Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Lead Tip (lead + tip)
Selected AbstractsEffect of Left Ventricular Lead Concordance to the Delayed Contraction Segment on Echocardiographic and Clinical Outcomes after Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2009JEFFREY W.H. FUNG M.D. Introduction: The optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing site for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is unclear. The current study aims to explore the clinical significance of LV lead concordance to delayed contraction segment in CRT. Methods and Results: Concordant LV lead position was defined as the lead tip located by fluoroscopy at or immediately adjacent to the LV segment with latest contraction determined by tissue Doppler imaging. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes among 101 consecutive patients with or without concordant LV lead positions were compared. There was no significant difference in changes in LV volumes and clinical parameters between patients with concordant (n = 46) or nonconcordant (n = 55) LV lead positions at 3 and 6 months. In multivariate analysis, the baseline asynchrony index (,= 1.092, 95% CI: 1.050,1.114; P < 0.001), but not LV lead concordance, was the only independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling. By Cox regression analysis, ischemic etiology, and LV reverse remodeling, but not LV lead concordance, were independent predictors of mortality (,= 2.475, 95% CI: 1.183,5.178; P = 0.016, and ,= 0.272, 95% CI: 0.130,0.567; P < 0.001, respectively), cardiovascular hospitalization (,= 1.551, 95% CI: 1.032,2.333; P = 0.035, and ,= 0.460, 95% CI: 0.298,0.708; P < 0.001, respectively), and heart failure hospitalization (,= 0.486, 95% CI: 0.320,0.738; P = 0.001 for LV reverse remodeling). Conclusion: LV lead concordance to the delayed contraction segment may not be a major determining factor for favorable echocardiographic and clinical outcomes after CRT. [source] Pacing from the Right Ventricular Septum: Is There a Danger to the Coronary Arteries?PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2009ANDREW W. TEH M.B.B.S. Background: Pacing from right ventricular (RV) septal sites has been suggested as an alternative to RV apical pacing in an attempt to avoid long-term adverse consequences on left ventricular function. Concern has been raised as to the relationship of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) to pacing leads in these positions. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed three cases in which patients with RV active-fixation leads in situ also had coronary angiography. Multiple fluoroscopic views were used to determine the relationship of the lead tip at various pacing sites to the coronary arteries. A lead placed on the anterior wall was in close proximity to the LAD, whereas septal and free wall positioning was not. Conclusion: Placement of RV active-fixation leads on the septum avoids potential coronary artery compromise. [source] Transfemoral Snaring and Stabilization of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads to Maintain Vascular Access During Lead ExtractionPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2009AVI FISCHER M.D. Background: Lead extraction is an effective method for removing pacemaker and defibrillator leads and to obtain venous access when central veins are occluded. Objective: We report a series of patients who required lead extraction and preservation of vascular access requiring a vascular snare introduced from the femoral vein to provide traction on the lead. This technique allowed advancement of the extraction sheath beyond the level of vascular occlusion, preserving vascular access in all patients. Methods: All patients had peripheral contrast venography performed immediately prior to the procedure to identify the site(s) of venous occlusion. An extraction sheath was employed and with direct manual traction, the lead tip pulled free from the myocardial surface prior to advancement of the sheath beyond the occlusion. A transfemoral snare was used to grasp the distal portion of the lead and traction was used to immobilize the lead. Results: In all patients, transfemoral snaring of the leads was necessary to allow safe advancement of a sheath to open the occluded venous system. There were no complications in any of the patients. Conclusion: Our series demonstrates the simple and safe technique of transfemoral lead snaring to assist lead extraction and maintain vascular access in the setting of venous occlusion, when the distal lead tip pulls free of the myocardium before an extraction sheath is passed