Apomorphine Infusion (apomorphine + infusion)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Efficacy of long-term continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: A multicenter study

MOVEMENT DISORDERS, Issue 8 2008
Pedro J. García Ruiz MD
Abstract Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is, at present, an alternative option for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations. We studied the evolution of patients with PD and severe motor fluctuations long-term treated with CSAI. We reviewed data from 82 patients with PD (mean age, 67 ± 11.07; disease duration, 14.39 ± 5.7 years) and severe motor fluctuations referred to 35 tertiary hospitals in Spain. These patients were long-term treated (for at least 3 months) with CSAI and tolerated the procedure without serious side effects. We compared the baseline data of these 82 patients (before CSAI) with those obtained from the last follow-up visit of each patient. The mean follow-up of CSAI was 19.93 ± 16.3 months. Mean daily dose of CSAI was 72.00 ± 21.38 mg run over 14.05 ± 1.81 hours. We found a statistically significant reduction in off-hours, according to self-scoring diaries (6.64 ± 3.09 vs. 1.36 ± 1.42 hours/day, P < 0.0001), total and motor UPDRS scores (P < 0.0001), dyskinesia severity (P < 0.0006), and equivalent dose of antiparkinsonian therapy (1,405 ± 536.7 vs. 800.1 ± 472.9 mg of levodopa equivalent units P < 0.0001). CSAI is an effective option for patients with PD and severe fluctuations, poorly controlled by conventional oral drug treatment. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society. [source]


Comparison of apomorphine and levodopa infusions in four patients with Parkinson's disease with symptom fluctuations

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2009
D. Nyholm
Background,,, Motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease may be successfully treated with subcutaneous apomorphine infusion or intraduodenal levodopa/carbidopa infusion. No comparative trials of these two alternatives were performed. Aims of the study,,, We present a subanalysis from a randomized crossover clinical trial where levodopa infusion as monotherapy was compared with any other combination of pharmacotherapy in fluctuating patients. Four patients used apomorphine infusion and oral levodopa in the comparator arm. The results of these four patients are presented in detail. Methods,,, The duration of the trial was 3 + 3 weeks. Patients were video-recorded half-hourly on two non-consecutive days of both treatment arms. Blinded video ratings were used. Patient self-assessments of motor function and quality-of-life (QoL) parameters were captured using an electronic diary. Results,,, Ratings in moderate to severe ,off' state ranged 0,44% on apomorphine infusion and 0,6% on levodopa infusion. Moderate to severe dyskinesias were not recorded in any of the treatments. QoL was reported to be improved in all patients on duodenal levodopa infusion. Conclusions,,, Monotherapy with duodenal infusion of levodopa was more efficacious and brought greater QoL than combination therapy with apomorphine infusion in these fluctuating patients. [source]