Home About us Contact | |||
Integrase Inhibitors (integrase + inhibitor)
Selected AbstractsSafety and Efficacy of Raltegravir in HIV-Infected Transplant Patients Cotreated with Immunosuppressive DrugsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009L. Tricot Solid organ transplantations (SOT) are performed successfully in selected HIV-infected patients. However, multiple and reciprocal drug,drug interactions are observed between antiretroviral (ARV) drugs and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) through CYP450 metabolization. Raltegravir (RAL), a novel HIV-1 integrase inhibitor, is not a substrate of CYP450 enzymes. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 13 HIV-infected transplant patients treated by an RAL + two nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen, in terms of tolerability, ARV efficacy (plasma viral load, CD4 cell count), drug interactions, RAL pharmacokinetics and transplant outcome. Thirteen patients with liver (n = 8) or kidney (n = 5) transplantation were included. RAL was initiated (400 mg BID) either at time of transplantation (n = 6), or after transplantation (n = 7). Median RAL trough concentration was 507 ng/mL (176,890), which is above the in vitro IC95 for wild type HIV-1 strains (15 ng/mL). Target trough levels of CNIs were promptly obtained with standard dosages of tacrolimus or cyclosporine. RAL tolerability was excellent. There was no episode of acute rejection. HIV infection remained controlled. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range: 6,14), all patients were alive with satisfactory graft function. The use of an RAL + two NRTI-based regimen is a good alternative in HIV-infected patients undergoing SOT. [source] Current therapy of HIVJOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, Issue 1 2010Anja Verena Potthoff Summary Antiretroviral therapy has improved continuously. Almost every year a new drug has been approved. Nucleoside analogs still build the backbone of antiretroviral therapy. They inhibit reverse transcriptase and thus the transcription of RNA to DNA. They are combined with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors. New therapeutic approaches are attachment or entry inhibitors, integrase inhibitors and maturation inhibitors. Multiple prospective multicenter studies have proven the life prolonging effect of antiretroviral therapy. With the optimal therapy life expectancy of HIV patients is only slightly reduced, similar to that of those with chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. One result of the higher age of HIV patients is an increase in concomitant diseases and medications. Drug interactions have to be considered and avoided. There has been a long discussion about the best time point to start antiretroviral therapy. In the late 1990s, every infected patient was treated hoping to eliminate the virus, ignoring the CD4+ cell count and viral load. This caused multiple (long-term) side effects and a rising resistance problem. The guidelines now recommend starting therapy at about 350/,l CD4 lymphocytes. Due to its complexity antiretroviral therapy should be initiated and monitored in specialized centers. [source] Phenotypic analysis of the sensitivity of HIV-1 to inhibitors of the reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase using a self-inactivating virus vector systemJOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, Issue 3 2001Gergely Jármy Abstract Conventional phenotypic analysis of resistance of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to antiviral therapy is time-consuming and requires culture of infectious virus. Although phenotypic analyses may be desirable, rapid generation of test results and decentralized availability of the test system will be important to achieve utility in the clinical practice. This study describes the design of an alternative phenotypic resistance test using replication incompetent viral vectors. Chimeric HIV vectors containing a marker gene were generated. The env and most of the regulatory and accessory genes of HIV were removed. In addition, the 3,U3 region was deleted to obtain a self-inactivating construct. Cotransfection of the plasmid with a plasmid that provided the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein resulted in the production of replication-incompetent virus vectors. Infection of susceptible cells with the vectors led to marker gene expression. Vector production in the presence of protease (PR) inhibitors, or infection in the presence of reverse transcriptase (RT) or integrase (IN) inhibitors reduced marker gene expression in a dose-dependent manner. Marker gene activity was preserved at higher drug levels if vectors contained RT and PR genes from resistant virus isolates. Sensitivity to nucleoside and non-nucleoside RT inhibitors, protease and integrase inhibitors could be determined in 10 working days. The phenotypic drug resistance test using replication-incompetent HIV vectors significantly speeds up drug resistance measurements and allows testing at reduced biosafety levels. This will make clinical use of phenotypic assessment of antiviral resistance more feasible. J. Med. Virol. 64:223,231, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] HIV-1 integrase inhibitors: 2005,2006 updateMEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS, Issue 1 2008Raveendra Dayam Abstract HIV-1 integrase (IN) catalyzes the integration of proviral DNA into the host genome, an essential step for viral replication. Inhibition of IN catalytic activity provides an attractive strategy for antiretroviral drug design. Currently two IN inhibitors, MK-0518 and GS-9137, are in advanced stages of human clinical trials. The IN inhibitors in clinical evaluation demonstrate excellent antiretroviral efficacy alone or in combination regimens as compared to previously used clinical antiretroviral agents in naive and treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients. However, the emergence of viral strains resistant to clinically studied IN inhibitors and the dynamic nature of the HIV-1 genome demand a continued effort toward the discovery of novel inhibitors to keep a therapeutic advantage over the virus. Continued efforts in the field have resulted in the discovery of compounds from diverse chemical classes. In this review, we provide a comprehensive report of all IN inhibitors discovered in the years 2005 and 2006. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 28, No. 1, 118,154, 2008 [source] The chemokine system and CCR5 antagonists: potential in HIV treatment and other novel therapiesJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2009H. Dhami PharmD (Student) Summary Since the recognition of human acquired immune deficiency syndrome, numerous classes of pharmacologic therapeutics have been developed to manage the disease. Current therapy includes co-administration of combinations of drugs classified by their mechanism of action as ,transcriptase inhibitors', ,protease inhibitors', ,integrase inhibitors' and the more recent ,fusion inhibitors'. This review focuses on the chemokine system and the recognition of chemokine receptors as targets for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy. The FDA-approved chemokine (C,C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist maraviroc (Selzentry®) is discussed in detail, along with another compound vicriviroc, currently in clinical trials. The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and current status of research on CCR5 antagonists is described. Further, potential therapeutic uses of these agents other than anti-HIV therapy are discussed. [source] |