Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Islet Transplantation (islet + transplantation)
Kinds of Islet Transplantation Selected AbstractsThe Anti-LFA-1 Trial in Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010J. Oberholzer The results of this small efalizumab study in islet transplantation are interesting but by no means definitive. See Article by Posselt et al on page 1870. [source] Rapamycin-Conditioned Donor Dendritic Cells Differentiate CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T Cells In Vitro with TGF-,1 for Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010K. L. Pothoven Dendritic cells (DCs) conditioned with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor rapamycin have been previously shown to expand naturally existing regulatory T cells (nTregs). This work addresses whether rapamycin-conditioned donor DCs could effectively induce CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs (iTregs) in cell cultures with alloantigen specificities, and whether such in vitro- differentiated CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs could effectively control acute rejection in allogeneic islet transplantation. We found that donor BALB/c bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) pharmacologically modified by the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin had significantly enhanced ability to induce CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs of recipient origin (C57BL/6 (B6)) in vitro under Treg driving conditions compared to unmodified BMDCs. These in vitro- induced CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs exerted donor-specific suppression in vitro, and prolonged allogeneic islet graft survival in vivo in RAG,/- hosts upon coadoptive transfer with T-effector cells. The CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs expanded and preferentially maintained Foxp3 expression in the graft draining lymph nodes. Finally, the CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs were further able to induce endogenous naïve T cells to convert to CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells. We conclude that rapamycin-conditioned donor BMDCs can be exploited for efficient in vitro differentiation of donor antigen-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs. Such in vitro- generated donor-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs are able to effectively control allogeneic islet graft rejection. [source] Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetics Using an Immunosuppressive Protocol Based on the Anti-LFA-1 Antibody EfalizumabAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010A. M. Posselt The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by renal and islet toxicities of currently available immunosuppressants. We describe a novel immunosuppressive regimen using the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab which permits long-term islet allograft survival while reducing the need for corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Eight patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by maintenance with efalizumab and sirolimus or mycophenolate. When efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in mid 2009, all patients were transitioned to regimens consisting of mycophenolate and sirolimus or mycophenolate and tacrolimus. All patients achieved insulin independence and four out of eight patients became independent after single-islet transplants. Insulin independent patients had no further hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased and renal function remained stable. Efalizumab was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were encountered. Although long-term follow-up is limited by discontinuation of efalizumab and transition to conventional imunnosuppression (including CNI in four cases), these results demonstrate that insulin independence after islet transplantation can be achieved with a CNI and steroid-free regimen. Such an approach may minimize renal and islet toxicity and thus further improve long-term islet allograft survival. [source] TLR4 Mediates Early Graft Failure After Intraportal Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2010Q. Gao We have previously shown that islet emboli in the portal vein block blood flow and induce local inflammatory reaction, resulting in functional loss of islet grafts following intraportal transplantation. This study was designed to test whether Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation mediates early islet graft failure. Syngeneic islet grafts were transplanted into chemically induced diabetic mice, and TLR deficient mice were used as donors and/or recipients of islet grafts. Islet viability, proinflammatory cytokines, high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) and NF-,B activation were analyzed by bioluminesce imaging (BLI), quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and histology. Early islet graft failure was observed in mice with intraportal islet engrafts with increased proinflammatory cytokines, HMGB1 expression, NF-,B activation, caspase-3 and TUNEL positive cells. Deficiency of TLR4 in donor, but not in recipient, inhibited