Liver Graft Recipients (liver + graft_recipient)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Kaposi's sarcoma in a liver graft recipient

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2003
Fabrizio Panaro
[source]


Cytomegalovirus and cyclosporin-induced gingival overgrowth in children with liver grafts

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2002
M.-T. Hosey
Summary., Objective. To determine whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with gingival overgrowth in paediatric liver graft recipients treated with cyclosporin. Study design. Thirty-four children, 25 of whom were under 5 years of age, who had undergone liver transplantation, were examined. An Index of Severity of Gingival Overgrowth was used to measure the prevalence and severity of the gingival overgrowth. The trough cyclosporin level was recorded and the CMV status of the patient matched to the dental findings. The association between the severity of gingival overgrowth and CMV infection was examined using the contingency coefficient. An anova was used to assess the association between the circulating trough cyclosporin concentration and the severity of gingival overgrowth. Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient was used to examine the association between the duration of exposure to cyclosporin and the severity of gingival overgrowth. Results. There was a significant inverse association between the duration of exposure to cyclosporin and the severity of gingival overgrowth. There was no relationship between the trough cyclosporin concentration and the severity of gingival overgrowth. There was no association between CMV and gingival overgrowth. Conclusion. Gingival overgrowth was related to the duration of cyclosporin therapy but was neither more prevalent nor more severe in subjects who were CMV seropositive. [source]


Transmission of an undiagnosed sarcoma to recipients of kidney and liver grafts procured in a non-heart beating donor

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2005
Olivier Detry
Transmission of an undiagnosed cancer with solid organ transplantation is a rare but dreadful event. In this paper the authors report the transmission of an undiagnosed sarcoma to recipients of kidney and liver grafts procured in a Maastricht category 3 non-heart beating donor. To the authors' knowledge this case is the first report of such a transmission with a liver graft procured in a non-heart beating donor. The cancer transferal was diagnosed 1 year after transplantation in the recipients of the liver and of one kidney. The liver recipient died from multiple organ failure after a failed attempt of tumor resection. The kidney recipient underwent immunosuppression withdrawal and transplantectomy. Non-heart beating donors should not be particularly at risk for undiagnosed cancer transmission if the procurement is performed according to the same rules of careful inspection of the abdominal and thoracic organs. After diagnosis of donor cancer transmission, kidney recipients should have the graft removed, and immunosuppression should be interrupted. The management of liver graft recipients is very difficult in this setting, and long-term survival was very rarely reported. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:696,699.) [source]


Cholelithiasis in pediatric organ transplantation: Detection and management

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2002
Rainer Ganschow
Abstract: The real incidence and the underlying causes of cholelithiasis in pediatric solid organ recipients is probably not exactly known. In addition to well-established risk factors for cholelithiasis, children after heart, kidney, or liver transplantation may develop gallstones due to drug therapy, sepsis, parenteral nutrition, or surgical complications. For pediatric patients, data are very limited and heterogeneous. However, the incidence in pediatric heart recipients seems to be substantially higher compared with kidney or liver graft recipients. In this review article the present data are discussed focusing on incidence, detection, and management of cholelithiasis in pediatric organ transplantation. In general, surgery is the therapy of choice in symptomatic patients; however, the pharmacological profile of ursodeoxycholic acid and the first results on its clinical impact are promising. The value of prophylactic therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid must be determined in further studies. [source]