Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Loop Recorder (loop + recorder)
Kinds of Loop Recorder Selected AbstractsElectromagnetic Interference in an Implantable Loop Recorder Caused by a Portable Digital Media PlayerPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2008JAY P. THAKER The implantable loop recorder has been shown to be a cost-effective tool for diagnosis of intermittent cardiovascular symptoms such as syncope and palpitations. Electromagnetic interference in these recorders may be caused by commonly encountered electronic devices such as antitheft electronic surveillance systems and magnetic resonance imaging cameras. In this report, we describe interference in two patients with implantable loop recorders from a portable digital media player. [source] Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with an Implantable Loop RecorderPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2008JORGE A. WONG M.D. Background: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of syncope. Our understanding of their functional and safety profile in interfering environments such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) becomes increasingly important as they become more prevalent. Methods: We report four patients with an ILR who underwent MRI. The ILR memory was cleared before MRI and no changes were made to programmed settings. Device interrogation took place immediately after the scan. Patients were surveyed for device movement and heating, in addition to cardiopulmonary symptoms after their MRI. Results: Following MRI scanning, all patients were asymptomatic and no device movement or heating was observed. In addition, the functionality of the device remained unaffected. Artifacts mimicking arrhythmias were seen in all ILR patients regardless of the type of MRI scan. Conclusions: MRI scanning of ILR patients can be performed without harm to patient or device, but artifacts that could be mistaken for a tachyarrhythmia are seen frequently. [source] Electromagnetic Interference of an Implantable Loop Recorder by Commonly Encountered Electronic DevicesPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2000CAREL C. DE COCK De COCK, C.C., et al.: Electromagnetic Interference of an Implantable Loop Recorder by Commonly Encountered Electronic Devices. Electromagnetic interference of pacemaker systems has been well established and can lead to an inappropriate function of these devices. Recently, an implantable loop recorder (ILR) (REVEAL, Medtronic Inc.) has been introduced to evaluate the possible arrhythmic etiology of patients with recurrent syncope. We evaluated the interference of this device in two patients with implantable ILR and in three nonimplanted ILRs with four electromagnetic sources: cellular phones (GSMs), electronic article surveillance systems (EASs), metal detector gates (MDGs), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The GSM did not affect appropriate function of the ILR whereas radiofrequency (RF) EAS could interfere with normal function in implanted and nonimplanted systems. The MDG had no influence on ILR function. The magnetic field induced by the MRI resulted in an irreversible error in one nonimplanted ILR. Therefore, although interference between electromagnetic sources and ILRs appears to be rare in our study, physicians should be aware of possible malfunctioning of these devices. [source] Demonstration of Myocardial Ischemia by an Internal Loop RecorderPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2000STEPHEN C. VLAY VLAY, S.C., et al.: Demonstration of Myocardial Ischemia by an Internal Loop Recorder. An internal loop recorder (ILR) implanted to evaluate syncope was activated during an episode of chest pain. Analysis of the recorded event revealed a marked increase in the amount of ST-segment depression over baseline. In addition to rhythm analysis, the ILR may be able to assess myocardial ischemia. Further refinements of filtering may make analysis more accurate. [source] Experience With Implantable Loop Recorders for Recurrent Unexplained SyncopeCONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, Issue 2008Michele Brignole MD Knowledge of what occurs during spontaneous syncope is the gold standard for evaluation. Initially, implantable loop recorders (ILRs) were used in patients with unexplained syncope at the end of unsuccessful full, conventional work-up. In pooled data regarding 247 patients, a correlation between syncope and electrocardiographic findings was found in 84 patients (34%); of these, 52% had a bradycardia or asystole at the time of the recorded event, 11% had tachycardia, and 37% had no arrhythmia. Presyncope-electrocardiography correlation was observed in another third of the patients; presyncope was much less likely to be associated with an arrhythmia than was syncope. The diagnostic yield was similar in patients with and without structural heart diseases and was higher in older than in younger patients. Recent studies showed that ILR implantation can be safely performed in an early phase of the diagnostic evaluation,provided that patients at