NF-,B activation, reduced proinflammatory cytokines and improved viability of islet grafts. Blockade of HMGB1 with anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody (mAb, 2g7) inhibited inflammatory reactions, as evidenced by reduced TNF, and IL-1ß production, and improved islet viability. We conclude that TLR4 activation mediates early graft failure following intraportal islet transplantation. Inhibition of TLR4 activation represents a novel strategy to attenuate early graft failure following intraportal islet transplantation. [source] Positron Emission Tomography in Clinical Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2009O. Eriksson The fate of islets in clinical transplantation is unclear. To elude on this positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed for 60 min during islet transplantation in five patients receiving six transplants. A fraction of the islets (23%) were labeled with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) and carefully mixed with unlabeled islets just prior to intraportal transplantation. The peak radioactivity concentration in the liver was found at 19 min after start of islet infusion and corresponded to only 75% of what was expected, indicating that islets are lost during the transplantation procedure. No accumulation of radioactivity was found in the lungs. A nonphysiological peak of C-peptide was found in plasma during and immediately after transplantation in all subjects. Distribution in the liver was heterogeneous with wide variations in location and concentration. Islets found in areas with concentrations of >400 IEQ/cc liver tissue varied between 1% and 32% of the graft in different subjects. No side effects attributed to the PET/CT procedure were found. Clinical outcome in all patients was comparable to that previously observed indicating that the [18F]FDG labeling procedure did not harm the islets. The technique has potential to be used to assess approaches to enhance islet survival and engraftment in clinical transplantation. [source] Thrombomodulin Improves Early Outcomes After Intraportal Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2009W Cui Primary islet nonfunction due to an instant blood mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) leads to an increase in donor islet mass required to achieve euglycemia. In the presence of thrombin, thrombomodulin generates activated protein C (APC), which limits procoagulant and proinflammatory responses. In this study, we postulated that liposomal formulations of thrombomodulin (lipo-TM), due to its propensity for preferential uptake in the liver, would enhance intraportal engraftment of allogeneic islets by inhibiting the IBMIR. Diabetic C57BL/6J mice underwent intraportal transplantation with B10.BR murine islets. In the absence of treatment, conversion to euglycemia was observed among 29% of mice receiving 250 allo-islets. In contrast, a single infusion of lipo-TM led to euglycemia in 83% of recipients (p = 0.0019). Fibrin deposition (p < 0.0001), neutrophil infiltration (p < 0.0001), as well as expression TNF-, and IL-, (p < 0.03) were significantly reduced. Significantly, thrombotic responses mediated by human islets in contact with human blood were also reduced by this approach. Lipo-TM improves the engraftment of allogeneic islets through a reduction in local thrombotic and inflammatory processes. As an enzyme-based pharmacotherapeutic, this strategy offers the potential for local generation of APC at the site of islet infusion, during the initial period of elevated thrombin production. [source] Long-Term Insulin-Independence After Allogeneic Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes: Over the 10-Year MarkAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009T. Berney Results of islet of Langerhans transplantation have markedly improved in recent years, but most patients still lose insulin independence in the long-term. We report herein the longest (over 11 years) case of insulin independence after allogeneic islet transplantation. The subject had a 27-year history of type 1 diabetes and received a single islet-after-kidney graft of 8800 islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg, pooled from 2 donors. Insulin was discontinued by 3 months posttransplant and the patient has remained off insulin ever since. Yearly follow-up studies have revealed normal metabolic control, including normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Reasons for success may involve choice of immunosuppression, low metabolic demand and low immune responsiveness as suggested by an excellent HLA matching and a high count of circulating regulatory T cells. This observation is so far an exceptional case, but clearly demonstrates the validity of the concept that long-term insulin independence after allogeneic islet transplantation is an achievable target. [source] Financial Issues Constraining the Use of Pancreata Recovered for Islet Transplantation: A White PaperAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2008J. F. Markmann Islet transplantation is a very promising therapy for select patients with type 1 diabetes. Continued clinical investigation is required to define the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes