Home  About us  Contact
 

Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators (internal + cardioverter_defibrillator)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

An Unusual Cause of Syncope in a Patient with an Internal Cardioverter Defibrillator

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2009
SLIM KACEM M.D.
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Utilization of Defibrillators and Resynchronization Therapy at the Time of Evaluation at a Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Center

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2010
DANIEL B. SIMS M.D.
Background: Internal cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduce mortality, but are underutilized in routine clinical practice. The use of these devices in patients at the time of an initial evaluation at an advanced heart failure and cardiac transplantation center is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who were enrolled in a database examining parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients at the time of an initial outpatient evaluation at a tertiary care center. Rates of ICD and CRT use in eligible patients were determined. Results: Two hundred two patients had an average age of 54 ± 13 years and an average peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) of 12.5 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min. Of 97 patients eligible for an ICD only, 57% had an ICD at the time of evaluation. Sixty-four percent of ICD-eligible male patients had an ICD compared to 36% of ICD-eligible female patients (P = 0.015). Of 105 patients meeting criteria for CRT, 54% had a CRT device. There was no difference between CRT use in eligible male and female patients. Conclusions: ICDs and CRT are underutilized in patients with severe CHF at the time of evaluation at a tertiary care center despite young age, objective functional limitation, and active consideration for advanced CHF therapies. Female patients have lower rates of ICD use than male patients. (PACE 2010; 988,993) [source]

Underutilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Systolic Dysfunction

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2010
JERRY M. JOHN M.D.
Background: Evaluation of the need for prophylactic internal cardiac defibrillators among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies should be deferred until at least 3 months after revascularization procedures to allow adequate time for recovery of ventricular function. Methods: Among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the proportion of patients who are risk stratified postoperatively with reassessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown. Results: One hundred and six patients with LVSD (LVEF < 40%) who underwent CABG during 2004,2006 and survived 3 months post CABG were evaluated. Follow-up was assessed by chart review and telephone contact. LVEF was not reassessed in 24% (25/106) of the population, none of whom underwent internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Of those with LVEF reassessed, persistent LVSD was present in 20/81 (25%), 12 of whom were referred for prophylactic ICD placement. Conclusion: One-fourth of patients with LVSD who undergo CABG do not have LVEF reassessed postoperatively which may lead to underutilization of ICDs. (PACE 2010; 33:727,733) [source]

Opening an Occluded Subclavian Vein with a Screw-Like Flexible Hollow Guide-wire and Venoplasty

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2007
SETH JOSEPH WORLEY M.D.
Patients with existing internal cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) often require upgrading to a biventricular ICD for treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). Placement of a left ventricular (LV) lead can be technically challenging in the best of circumstances. A subclavian vein stenosis or occlusion related to previously placed leads adds a major obstacle to a successful implant. We report a technique of implanting an LV lead from the same side as the existing ICD system despite complete occlusion of the subclavian vein. [source]

Upgrading Patients with Chronic Defibrillator Leads to a Biventricular System and Reducing Patient Risk: Contralateral LV Lead Placement

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2006
DAVID J. FOX
Increasing numbers of patients with indwelling single- or dual- chamber internal cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) will require upgrading of an existing system to a biventricular ICD providing cardiac resynchronization with back-up defibrillation. Upgrading, usually by the addition of a new left ventricular (LV) lead, can be technically challenging with central venous occlusion or stenosis often being the main obstacle to a successful procedure. We report a new technique of implanting a LV lead from the contralateral side to the existing ICD system to minimize the peri- and postoperative risk to the patient. [source]