risk for life-threatening events are carefully excluded,in the patients who have a severe presentation of syncope (because of high risk of trauma or high frequency of episodes) which can be a benefit of a mechanism-specific therapy. Congest Heart Fail. 2008;14:7,12. ©2008 Le Jacq [source] Improved Arrhythmia Detection in Implantable Loop RecordersJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2008MICHELE BRIGNOLE M.D. Introduction: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) have an automatic arrhythmia detection feature that can be compromised by inappropriately detected episodes. This study evaluated a new ILR sensing and detection scheme for automatically detecting asystole, bradyarrhythmia, and tachyarrhythmia events, which is implemented in the next generation device (Reveal DX/XT). Methods and Results: The new scheme employs an automatically adjusting R-wave sensing threshold, enhanced noise rejection, and algorithms to detect asystole, bradyarrhythmia, and tachyarrhythmia. Performance of the new algorithms was evaluated using 2,613 previously recorded, automatically detected Reveal Plus episodes from 533 patients. A total of 71.9% of episodes were inappropriately detected by the original ILR, and at least 88.6% of patients had one or more inappropriate episodes, with most inappropriate detections due to R-wave amplitude reductions, amplifier saturation, and T-wave oversensing. With the new scheme, inappropriate detections were reduced by 85.2% (P < 0.001), with a small reduction in the detection of appropriate episodes (1.7%, P < 0.001). The new scheme avoided inappropriate detections in 67.4% of patients that had them with the original scheme. Conclusions: The new sensing and detection scheme is expected to substantially reduce the occurrence of inappropriately detected episodes, relative to that of the original ILR. [source] How Revealing Are Insertable Loop Recorders in Pediatrics?PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2008PATRICIA A. FRANGINI M.D. Introduction: An insertable loop recorder (ILR) in patients with infrequent syncope or palpitations may be useful to decide management strategies, including clinical observation, medical therapy, pacemaker, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We sought to determine the diagnostic utility of the Reveal® ILR (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) in pediatric patients. Methods: Retrospective review of clinical data, indications, findings, and therapeutic decision in 27 consecutive patients who underwent ILR implantation from 1998,2007. Results: The median age was 14.8 years (2,25 years). Indications were syncope in 24 patients and recurrent palpitations in three. Overall, eight patients had structural heart disease (six congenital heart disease, one hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, one Kawasaki), five had previous documented ventricular arrhythmias with negative evaluation including electrophysiology study, and three patients had QT prolongation. Tilt testing was performed in 10 patients, of which five had neurocardiogenic syncope but recurrent episodes despite medical therapy. After median three months (1,20 months), 17 patients presented with symptoms and the ILR memory was analyzed in 16 (no episode stored in one due to full device memory), showing asystole or transient atrioventricular (AV) block (2), sinus bradycardia (6), or normal sinus rhythm (8). Among asymptomatic patients, 3/10 had intermittent AV block or long pauses, automatically detected and stored by the ILR. In 19 of 20 patients, ILR was diagnostic (95%) and five subsequently underwent pacemaker implantation, while seven patients remained asymptomatic without ILR events. Notably, no life-threatening events were detected. The ILR was explanted in 22 patients after a median of 22 months, two due to pocket infection, 12 for battery depletion and eight after clear documentation of nonmalignant arrhythmia. Conclusions: The ILR in pediatrics is a useful adjunct to other diagnostic studies. Patient selection is critical as the ILR should not be utilized for malignant arrhythmias. A diagnosis is attained in the majority of symptomatic patients, predominantly bradyarrhythmias including pauses and intermittent AV block. [source] The Utility of Holter Monitoring Compared to Loop Recorders in the Evaluation of Syncope and PresyncopeANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2000Andrew D. Krahn M.D. Background: Holter monitoring is frequently used to assess patients with syncope, but rarely provides a diagnosis. Newer loop recorders provide the opportunity for prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring to enhance diagnostic yield. Methods: The results of 232 Holter monitors and 81 loop recordings performed for the investigation of syncope or presyncope were reviewed for indication, patient demographics, and presence and type of symptoms and/or arrhythmias. The results were classified as (1) symptom-arrhythmia correlation, (2) clinically useful information (group 1 plus those excluding arrhythmic syncope, and those demonstrating