before the procedure will be accepted as a standard of care even for those with the most severe manifestations of diabetes. Threatening successful accomplishment of these and other innovative studies designed to advance the field are the complex financial cost accounting issues that pose undue burden on organ procurement organizations and transplant centers trying to manage the costs of the pancreata from deceased donors needed to isolate islets. Compounding the problem is the recent ruling by CMS regarding ,intent to transplant' (CMS-1543-R Dec. 21, 2006: Allocation of Donor Acquisition Costs Incurred by Organ Procurement Organizations) that does not account for the clinical need to complete the manufacturing process for islets before suitability and transplant intent of the pancreata involved can be determined. We provide a consensus document supported by a diverse group of stakeholders in islet transplantation to suggest actions to address this problem. [source] Has Time Come for New Goals in Human Islet Transplantation?AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2008R. Lehmann The enthusiasm regarding clinical islet transplantation has been dampened by the long-term results. Concerns about the associated risks of life-long immunosuppression and the striking imbalance between potential recipients and available donor pancreata warrant changes in some of the current goals. Islet transplantation will never be a cure of type 1 diabetes in the majority of patients with no secondary complications, but is a valid option for a limited number of patients with brittle diabetes waiting for an organ or after organ transplantation. Furthermore, insulin independence should not be the main goal of islet transplantation, but avoidance of severe hypoglycemia and good glycemic control, which can be achieved with a relatively small functional beta-cell mass. Therefore, initially one islet infusion is sufficient. Retransplantation at a later time point remains an option, if glucose control deteriorates. Efforts to improve islet transplantation should no longer focus on islet isolation and immunosuppression, but rather on the low posttransplant survival rate of islets caused by activation of the coagulation pathway and the limited oxygen delivery to the islets. Transplantation of smaller islets be it naturally small or size tailored reaggregated islets has the potential to facilitate these processes. [source] Islet Transplantation for Brittle Type 1 Diabetes: The UIC ProtocolAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2008A. Gangemi This prospective phase 1/2 trial investigated the safety and reproducibility of allogeneic islet transplantation (Tx) in type I diabetic (T1DM) patients and tested a strategy to achieve insulin-independence with lower islet mass. Ten C-peptide negative T1DM subjects with hypoglycemic unawareness received 1,3 intraportal allogeneic islet Tx and were followed for 15 months. Four subjects (Group 1) received the Edmonton immunosuppression regimen (daclizumab, sirolimus, tacrolimus). Six subjects (Group 2) received the University of Illinois protocol (etanercept, exenatide and the Edmonton regimen). All subjects became insulin- independent. Group 1 received a mean total number of islets (EIN) of 1460 080 ± 418 330 in 2 (n = 2) or 3 (n = 2) Tx, whereas Group 2 became insulin- independent after 1 Tx (537 495 ± 190 968 EIN, p = 0.028). All Group 1 subjects remained insulin free through the follow-up. Two Group 2 subjects resumed insulin: one after immunosuppression reduction during an infectious complication, the other with exenatide intolerance. HbA1c reached normal range in both groups (6.5 ± 0.6 at baseline to 5.6 ± 0.5 after 2,3 Tx in Group 1 vs. 7.8 ± 1.1 to 5.8 ± 0.3 after 1 Tx in Group 2). HYPO scores markedly decreased in both groups. Combined treatment of etanercept and exenatide improves islet graft function and facilitates achievement of insulin-independence with less islets. [source] Pretransplant HLA Antibodies Are Associated with Reduced Graft Survival After Clinical Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2007P. M. Campbell Despite significant improvements in islet transplantation, long-term graft function is still not optimal. It is likely that both immune and nonimmune factors are involved in the deterioration of islet function over time. Historically, the pretransplant T-cell crossmatch and antibody screening were done by anti-human globulin,complement-dependent cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC). Class II antibodies were not evaluated. In 2003, we introduced solid-phase antibody screening using flow-based beads and flow crossmatching. We were interested to know whether pretransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies or a positive flow crossmatch impacted islet function post-transplant. A total of 152 islet transplants was performed in 81 patients. Islet function was determined by a positive C-peptide. Results were analyzed by procedure. Class I and class II panel reactive antibody (PRA) > 15% and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were associated with a reduced C-peptide survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). A