Inappropriate Utilization (inappropriate + utilization)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Do competition and managed care improve quality?

HEALTH ECONOMICS, Issue 7 2002
Nazmi SariArticle first published online: 22 JUL 200
Abstract In recent years, the US health care industry has experienced a rapid growth of managed care, formation of networks, and an integration of hospitals. This paper provides new insights about the quality consequences of this dynamic in US hospital markets. I empirically investigate the impact of managed care and hospital competition on quality using in-hospital complications as quality measures. I use random and fixed effects, and instrumental variable fixed effect models using hospital panel data from up to 16 states in the 1992,1997 period. The paper has two important findings: First, higher managed care penetration increases the quality, when inappropriate utilization, wound infections and adverse/iatrogenic complications are used as quality indicators. For other complication categories, coefficient estimates are statistically insignificant. These findings do not support the straightforward view that increases in managed care penetration are associated with decreases in quality. Second, both higher hospital market share and market concentration are associated with lower quality of care. Hospital mergers have undesirable quality consequences. Appropriate antitrust policies towards mergers should consider not only price and cost but also quality impacts. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]


Explaining the use and non-use of community-based long-term care services by caregivers of persons with dementia

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 3 2001
Maureen Markle-Reid RN MScN PhD (Cand.)
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to synthesize and critically evaluate the current literature that explains the use and non-use of formal community-based long-term care services by caregivers of persons with dementia. There are four issues related to formal community service use by caregivers: reluctance to initiate formal services; under-utilization of available services; delayed utilization of services; and inappropriate utilization of services. Despite substantial research efforts to understand these issues, the reasons for low rates of community service use by this population remains unclear. Common methodological problems and limitations in the underlying theoretical assumptions in the literature, as they relate to caregivers of persons with dementia, have limited the usefulness of the current research for informing practice and policy. A conflict-theory model of decision-making is proposed as an alternative theoretical framework for understanding the particularity and complexity of the decision-making process leading up to the initiation of formal service use. Utilization of formal services is a result of a complex and subjective decision-making process that is unrelated to objective circumstances. The proposed conflict theory model of decision-making can inform policy and practice regarding the development of appropriate, timely and individualized interventions to facilitate the use of formal services by caregivers of persons with dementia. [source]


Predictors of inappropriate utilization of intravenous proton pump inhibitors

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 5 2007
W. AFIF
Summary Background, Inappropriate use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors is prevalent. Aim, To assess appropriateness of intravenous proton pump inhibitor prescribing. Methods, Retrospective review of in-patient prescribing of intravenous pantoprazole over a 2-month period in 2004, in an academic centre. Prescribing was deemed appropriate before and after endoscopic haemostasis, and in fasting individuals requiring a proton pump inhibitor. Results, Amongst 107 patients, 49 (46%) had upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, 33 (31%, 95% CI: 22,41%) received appropriate therapy (indication, dose and duration), 61 (57%, 95% CI: 47,67%) had an inappropriate indication, and 13 (12%, 95% CI: 7,20%) had an incorrect treatment dose or duration. Therapy was appropriate in 20 (41%, 95% CI: 27,55%) with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and 13 (22%, 95% CI: 12,33%) in the non-upper gastrointestinal bleeding group. Appropriate prescribing rates decreased (from 41% to 16%, 95% on difference CI: 14,38%) when considering intravenous proton pump inhibitor use while awaiting endoscopy as inappropriate. Significant predictors of inappropriate use were increasing age and decreasing mean daily dose, with a trend for prescriptions written during evening shifts. Conclusion, Inappropriate intravenous proton pump inhibitor utilization was most frequent in the non-upper gastrointestinal bleeding group, mostly for unrecognized indications. Educational interventions to optimize utilization should target prescribing in older patients, those receiving lower mean daily doses, and, perhaps, prescribing outside regular hours. [source]


Misdiagnosis of epileptic and non-epileptic seizures in a neurological intensive care unit

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2010
F. Boesebeck
Boesebeck F, Freermann S, Kellinghaus C, Evers S. Misdiagnosis of epileptic and non-epileptic seizures in a neurological intensive care unit. Acta Neurol Scand: 122: 189,195. © 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. Objective,,, The etiological misinterpretation of paroxysmal neurological symptoms frequently causes a delayed treatment or an inappropriate utilization of ICU-capacities. Methods,,, In this study, the data of 208 patients admitted to a neurological ICU because of acute transient neurological deficits, loss of consciousness or unclear motor phenomena were retrospectively analyzed. The initial emergency room diagnosis was compared to the final diagnosis and the rate of misdiagnosis was related to the patients' history and diagnostic data. Results,,, In 13.9%, the emergency room diagnosis of epileptic seizures turned out to be incorrect, whereas in 15.6%, the final diagnosis of epileptic seizures was missed in the emergency room. Factors that were significantly correlated to missing the seizure diagnosis were (i) no prior history of epilepsy, (ii) old age, (iii) multi-morbidity, (iv) pathologic CT-scans demonstrating cerebrovascular lesions, (v) seizure description by non-professionals, (vi) predominantly negative seizure phenomena (aphasia, loss of consciousness, paresis), (vii) lack of tongue-bite lesions. [source]