asymptomatic serious arrhythmias) and (3) unhelpful (asymptomatic and no serious arrhythmias). Results: Loop recorders provided a symptom-arrhythmia correlation in 11.1% of patients compared to only 0.4% in the Holter group (P < 0.0001). Clinically useful information was obtained in 54.3% of loop patients compared to 27.6% in the Holter group (P < 0.0001). Technical problems occurred in 0.4% of the Holter patients and in 3.7% of loop patients (P = 0.05). Classification was difficult in seven patients in the Holter group; two experienced symptoms during sinus rhythm but also had a serious asymptomatic arrhythmia, and five patients had 6,10 beats of asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia at a rate < 160 beats/min. Conclusion: Loop recording was well tolerated and superior to Holter monitoring in providing a symptom-arrhythmia correlation or clinically useful information in patients with syncope and presyncope. An initial approach with a loop-recording device should be employed in these patients. [source] Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation Early After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Findings from 3 Months of Continuous Automatic ECG Loop RecordingsJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2009SANDEEP JOSHI M.D. Introduction: Following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), early recurrences are frequent, benign and classified as a part of a "blanking period." This study characterizes early recurrences and determines implications of early AF following PVI. Methods and Results: Seventy-two consecutive patients (59.8 ± 10.7 years, 69% male) were studied following PVI for paroxysmal or persistent AF. Subjects were fitted with an external loop recorder for automatic, continuous detection of AF recurrence for 3 months. AF prevalence was highest 2 weeks after PVI (54%) and declined to an eventual low of 22%. A significant number (488, 34%) of recurrences were asymptomatic; however, all patients with ,1 AF event had ,1 symptomatic event. No clear predictor of early recurrence was identified. Forty-seven (65%) patients had at least 1 AF episode, predominantly (39 of 47 patients, 83%) within 2 weeks of PVI. Of the 33 patients who did not experience AF within the first 2 weeks, 85% (28/33) were complete responders (P = 0.03) at 12 months. Recurrence at any time within 3 months was not associated with procedural success or failure. Conclusions: Early AF recurrence peaks within the first few weeks after PVI, but continues at a lower level until the completion of monitoring. A blanking period of 3 months is justified to identify patients with AF recurrences that do not portend procedure failure. Freedom from AF in the first 2 weeks following ablation significantly predicts long-term AF freedom. [source] All is Not Lost: Utilizing Continuous Remote ILR Monitoring to Diagnose SyncopePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2010PAUL S. G. HONG M.D. A 63-year-old man with frequent unexplained syncope was implanted with a second generation remotely monitored implantable loop recorder for continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. He had a subsequent syncopal episode and despite accidental destruction of his patient activator, vital ECG data from the event were transmitted wirelessly, enabling a cardiac arrhythmia to be excluded. This case highlights the benefit of remote monitoring in syncope assessment, as well as a transmission system that ensures prompt analysis of the ECG data and therefore rapid optimal patient management. (PACE 2010; 33:763,765) [source] How Revealing Are Insertable Loop Recorders in Pediatrics?PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2008PATRICIA A. FRANGINI M.D. Introduction: An insertable loop recorder (ILR) in patients with infrequent syncope or palpitations may be useful to decide management strategies, including clinical observation, medical therapy, pacemaker, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We sought to determine the diagnostic utility of the Reveal® ILR (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) in pediatric patients. Methods: Retrospective review of clinical data, indications, findings, and therapeutic decision in 27 consecutive patients who underwent ILR implantation from 1998,2007. Results: The median age was 14.8 years (2,25 years). Indications were syncope in 24 patients and recurrent palpitations in three. Overall, eight patients had structural heart disease (six congenital heart disease, one hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, one Kawasaki), five had previous documented ventricular arrhythmias with negative evaluation including electrophysiology study, and three patients had QT prolongation. Tilt testing was performed in 10 patients, of which five had neurocardiogenic syncope but recurrent episodes despite medical therapy. After median three months (1,20 months), 17 patients presented with symptoms and the ILR memory was analyzed in 16 (no episode stored in one due to full device memory), showing asystole or transient atrioventricular (AV) block (2), sinus