positive T- and or B-cell crossmatch alone was not. Pretransplant HLA antibodies detectable by flow beads are associated with reduced graft survival. This suggests that the sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus-based immunosuppression may not control the alloimmune response in this presensitized population and individuals with a PRA > 15% may require more aggressive inductive and maintenance immunosuppression, or represent a group that may not benefit from islet transplantation. [source] West Nile Virus Encephalopathy Following Pancreatic Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2006N. R. Barshes No abstract is available for this article. [source] Antiangiogenic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Rapamycin on Islet Endothelium: Relevance for Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2006V. Cantaluppi Donor intra-islet endothelial cells contribute to neovascularization after transplantation. Several factors may interfere with this process and ultimately influence islet engraftment. Rapamycin, a central immunosuppressant in islet transplantation, is an mTOR inhibitor that has been shown to inhibit cancer angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rapamycin on islet endothelium. Rapamycin inhibited the outgrowth of endothelial cells from freshly purified human islets and the formation of capillary-like structures in vitro and in vivo after subcutaneous injection within Matrigel plugs into SCID mice. Rapamycin decreased migration, proliferation and angiogenic properties of human and mouse islet-derived endothelial cell lines with appearance of apoptosis. The expression of angionesis-related factors VEGF, ,V,3 integrin and thrombospondin-1 on islet endothelium was altered in the presence of rapamycin. On the other hand, rapamycin decreased the surface expression of molecules involved in immune processes such as ICAM-1 and CD40 and reduced the adhesion of T cells to islet endothelium. Our results suggest that rapamycin exerts dual effects on islet endothelium inducing a simultaneous inhibition of angiogenesis and a down-regulation of receptors involved in lymphocyte adhesion and activation. [source] Composite Islet-Endothelial Cell Grafts: A Novel Approach to Counteract Innate Immunity in Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2005Ulrika Johansson An instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) is elicited when islets come in contact with blood after intraportal transplantation. In contrast, endothelial cells (EC) readily tolerate contact with blood. A conceivable strategy to overcome IBMIR would be to create composite islet-EC grafts. Human islets were co-cultured with primary human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC) for 2,7 days to obtain 50,90% coverage. HAEC-coated islets were exposed to ABO-identical blood and analyzed with regard to clotting time, signs of inflammation and cell infiltration. Composite islet-HAEC graft survival was assessed after transplantation to athymic (nu/nu) nude mice. Exposed to blood, HAEC-coated islets induced less activation of coagulation and complement compared to control islets. Also, platelet and leukocyte consumption in blood was decreased. Clots with entrapped HAEC-coated islets showed less infiltration of CD11b+ cells. The extent of protection correlated to the level of HAEC coverage. Transplanted composite grafts stained positive for insulin and PECAM-1 demonstrating presence of both islets and HAEC within the islet graft 7 weeks after transplantation. Composite islet-HAEC grafts reduce all components of IBMIR. Refinement of the technique will allow introduction of composite islet-EC grafts in clinical islet transplantation, using autologous EC expanded in vitro and kept frozen until allogeneic islets become available for that specific recipient. [source] Islet transplantation: where do we stand now?,DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 3 2003Boaz Hirshberg Abstract After many years of limited success in islet transplantation, researchers developing this procedure have made great strides, and several centers have now reported that islet transplantation can result in long-term insulin independence for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The improved quality of life achieved in some islet allograft recipients suggests that this important line of investigation should proceed. Yet, several factors limit the technique and these hurdles must be overcome before it can be considered a practical treatment for the millions of individuals with diabetes, be it type 1 or type 2. Most obvious is the gross disparity between the number of islets available for clinical transplantation and the number of patients with diabetes who might benefit. Other important limitations, too often lost in the discussion, include complications associated with the technique itself, the toxicity of currently available immunosuppressive drugs, and the imperfect glycemia control achieved in most patients. In fact, our ongoing analysis as to whether transplantation-based therapy improves survival for patients with type 1 diabetes suggests that, for many at least, the opposite may be true. Two variables, as yet undefined, also need to be considered: (1) can the procedure, when done well, prevent or reverse diabetes-associated complications and (2) what are the long-term consequences of intrahepatic islets? Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Human islet cell transplantation , future prospectsDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 2 2001S. A. White Summary Background Islet transplantation has the potential to cure diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless despite successful reversal of diabetes in many small animal models, the clinical situation has been far more challenging. The aim of this review is to discuss why insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation has been so difficult to achieve. Methods A literature review was undertaken using Medline from 1975 to July 2000. Results reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) up to December 1998 were also analysed. Results Up to December 1998, 405 islet allotransplants have been reported the ITR. Of those accurately documented between 1990 and 1998 (n = 267) only 12% have achieved insulin-independence (greater than 7 days). However with refined peri-transplant protocols insulin indepedence at 1 year can reach 20%. Conclusions There are many factors which can explain the failure of achieving insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation. These include the use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents to abrogate both islet allo-immunity and auto-immunity, the critical islet mass to achieve insulin-independence and the detrimental effects of transplanting islets in an ectopic site. However recent evidence most notably from the Edmonton group demonstrates that islet allotransplantation still has great potential to become an established treatment option for diabetic patients. [source] Cotransplanted hepatic stellate cells enhance vascularization of islet allograftsMICROSURGERY, Issue 4 2007Zhenyu Yin M.D. Islet transplantation is an alternative to whole pancreas transplantation in curative therapy of diabetics. The outcome of engraftment of islet, however, remains disappointing. Rapid and adequate islet revascularization is crucial for the survival and function of transplanted islets. In this study, hepatic stellate cells (HSC) were cotransplanted with islet allografts, achieving marked prolongation of islet allografts. This was associated with enhanced revascularization within islet grafts as determined by anti-CD31 antibody staining. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 2007. [source] Experience with a Novel Efalizumab-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen to Facilitate Single Donor Islet Cell TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2010N. A. Turgeon Islet transplantation is an experimental therapy for selected patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). It remains limited by immunosuppressive drug toxicity, progressive loss of insulin independence, allosensitization and the need for multiple islet donors. We describe our experience with an efalizumab-based immunosuppressive regimen as compared to the prevailing standard regimen, the Edmonton protocol. Twelve patients with T1DM received islet transplants: eight were treated with the Edmonton protocol; four were treated with daclizumab induction, a 6-month course of tacrolimus, and maintenance with efalizumab and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was insulin independence after one islet infusion. Only two Edmonton protocol treated patients achieved the primary endpoint; six required islets from multiple donors, and all experienced leukopenia, mouth ulcers, anemia, diarrhea and hypertransaminasemia. Four became allosensitized. All patients treated with the efalizumab-based regimen achieved insulin independence with normal hemoglobin A1c after a single islet cell infusion and remained insulin independent while on efalizumab. These patients experienced significantly fewer side effects and none became allosensitized. Trial continuation was terminated by withdrawal of efalizumab from the market. These data suggest that this efalizumab-based regimen prevents islet rejection, is well tolerated, and allows for single donor islet transplantation. [source] Multicenter Analysis of Novel and Established Variables Associated with Successful Human Islet Isolation OutcomesAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010J. S. Kaddis Islet transplantation is a promising therapy used to achieve glycometabolic control in a select subgroup of individuals with type I diabetes. However, features that characterize human islet isolation success prior to transplantation are not standardized and lack validation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 806 isolation records from 14 pancreas-processing laboratories, considering variables from relevant studies in the last 15 years. The outcome was defined as postpurification islet equivalent count, dichotomized into yields ,315 000 or ,220 000. Univariate analysis showed that donor cause of death and use of hormonal medications negatively influenced outcome. Conversely, pancreata from heavier donors and those containing elevated levels of surface fat positively influence outcome, as did heavier pancreata and donors with normal amylase levels. