			Home About us Contact

Marginal Donors (marginal + donor)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	90%

Selected Abstracts

Marginal donors in pediatric solid organ transplantation,

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2010
Lothar Bernd Zimmerhackl
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2003
Ronald W. Busuttil
The shortage of organs has led centers to expand their criteria for the acceptance of marginal donors. The combination of multiple marginal factors seems to be additive on graft injury. In this review, the utility of various marginal donors in patients requiring liver transplantation will be described, including older donors, steatotic livers, non-heart-beating donors, donors with viral hepatitis, and donors with malignancies. The pathophysiology of the marginal donor will be discussed, along with strategies for minimizing the ischemia reperfusion injury experienced by these organs. Finally, new strategies for improving the function of the marginal/expanded donor liver will be reviewed. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:651-663.) [source]

Progressive interstitial fibrosis of kidney allograft early after transplantation from a non-heart beating donor: possible role of persistent ischemic injury

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2010
Kohsuke Masutani
Masutani K, Kitada H, Yamada S, Tsuchimoto A, Noguchi H, Tsuruya K, Katafuchi R, Tanaka M, Iida M. Progressive interstitial fibrosis of kidney allograft early after transplantation from a non-heart beating donor: Possible role of persistent ischemic injury. Clin Transplant 2010: 24 (Suppl. 22): 70,74. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, The donor was 63-yr-old woman with subarachnoid hemorrhage. As she developed severe hypotension for more than four h before cardiac arrest, we biopsied the grafts and decided to transplant those kidneys. Recipient 1 was a 23-yr-old man on 13-yr dialysis program. After 19 d of delayed graft function (DGF), we discontinued hemodialysis (HD). However, the decrease in serum creatinine (sCr) was poor. The minimum sCr was 4.3 mg/dL on post-operative day (POD) 40, and increased to 6.5 mg/dL. The contralateral graft was transplanted to a 61-yr-old man (recipient 2) with 18-yr HD. After 15 d of DGF period, sCr decreased gradually and has been stable at 1.9 mg/dL. In recipient 1, graft biopsies performed on POD 15, 69, and 110, revealed progressive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) without evidences of acute rejection, tacrolimus associated injury, reflux nephropathy, or viral nephropathy. The second biopsy on POD 69 showed typical findings of acute tubular necrosis. We compared the clinical courses of the two recipients because certain features of recipient 1, such as age, duration of HD, total ischemic time, and body size were advantageous, whereas graft function was poorer than that in recipient 2. Recipient 1 developed severe anemia following the dissociation of graft function from recipient 2. In this case, posttransplant anemia and lower blood pressure might promote IF/TA through persistent ischemic tubular damage, and positive CMV antigenemia and its treatment could promote anemia. Especially in the kidney allograft from a marginal donor, we should consider various factors to obtain a better graft outcome. [source]

Cellular senescence in pretransplant renal biopsies predicts postoperative organ function

AGING CELL, Issue 1 2009
Liane M. McGlynn
Summary Older and marginal donors have been used to meet the shortfall in available organs for renal transplantation. Post-transplant renal function and outcome from these donors are often poorer than chronologically younger donors. Some organs, however, function adequately for many years. We have hypothesized that such organs are biologically younger than poorer performing counterparts. We have tested this hypothesis in a cohort of pre-implantation human renal allograft biopsies (n = 75) that have been assayed by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the expression of known markers of cellular damage and biological aging, including CDKN2A, CDKN1A, SIRT2 and POT1. These have been investigated for any associations with traditional factors affecting transplant outcome (donor age, cold ischaemic time) and organ function post-transplant (serum creatinine levels). Linear regression analyses indicated a strong association for serum creatinine with pre-transplant CDKN2A levels (p = 0.001) and donor age (p = 0.004) at 6 months post-transplant. Both these markers correlated significantly with urinary protein to creatinine ratios (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005 respectively), an informative marker for subsequent graft dysfunction. POT1 expression also showed a significant association with this parameter (p = 0.05). Multiple linear regression analyses for CDKN2A and donor age accounted for 24.6% (p = 0.001) of observed variability in serum creatinine levels at 6 months and 23.7% (p = 0.001) at 1 year post-transplant. Thus, these data indicate that allograft biological age is an important novel prognostic determinant for renal transplant outcome. [source]

