Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (major + adverse_cardiovascular_event)
Selected AbstractsHaem oxygenase-1 genotype and cardiovascular adverse events in patients with peripheral artery diseaseEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, Issue 12 2005P. Dick Abstract Background, A functional GT dinucleotide length polymorphism in the haem oxygenase-1 (HO-1) gene promoter is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Short (< 25) (GT)n repeats are suggested to facilitate enhanced HO-1 up-regulation in response to injury and confer potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects. Materials and methods, We investigated the association between the HO-1 GT-polymorphism and cardiovascular outcome in 472 patients with advanced peripheral artery disease. Cardiovascular risk profile and DNA samples for determination of the HO-1 genotype (carrier vs. noncarrier of a short (GT)n repeat allele) were obtained at baseline, and patients were followed for median 21 months for the occurrence of coronary events (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft), cerebrovascular events (stroke or carotid revascularization) and all-cause mortality. Results, Coronary events occurred in 48 patients (9%), cerebrovascular events in 40 patients (9%) and 59 patients (13%) died. In total, 173 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 133 patients (28%). Carriers of the short (GT)n repeat allele had a 0·46-fold reduced adjusted hazard ratio for coronary events (P = 0·016) as compared to noncarriers. No significant difference was found for cerebrovascular events, mortality and overall MACE. Conclusion, Apparently, the HO-1 genotype exerts potentially protective effects against coronary adverse events in patients with peripheral artery disease. Homozygous and heterozygous carriers of < 25 (GT)n repeats had lower rates of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary bypass operations compared to patients with longer (GT)n repeats. [source] Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring Model to Predict Net Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Pretreated with 600 mg Clopidogrel: Rationale and Design of the RISK-PCI StudyJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2009IGOR MRDOVIC M.D., Ph.D Background: No comprehensive primary PCI (pPCI) risk model to predict net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) has been reported with the use of clopidogrel 600 mg, which is now considered the standard loading dose. The primary hypothesis of the RISK-PCI trial is that an accurate risk prediction may be achieved by using clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables available at the time of intervention. Methods: The present single-center, longitudinal, cohort study will include 1,750 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), undergoing pPCI after pretreatment with 300 mg aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel. The primary end-points of the trial (NACE) include major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding. A logistic regression model will be developed to predict 30-day and 1-year NACE after pPCI. A risk score derived from study set data will be validated using validation set data. Results: Until June 1, 2008, 1,166 patients have been enrolled. Thirty-day follow-up is available in 1,007 patients. Conclusions: The RISK-PCI study is designed to develop an accurate risk scoring system, using variables available at the time of intervention, to predict long-term adverse outcomes after pPCI. Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials Register,ISRCTN83474650,http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN83474650). [source] Impact of Thienopyridine Administration Prior to Primary Stenting in Acute Myocardial InfarctionJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2009LEROY E. RABBANI M.D. The impact of thienopyridine administration prior to primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been well studied. We therefore examined the database from the prospective, multicenter, controlled CADILLAC trial in which 1,036 patients were randomized to bare metal stenting with or without abciximab to determine whether patients who received a thienopyridine prior to bare metal stenting in AMI had superior clinical outcomes. Per operator discretion, 659 patients (63.6%; Th+) received either a 500 mg ticlopidine loading dose (n = 623) or a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 40), while 377 patients (36.4%; Th-) received no thienopyridine prior to stent implantation. Baseline and procedural characteristics of the two groups, including abciximab use (52.5% vs 52.8%, P = 0.93) were well matched. Th+ compared to Th- patients had lower rates of core lab assessed TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure (0.8% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Th+ compared to Th- patients also had significantly reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR) (1.1% vs 3.2%, P = 0.01 and 1.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.02, respectively) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (2.7% vs 5.8%, P = 0.01 and 4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03, respectively), results that remained significant after covariate adjustment. In conclusion, in this large prospective, controlled trial, patients receiving a thienopyridine prior to primary stenting in AMI were less likely to have TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure and experienced reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic TVR and MACE compared to those not administered a thienopyridine prior to stent implantation. [source] Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease after ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary AngioplastyJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2008Ph.D., STEFANO RIGATTIERI M.D. Background: Optimal treatment strategy of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing primary angioplasty is still unclear. