Home About us Contact | |||
Lesion Excision (lesion + excision)
Kinds of Lesion Excision Selected AbstractsLetter: Nipple Asymmetry Resulting from Lesion Excision and Use of a Purse-String SutureDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 8 2007FIACS, LAWRENCE M. FIELD MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Upper Eyelid Full-Thickness Skin Graft in Facial ReconstructionDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 1 2005Dogan Tuncali MD Background The potentially available upper eyelid skin, as an alternative donor site, deserves more attention in clinical use. Objective The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical behavioral characteristics of upper eyelid full-thickness skin grafts in facial reconstruction. Methods Sixteen patients who concluded the 12-month follow-up period were included in the study. Graft dimensions were measured in place before the graft harvest. Defect sizes were measured following lesion excision and postgrafting. Graft sizes were measured postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results The largest and smallest grafts were 46 × 22 mm and 40 × 15 mm (average 43.1 × 19.3 mm) in size, respectively. The largest and smallest defect dimensions were 33 × 23 mm and 17 × 9 mm (average 22.6 × 15.6 mm), respectively. The average postgrafting size was 21.1 × 14.6 mm. Grafts and donor sites healed very well. Generally, an acceptable to good texture and color match was observed beyond 6 months. Wound bed contraction was not observed beyond the first month (p < .05). Conclusion Special characteristics of hairless skin, good color and texture matching, and inconspicuous and hidden donor scar make the upper eyelid a good alternative donor site for small- to medium-sized facial skin defects. The main disadvantages that limit its clinical use are the age of the patient, a lack of adnexal structures, comparatively limited sun exposure, and possible insufficient thickness, especially when deep defects are of concern. DOGAN TUNCALI, MD, LEVENT ATES, MD, AND GÜRCAN ASLAN, MD, HAVE INDICATED NO SIGNIFICANT INTEREST WITH COMMERCIAL SUPPORTERS. [source] Factors affecting carbon dioxide laser treatment for oral precancer: A patient cohort studyLASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, Issue 1 2009O. Hamadah DDS Abstract Background Although the benefits of CO2 laser surgery in oral precancer management have been evaluated, little consideration has been given to the factors which may influence treatment outcome, especially amongst patients developing recurrence or malignant transformation. Study Design Seventy eight patients (51 males, 27 females; mean age 57.8 years) undergoing CO2 laser excision of single, new dysplastic oral precancer lesions (OPLs) were followed up for a minimum of 2 years and the influence of clinico-pathological parameters, socio-demographic factors and the presence or absence of residual dysplasia in excision margins upon clinical outcome were examined. Results Seventy three percent of patients were smokers and 78% consumed alcohol regularly. The majority of lesions were leukoplakias arising in the floor of mouth and ventro-lateral tongue and moderate or severe dysplasia accounted for 86% of histopathological diagnoses. Patient follow up ranged from 24 to 119 months (mean 58 months). Sixty four percent of patients were disease free at most recent clinical follow up, whilst 32% developed local recurrent dysplasia or new site dysplasia with 4% developing oral squamous cell carcinoma (but at sites distinct from their initial OPL). Excision margins were clear in 55% of cases, but 19% showed mild, 21% moderate and 5% severe dysplasia on histopathological examination. No statistically significant associations were seen between patients' age, gender, lesion appearance, site of origin, histopathological grading, presence of dysplasia in resection margins, or alcohol consumption and clinical outcome. Smokers, however, were at significantly higher risk of dysplasia recurrence compared to ex-smokers or non-smokers (P,=,0.04). Conclusions In the absence of agreed treatment protocols for OPLs, we recommend CO2 laser surgery as an effective treatment modality offering precise lesion excision, full histopathological assessment, minimal post-operative morbidity and a 64% disease free clinical outcome. Regular patient follow up is encouraged due to the persistence of field cancerisation effects. Lasers Surg. Med. 41:17,25, 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Ulceration and antihypertensive use are risk factors for infection after skin lesion excisionANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 9 2010Anthony Penington Abstract Background:, A prospective audit was performed of wound complications of skin lesion excision in a private practice setting. Methods:, For 924 consecutive skin lesion excisions performed by a single surgeon, information was collected on tumour size and site, closure method and on risk factors of age, known diabetes, use of