			Home About us Contact

Long-term Oncological Outcome (long-term + oncological_outcome)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A single-center experience of 100 cases

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 11 2008
Takatsugu Okegawa
Objectives: To report our experience with the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Between July 2001 and December 2007, 100 patients with RCC underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy at our institution for clinically localized RCC. Fifty-three patients received a retroperitoneal procedure and 47 received a transperitoneal procedure. The perioperative and oncological outcomes of these groups were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Mean follow up was 34 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the two approaches in terms of pathological stage, operative time, need for additional procedures such as adrenalectomy and/or lymph node sampling, estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusions, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, or the incidence of minor or major complications. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 90% for both the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal procedures. The 5-year overall survival rates were 98% and 96%, respectively. Therefore, no significant difference was observed in the long-term oncological outcome between the two groups. Conclusions: Tumor control and surgical morbidity in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy seem not to be significantly influenced by the approach. [source]

Impact of laparoscopic surgery on the long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancer

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 11 2009
Jun-Gi Kim
Abstract Background:, This 20-year retrospective study compared the results of laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for patients with rectal cancer to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on long-term oncological outcomes for rectal cancer. Methods:, We analysed survival data collected over 20 years for patients with rectal cancer (n= 407) according to surgical methods and tumour stage between those treated with laparoscopic surgery (n= 272) and those with open surgery (n= 135). Clinical factors were analysed to ascertain possible risk factors that might have been associated with survival from and recurrence of rectal cancer. A multivariate analysis was applied by using Cox's regression model to determine the impact of laparoscopic surgery on long-term oncological outcomes. Results:, Overall survival, disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were statistically higher in the laparoscopic group than in the open-surgery group. The incidence of local recurrence in the laparoscopic group (7.9%; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.2,11.5) was significantly lower than that for the open-surgery group (30.2%; 95% CI, 21.0,39.3; P < 0.001). By using a multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer appeared not to be an independent factor for disease-specific survival or disease-free survival. However, the laparoscopic surgery was an independent factor associated with reduced local recurrence (Hazard ratio (HR), 3.408; 95% CI, 1.890,6.149; P < 0.001). Conclusion:, Laparoscopic surgery did not adversely affect the long-term oncological outcome for patients with rectal cancer. [source]

Is laparoscopic surgery acceptable for advanced colon cancer?

CANCER SCIENCE, Issue 4 2009
Seigo Kitano
Laparoscopic surgery is widespread in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In Japan, a nationwide survey has shown that the rate of advanced colorectal cancer has increased gradually to 65% of total laparoscopic surgeries in 2007. Many randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that in the short term, laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe, and has many benefits, including reduction of peri-operative mortality. In terms of long-term outcomes, four randomized controlled trials suggest that there are no differences in laparosupic and open surgery for colon cancer. However, important issues, including long-term oncological outcome, cost effectiveness, and the impact on the quality of life of patients, should be addressed in well-designed large-scale trials. In Japan, a retrospective multicenter study has demonstrated that the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery are beneficial, and the long-term outcomes are the same as for open surgery. In 2004, a prospective large-scale randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) to compare laparoscopic surgery with open surgery was started to evaluate oncological outcomes for advanced colon cancer. This trial is supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. In the present study, laparoscopic surgery is found to be acceptable for stage I disease of colon cancer, whereas it is controversial for stage II/III disease because of inadequate clinical evidence. Whether laparoscopic surgery is acceptable for advanced colon cancer or not should be confirmed by the Japanese large-scale prospective randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) in the near future. (Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 567,571) [source]

Impact of laparoscopic surgery on the long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancer

Outcome of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 9 2008
S. Morita
Background: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy has been introduced as a function-preserving operation for early gastric cancer in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and radicality of the procedure. Methods: Between 1995 and 2004, 611 patients with apparent early gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach had pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. The short-term surgical and long-term oncological outcomes of these operations were assessed. Results: The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer was 94·3 per cent. Nodal involvement was seen in 62 patients (10·1 per cent). There were no postoperative deaths. Complications developed in 102 patients (16·7 per cent). Major complications, such as leakage and abscess, were observed in 19 (3·1 per cent). The most common complication was gastric stasis, occurring in 49 (8·0 per cent). The overall 5-year survival rate in patients with early gastric cancer was 96·3 per cent. Conclusion: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is a safe operation with an excellent prognosis in patients with early gastric cancer. It is recommended as the standard procedure for early gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]