Liver Growth (liver + growth)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Cytosolic calcium regulates liver regeneration in the rat,

HEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2010
Laura Lagoudakis
Liver regeneration is regulated by growth factors, cytokines, and other endocrine and metabolic factors. Calcium is important for cell division, but its role in liver regeneration is not known. The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of cytosolic calcium signals in liver growth after partial hepatectomy (PH). The gene encoding the calcium-binding protein parvalbumin (PV) targeted to the cytosol using a nuclear export sequence (NES), and using a discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsR) marker, was transfected into rat livers by injecting it, in recombinant adenovirus (Ad), into the portal vein. We performed two-thirds PH 4 days after Ad-PV-NES-DsR or Ad-DsR injection, and liver regeneration was analyzed. Calcium signals were analyzed with fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester in hepatocytes isolated from Ad-infected rats and in Ad-infected Hela cells. Also, isolated hepatocytes were infected with Ad-DsR or Ad-PV-NES-DsR and assayed for bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. Ad-PV-NES-DsR injection resulted in PV expression in the hepatocyte cytosol. Agonist-induced cytosolic calcium oscillations were attenuated in both PV-NES,expressing Hela cells and hepatocytes, as compared to DsR-expressing cells. Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation (S phase), phosphorylated histone 3 immunostaining (mitosis), and liver mass restoration after PH were all significantly delayed in PV-NES rats. Reduced cyclin expression and retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation confirmed this observation. PV-NES rats exhibited reduced c-fos induction and delayed extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation after PH. Finally, primary PV-NES,expressing hepatocytes exhibited less proliferation and agonist-induced cyclic adenosine monophosphate responsive element binding and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation, as compared with control cells. Conclusion: Cytosolic calcium signals promote liver regeneration by enhancing progression of hepatocytes through the cell cycle. (HEPATOLOGY 2010;) [source]


Liver regeneration after adult living donor and deceased donor split-liver transplants

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2004
Abhinav Humar
As the number of living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD) split-liver transplants (SLTs) have increased over the last 5 years, so too has the interest in liver regeneration after such partial-liver transplants. We looked at liver regeneration, as measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetrics, to see if there were significant differences among LDs, right-lobe LD recipients, and SLT recipients. We measured liver volume at 3 months postoperatively by using CT, and we compared the result to the patient's ideal liver volume (ILV), which was calculated using a standard equation. The study group consisted of 70 adult patients who either had donated their right lobe for LD transplants (n = 24) or had undergone a partial-liver transplant (right-lobe LD transplants, n = 24; right-lobe SLTs, n = 11; left-lobe SLTs, n = 11). DD (vs. LDs) were younger (P < 0.01), were heavier (P = 0.06), and had longer ischemic times (P < 0.01). At 3 months postoperatively, LDs had attained 78.6% of their ILV, less than the percentage for right-lobe LD recipients (103.9%; P = 0.0002), right-lobe SLT recipients (113.6%; P = 0.01), and left-lobe SLT recipients (119.7%; P = 0.0006). When liver size at the third postoperative month was compared with the liver size immediately postoperatively, LDs had a 1.85-fold increase. This was smaller than the increase seen in right-lobe LD recipients (2.08-fold), right-lobe SLT recipients (2.17-fold), and left-lobe SLT recipients (2.52-fold). In conclusion, liver regeneration, as measured by CT volume, seems to be greatest in SLT recipients. LD recipients seem to have greater liver growth than their donors. The reason for this remains unclear. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:374,378.) [source]


Nonregenerative stimulation of hepatocyte proliferation in the rat: Variable effects in relation to spontaneous liver growth; a possible link with metabolic induction

CELL PROLIFERATION, Issue 5 2000
C. Nadal
Three procedures were used to stimulate hepatocyte proliferation in the rat without reducing liver mass, resulting in a supplementary growth which differs from the regenerative growth observed after loss of liver mass by hepatectomy or toxic necrosis. They were: (a) the ingestion of cyproterone, a cytochrome P450 inducing drug (b) the injection of an irritant which provokes glycogenesis and synthesis of acute-phase proteins (c) the injection of albumin-bound bilirubin leading to elimination of glucuronated bilirubin in bile. This ensuing supplementary growth was studied in the rat under several conditions of hepatic proliferation: 1In normal adult rats, in which hepatocyte proliferation is very low, the effect on proliferation was either weak or undetectable. 2In suckling rats, with a rapid body and liver growth, all the stimulants provoked a synchronized wave of proliferation with a steep increase of the percentage of S-phase hepatocytes from 4.5% in controls to 15,30% in treated rats. This increase was followed by a compensatory period of low proliferation during which a treatment with a second stimulant was much less effective. 3In 2/3 hepatectomized adult rats, the proliferation induced by cyproterone was higher than the spontaneous regenerative proliferation alone and additional to it during all of the regenerative process. The proliferation induced by acute inflammation was competitive with the synchronous spontaneous proliferation during the early period of synchronized proliferation following surgery, suggesting that both are similar acute responses. Differently, during the late period of lower and unsynchronized regenerative proliferation, the proliferation provoked by acute inflammation was additional to the spontaneous one. A stimulation of proliferation by injection of the albumin-bilirubin complex was observed during the late period after 2/3 hepatectomy. The highest level of stimulation occurred when the liver growth and the hepatocyte proliferation were already high. This suggests that these stimulants are not complete mitogenic stimuli and need cofactors which are present during the spontaneous growth or, alternatively, that the effect of stimulants is opposed by an inhibitory mechanism present in the adult rat. [source]