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-culprit vessels simultaneously or soon after primary angioplasty is feasible and safe, but available data failed to consistently show a benefit in long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively compared in-hospital and long-term outcomes for patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD treated by primary angioplasty with (Group 1, n=64) or without (Group 2, n=46) early, staged PCI of other angiographically significant coronary lesions. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as a composite of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction after staged, elective PCI, stroke, stent thrombosis, major bleeding, and vascular complications. MACE at follow-up were defined as a composite of death, stroke, stent thrombosis, any coronary revascularization, and re-hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. Results: Group 1 patients underwent staged PCI 5.9 ± 3.5 days after primary angioplasty. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months (392 ± 236 days). The incidence of in-hospital MACE was 20.3% in Group 1 and 10.8% in Group 2 (P=0.186); the incidence of out of hospital MACE was 9.3% in Group 1 and 23.9% in Group 2 (P=0.037). In Group 1 in-hospital MACE were driven by periprocedural myocardial infarction after the elective procedure, which occurred in 15.6% of patients. Conclusions: Our data show that multivessel, staged PCI in STEMI patients is associated with a low incidence of adverse events at follow-up but with a higher incidence of in-hospital MACE, mainly driven by periprocedural myocardial infarction during the elective procedure. [source] Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients with Multivessel Coronary DiseaseJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2007ZHEN KUN YANG M.D. Background: Drug-eluting stents (DES) constitute a major breakthrough in restenosis prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study compared the clinical outcomes of PCI using DES versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) in real-world. Methods: From January 2003 to December 2004, 466 consecutive patients with MVD underwent revascularization, 235 by PCI with DES and 231 by CABG. The study end-point was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at the first 30 days after procedure and during follow-up. Results: Most preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups, but left main disease (24.7% vs 2.6%, P<0.001) and three-vessel disease (65% vs 54%, P = 0.02) were more prevalent in CABG group. The number of coronary lesions was also greater in CABG group (3.7 ± 1.1 vs 3.3 ± 1.1, P<0.001). Despite higher early morbidity (3.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.03) associated with CABG, there were no significant differences in composite MACEs at the first 30 days between the two groups. During follow-up (mean 25±8 months), the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular event was similar in both groups (PCI 6.3% vs CABG 5.6%, P = 0.84). However, bypass surgery still afforded a lower need for repeat revascularization (2.8% vs 10.4%, p = 0.001). Consequently, overall MACE rate (14.5% vs 7.9%, P = 0.03) remained higher after PCI. Conclusion: PCI with DES is a safe and feasible alternative to CABG for selected patients with MVD. The reintervention gap was further narrowed in the era of DES. Aside from restenosis, progression of disease needs to receive substantial emphasis. [source] Does Proximal Location of Culprit Lesion Confer Worse Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction?JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 4 2006KISHORE J. HARJAI M.D. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from proximally located culprit lesion is associated with greater myocardium at jeopardy. In STEMI patients treated with thrombolytics, proximal culprit lesions are known to have worse prognosis. This relation has not been studied in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In 3,535 STEMI patients with native coronary artery occlusion pooled from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction database, we compared in-hospital and 1-year outcomes between those with proximal (n = 1,606) versus nonproximal (n = 1,929) culprit lesions. Patients with proximal culprits were more likely to die and suffer major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during the index hospital stay (3.8% vs 2.2%, P = 0.006; 8.2% vs 5.8%, P = 0.0066, respectively) as well as during 1-year follow-up (6.9% vs 4.5%, P = 0.0013; 22% vs 17%, P = 0.003, respectively) compared to those with nonproximal culprits. After adjustment for baseline differences, proximal culprit was independently predictive of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio% 1.58, 95% confidence intervals, CI 1.05,2.40) and MACE (OR 1.41, CI 1.06,1.86), but not 1-year death or MACE. In addition, proximal culprit was independently associated with higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and sustained hypotension during the index hospitalization. The univariate impact of proximal culprit lesion on in-hospital death and MACE was comparable to other adverse angiographic characteristics, such as multivessel disease and poor initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow, and greater than that of anterior wall STEMI. In conclusion, proximal location of the culprit lesion is a strong independent