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the positive impact on outcome of surgically intact pancreata and donors with normal liver function, and confirmed that younger donors, increased body mass index, shorter cold ischemia times, no administration of fluid/electrolyte medications, absence of organ edema, use of University of Wisconsin preservation solution and a fatty pancreas improves outcome. In conclusion, this multicenter analysis highlights the importance of carefully reviewing all donor, pancreas and processing parameters prior to isolation and transplantation. [source] Improving the Procedure for Detection of Intrahepatic Transplanted Islets by Magnetic Resonance ImagingAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2009M. L. Malosio Islet transplantation is an effective therapy for restoring normoglycemia in type-1 diabetes, but long-term islet graft function is achieved only in a minority of cases. Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets is an attractive option for "real-time" monitoring of graft evolution. So far, previous studies have been performed in the absence of a standardized labeling procedure and, besides a feasibility study in patients, the effectiveness and safety of various labeling approaches were tested only with high field magnets (4.7 T). In this study, we addressed: (a) standardization of a labeling procedure for human islets with clinically-approved contrast agent Endorem®, (b) safety aspects of labeling related to inflammation and (c) quality of imaging both at 7 T and 1.5 T. We have highlighted that the ratio of Endorem®/islet is crucial for reproducible labeling, with a ratio of 2.24 ug/IEQ, allowing successful in vivo imaging both with 1.5 T and 7.0 T magnets up to 143 days after intrahepatic transplant. With this standardized labeling procedure, labeled islets are neither inflamed nor more susceptible to inflammatory insults than unlabeled ones. This report represents an important contribution towards the development of a standardized and safe clinical protocol for the noninvasive imaging of transplanted islets in humans. [source] Financial Issues Constraining the Use of Pancreata Recovered for Islet Transplantation: A White PaperAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2008J. F. Markmann Islet transplantation is a very promising therapy for select patients with type 1 diabetes. Continued clinical investigation is required to define the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes before the procedure will be accepted as a standard of care even for those with the most severe manifestations of diabetes. Threatening successful accomplishment of these and other innovative studies designed to advance the field are the complex financial cost accounting issues that pose undue burden on organ procurement organizations and transplant centers trying to manage the costs of the pancreata from deceased donors needed to isolate islets. Compounding the problem is the recent ruling by CMS regarding ,intent to transplant' (CMS-1543-R Dec. 21, 2006: Allocation of Donor Acquisition Costs Incurred by Organ Procurement Organizations) that does not account for the clinical need to complete the manufacturing process for islets before suitability and transplant intent of the pancreata involved can be determined. We provide a consensus document supported by a diverse group of stakeholders in islet transplantation to suggest actions to address this problem. [source] Has Time Come for New Goals in Human Islet Transplantation?AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2008R. Lehmann The enthusiasm regarding clinical islet transplantation has been dampened by the long-term results. Concerns about the associated risks of life-long immunosuppression and the striking imbalance between potential recipients and available donor pancreata warrant changes in some of the current goals. Islet transplantation will never be a cure of type 1 diabetes in the majority of patients with no secondary complications, but is a valid option for a limited number of patients with brittle diabetes waiting for an organ or after organ transplantation. Furthermore, insulin independence should not be the main goal of islet transplantation, but avoidance of severe hypoglycemia and good glycemic control, which can be achieved with a relatively small functional beta-cell mass. Therefore, initially one islet infusion is sufficient. Retransplantation at a later time point remains an option, if glucose control deteriorates. Efforts to improve islet transplantation should no longer focus on islet isolation and immunosuppression, but rather on the low posttransplant survival rate of islets caused by activation of the coagulation pathway and the limited oxygen delivery to the islets. Transplantation of smaller islets be it naturally small or size tailored reaggregated islets has the potential to facilitate these processes. [source] Advances in pancreatic islet transplantation in humansDIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 1 2006Sulaiman A. Nanji With recent advances in methods of islet isolation and