Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Inappropriate Shocks (inappropriate + shock)
Selected AbstractsInappropriate Shock and Pacing?JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2003AMIN AL-AHMAD M.D. [source] Simultaneous Atrial and Ventricular Anti-Tachycardia Pacing as a Novel Method of Rhythm DiscriminationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2006SAMIR SABA M.D. Background: Inappropriate shocks remain a problem in patients with defibrillators (ICD). Objective: To evaluate a new discrimination algorithm for supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular (VT) tachycardias, based on the response to simultaneous (A+V) atrial (A) and ventricular (V) anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods: Patients undergoing electrophysiological testing or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation were enrolled (N = 32) and underwent A+V ATP through a Marquis ICD with investigational software. If persisting after ATP, the rhythm was classified as VT if the first electrical event was sensed on the V channel and as an SVT otherwise. Results: Arrhythmia sequences (N = 275; 53 VT; 222 SVT) were analyzed in 26 patients (age = 51 ± 17 years, 13 men, LVEF = 0.49 ± 0.14). In response to A+V ATP, 55% of SVT versus 41% of VT episodes were terminated (P = NS). Termination of VT but not of SVT was more likely with faster (50% at ATP/arrhythmia cycle length (CL) = 0.81 vs 8% at ATP/arrhythmia CL = 0.88, P = 0.02) but not with longer ATP bursts (P = NS). Of the 115 arrhythmias that persisted after A+V ATP, the algorithm correctly classified 24 of 24 VT (GEE-adjusted sensitivity = 100%) and 85 of 91 SVT (GEE-adjusted specificity = 93%). Proarrhythmia was noted after two A+V ATP, in the form of atrial fibrillation induction and VT acceleration. Conclusions: We describe a new algorithm that can discriminate between SVT and VT with a high sensitivity and specificity. This form of ATP can terminate 55% of SVT sequences. The performance of this new algorithm merits further testing in a large population of dual-chamber ICD patients. [source] Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Malfunction due to Mechanical Failure of the Header ConnectionJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2004R. ANDREW PICKETT III M.D. Four cases of ICD system malfunction occurring within the Medtronic Marquis family over a limited time frame are reported. These cases shared a common element of defective connections between the header post and the right ventricular pace/sense terminal pin that required intervention and reconnection. Inappropriate shocks occurred in two cases. The circumstances of these cases provide important information about the potential difficulties with these devices and highlight the deficiencies of the current system in tracking and analyzing device-related problems. [source] Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Children and Young Adults with Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 10 2001BARRY A. LOVE M.D. SVT in Pediatric ICD Recipients.Introduction: Rapidly conducted supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) can lead to inappropriate device therapy in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. We sought to determine the incidence of SVTs and the occurrence of inappropriate ICD therapy due to SVT in a pediatric and young adult population. Methods and Results: We undertook a retrospective review of clinical course, Holter monitoring, and ICD interrogations of patients receiving ICD follow-up at our institution between March 1992 and December 1999. Of 81 new ICD implantations, 54 eligible patients (median age 16.5 years, range 1 to 48) were identified. Implantation indications included syncope and/or spontaneous/inducible ventricular arrhythmia with congenital heart disease (30), long QT syndrome (9), structurally normal heart (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]) (7), and cardiomyopathies (7). Sixteen patients (30%) received a dual-chamber ICD. SVT was recognized in 16 patients, with 12 of 16 having inducible or spontaneous atrial tachycardias. Eighteen patients (33%) received , 1 appropriate shock(s) for VT/VF; 8 patients (15%) received inappropriate therapy for SVT. Therapies were altered after an inappropriate shock by increasing the detection time or rate and/or increasing beta-blocker dosage. No single-chamber ICD was initially programmed with detection enhancements, such as sudden onset, rate stability, or QRS discriminators. Only one dual-chamber defibrillator was programmed with an atrial discrimination algorithm. Appropriate ICD therapy was not withheld due to detection parameters or SVT discrimination programming. Conclusion: SVT in children and young adults with ICDs is common. Inappropriate shocks due to SVT can be curtailed even without dual-chamber devices or specific SVT discrimination algorithms. [source] Rationale and Design of the OPTION Study: Optimal Antitachycardia Therapy in ICD Patients without Pacing IndicationsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2010CHRISTOF KOLB M.D. Background:,Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent the treatment of choice for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death but ICD therapy is also plagued by inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Dual-chamber (DC) ICDs are considered to exhibit an enhanced discrimination performance in comparison to single-chamber (SC) ICDs, which results in reduction of inappropriate detections in a short- to mid-term follow-up. Comparative data on long-term follow-up and especially on inappropriate shocks are limited. Methods:,The aim of the OPTION study is to assess whether an optimized treatment with DC ICDs improves patient outcome and decreases the rate of inappropriate shocks in comparison to SC ICDs. DC ICD therapy optimization is achieved by optimal customizing of antitachycardia therapy parameters, activation of discrimination algorithms, antitachycardia pacing in the slow ventricular tachycardia zone, and avoidance of right ventricular pacing with the SafeR algorithm mode. The OPTION study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel study, will randomize 450 patients on a 1:1 allocation to either an SC arm with backup pacing at VVI 40 beats per minute (bpm) or to the DC arm with SafeR pacing at 60 bpm. Patients will be followed for 27 months. Primary outcome measure