Home About us Contact | |||
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (mechanical + circulatory_support_device)
Selected AbstractsDevelopment of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in ChinaARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 11 2009Wei Wang Abstract Myocardial dysfunction leading to low cardiac output syndrome is a common clinical pathophysiological state. Currently, the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is an essential aspect of the treatment of patients with cardiac failure. Several groups in China are engaged in the design and development of MCS devices. These devices can be classified as pulsatile, rotary, and total artificial heart (TAH). There are two types of pulsatile pump, which are driven by air (pneumatic). One of these pumps, the Luo-Ye pump, has been used clinically for short-term support since 1998. The other is a push-plate left ventricular device, which has a variable rate mode. Various rotary devices are classified into axial and centrifugal pumps, depending on the impeller geometry. Most rotary pumps are based on the maglev principle, and some types have been used clinically. Others are still being studied in the laboratory or in animal experiments. Furthermore, certain types of total implantable pump, such as the UJS-III axial pump and the UJS-IV aortic valvo-pump, have been developed. Only one type of TAH has been developed in China. The main constituents of this artificial heart are two axial pumps, two reservoir tanks mimicking the right and left atria, flow meters, two pressure gauges, and a resistance adaptor. Although the development of mechanical assist devices in China is still in a nascent stage, a number of different types of MCS devices are currently being studied. [source] Bridge to Transplant with the HeartMate DeviceJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 4 2001William Piccione Jr. The incidence and prevalence of chronic heart failure continues to increase, with an estimated 400,000 new cases per year in the United States. Cardiac transplantation is an effective therapy but is severely limited to approximately 2300 patients per year due to the donor shortage. With ever increasing waiting times, a significant number of patients become severely debilitated or expire prior to transplantation. A mechanical circulatory support device was first used as a "bridge to transplantation" in 1969. Since then, mechanical devices have increased tremendously in reliability and efficaciousness. The HeartMate left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been utilized extensively in a bridge to transplant application with excellent results. Patients refractory to aggressive medical management can be sustained reliably until transplantation. In addition, bridging allows for the correction of physiologic and metabolic dearrangements often seen in these severely ill patients prior to transplantation. Nutritional, economic, and quality-of-life issues also favor earlier LVAD placement in refractory patients. This report summarizes the overall bridging experience with the HeartMate LVAD and focuses on our experience with this device at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center. [source] Mechanical Circulatory Support for AMI and Cardiogenic ShockJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 4 2010Yasir Abu-Omar D.Phil. The dismal prognosis associated with post-MI cardiogenic shock, allied with surgical and technological advancements, has shifted the treatment paradigm toward wider use of mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD). Current experience demonstrates that better outcomes may be achieved with early MCSD deployment (prior to the onset of end-organ dysfunction). However, perceived limitations with existing devices mean that they remain infrequently applied. There is an urgent need for increased awareness of MCSD options among clinicians treating post-MI shock patients. (J Card Surg 2010;25:434-441) [source] Under-Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Canada: Why and What Can Be Done?ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 3 2004Tofy Mussivand Abstract:, In October of 2002, a workshop was held as part of the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress in Edmonton, Canada, entitled "Under-Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Canada. Why and What Can Be Done?" The workshop examined various issues related to the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in the Canadian context. Representatives from all Canadian centers with active mechanical circulatory support programs were invited to participate and participants included surgeons and cardiologists, as well as other affiliated health professionals. Opinions were solicited from the workshop participants and a series of recommendations were formulated. [source] |