The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation

Change in live donor characteristics over the last 25 years: A single centre experience

NEPHROLOGY, Issue 7 2008
MOHD O KAISAR
SUMMARY: Aim: While deceased donor kidney transplantation rates have remained stagnant, live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) rates have increased significantly over the last decade, and are now a major component of renal transplantation programmes worldwide. Additionally, there has been an increased utilization of more marginal donors, including donors who are obese, older and subjects with well-controlled hypertension. Method: A retrospective audit of all live donors at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Renal Transplantation unit was performed from 24 August 1982 to 29 May 2007 to assess any change in donor characteristics over time. Results: There were 373 live donor operations. Over the last 25 years there has been a significant increase in the number of donors who are either older or obese. Furthermore, there is a greater proportion of spousal and emotionally related LDKT. Conclusion: It is imperative that donors, in particular marginal donors, are followed up long-term to determine their risk of kidney and cardiovascular disease and initiation of appropriate treatment if required. [source]

Ischemic Preconditioning (IP) of the Liver as a Safe and Protective Technique against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury (IRI)

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009
A. Franchello
The aim of the study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of IP in LT, particularly in marginal grafts. From 2007 to 2008, 75 LT donors were randomized to receive IP (IP+) or not (IP,). Considering the graft quality, we divided the main groups in two subgroups (marg+/marg,). IP was performed by 10-min inflow occlusion (Pringle maneuver utilizing a toruniquet). Donor variables considered were gender, age, AST/ALT, ischemia time and steatosis. Recipient variables were gender, age, indication to LT and MELD/CHILD/UNOS score. AST/ALT levels, INR, bilirubin, lactic acid, bile output on postoperative days 1, 3 and 7 were evaluated. Histological analysis was performed evaluating necrosis/steatosis, hepatocyte swelling, PMN infiltration and councilman bodies. Thirty patients received IP+ liver. No differences were seen between groups considering recipient and donor variables. Liver function and AST/ALT levels showed no significant differences between the main two groups. Marginal IP+ showed lower AST levels on day1 compared with untreated marginal livers (936.35 vs. 1268.23; p = 0.026). IP+ livers showed a significant reduction of moderate-severe hepatocyte swelling (33.3% vs. 65.9%; p = 0.043). IP+ patients had a significant reduction of positive early microbiological investigations (36.7% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.042). In our experience IP was safe also in marginal donors, showing a protective role against IRI. [source]

Increased Primary Non-Function in Transplanted Deceased-Donor Kidneys Flushed with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2009
R. B. Stevens
Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution is increasingly used to flush and preserve organ donor kidneys, with efficacy claimed equivalent to University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. We observed and reported increased graft pancreatitis in pancreata flushed with HTK solution, which prompted this review of transplanting HTK-flushed kidneys. We analyzed outcomes of deceased-donor kidneys flushed with HTK and UW solutions with a minimum of 12 months follow-up, excluding pediatric and multi-organ recipients. We evaluated patient and graft survival and rejection rates, variables that might constitute hazards to graft survival and renal function. Two-year patient survival, rejection, renal function and graft survival were not different, but early graft loss (<6 months) was worse in HTK-flushed kidneys (p < 0.03). A Cox analysis of donor grade, cold ischemic time, panel reactive antibodies (PRA), donor race, first vs. repeat transplant, rejection and flush solution showed that only HTK use predicted early graft loss (p < 0.04; relative risk = 3.24), almost exclusively attributable to primary non-function (HTK, n = 5 (6.30%); UW, n = 1 (0.65%); p = 0.02). Delayed graft function and early graft loss with HTK occurred only in lesser grade kidneys, suggesting it should be used with caution in marginal donors. [source]