the introduction of more potent and less diabetogenic immunosuppressive therapies, islet transplantation has progressed from research to clinical reality. Presently, several international centres have demonstrated successful clinical outcomes with high rates of insulin independence after islet transplantation. Ongoing refinements in donor pancreas procurement and processing, developments in islet isolation and purification technology, and advances in novel immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to the acceptance of islet transplantation as a safe and effective therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. This review provides a historical perspective of islet transplantation, outlines the recent advances and current clinical outcomes, and addresses the present challenges and future directions in clinical islet transplantation. [source] Recent developments and future prospects in pancreatic and islet transplantationDIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 1 2001Nadey S. Hakim First page of article [source] Islet transplantation: where do we stand now?,DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 3 2003Boaz Hirshberg Abstract After many years of limited success in islet transplantation, researchers developing this procedure have made great strides, and several centers have now reported that islet transplantation can result in long-term insulin independence for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The improved quality of life achieved in some islet allograft recipients suggests that this important line of investigation should proceed. Yet, several factors limit the technique and these hurdles must be overcome before it can be considered a practical treatment for the millions of individuals with diabetes, be it type 1 or type 2. Most obvious is the gross disparity between the number of islets available for clinical transplantation and the number of patients with diabetes who might benefit. Other important limitations, too often lost in the discussion, include complications associated with the technique itself, the toxicity of currently available immunosuppressive drugs, and the imperfect glycemia control achieved in most patients. In fact, our ongoing analysis as to whether transplantation-based therapy improves survival for patients with type 1 diabetes suggests that, for many at least, the opposite may be true. Two variables, as yet undefined, also need to be considered: (1) can the procedure, when done well, prevent or reverse diabetes-associated complications and (2) what are the long-term consequences of intrahepatic islets? Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Prevalence of autoimmune diseases in islet transplant candidates with severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic lability: previously undiagnosed coeliac and autoimmune thyroid disease is identified by screeningDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007M. Walter Abstract Aims, Autoimmune diseases such as Addison's or coeliac disease can contribute to hypoglycaemia or malabsorption and are more common in Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). This brief report describes the prevalence of known and newly detected autoimmune disease in clinical islet transplant candidates with longstanding T1DM and severe hypoglycaemia and/or glycaemic lability who are routinely screened for coexisting autoimmune disease. Methods, One hundred and twenty-four C-peptide negative T1DM subjects [77 (62%) female, mean age 44 ± 9 years, diabetes duration 28 ± 11 years, body mass index 24.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2] with indications for clinical islet transplantation at the University of Alberta were screened for autoimmune disease by history and measurement of anti-transglutaminase antibodies (positive > 10 U/ml), 09.00 h cortisol (followed by adrenocorticotrophic hormone-stimulation if < 495 nmol/l) and thyroid-stimulating hormone to determine the prevalence of coeliac disease, Addison's disease and autoimmune thyroid disease, respectively. Results, Forty per cent of subjects had one or more coexisting autoimmune disease. The prevalence of autoimmune disease was 35%, coeliac disease 8% and Addison's disease 1.6%. In 11 individuals (9%), one or more autoimmune disease were newly detected (seven coeliac disease and five thyroid disease). Seven of 10 cases of coeliac disease were newly detected. A gluten-free diet in individuals with newly diagnosed coeliac disease reduced gastrointestinal symptoms, but indications for clinical islet cell transplantation persisted. Conclusions, Coexisting autoimmune disease is common in candidates for clinical islet cell transplantation. Screening in this group identified a substantial number of previously unrecognized cases. Clinicians should consider the presence of autoimmune disease even in the absence of classical symptoms. [source] Clinical islet transplant: current and future directions towards toleranceIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2003A. M. James Shapiro Summary:, The ultimate goal of islet transplantation is to completely correct the diabetic state from an unlimited donor source, without the need for