Internal Derangement (internal + derangement)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Body posture during sleep and disc displacement in the temporomandibular joint: a pilot study

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 2 2005
H. HIBI
summary, ,Many possible factors associated with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) have been discussed, but the causal factors remain unproven. The present study aimed to investigate habitual body posture during sleep (HBP) of patients with anterior disc displacement (ADD) in the TMJ. The sample comprised 87 patients (12 males, 75 females) aged 13,68 years (mean 25 years) and diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging as having unilateral or bilateral ADD in the TMJ. The HBPs were classified into five categories: supine, prone, right lateral, left lateral, and no-dominant positions. Of the 50 patients with the unilateral ADD, 33 (66%) had the ipsilateral HBP to the affected joint while none (0%) had the contralateral HBP. This contrast showed that the HBP was a possible contributing factor to the ADD. It was suggested that HBP allows the ipsilateral condyle to displace posteriorly and this posterior position causes relative ADD. [source]


The expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human temporomandibular joint samples: an immunohistochemical study

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 12 2002
H. Yoshida
summary, The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and to compare it with that control specimens. Expression of COX-2 in the TMJ disc and the synovial membrane in 26 human TMJ samples (internal derangement of TMJ; n=16, and control; n=10) was measured by an immunohistological technique using paraffin-embedded tissue and specific antihuman COX-2 polyclonal antibody. There were obvious distinction of COX-2 immunoreactivity between the control specimens and internal derangement cases, in the region of posterior and/or anterior loose connective tissues. In particular, intensive COX-2 expression was detected in the synovial membrane of internal derangement cases. The findings of the present study suggest that COX-2 might be an important mechanism regulating inflammation in the synovial membrane with internal derangement of TMJ. [source]


Effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 12 2001
P. Nicolakis
This study intended in evaluating the effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with craniomandibular disorders (CMD). Twenty consecutive patients suffering from CMD with anterior disc displacement without reduction consulting a CMD service were included in the study if they met following criteria: (i) pain in the temporomandibular region, (ii) reduced incisal edge clearance (<35 mm), (iii) magnet resonance imaging confirmed anterior disc displacement without reduction and (iv) evidence of postural dysfunction. All patients were assigned to a waiting list, serving as a no-treatment control period, according to a before,after trial. The treatment consisted of active and passive jaw movement exercises, correction of body posture and relaxation techniques. A total of 18 patients completed the study, no adverse effects occurred. Following main outcome measures were evaluated: (1) pain at rest (2) pain at stress (3) impairment (4) mouth opening at base-line, before and after treatment and at 6 month follow-up. As a result of treatment pain, impairment and mouth opening improved significantly more than during control period (paired samples t -test P < 0·05). After treatment four patients had no pain at all (chi-square: P < 0·05) and only seven patients revealed an impaired incisal edge clearance after treatment. (chi-square Test, P < 0·001). At follow up, seven patients had no pain and experienced no impairment. Exercise therapy seems to be useful in the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction. [source]


The distribution of cyclooxygenase-1 in human temporomandibular joint samples: an immunohistochemical study

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 6 2001
H. Yoshida
Cyclooxygenase-1,2 (COX-1,2) or prostaglandin (PG) H synthase, is the first enzyme of the pathway in which arachidonic acid is oxidized to PGs. Thus, we examined the expression of COX-1 in 16 human temporomandibular joint (TMJ) samples with internal derangement and in 10 control specimens by an immunohistological technique using paraffin-embedded tissue and specific antihuman COX-1 polyclonal antibody. There was obvious distinction of COX-1 immunoreactivity between the control specimens and internal derangement cases, at the endothelial cells and fibroblasts, in the region of posterior and/or anterior loose connective tissues and synovial membrane. The findings of the present study suggest that COX-1 might be an important mechanism for maintaining normal homeostasis at the endothelial cells and fibroblasts with internal derangement of TMJ. [source]


Temporomandibular joint sound evaluation with an electronic device and clinical evaluation

ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, Issue 2 2001
R. A. Tanzilli
Sound analysis to diagnose internal derangement has received much attention as an alternative to radiographic examination. The purpose of this study was to compare findings with an electronic device (sonography) and clinical examination to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Twenty-three symptomatic patients (46 joints) were evaluated for this study. All patients had jaw joint pain and one or more of the following findings; limitation of jaw opening, painful mandibular movement with or without clicking or crepitation. The presence or absence of joint sounds was evaluated clinically by palpation and auscultation and with sonography. If sounds were present (clicking or crepitation) on either examination the patient was considered positive for disc displacement for that examination. Two by two tables were constructed comparing sonography and clinical examination with MRI findings. The sensitivity of the sonogram was 84% and the specificity was 33% when compared with MRI findings. The sensitivity of the clinical examination was 70% and the specificity was 40% when compared with MRI findings. This study suggests that clinical and sonographic examination has a high sensitivity (low false negative examinations) but low specificity (high false positive examinations). [source]