Home About us Contact | |||
Intracellular Hyphae (intracellular + hyphae)
Selected AbstractsEricoid mycorrhizal fungi are common root inhabitants of non- Ericaceae plants in a south-eastern Australian sclerophyll forestFEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, Issue 2 2008Susan M. Chambers Abstract Fungi were isolated from the roots of 17 plant species from the families Apiaceae, Cunoniaceae, Cyperaceae, Droseraceae, Fabaceae-Mimosoideae, Lomandraceae, Myrtaceae, Pittosporaceae, Proteaceae and Stylidiaceae at a sclerophyll forest site in New South Wales, Australia. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence comparisons indicated that the isolated fungi had affinities to a range of ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and zygomycetes. Four RFLP types had closest affinities to previously identified Helotiales ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) or Oidiodendron spp. Isolates representing six RFLP types, which were variously isolated from all 17 plant species, formed ERM coils in hair root epidermal cells of Woollsia pungens (Ericaceae) under gnotobiotic conditions. Three of these isolates formed intercellular hyphae, intracellular hyphae and/or microsclerotia, which are typical of dark septate endophyte infection, in roots of Stylidium productum (Stylidiaceae), indicating an ability to form different types of association with roots of different hosts. Overall the data indicate that a broad range of plant taxa may act as repositories for ERM fungi in sclerophyll forest soil. [source] The distribution and expression of a biotrophy-related gene, CIH1, within the genus ColletotrichumMOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, Issue 4 2000Sarah E. Perfect During the biotrophic phase of the infection process of the hemibiotrophic anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, an intracellular hypha develops within epidermal cells of its host, Phaseolus vulgaris. This is followed by the formation of secondary hyphae during the necrotrophic phase. Previous work using a monoclonal antibody, UB25, has identified a glycoprotein that is specific to the interfacial matrix that forms between the wall of the intracellular hypha and the invaginated host plasma membrane. The gene encoding the protein identified by UB25 was cloned by immunoscreening and designated CIH1. The predicted amino acid sequence revealed a proline-rich glycoprotein, and biochemical evidence suggested that it formed a cross-linked structure at the biotrophic interface. Although CIH1 is a fungal gene, its product has several similarities to plant cell wall proteins. In this paper, we have surveyed the distribution and expression of CIH1 within the genus Colletotrichum, encompassing both necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic species. The results show that homologues of the CIH1 gene are present in all the Colletotrichum species tested. Northern blot studies of the time course of the infection process in planta have shown that CIH1 is expressed by both C. lindemuthianum in bean and C. trifolii in alfalfa during the biotrophic phase of fungal development. Immunofluorescence labelling of infected epidermal strips with UB25 revealed that the intracellular hyphae formed by C. destructivum as it infects alfalfa were specifically labelled in a similar way to those formed by C. lindemuthianum in bean. Northern and Western analysis showed that CIH1 was also expressed by C. lindemuthianum in vitro, though not constitutively. Overall, the evidence supports a role for CIH1 in biotrophy within the genus Colletotrichum. [source] Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: infection pathways, spatial distribution, and host responsesNEW PHYTOLOGIST, Issue 3 2007Michael Krings Summary ,,The Early Devonian Rhynie chert has been critical in documenting early land plant,fungal interactions. However, complex associations involving several fungi that enter into qualitatively different relationships with a single host plant and even interact with one another have not yet been detailed. ,,Here, we studied petrographic thin sections of the Rhynie chert plant Nothia aphylla. ,,Three fungal endophytes (co)occur in prostrate axes of this plant: narrow hyphae producing clusters of small spores; large spherical spores/zoosporangia; and wide aseptate hyphae that form intercellular vesicles in the cortex. Host responses on attack include bulging of infected rhizoids, formation of encasement layers around intracellular hyphae, and separation of infected from uninfected tissues by secondarily thickened cell walls. ,,A complex simultaneous interaction of N. aphylla with three endophytic fungi was discovered. The host responses indicate that some of the mechanisms causing host responses in extant plants were in place 400 million yr ago. Anatomical and life history features of N. aphylla suggest that this plant may have been particularly susceptible to colonization by fungi. [source] Orchid mycorrhiza: implications of a mycophagous life styleOIKOS, Issue 3 2009Hanne N. Rasmussen Orchid mycorrhiza probably affects about 25,000 plant species and thus roughly one tenth of all higher plants. Histologically, this symbiosis resembles other kinds of endomycorrhiza, the fungal hyphae growing within living plant cells. Considerable evidence, however, suggests that it is not a two-way exchange relationship and thus not potentially mutualistic, such as the wide-spread endomycorrhiza between plants and Glomalean fungi, known as arbuscular mycorrhiza. During the achlorophyllous seedling stage orchids are obligately dependent on the fungi; some species remain so through life, while others establish photosynthesis but to varying degrees remain facultatively dependent of /responsive to fungal infection as adults. None of the fungi involved are so far known to depend on the symbiosis with orchids. Transfer of organic carbon compounds from hyphae to the orchid has been demonstrated repeatedly, but it is not clear to what extent this takes place during a biotrophic phase while the intracellular hyphae remain intact, or during the subsequent extensive degradation of the hyphal coils. The advantage of viewing orchid mycorrhiza basically as a unilateral mycophagous relationship, in spite of hypothetical beneficial spin-offs to the mycobiont, is that it provides a conceptual framework similar to that of other parasitic or fungivore relationships; mechanisms known in such relationships could be searched for in future studies of the orchid,fungus symbiosis. These could include mechanisms for recognition, attraction and selection of fungi, physiological regulation of internal hyphal growth, breakdown, and material transfer, nutritional consequences of the plant's preference(s) and trophic changes, fungal avoidance mechanisms, and consequences at population and ecosystem levels. A whole range of possible life strategies becomes apparent that could support divergent evolution and lead to the proliferation of species that has indeed occurred in the orchid family. We outline some of the possible physiological mechanisms and ecological implications of this approach. [source] |