chronic immunosuppressive drug therapy. Although islet transplantation provides an opportunity to develop innovative strategies for tolerance in the clinic, both alloimmune and autoimmune barriers must be controlled, if stable graft function is to be maintained long-term. After islet extraction from the pancreas, the cellular graft may be stored in tissue culture or cryopreserved for banking, providing an opportunity not only to optimally condition the recipient but also to allow in vitro immunologic manipulation of the graft before transplantation, unlike solid organ grafts. As such, islets may be considered a ,special case.' Remarkable progress has occurred in the last three years, with dramatic improvements in outcomes after clinical islet transplantation. The introduction of a steroid-free, sirolimus-based, anti-rejection protocol and islets prepared from two (or rarely three) donors led to high rates of insulin independence. The ,Edmonton Protocol' has been successfully replicated by other centers in an international multicenter trial. A number of key refinements in pancreas transportation, processing, purification on non-ficoll-based media, storage of islets in culture for two days and newer immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to continued advancement through extensive collaboration between key centers. This review outlines the historical development of islet transplantation over the past 30 years, provides an update on current clinical outcomes, and summarizes a series of unique opportunities for development and early testing of tolerance protocols in patients. [source] Preclinical evaluation of tolerance induction protocols and islet transplantation in non-human primatesIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2001Sean P. Montgomery Summary: Non-human primate studies of tolerance induction strategies in solid organ transplantation represent a critical bridge between studies in rodents and humans. Our work demonstrates that strategies involving the blockade of co-stimulatory molecules, especially the CD40,CD154 pathway, have great potential for clinical adaptation. While the combination of anti-CD154 antibody with blockade of the CD28 pathway reduced donor antibody production, graft survival was not significantly improved over that achieved with anti-CD154 antibody alone. Moreover, although long courses of steroids seem to interfere with this approach, it may be possible to combine blockade of the CD40,CD154 pathway with other conventional immunosuppressants without sacrificing efficacy. This is a key issue for reducing the risk associated with eventual clinical trials. Work in the non-human primate islet transplant model demonstrates that viable islets can be recovered, isolated and infused in a reliable fashion. It also confirms the efficacy of a steroid sparing approach to immunosuppression for islet transplantation. These data have been expanded to the kidney allograft model, setting the stage for kidney islet transplantation studies. Overall, tolerance induction and islet transplant studies in non-human primates permit the preclinical screening of promising immunomodulatory approaches developed in rodents and reduce the inherent uncertainties associated with adapting new regimens to the clinic. [source] Toward a cell-based cure for diabetes: advances in production and transplant of beta cellsMOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE: A JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2008Kathryn C. Claiborn Abstract Type 1 diabetes results from autoimmune destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells of the pancreatic islets of Langerhans. Although developments in exogenous insulin therapy have greatly improved clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes, the ability of the pancreatic beta cell to exquisitely regulate the delivery of insulin and maintain normal levels of blood glucose is still far superior to what can be achieved by external delivery of insulin. As a result, the majority of patients with type 1 diabetes still experience the complications of chronic hyperglycemia or serious and potentially life-threatening hypoglycemia. The shortcomings of medical therapy have driven research toward more direct approaches of beta cell replacement. Indeed, the specificity of beta cell loss in type 1 diabetes makes this disease a particularly attractive candidate for cell-based therapies. In order for significant progress to be made, however, a thorough understanding of beta cell biology and more broadly islet biology is necessary. This review addresses recent advances in developmental biology that have expanded our understanding of islet cell differentiation, assesses the promise and limitations of islet transplantation, and discusses the future of alternative sources of beta cells, including directed differentiation of stem cells, replication of adult beta cells, and transdifferentiation of nonislet cells to a beta cell fate. Mt Sinai J Med 75:362,371, 2008. © 2008 Mount Sinai School of Medicine [source] Clinical islet transplantation: a triumph of hope over experienceNEPHROLOGY, Issue 2002Jeremy Chapman [source] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||