bradycardia (6), or normal sinus rhythm (8). Among asymptomatic patients, 3/10 had intermittent AV block or long pauses, automatically detected and stored by the ILR. In 19 of 20 patients, ILR was diagnostic (95%) and five subsequently underwent pacemaker implantation, while seven patients remained asymptomatic without ILR events. Notably, no life-threatening events were detected. The ILR was explanted in 22 patients after a median of 22 months, two due to pocket infection, 12 for battery depletion and eight after clear documentation of nonmalignant arrhythmia. Conclusions: The ILR in pediatrics is a useful adjunct to other diagnostic studies. Patient selection is critical as the ILR should not be utilized for malignant arrhythmias. A diagnosis is attained in the majority of symptomatic patients, predominantly bradyarrhythmias including pauses and intermittent AV block. [source] Electromagnetic Interference of an Implantable Loop Recorder by Commonly Encountered Electronic DevicesPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2000CAREL C. DE COCK De COCK, C.C., et al.: Electromagnetic Interference of an Implantable Loop Recorder by Commonly Encountered Electronic Devices. Electromagnetic interference of pacemaker systems has been well established and can lead to an inappropriate function of these devices. Recently, an implantable loop recorder (ILR) (REVEAL, Medtronic Inc.) has been introduced to evaluate the possible arrhythmic etiology of patients with recurrent syncope. We evaluated the interference of this device in two patients with implantable ILR and in three nonimplanted ILRs with four electromagnetic sources: cellular phones (GSMs), electronic article surveillance systems (EASs), metal detector gates (MDGs), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The GSM did not affect appropriate function of the ILR whereas radiofrequency (RF) EAS could interfere with normal function in implanted and nonimplanted systems. The MDG had no influence on ILR function. The magnetic field induced by the MRI resulted in an irreversible error in one nonimplanted ILR. Therefore, although interference between electromagnetic sources and ILRs appears to be rare in our study, physicians should be aware of possible malfunctioning of these devices. [source] Demonstration of Myocardial Ischemia by an Internal Loop RecorderPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2000STEPHEN C. VLAY VLAY, S.C., et al.: Demonstration of Myocardial Ischemia by an Internal Loop Recorder. An internal loop recorder (ILR) implanted to evaluate syncope was activated during an episode of chest pain. Analysis of the recorded event revealed a marked increase in the amount of ST-segment depression over baseline. In addition to rhythm analysis, the ILR may be able to assess myocardial ischemia. Further refinements of filtering may make analysis more accurate. [source] Experience With Implantable Loop Recorders for Recurrent Unexplained SyncopeCONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, Issue 2008Michele Brignole MD Knowledge of what occurs during spontaneous syncope is the gold standard for evaluation. Initially, implantable loop recorders (ILRs) were used in patients with unexplained syncope at the end of unsuccessful full, conventional work-up. In pooled data regarding 247 patients, a correlation between syncope and electrocardiographic findings was found in 84 patients (34%); of these, 52% had a bradycardia or asystole at the time of the recorded event, 11% had tachycardia, and 37% had no arrhythmia. Presyncope-electrocardiography correlation was observed in another third of the patients; presyncope was much less likely to be associated with an arrhythmia than was syncope. The diagnostic yield was similar in patients with and without structural heart diseases and was higher in older than in younger patients. Recent studies showed that ILR implantation can be safely performed in an early phase of the diagnostic evaluation,provided that patients at risk for life-threatening events are carefully excluded,in the patients who have a severe presentation of syncope (because of high risk of trauma or high frequency of episodes) which can be a benefit of a mechanism-specific therapy. Congest Heart Fail. 2008;14:7,12. ©2008 Le Jacq [source] Improved Arrhythmia Detection in Implantable Loop RecordersJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2008MICHELE BRIGNOLE M.D. Introduction: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) have an automatic arrhythmia detection feature that can be compromised by inappropriately detected episodes. This study evaluated a new ILR sensing and detection scheme for automatically detecting asystole, bradyarrhythmia, and tachyarrhythmia events, which is implemented in the next generation device (Reveal DX/XT). Methods and Results: The new scheme employs an automatically adjusting R-wave sensing threshold, enhanced noise rejection, and algorithms to detect asystole, bradyarrhythmia, and tachyarrhythmia. Performance of the new algorithms was evaluated using 2,613 previously recorded, automatically detected Reveal Plus