysed by qualitative content analysis. Findings., Two main themes emerged: Theme 1. Having a home ventilator enhances quality of life , a life worth living. The ventilator treatment builds up strength and improves well-being. Participants emphasized that it was important to feel in control of their own situation and had an overriding wish to live a normal and active life; Theme 2. Competence and continuity of healthcare personnel are factors for success. The experience was that competence and follow-up by healthcare personnel varied, and that good quality teaching and information were important. Conclusion., Users of home mechanical ventilators should be active partners in their own care so that their experience is taken into account. It is important for clients having home mechanical ventilation to be empowered and have control in their daily lives, as well as having competent caregivers and continuity of care. [source]

Barriers that delay children and young people who are dependent on mechanical ventilators from being discharged from hospital

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 1 2002
Cert.Ed.MILT, JANE NOYES MSc
,,A qualitative study of user perspectives published previously by the author found that children and young people who are dependent on ventilators spend many months and in some cases years in hospital when they no longer had a medical need or wanted to be there. ,,This second paper is drawn from the same qualitative study and reports on the barriers that the children and young people who are dependent on ventilators, and their parents, described as important factors in preventing their discharge from hospital. ,,Six issues were identified as significant barriers that prevented the children and young people from being discharged. These were: the attitudes of professionals; the lack of joint commissioning and accounting responsibility; general poor management both within the health service and in collaborating with other services; complex social issues; housing problems; and a general lack of auditing and outcome measures. ,,The generalizability of the findings is unknown. However, recommendations are made in relation to the need to establish joint commissioning and accounting responsibility for care and services, and to establish outcome measures to monitor the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care and services provided. [source]