Home About us Contact | |||
Individual Physicians (individual + physician)
Selected AbstractsThe Relationship between Health Plan Performance Measures and Physician Network Overlap: Implications for Measuring Plan QualityHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, Issue 4 2010Daniel D. Maeng Objective. To examine the extent to which health plan quality measures capture physician practice patterns rather than plan characteristics. Data Source. We gathered and merged secondary data from the following four sources: a private firm that collected information on individual physicians and their health plan affiliations, The National Committee for Quality Assurance, InterStudy, and the Dartmouth Atlas. Study Design. We constructed two measures of physician network overlap for all health plans in our sample and linked them to selected measures of plan performance. Two linear regression models were estimated to assess the relationship between the measures of physician network overlap and the plan performance measures. Principal Findings. The results indicate that in the presence of a higher degree of provider network overlap, plan performance measures tend to converge to a lower level of quality. Conclusions. Standard health plan performance measures reflect physician practice patterns rather than plans' effort to improve quality. This implies that more provider-oriented measurement, such as would be possible with accountable care organizations or medical homes, may facilitate patient decision making and provide further incentives to improve performance. [source] Thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients: A Multicenter Qualitative study,,JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, Issue 5 2009Deborah Cook MD Abstract BACKGROUND: Observational studies have documented that medical patients infrequently receive venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention. OBJECTIVE: To understand the barriers to, and facilitators of, optimal thromboprophylaxis. PATIENTS: Hospitalized medical patients. DESIGN: We conducted in-depth interviews with 15 nurses, 6 pharmacists, 12 physicians with both clinical and managerial experience, and 3 hospital administrators. SETTING: One university-affiliated and 2 community hospitals. INTERVENTION: Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were reviewed and interpreted independently in duplicate. MEASUREMENT: Analysis was conducted using grounded theory. RESULTS: Physicians and pharmacists affirmed that evidence supporting heparin is strong and understood. Clinicians, particularly nurses, reported that mobilization was important, but were uncertain about how much mobilization was enough. Participants believed that depending on individual physicians for VTE prevention is insufficient. The central finding was that multidisciplinary care was also perceived as a barrier to effective VTE prevention because it can lead to unclear accountability by role confusion. Participants believed that a comprehensive, systems approach was necessary. Suggestions included screening and risk-stratifying all patients, preprinted orders at hospital admission that are regularly reevaluated, and audit and feedback programs. Patient or family-mediated reminders, and administrative interventions, such as hiring more physiotherapists and profiling thromboprophylaxis in hospital accreditation, were also endorsed. CONCLUSIONS: Universal consideration of thromboprophylaxis finds common ground in multidisciplinary care. However, results of this qualitative study challenge the conviction that either individual physician efforts or multidisciplinary care are sufficient for optimal prevention. To ensure exemplary medical thromboprophylaxis, clinicians regarded coordinated, systemwide processes, aimed at patients, providers, and administrators as essential. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2009;4:269,275. © 2009 Society of Hospital Medicine. [source] Assessment of the practicing physician: Challenges and opportunitiesTHE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue S1 2008Eric S. Holmboe MDArticle first published online: 4 DEC 200 Abstract Despite spending a substantial amount of time in structured educational settings during early medical training, most physicians will spend the majority of their career in clinical practice. In the clinical practice setting, physicians become responsible for determining and implementing their own educational program in order to maintain, at a minimum, competence. Pressure to change the nature of continuing medical education (CME) parallels pressure from patients, payers, and policymakers to hold individual physicians more accountable for the care they provide. How can these two forces be brought together more deliberately and effectively? Comprehensive physician assessment provides such an opportunity with the potential to benefit all parties involved in health care, especially patients and physicians. Many assessment methods and tools exist today that can facilitate the integration of CME and quality. Using a multifaceted physician-level performance assessment system has substantial potential to align the public's need and desire to ensure their physician is competent, at a minimum, with providing the physician with meaningful, actionable information and data to improve performance and engage in transformative learning. CME programs need to incorporate more robust assessment as part of the learning activity to facilitate improvements in health care more directly. [source] Stemming the tide: Cognitive aging theories and their implications for continuing education in the health professionsTHE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue 3 2003Dr. Kevin W. Eva PhD Assistant Professor Abstract As demographic drift among health care providers mimics that of the larger population, it becomes increasingly clear that theory pertaining to the impact of aging on cognitive processing should inform the continuing education efforts designed for health care professionals. The purpose of this article is to offer a critical review of the major theories in this area and outline a sample of the implications that can be derived from these views. Research articles examining the relationship between age and physician performance were identified using MEDLINE, PsychLit, and ERIC. In addition, the psychology literature on age-related changes in cognitive processing was reviewed. Evidence from the medical education literature and psychological theory suggest the importance of increased environmental supports, decreased time demands, and peer review programs as barriers against the impact of aging. The implications of these findings include the potential to tailor continuing education (and physician remediation) efforts toward the age-related abilities/deficiencies of individual physicians. [source] Historical perspective: Neurological advances from studies of war injuries and illnesses,ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 4 2009Douglas J. Lanska MD Early in the 20th century during the Russo-Japanese War and World War I (WWI), some of the most important, lasting contributions to clinical neurology were descriptive clinical studies, especially those concerning war-related peripheral nerve disorders (eg, Hoffmann-Tinel sign, Guillain-Barré-Strohl syndrome [GBS]) and occipital bullet wounds (eg, the retinal projection on the cortex by Inouye and later by Holmes and Lister, and the functional partitioning of visual processes in the occipital cortex by Riddoch), but there were also other important descriptive studies concerning war-related aphasia, cerebellar injuries, and spinal cord injuries (eg, cerebellar injuries by Holmes, and autonomic dysreflexia by Head and Riddoch). Later progress, during and shortly after World War II (WWII), included major progress in understanding the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injuries by Denny-Brown, Russell, and Holbourn, pioneering accident injury studies by Cairns and Holbourn, promulgation of helmets to prevent motorcycle injuries by Cairns, development of comprehensive multidisciplinary neurorehabilitation by Rusk, and development of spinal cord injury care by Munro, Guttman, and Bors. These studies and developments were possible only because of the large number of cases that allowed individual physicians the opportunity to collect, collate, and synthesize observations of numerous cases in a short span of time. Such studies also required dedicated, disciplined, and knowledgeable investigators who made the most out of their opportunities to systematically assess large numbers of seriously ill and injured soldiers under stressful and often overtly dangerous situations. Ann Neurol 2009;66:444,459 [source] Management of patients with non,ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the pursuit trialCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S5 2000Dan J. Fintel M.D The glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide (INTEGRILIN®, COR Therapeutics, Inc., South San Francisco, California, and Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey) is a novel and highly potent antithrombotic agent indicated for the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The approval of eptifibatide for non-ST-segment elevation ACS was based on the positive results of the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial. With enrollment of almost 11,000 patients, not only is the PURSUIT trial the largest trial of a GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor to date, but it is also the largest clinical study ever conducted in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS. The key feature of the PURSUIT trial is that patient management closely resembled standard clinical practice, because decisions about the use and timing of invasive cardiac procedures were made by the individual physicians rather than being prespecified in the study protocol. Eptifibatide therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint,a composite of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (14.2 vs. 15.7% in the placebo group; p = 0.042). Of importance is the fact that the beneficial effect of eptifibatide was independent of the management strategy pursued during study drug infusion (invasive or conservative), and it was achieved with few major safety concerns. These findings demonstrate that the use of eptifibatide should be considered for all patients presenting with signs and symptoms of intermediate- to high-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS. [source] |