Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Mg I.m. (mg + i.m)
Selected AbstractsAnalgesic and antiemetic effect of ketorolac vs. betamethasone or dexamethasone after ambulatory surgeryACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2007K. S. Thagaard Background:, Glucocorticoids are known to provide slower onset and more prolonged duration of analgesic effect than ketorolac. In the present study, we wanted to evaluate the effect over time from a single dose of either intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone or an intramuscular (i.m.) depot formulation of betamethasone compared with i.v. ketorolac. Materials and methods:, One hundred and seventy-nine patients admitted for mixed ambulatory surgery were included in the study. After induction of general i.v. anaesthesia, the patients were randomized to receive double-blindly either dexamethasone 4 mg i.v. (Group D) or betamethasone depot formulation 12 mg i.m. (Group B) or ketorolac 30 mg i.v. (Group K). Fentanyl was used for rescue analgesic medication in the post-operative care unit (PACU) and codeine with paracetamol after discharge, for a study period of 3 days. Results:, There was significantly less post-operative pain in the ketorolac group during the stay in the unit (88% with minor or less pain in Group K vs. 74% and 67% in Groups D and B, respectively, P < 0.05), significantly less need for rescue medication (P < 0.05) and significantly less nausea or vomiting (12% in Group K vs. 30% in the other groups pooled, P < 0.05). The ketorolac patients were significantly faster for ready discharge, median 165 min vs. 192 min and 203 min in Groups D and B, respectively (P < 0.01). There were no differences between the groups in perceived pain, nausea, vomiting or rescue analgesic consumption in the 4- to 72-h period. Conclusion:, Dexamethasone 4 mg or bethamethasone 12 mg did not provide prolonged post-operative analgesic effect compared with ketorolac 30 mg, which was superior for analgesia and antiemesis in the PACU. [source] Effect of long-term treatment with octreotide on rectal sensitivity in patients with non-constipated irritable bowel syndromeALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 4 2007T. K. KLOOKER Summary Background, Acute administration of octreotide reduces visceral perception and therefore has been suggested as potential treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. Whether prolonged treatment with octreotide also reduces visceral sensitivity and improves gastrointestinal symptoms remains, however, unknown. Aim, To investigate the effect of a slow release preparation of octreotide on rectal sensitivity and symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Methods, Forty-six non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome patients (52% female, 19,63 years) participated. Before and after 8 weeks of treatment with octreotide (Sandostatin LAR 20 mg i.m.) or placebo, patients underwent a barostat study to assess the rectal sensitivity. During a 2-week run-in period and treatment, abdominal pain, defecation frequency, consistency and symptom relief were scored weekly. Results, Octreotide, but not placebo, significantly increased the threshold for first sensation. Thresholds for urge to defecate and discomfort/pain and rectal compliance were not altered by either treatment. Octreotide improved stool consistency compared with placebo (loose stools after eight weeks: octreotide: 52%, placebo: 81%, P < 0.05). In contrast, abdominal pain and defecation frequency were not affected. Conclusions, Although the threshold of first rectal sensation increased and stool consistency improved, long-term treatment with octreotide, at least at the current dose used, has no visceral analgesic effect and fails to improve irritable bowel syndrome symptoms. [source] Efficacy of depot long-acting release octreotide therapy in severe dumping syndromeALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 10 2005C. PENNING Summary Background:, Dumping syndrome is a serious complication occurring in 10% of patients after gastric surgery. Dumping symptoms are effectively reduced by subcutaneous application of the somatostatin analogue octreotide, but side-effects limit its use. Aim:, To evaluate the efficacy of depot long-acting release octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR) vs. octreotide subcutaneous on dumping symptoms, quality of life and side-effects. Methods:, Twelve patients (five females, age 58 ± 3 years) with severe dumping symptoms, requiring daily use of octreotide subcutaneous, were included in an open study and changed from octreotide subcutaneous after a 2 weeks washout to Sandostatin-LAR 10 mg i.m., every 4 weeks for 6 months. Symptoms (diary), body weight, fat excretion, food intake and Gastrointestinal Specific Quality of Life Index were evaluated. Results:, Gastrointestinal Specific Quality of Life Index increased significantly (P < 0.05) during Sandostatin-LAR treatment (88 ± 4) compared with octreotide (74 ± 4) and washout (75 ± 6). During Sandostatin-LAR treatment, abdominal symptom score was lower compared with octreotide and washout, but not significantly. During Sandostatin-LAR treatment, body weight increased (66 ± 4 to 70 ± 3 kg; P = 0.19). Conclusions:, Sandostatin-LAR is at least as effective as octreotide subcutaneous in suppressing symptoms in patients with severe dumping syndrome and is more effective than octreotide subcutaneous in increasing body weight and quality of life. [source] Epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis: do all 40 mg sublingual epinephrine tablet formulations with similar in vitro characteristics have the same bioavailability?BIOPHARMACEUTICS AND DRUG DISPOSITION, Issue 9 2006Mutasem M. Rawas-Qalaji Abstract Epinephrine autoinjectors are underutilized in the first aid emergency treatment of anaphylaxis in the community; so non-invasive sublingual epinephrine administration is being proposed. In order to determine the effect of changing excipients on the bioavailability of sublingual epinephrine, four distinct fast-disintegrating epinephrine 40 mg tablet formulations, A, B, C and D, were manufactured using direct compression. All formulations were evaluated for tablet hardness (H), disintegration time (DT) and wetting time (WT). In a prospective 5-way crossover study, four sublingual formulations and epinephrine 0.3 mg i.m. as a control were tested sequentially in a validated rabbit model. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at intervals afterwards. Epinephrine plasma concentrations were measured using HPLC-EC. All tablet formulations met USP standards for weight variation and content uniformity, and resulted in similar mean H, DT and WT (n=6). The area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax) and time at which Cmax was achieved (Tmax) did not differ significantly after the sublingual administration of formulation A and epinephrine 0.3 mg i.m. The AUC after B, C and D were significantly lower (p<0.05) than after epinephrine 0.3 mg i.m. These results suggest that the selection of excipients used in these tablet formulations can affect the bioavailability of sublingually administered epinephrine. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | ||||||||||