predictor of worse in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. [source] Native chronic total occlusion recanalization after lower limb bypass graft occlusion: A series of nine cases,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 2 2010FSCAI, Osami Kawarada MD Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to report the clinical utility of native chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization as an endovascular strategy in lower limb bypass graft occlusion. Background: There is no consensus on the best approach for threatened limbs in patients with graft occlusion. Methods: The subjects were nine consecutive patients with limb-threatening ischemia after bypass graft occlusion. Native CTO recanalization was attempted endovascularly using conventional intraluminal and subintimal angioplasty techniques supported by stents. Results: The mean age of the bypass grafts was 6.7 ± 7.3 (range: 1,24) months and the mean number of previous lower limb bypass surgeries was 1.4 ± 0.5 (range: 1,2). Native CTO recanalization was performed in the iliofemoral (n = 2), iliac (n = 2), superficial femoral (n = 3), popliteal (n = 1), and popliteal-tibial (n = 1) arteries. Technical success was achieved in 89% (8/9) of cases without complications or major adverse cardiovascular events. The ankle-brachial index and skin perfusion pressure of the foot significantly increased after revascularization, with marked improvement of clinical symptoms (Rutherford class: 4.5 ± 1.1,0.9 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Limb salvage was achieved in all successful recanalization cases during the mean follow-up time of 25 ± 20 months (range: 9,60). Conclusions: In this preliminary study, endovascular recanalization of native CTO showed satisfactory outcomes in patients with bypass graft occlusion. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Five-year clinical outcomes after coronary stenting of chronic total occlusion using sirolimus-eluting stents: Insights from the rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital,(Research) Registry,CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 7 2009Zhu Jun Shen MD Abstract Background: The use of drug eluting stents (DES) in patients with a successfully recanalized chronic total occlusion (CTO) has been associated with a significant decrease in the need for repeat revascularization, and a favorable short-term clinical outcome when compared with the use of bare metal stents (BMS). Our group, however, has previously reported similar rates of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 3 years follow-up in patients with a successfully opened CTO who were treated with either a sirolimus eluting stent (SES) or a BMS. The objective of this report was to evaluate the outcomes of these patients at 5-years clinical follow-up. Methods and Results: A total of 140 (BMS 64, SES 76) patients with successfully opened CTOs were included. Seven patients died in the BMS group whilst nine patients died in the SES group (P = 0.90). Noncardiac death was the major component of all-cause mortality (11 noncardiac deaths vs. 5 cardiac). There were two and three myocardial infarctions (MI) in the BMS and SES group, respectively (P = 1.0). The composite of death and MI occurred in seven (10.9%) and eleven (14.5%) patients in the BMS and SES group, respectively (P = 0.53). Clinically driven TLR was performed in eight patients (12.5%) in the BMS group, and five (6.6%) in the SES group (P = 0.26). Non-TLR target vessel revascularization was performed in one patient in the BMS group, and four in the SES group (P = 0.37). The 5-year device-oriented cumulative MACE rate was 15.6% and 11.8% in the BMS and SES group, respectively (P = 0.56). Conclusion: In patients with a successfully treated CTO, clinical outcome after 5 years was similar between SES and BMS, however, clinically driven TLR was slightly higher in the BMS group. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarctionCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 1 2007L. Iri Kupferwasser MD Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) vs. bare metal stents (BMS). Background: DES have been shown to reduce the incidence of restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) in clinical randomized studies when compared with BMS in patients undergoing elective percutaneous intervention. Limited data are available with the use of DES in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: Two hundred and sixty-one consecutive patients who presented with myocardial infarction between 7/2001 and 8/2005 were studied. The procedural characteristics, 30-day and 12-month outcomes of 131 patients treated with DES were compared with 130 patients treated with BMS. Results: At 12-months follow-up DES therapy was associated with a substantial decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.33; P =0.002), TVR (HR 0.19; P =0.002), and recurrent myocardial infarction (HR 0.23; P =0.051) vs. BMS therapy. Coronary interventions utilizing DES were characterized by a marked increase in the number of stent per target vessel (DES: 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. BMS: 1.38 ± 0.6, P < 0.0001), treatment of bifurcation (DES: 21% vs. BMS: 5%, P =0.0004), and multivessel intervention (DES: 22% vs. BMS: 8%, P =0.003). Conclusion: The routine use of DES in acute myocardial infarction is associated with reduced rates of MACE at 12 months vs BMS, despite a higher rate of complex procedures in the DES treated patients. In addition to its anti-restenosis effect, the improved outcome of patients treated with DES may be linked to a more complete revascularization in association with prolonged clopidogrel therapy. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||