Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Major Cytogenetic Response (major + cytogenetic_response)
Selected AbstractsDasatinib 140 mg once daily versus 70 mg twice daily in patients with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who failed imatinib: Results from a phase 3 study,,AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2010Michael B. Lilly Dasatinib 70 mg twice daily is indicated for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) intolerant or resistant to imatinib. In patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, once-daily dosing has similar efficacy with improved safety, compared with twice-daily dosing. A phase 3 study (n = 611) assessed the efficacy and safety of dasatinib 140 mg once daily versus 70 mg twice-daily in patients with advanced phase chronic myelogenous leukemia or Ph+ ALL resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Here, results from the Ph+ ALL subset (n = 84) with a 2-year follow-up are reported. Patients were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib either 140 mg once daily (n = 40) or 70 mg twice daily (n = 44). The rate of confirmed major hematologic response with once-daily dosing (38%) was similar to that with twice-daily dosing (32%). The rate of major cytogenetic response with once-daily dosing (70%) was higher than that with twice-daily dosing (52%). Compared with the twice-daily schedule, the once-daily schedule had longer progression-free survival (median, 3.0 months versus 4.0 months, respectively) and shorter overall survival (median, 9.1 months versus 6.5 months, respectively). Overall safety profiles were similar between two groups, with nonhematologic adverse events being mostly grade 1 or 2. Pleural effusion was less frequent with once-daily dosing than with twice-daily dosing (all grades, 18% versus 32%). Notably, none of the differences between the two schedules was statistically significant. Compared with the 70 mg twice daily, dasatinib 140 mg once daily had similar overall efficacy and safety in patients with imatinib-resistant or intolerant Ph+ ALL. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00123487). Am. J. Hematol. 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Survival outcomes for clonal evolution in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy,CANCER, Issue 11 2010Dushyant Verma MD Abstract BACKGROUND: Clonal evolution is frequently detected in patients developing resistance to imatinib. The outcome of patients with clonal evolution treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors is not known. METHODS: The authors analyzed the outcome of 177 CML patients after second tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were in chronic phase, 30 had clonal evolution, 28 were in accelerated phase (AP), and 24 were in AP plus clonal evolution. Major cytogenetic response rates were 58%, 54%, 28%, and 13%; 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86%, 73%, 68%, and 33%; and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 69%, 67%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. The hematologic and cytogenetic response rates, OS, and EFS were no different between patients in chronic phase with clonal evolution and patients with chronic phase and no clonal evolution. However, clonal evolution had a significant adverse impact when associated with other features of AP. On multivariate analysis, clonal evolution had no independently significant effect on achieving major cytogenetic response on the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The factors predicting increasing major cytogenetic response to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors were prior achievement of major cytogenetic response with imatinib, higher hemoglobin levels, no splenomegaly, lower percentage of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases, and no prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clonal evolution constitutes a heterogeneous entity with variable outcome with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with trisomy 8, chromosome 17, and complex abnormalities having the worst outcome, regardless of the number of metaphases involved. The molecular events behind these abnormalities and potential therapeutic approaches directed at them need to be defined. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. [source] Dasatinib early intervention after cytogenetic or hematologic resistance to imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemiaCANCER, Issue 13 2009Alfonso Quintás-Cardama MD Abstract BACKGROUND: Although many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) respond well to imatinib therapy, a significant proportion loses their initial response. Loss of response on imatinib is often because of BCR-ABL mutations. Dasatinib is a 325-fold more potent inhibitor of Bcr-Abl than imatinib and has been associated with high rates of durable responses in patients with CML in chronic phase (CP) after imatinib failure. METHODS: To determine the optimal time for initiating dasatinib after loss of response on imatinib, data from dasatinib trials in CML-CP were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to whether they received early intervention with dasatinib (ie, after cytogenetic recurrence on imatinib), rather than after both cytogenetic and hematologic recurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 72% of patients who received dasatinib after loss of a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) on imatinib achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) compared with 42% of patients who were treated after loss of both MCyR and complete hematologic response (CHR). Event-free survival (EFS) also was higher after earlier dasatinib treatment (24-month EFS rates: 89% after loss of MCyR on imatinib vs 29% after loss of both MCyR and CHR). Among patients who were treated after loss of CHR on imatinib with no prior MCyR, 26% achieved a CCyR with dasatinib, and the 24-month EFS rate was 64%. In all 3 groups, CCyR rates were similar in patients with or without pre-existing BCR-ABL mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggested that optimal outcomes are achieved when dasatinib is administered early after imatinib resistance. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. [source] Cytogenetic and molecular responses and outcome in chronic myelogenous leukemiaCANCER, Issue 4 2008Need for new response definitions? Abstract BACKGROUND. Response rates in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are now reported based on the cumulative incidence of a single-time best response. The study aim was to examine the significance of different response criteria for CML on imatinib therapy. METHODS. In all, 276 patients with chronic phase CML on imatinib therapy were analyzed. Cytogenetic and molecular responses were coded as to single best response and response at specific intervals of treatment. RESULTS. The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CGCR) with imatinib was 91%; however, the incidence of CGCR at 48 months into therapy was only 78%. Similarly, the incidence of major molecular responses (best cumulative vs landmark at 48 months) were 74% versus 62%, and of undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts 38% versus 24%. There was a strong association between achievement of major cytogenetic response (Philadelphia chromosome [Ph]-positivity ,35%) at 6 months to 12 months and survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS). Achievement of major molecular response (vs lesser molecular response) in patients in complete cytogenetic response was not associated with significant differences in survival, but showed some association with PFS. Durable CGCR and major molecular responses (documented continuously for ,12 months) were associated with longer PFS duration but not with survival duration differences. Of interest, major molecular responses documented at least twice were noted in 71% of patients on imatinib therapy; undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts documented at least twice were noted in 34%. CONCLUSIONS. Achievement and durability of CGCR and of major and complete molecular responses at landmark times predict outcome in CML, and may help in comparing the efficacy of different treatments. Cancer 2008. © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source] Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib eraCANCER, Issue 6 2007Perspective from a developing country Abstract BACKGROUND There is paucity of data from developing countries on the efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The primary objective of this study was to document complete and partial cytogenetic responses to imatinib in all phases of CML. Secondary objectives included evaluations of complete hematologic response, safety, time to progression, and survival. METHODS Two hundred seventy-five patients in all phases of CML who received treatment with imatinib from January 2001 to December 2005 were included in the study. All patients had on bone marrow or BCR-ABL positive in peripheral blood by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 18 months, major cytogenetic responses (Ph <35%) in chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), and blastic phase (BP) were documented in 61%, 57%, and 28% of patients, respectively. A complete cytogenetic response was observed in 39.4%, 35.7%, and 14.3% of patients in CP, AP, and BP, respectively; and a complete hematologic response was observed in 90%, 86%, and 30%, respectively. The median time to progression at 18 months was 91% in CP and 68% in AP. The overall survivals in CP, AP, and BP at 18 months was 92%, 74%, and 38%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Impressive hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses to imatinib were observed, similar to the responses reported in patients from Western countries. Patients had good compliance, toxicity was limited, and overall quality of life was improved markedly. The results indicated that the biology of CML is not different in patients from developing countries. Cancer 2007 © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source] | ||||||||||