episodes from 533 patients. A total of 71.9% of episodes were inappropriately detected by the original ILR, and at least 88.6% of patients had one or more inappropriate episodes, with most inappropriate detections due to R-wave amplitude reductions, amplifier saturation, and T-wave oversensing. With the new scheme, inappropriate detections were reduced by 85.2% (P < 0.001), with a small reduction in the detection of appropriate episodes (1.7%, P < 0.001). The new scheme avoided inappropriate detections in 67.4% of patients that had them with the original scheme. Conclusions: The new sensing and detection scheme is expected to substantially reduce the occurrence of inappropriately detected episodes, relative to that of the original ILR. [source] The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event MonitoringJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2007STEVEN A. ROTHMAN M.D. Introduction: Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring systems are frequently used in the outpatient evaluation of symptoms suggestive of a cardiac arrhythmia; however, they have a low yield in the identification of clinically significant but infrequent, brief, and/or intermittently symptomatic arrhythmias. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative value of a mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry system (MCOT) with a patient-activated external looping event monitor (LOOP) for symptoms thought to be due to an arrhythmia. Methods and Results: The study was a 17-center prospective clinical trial with patients randomized to either LOOP or MCOT for up to 30 days. Subjects with symptoms of syncope, presyncope, or severe palpitations who had a nondiagnostic 24-hour Holter monitor were randomized. The primary endpoint was the confirmation or exclusion of a probable arrhythmic cause of their symptoms. A total of 266 patients who completed the monitoring period were analyzed. A diagnosis was made in 88% of MCOT subjects compared with 75% of LOOP subjects (P = 0.008). In a subgroup of patients presenting with syncope or presyncope, a diagnosis was made in 89% of MCOT subjects versus 69% of LOOP subjects (P = 0.008). MCOT was superior in confirming the diagnosis of clinical significant arrhythmias, detecting such events in 55 of 134 patients (41%) compared with 19 of 132 patients (15%) in the LOOP group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MCOT provided a significantly higher yield than standard cardiac loop recorders in patients with symptoms suggestive of a significant cardiac arrhythmia. [source] Electromagnetic Interference in an Implantable Loop Recorder Caused by a Portable Digital Media PlayerPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2008JAY P. THAKER The implantable loop recorder has been shown to be a cost-effective tool for diagnosis of intermittent cardiovascular symptoms such as syncope and palpitations. Electromagnetic interference in these recorders may be caused by commonly encountered electronic devices such as antitheft electronic surveillance systems and magnetic resonance imaging cameras. In this report, we describe interference in two patients with implantable loop recorders from a portable digital media player. [source] The Utility of Holter Monitoring Compared to Loop Recorders in the Evaluation of Syncope and PresyncopeANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2000Andrew D. Krahn M.D. Background: Holter monitoring is frequently used to assess patients with syncope, but rarely provides a diagnosis. Newer loop recorders provide the opportunity for prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring to enhance diagnostic yield. Methods: The results of 232 Holter monitors and 81 loop recordings performed for the investigation of syncope or presyncope were reviewed for indication, patient demographics, and presence and type of symptoms and/or arrhythmias. The results were classified as (1) symptom-arrhythmia correlation, (2) clinically useful information (group 1 plus those excluding arrhythmic syncope, and those demonstrating asymptomatic serious arrhythmias) and (3) unhelpful (asymptomatic and no serious arrhythmias). Results: Loop recorders provided a symptom-arrhythmia correlation in 11.1% of patients compared to only 0.4% in the Holter group (P < 0.0001). Clinically useful information was obtained in 54.3% of loop patients compared to 27.6% in the Holter group (P < 0.0001). Technical problems occurred in 0.4% of the Holter patients and in 3.7% of loop patients (P = 0.05). Classification was difficult in seven patients in the Holter group; two experienced symptoms during sinus rhythm but also had a serious asymptomatic arrhythmia, and five patients had 6,10 beats of asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia at a rate < 160 beats/min. Conclusion: Loop recording was well tolerated and superior to Holter monitoring in providing a symptom-arrhythmia correlation or clinically useful information in patients with syncope and presyncope. An initial approach with a loop-recording device should be employed in these patients. [source] | ||||||||||