			Home About us Contact

Invasion Impacts (invasion + impact)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 6 2005
KATHRYN A. YURKONIS
Summary 1Invading plant species often alter community structure, composition and, in some instances, reduce local diversity. However, the community dynamics underlying these impacts are relatively unknown. 2Declines in species richness with invasion may occur via displacement of resident species and/or reduction of seedling establishment by the invader. These two mechanisms differ in the demographic stage of the interaction. 3We document turnover dynamics using long-term permanent plot data to assess the mechanism(s) of invasion impacts of four exotic species on a mixed community of native and exotic species. These mechanisms were evaluated at both the neighbourhood (1-m2 plot) and population (individual species) scales. 4During invasion, species richness declined with increasing invader cover for three of the four invaders. All invaders reduced colonization rates, but had no effect on extinction rates at the neighbourhood scale. Populations differed in their susceptibility to invasion impacts, with significant reductions in colonization for 10 of 25 (40%) species and increases in extinction for only 4 of 29 (14%) species. 5At neighbourhood and population scales, influences of invasion on community dynamics were essentially the same for all invaders regardless of life-form. While individual resident species had some increase in extinction probability, community richness impacts were largely driven by colonization limitation. 6The consistency of invasion impacts across life-forms suggests establishment limitation as a general mechanism of invasion impact. This common causal mechanism should be explored in other systems to determine the extent of its generality. [source]

Detecting the effects of introduced species: a case study of competition between Apis and Bombus

OIKOS, Issue 3 2006
Diane M. Thomson
Developing tools for rapid assessment of introduced species impacts is one of the most important challenges in invasion ecology. Most assessments of impact rely on correlational data or other indirect measures. Yet few studies have evaluated invasion effects using multiple, simultaneously applied monitoring and experimental approaches, in order to compare easily obtained metrics with more difficult but direct measures of reproductive success or population dynamics. In this study, I use data from an experimental test of introduced honey bee (Apis mellifera) impacts on native bumble bees (Bombus spp.) to address two major questions: 1) how well did observational data on niche overlap and spatial correlations between Apis and Bombus predict the results of experimental tests of competitive effects? and 2) how well did effects of the experimental Apis manipulations on Bombus foragers, which are easy to observe, predict changes in reproductive success of colonies, which are difficult to measure? Niche overlap between Apis and Bombus varied substantially, but increased to levels as high as 80,90% during periods of resource scarcity. Correlations between numbers of Apis foragers and numbers of Bombus foragers were also highly variable, but I detected a significant negative relationship in only one of the seven months observed. In contrast, the experimental results showed that mean numbers of Bombus foragers observed on a given transect increased significantly with greater distance from introduced Apis colonies. Of these three measures (niche overlap, correlations in abundances, and effects of experimental introductions), only the experimental data on forager abundances accurately estimated competitive effects on colony reproductive success previously reported for the same experiment, and the correlational data in particular completely failed to predict the effects observed in the experimental study. This work suggests that great caution is warranted in making assessments of invasion impact on the basis of spatial or temporal correlations between invasive and native species. Thus, investing in even small and limited experimental studies may be more valuable than extensive observational work in quantifying invasion impacts. [source]

Matrix Models as a Tool for Understanding Invasive Plant and Native Plant Interactions

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2005
DIANE M. THOMSON
competencia; invasión biológica; plantas invasoras; modelo matricial; perturbación Abstract:,Demographic matrix models are an increasingly standard way to evaluate the effects of different impacts and management approaches on species of concern. Although invasive species are now considered among the greatest threats to biodiversity, matrix methods have been little used to explore and integrate the potentially complicated effects of invasions on native species. I developed stage-structured models to assess the impacts of invasive grasses on population growth and persistence of a federally listed (U.S.A.) endemic plant, the Antioch Dunes evening primrose (Oenothera deltoides subsp. howellii [Munz] W. Klein). I used these models to evaluate two frequently made assumptions: (1) when rare plant populations decline in invaded habitats, invasive species are the cause and (2) invasive plants suppress rare plants primarily through direct resource competition. I compared two control and two removal matrices based on previous experimental work that showed variable effects of invasive grasses on different life-history stages of O. deltoides. Matrix analysis showed that these effects translated into substantial changes in population growth rates and persistence, with control matrices predicting a mean stochastic population growth rate (,) of 0.86 and removal matrices predicting growth rates from 0.92 to 0.93. Yet even the most optimistic invasive removal scenarios predicted rapid decline and a probability of extinction near one in the next 100 years. Competitive suppression of seedlings had much smaller effects on growth rates than did lowered germination, which probably resulted from thatch accumulation and reduced soil disturbance. These results indicate that although invasive grasses have important effects on the population growth of this rare plant, invasion impacts are not solely responsible for observed declines and are likely to be interacting with other factors such as habitat degradation. Further, changes in the disturbance regime may be as important a mechanism creating these impacts as direct resource competition. My results highlight the value of demographic modeling approaches in creating an integrated assessment of the threats posed by invasive species and the need for more mechanistic studies of invasive plant interactions with native plants. Resumen:,Los modelos demográficos matriciales son una forma cada vez más utilizada para evaluar los efectos de diferentes impactos y métodos de gestión sobre las especies en cuestión. Aunque actualmente se considera a las plantas invasoras entre las mayores amenazas a la biodiversidad, los modelos matriciales han sido poco utilizados para explorar e integrar los efectos potencialmente complicados de las invasiones sobre las especies nativas. Desarrollé modelos estructurados por etapas para evaluar los impactos de pastos invasores sobre el crecimiento poblacional y la persistencia de una especie de planta endémica, enlistada federalmente (E.U.A.), Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii [Munz] W. Klein. Utilicé estos modelos para evaluar dos suposiciones frecuentes: (1) cuando las poblaciones de plantas raras declinan en hábitats invadidos, las especies invasoras son la causa y (2) las plantas invasoras suprimen a las plantas raras principalmente mediante la competencia directa por recursos. Comparé dos matrices de control y dos de remoción con base en trabajo experimental previo que mostró efectos variables de los pastos invasores sobre las diferentes etapas de la historia de vida de O. deltoides. El análisis de la matriz mostró que estos efectos se tradujeron en cambios sustanciales en las tasas de crecimiento y persistencia de la población, las matrices de control predijeron una tasa media de crecimiento poblacional estocástica (,) de 0.86 y las matrices de remoción predijeron tasas de crecimiento de 0.92-0.93. Aun los escenarios más optimistas de remoción de invasores predijeron una rápida declinación y una probabilidad de extinción en 100 años cerca de uno. La supresión competitiva de plántulas tuvo mucho menor efecto sobre las tasas de crecimiento que la disminución en la germinación, que probablemente resultó de la acumulación de paja y reducción en la perturbación del suelo. Estos resultados indican que, aunque los pastos invasores tienen efectos importantes sobre el crecimiento poblacional de esta planta rara, los impactos de la invasión no son los únicos responsables de las declinaciones observadas y probablemente están interactuando con otros factores como la degradación del hábitat. Más aun, los cambios en el régimen de perturbación pueden ser un mecanismo tan importante en la creación de estos impactos como la competencia directa por recursos. Mis resultados resaltan el valor del enfoque de los modelos demográficos para la evaluación integral de las amenazas de especies invasoras y la necesidad de estudios más mecanicistas de las interacciones de plantas invasoras con plantas nativas. [source]