beyond the point of venous obstruction. [source] Microdislodgment of Ventricular Pacing Lead Undetectable During Rapid Pacing One Year After ImplantationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003YUKO CHINUSHI CHINUSHI, Y., et al.: Microdislodgment of Ventricular Pacing Lead Undetectable During Rapid Pacing One Year After Implantation. A 71-year-old woman had undergone valvular heart surgery in 1981, and implantation of a permanent ventricular pacemaker for ventricular pauses during atrial fibrillation in 2001. One year after pacemaker implantation, she complained of faintness. When pacing at 100 beats/min the pacemaker functioned properly. However, pacing and sensing failure was detected at a pacing rate of 60 beats/min. At rapid pacing rates, the lead tip was in closer contact with the endocardium, and its microdislodgment was undetectable. The symptoms have resolved since the lead was repositioned. (PACE 2003; 26:787,788) [source] Development of an Echocardiographic Method for Choosing the Best Fitting Single-Pass VDD LeadPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2002WEI-HSIAN YIN YIN, W.-H., et al.: Development of an Echocardiographic Method for Choosing the Best Fitting Single-Pass VDD Lead. To achieve stable single-lead VDD pacing, a selection of the electrode with the optimal distance between the lead tip and the floating atrial dipole (AV distance [AVD]) is important. The authors hypothesized that the size of the right heart chambers may affect atrial sensing, and that measurement of their internal dimension at end-diastole (RHIDd) in the apical four chamber view by transthoracic echocardiography may aid in choosing the proper AVD. Twenty-six consecutive cases that had undergone VDD pacer implantation using the conventional chest X ray were examined retrospectively by the echocardiographic method. The chest x-ray method properly selected a lead with optimal atrial sensing, defined as minimum P wave amplitude , 1.0 mV, for only 20 (77%) of 26 patients. By comparing these results with their respective RHIDd, a cut-off point of 13 cm was obtained that indicated a criterion for choosing the proper AVD. The indication was that if the RHIDd was , 13 cm, a lead with an AVD of 15.5/16 cm should have been used; if the RHIDd was < 13 cm, a lead with an AVD of 13/13.5 cm should have been chosen. Using the echocardiographic method, all six patients who had suboptimal atrial sensing could be identified and classified as having missized (four undersized; two oversized) permanent leads. In conclusion, the described method provides a promising preoperative assessment of the best fitting electrode length in single lead VDD pacing. A prospective study is ongoing to verify its applicability. [source] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Visceral Abdominal PainPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 3 2010Leonardo Kapural MD Abstract Background., Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may reduce pain scores and improve function in patients with chronic visceral abdominal pain. We thus present our large clinical experience in SCS for visceral abdominal pain. Methods., We trialed spinal cord stimulation in 35 patients, each of whom was shown by retrograde differential epidural block to have either visceral pain (n = 32) or mixed visceral and central pain (n = 3). SCS trials lasted 4 to 14 days (median 9 days). SCS lead tips were mostly positioned at T5 (n = 11) or T6 (n = 10). Results., Thirty patients (86%) reported at least 50% pain relief upon completion of the trial. Among these, pretrial visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores averaged 8.2 ± 1.6 (SD) and opioid use averaged 110 ± 119 mg morphine sulfate equivalents. During the trial, VAS pain scores decreased to 3.1 ± 1.6 cm (P < 0.001, Mann,Whitney Rank Sum Test) and opioid use decreased to 70 ± 68 mg morphine equivalent a day (P = 0.212). Five patients failed the trial, one was lost to follow-up, and 19 were followed for the whole year. Seven patients were either followed for less than a year (n = 3) or the SCS system was removed due to infection or lead migration (n = 4). One patient despite the successful trial felt no improvements at 6 months after the implant and requested an explant of the SCS device. Among the 28 patients who received permanent implant, 19 were followed at least a year. Their VAS pain scores remained low (3.8 ± 1.9 cm; P < 0.001) at 1 year, as did opioid use (38 ± 48 mg morphine equivalents; P = 0.089). Conclusions., Spinal cord stimulation may be a useful therapeutic option for patients with severe visceral pain. [source] | ||||||||||