steroids, antihypertensives or anticoagulants and ulceration of the lesion. Patients were given written instructions to wet the wound in the shower after one or two days. A wound ,infection' event was recorded if the wound appeared inflamed or if the patient had been treated with antibiotics by any practitioner. Wound bleeding was recorded if the patient returned or attended elsewhere for management of bleeding. Results:, Sixty-seven wounds (7.25%) met the broad definition of ,infection' and 18 (1.9%) wounds suffered bleeding. Ulceration (odds ratio (OR) 3.15, P= 0.008) and use of antihypertensives (OR 2.5, P= 0.006) were independent risk factors for infection along with site and closure method. The patients who did not wet their wounds post-operatively were also at an increased risk of infection (OR 2.1, P= 0.018). Aspirin caused a slight, non-statistically significant increase in bleeding rate, and warfarin caused a larger, but still not statistically significant, increase in bleeding. Use of other anticoagulants caused a significant increase in bleeding (OR 10.9, P= 0.006). Conclusion:, Ulceration of the skin lesion and use of antihypertensives are significant risk factors for wound infection. Wetting surgical wounds with clean tap water does not increase, and may even reduce, wound infection rate. [source] Double Butterfly Suture for High Tension: A Broadly Anchored, Horizontal, Buried Interrupted SutureDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 3 2000Helmut Breuninger MD Background. The excision of skin lesions such as tumors, nevi, and scars frequently results in tension on surgical wound margins. This tension is commonly counteracted surgically with buried, intracutaneous, interrupted sutures of absorbable material which are anchored vertically in the corium. Method. The horizontal, buried, intracutaneous butterfly suture has been described elsewhere. It is firmly anchored in the corium, everts wound margins, and adapts them nearly as broadly as two vertical sutures. It can also be laid as a double butterfly suture, as described here, and then has the shape of an "8." This double butterfly suture is equivalent to three vertical sutures because of its broad base in the corium. Moreover, it can cope with much greater tension because of its "pulley" effect. A single double butterfly suture usually suffices for small defects, particularly when the wound edges are cut obliquely with a longer rim of epidermis. Materials. We have laid the traditional butterfly suture in more than 35,000 skin lesion excisions since 1985 and the double butterfly suture alone or as a supplement in more than 10,000 sutures since 1992. We use 2-0 to 6-0 polydioxanone for these procedures, since it has proven in trials to be the best-absorbed suture material. Results. In most cases, the resulting scars were narrow and smooth in spite of high tension. Results were unsatisfactory in only 6.2% of procedures. Conclusion. The double butterfly suture described here has the advantages of withstanding tension better while everting wound margins and requiring fewer stitches for wound closure. However, it is important that the suture knot be deeply anchored beneath the corium. [source] Ulceration and antihypertensive use are risk factors for infection after skin lesion excisionANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 9 2010Anthony Penington Abstract Background:, A prospective audit was performed of wound complications of skin lesion excision in a private practice setting. Methods:, For 924 consecutive skin lesion excisions performed by a single surgeon, information was collected on tumour size and site, closure method and on risk factors of age, known diabetes, use of steroids, antihypertensives or anticoagulants and ulceration of the lesion. Patients were given written instructions to wet the wound in the shower after one or two days. A wound ,infection' event was recorded if the wound appeared inflamed or if the patient had been treated with antibiotics by any practitioner. Wound bleeding was recorded if the patient returned or attended elsewhere for management of bleeding. Results:, Sixty-seven wounds (7.25%) met the broad definition of ,infection' and 18 (1.9%) wounds suffered bleeding. Ulceration (odds ratio (OR) 3.15, P= 0.008) and use of antihypertensives (OR 2.5, P= 0.006) were independent risk factors for infection along with site and closure method. The patients who did not wet their wounds post-operatively were also at an increased risk of infection (OR 2.1, P= 0.018). Aspirin caused a slight, non-statistically significant increase in bleeding rate, and warfarin caused a larger, but still not statistically significant, increase in bleeding. Use of other anticoagulants caused a significant increase in bleeding (OR 10.9, P= 0.006). Conclusion:, Ulceration of the skin lesion and use of antihypertensives are significant risk factors for wound infection. Wetting surgical wounds with clean tap water does not increase, and may even reduce, wound infection rate. [source] |