Inhibitor Toxicity (inhibitor + toxicity)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Kinds of Inhibitor Toxicity

  • calcineurin inhibitor toxicity


  • Selected Abstracts


    Mycophenolate mofetil introduction stabilizes and subsequent cyclosporine A reduction slightly improves kidney function in pediatric renal transplant patients: A retrospective analysis

    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2006
    Kerstin Benz
    Abstract: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the major cause of late graft loss. Among others, chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNI) contributes to the development of CAN. Therefore, reduction in CNI dosage may delay the development of CAN, leading to longer graft survival. It was the aim of the present retrospective analysis to investigate the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) addition with subsequent cyclosporine A (CSA) reduction on renal function in pediatric kidney allograft recipients. Seventeen patients (aged 8.3,17.6 yr) with monotherapy with CSA and progressive loss of renal function at a median of 3.4 yr after kidney transplantation were enrolled. After at least three months of MMF treatment, CSA dosage was stepwise reduced to trough levels of 100, 80, and 60 ng/mL. In all patients, introduction of MMF prevented a further decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The mean GFR 12 months before study enrollment was 96.1±24.5 and 71.0±21.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at start of MMF. After introduction of MMF and unchanged CSA dosage GFR was stabilized to 71.1±23.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. After CSA reduction to trough levels of 60 ng/mL, GFR was slightly ameliorated up to 76.3±24.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. Within the follow-up period, one borderline rejection occurred in a patient in whom the CSA trough level was 60 ng/mL since seven months. In pediatric kidney allograft recipients with progressive loss of renal function reduction of CSA after introduction of MMF may stabilize and even slightly ameliorate renal function. [source]


    An Integrated View of Molecular Changes, Histopathology and Outcomes in Kidney Transplants

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2010
    P. F. Halloran
    Data-driven approaches to deteriorating kidney transplants, incorporating histologic, molecular and HLA antibody findings, have created a new understanding of transplant pathology and why transplants fail. Transplant dysfunction is best understood in terms of three elements: diseases, the active injury,repair response and the cumulative burden of injury. Progression to failure is mainly attributable to antibody-mediated rejection, nonadherence and glomerular disease. Antibody-mediated rejection usually develops late due to de novo HLA antibodies, particularly anti-class II, and is often C4d negative. Pure treated T cell-mediated rejection does not predispose to graft loss because it responds well, even with endothelialitis, but it may indicate nonadherence. The cumulative burden of injury results in atrophy-fibrosis (nephron loss), arterial fibrous intimal thickening and arteriolar hyalinosis, but these are not progressive without ongoing disease/injury, and do not explain progression. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity has been overestimated because burden-of-injury lesions invite this default diagnosis when diseases such as antibody-mediated rejection are missed. Disease/injury triggers a stereotyped active injury,repair response, including de-differentiation, cell cycling and apoptosis. The active injury,repair response is the strongest correlate of organ function and future progression to failure, but should always prompt a search for the initiating injury or disease. [source]


    De novo Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Renal Allograft Biopsies,Role of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010
    A. A. Satoskar
    The most common cause of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in renal allografts is thought to be calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) can also cause TMA, but its true impact on de novo TMA is unknown. In a retrospective review of renal allograft biopsies from January 2003 to December 2008 at our institution, we determined the prevalence of TMA in patients with C4d positive (n = 243) and C4d negative (n = 715) biopsies. Over 90% of patients received cyclosporine in both groups. De novo TMA was seen in 59 (6.1%) patients; most of them (55%) with C4d positive biopsy. Among patients with C4d positive biopsies, 13.6% had TMA, as compared to only 3.6% patients with C4d negative biopsies (p < 0.0001). Incidence of graft loss between C4d positive and C4d negative TMA groups was not significantly different, but 70% of patients with C4d positive TMA who received plasmapheresis had slightly lower graft loss rate. In biopsies with AMR-associated TMA, glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were significantly more prominent. AMR is the most common cause of TMA in renal allografts in our patient population. It is important to recognize AMR-related TMA because plasmapheresis treatment may be beneficial. [source]


    Kidney Transplantation in Previous Heart or Lung Recipients

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2009
    B. E. Lonze
    Outcomes after heart and lung transplants have improved, and many recipients survive long enough to develop secondary renal failure, yet remain healthy enough to undergo kidney transplantation. We used national data reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to evaluate outcomes of 568 kidney after heart (KAH) and 210 kidney after lung (KAL) transplants performed between 1995 and 2008. Median time to kidney transplant was 100.3 months after heart, and 90.2 months after lung transplant. Renal failure was attributed to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in most patients. Outcomes were compared with primary kidney recipients using matched controls (MC) to account for donor, recipient and graft characteristics. Although 5-year renal graft survival was lower than primary kidney recipients (61% KAH vs. 73.8% MC, p < 0.001; 62.6% KAL vs. 82.9% MC, p < 0.001), death-censored graft survival was comparable (84.9% KAH vs. 88.2% MC, p = 0.1; 87.6% KAL vs. 91.8% MC, p = 0.6). Furthermore, renal transplantation reduced the risk of death compared with dialysis by 43% for KAH and 54% for KAL recipients. Our findings that renal grafts function well and provide survival benefit in KAH and KAL recipients, but are limited in longevity by the general life expectancy of these recipients, might help inform clinical decision-making and allocation in this population. [source]


    Detection of Acute Tubulointerstitial Rejection by Proteomic Analysis of Urinary Samples in Renal Transplant Recipients

    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2005
    Stefan Wittke
    This study investigates proteomic analysis of urinary samples as a non-invasive method to detect acute rejection of renal allografts. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) was used to analyze urinary samples in 19 patients with different grades of subclinical or clinical acute rejection (BANFF Ia to IIb), 10 patients with urinary tract infection and 29 patients without evidence of rejection or infection. A distinct urinary polypeptide pattern identified 16 out of 17 cases of acute tubolointerstitial rejection, but was absent in two cases of vascular rejection. Urinary tract infection resulted in a different polypeptide pattern that allowed to differentiate between infection and acute rejection in all cases. Potentially confounding variables such as acute tubular lesions, tubular atrophy, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, proteinuria, hematuria, allograft function and different immunosuppressive regimens did not interfere with test results. Blinded analysis of samples with and without rejection showed correct diagnosis by CE-MS in the majority of cases. Detection of acute rejection by CE-MS offers a promising non-invasive tool for the surveillance of renal allograft recipients. Further investigation is needed to establish polypeptide patterns in vascular rejection and to explore whether changes in the urinary proteome occur before the onset of histologically discernible rejection. [source]