Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Major Safety Concerns (major + safety_concern)
Selected AbstractsAn inventory of shedding data from clinical gene therapy trialsTHE JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE, Issue 10 2007Ellen A. M. Schenk-Braat Abstract Viruses are the most commonly used vectors for clinical gene therapy. The risk of dissemination of a viral vector into the environment via excreta from the treated patient, a phenomenon called shedding, is a major safety concern for the environment. Despite the significant number of clinical gene therapy trials that have been conducted worldwide, there is currently no overview of actual shedding data available. In this article, an inventory of shedding data obtained from a total of 100 publications on clinical gene therapy trials using retroviral, adenoviral, adeno-associated viral and pox viral vectors is presented. In addition, the experimental set-up for shedding analysis including the assays used and biological materials tested is summarized. The collected data based on the analysis of 1619 patients in total demonstrate that shedding of these vectors occurs in practice, mainly determined by the type of vector and the route of vector administration. Due to the use of non-quantitative assays, the lack of information on assay sensitivity in most publications, and the fact that assay sensitivity is expressed in various ways, general conclusions cannot be made as to the level of vector shedding. The evaluation of the potential impact and consequences of the observations is complicated by the high degree of variety in the experimental design of shedding analysis between trials. This inventory can be supportive to clinical gene therapy investigators for the establishment of an evidence-based risk assessment to be included in a clinical protocol application, as well as to national regulatory authorities for the ongoing development of regulatory guidelines regarding gene therapy. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] A multicenter, prospective pilot study of gamma knife radiosurgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Seizure response, adverse events, and verbal memory,ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 2 2009Nicholas M. Barbaro MD Objective The safety, efficacy, and morbidity of radiosurgery (RS) must be established before it can be offered as an alternative to open surgery for unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. We report the 3-year outcomes of a multicenter, prospective pilot study of RS. Methods RS was randomized to 20 or 24Gy targeting the amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus. Seizure diaries evaluated the final seizure remission between months 24 and 36. Verbal memory was evaluated at baseline and 24m with the Wechsler Memory Scale,Revised (WMS-R) and California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). Patients were classified as having "significant improvement," "no change," and "significant impairment" based on relative change indices. Results Thirteen high-dose and 17 low-dose patients were treated. Both groups showed significant reductions in seizures by 1 year after treatment. At the 36-month follow-up evaluation, 67% of patients were free of seizures for the prior 12 months (high dose: 10/13, 76.9%; low dose: 10/17, 58.8%). Use of steroids, headaches, and visual field defects did not differ by dose or seizure remission. The prevalence of verbal memory impairment was 15% (4/26 patients); none declined on more than one measure. The prevalence of significant verbal memory improvements was 12% (3/26). Interpretation RS for unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy offers seizure remission rates comparable with those reported previously for open surgery. There were no major safety concerns with high-dose RS compared with low-dose RS. Additional research is required to determine whether RS may be a treatment option for some patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2009 [source] Three-year registry data on biological treatment for psoriasis: the influence of patient characteristics on treatment outcomeBRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2009R.J.B. Driessen Summary Background, The course of biological treatment in clinical practice may be highly different from treatment schedules in clinical trials. Treatment modifications and patient characteristics may influence treatment safety and efficacy. So far, long-term results from the use of biological treatment in clinical practice are lacking. Objectives, To report short- and long-term efficacy and safety data on biologics, especially etanercept, used in daily clinical practice. Special attention has been paid to patient characteristics that may have influenced the response to therapy. Methods, Prospectively collected registry data of all patients with psoriasis treated with biologics in the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre outpatient clinic were used for analysis. Patient and treatment characteristics were surveyed. Efficacy and safety of etanercept for up to 3 years were analysed. Moreover, the influence of patient characteristics on etanercept treatment response was studied. Results, The analysed cohort, consisting of 118 patients, went through 142 treatment episodes in total. Patients treated with biologics had an extensive medical history. Optimization of biological treatment was established in various ways, including treatment switches and introduction of concomitant therapies. Short-term etanercept efficacy analysis showed a mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement at week 24 of 59·7%. No significant influence of gender, age, baseline PASI, body mass index, number of previous systemic therapies or duration of psoriasis was found on week 24 efficacy results, although trends were discernible. The efficacy of etanercept remained stable for up to 156 weeks. Long-term daily practice treatment with etanercept was only occasionally accompanied by major safety concerns. Conclusions, The current study demonstrates that etanercept is able to improve psoriasis symptoms for a considerable time, and that serious side-effects are infrequent. The influence of patient characteristics on treatment response is limited. [source] Management of patients with non,ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the pursuit trialCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S5 2000Dan J. Fintel M.D The glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide (INTEGRILIN®, COR Therapeutics, Inc., South San Francisco, California, and Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey) is a novel and highly potent antithrombotic agent indicated for the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The approval of eptifibatide for non-ST-segment elevation ACS was based on the positive results of the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial. With enrollment of almost 11,000 patients, not only is the PURSUIT trial the largest trial of a GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor to date, but it is also the largest clinical study ever conducted in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS. The key feature of the PURSUIT trial is that patient management closely resembled standard clinical practice, because decisions about the use and timing of invasive cardiac procedures were made by the individual physicians rather than being prespecified in the study protocol. Eptifibatide therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint,a composite of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (14.2 vs. 15.7% in the placebo group; p = 0.042). Of importance is the fact that the beneficial effect of eptifibatide was independent of the management strategy pursued during study drug infusion (invasive or conservative), and it was achieved with few major safety concerns. These findings demonstrate that the use of eptifibatide should be considered for all patients presenting with signs and symptoms of intermediate- to high-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS. [source] | ||||||||||