is the time to first occurrence of inappropriate shock and a combined endpoint of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. Conclusion:,The study will evaluate the relative performance of DC in comparison to SC ICDs in terms of inappropriate shock reduction and patient outcome. (PACE 2010; 33:1141,1148) [source] Supraventricular Arrhythmia Induction by an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in a Patient with Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2010FARIBORZ AKBARZADEH M.D. A 23-year-old woman with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and history of frequent unexplained syncope had undergone implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. She had experienced frequent inappropriate shocks since implantation due to T-wave oversensing. After one of the syncopal attacks, she was found to have an atrioventricular (AV)-reentrant tachycardia, induced by a high-voltage shock, with rapid degeneration to atrial fibrillation and then ventricular fibrillation. The AV-reentrant tachycardia was believed to be the cause of both syncopal attacks and inappropriate shocks. The patient has been asymptomatic after ablation of the accessory pathway. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of induction of an AV-reentrant tachycardia by a high-voltage implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. (PACE 2010; 33:372,376) [source] A Rare type of Ventricular Oversensing in ICD Therapy,Inappropriate ICD Shock Delivery Due to Triple CountingPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010MICHAEL GUENTHER M.D. Irregular sensing by triple counting of wide QRS complexes resulted in inappropriate shocks in a patient with a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD): A 66-year-old male patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy, left bundle branch block, and impaired left ventricular function received a biventricular ICD for optimal therapy of heart failure (CHF). Two years after implantation, the patient experienced recurrent unexpected ICD shocks without clinical symptoms of malignant tachyarrhythmia, or worsened CHF. The patient's condition rapidly worsened, with progressive cardiogenic shock and electrical,mechanical dissociation. After unsuccessful resuscitation of the patient the interrogation of the ICD showed an initial triple counting of extremely wide and fragmented QRS complexes with inappropriate shocks. (PACE 2010; 33:e17,e19) [source] Experience with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Grown-Ups with Congenital Heart DiseasePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2008MAREN TOMASKE M.D. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are increasingly implanted for primary or secondary prevention of sudden death in young patients with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies, or channelopathies. Although major advances in ICD technology and implant techniques have facilitated ICD therapy in young patients, complications such as lead failures, inappropriate shocks, system infections, and negative psychosocial impacts are of concern. The various underlying cardiovascular disease states and a lack of standardized ICD protocols for young patients often necessitate individualized implant techniques, ICD programming, and follow-up. Young ICD patients need a thorough follow-up to ensure adequate therapy, and psychosocial problems have to be addressed. [source] Long-Term Structural Failure of Coaxial Polyurethane Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator LeadsPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2002ROBERT G. HAUSER HAUSER, R.G., et al.: Long-Term Structural Failure of Coaxial Polyurethane Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads. Transvene models 6936/6966, a coaxial polyurethane ICD lead, may be prone to structural failure. These models comprise 54% of ICD lead failures in the authors' Multicenter Registry database. Because ICD leads perform a vital function, the clinical features, causes, and probability of Transvene 6936/6966 lead failure were determined. The Registry and United States Food and Drug Administration databases were queried for the clinical features and structural causes of the Transvene 6936/6966 lead failure, and a five-center substudy estimated the survival probability for 521 Transvene 6936/6966 implants. The mean time to failure was 4.8 ± 2.1 years, and the estimated survival at 60 and 84 months after implant were 92% and 84%, respectively. Oversensing was the most common sign of failure (76%), and 24 patients experienced inappropriate shocks. The manufacturer's reports indicated that high voltage coil fracture and 80A polyurethane defects were the predominant causes of lead failure. Transvene models 6936 and 6966 coaxial polyurethane ICD leads are prone to failure over time. Patients who have these leads should be evaluated frequently. Additional studies are needed to identify safe management strategies. [source] Washing Machine Associated 50 Hz Detected As Ventricular Fibrillation by An Implanted Cardioverter DefibrillatorPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2001XAVIER SABATÉ SABATÉ, X., et al.: Washing Machine Associated 50 Hz Detected As Ventricular Fibrillation by An Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator. This case report describes a patient with an automatic ICD who suffered a defibrillation shock without warning symptoms. An electrical interference can be observed in the stored EGM of the episode. The patient explained that the moment he felt the shock he was touching a washing machine. After correct grounding of this machine the patient did not suffer more inappropriate shocks. [source] Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation LeadPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2001RAINER GRADAUS GRADAUS, R., et al.: Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead. Dual-chamber ICDs are increasingly used to avoid inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachycardias. Additionally, many ICD patients will probably benefit from dual chamber pacing. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraoperative performance and short-term follow-up of an innovative single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and ventricle. Implantation of this single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead was successful in all 13 patients (age 63 ± 8 years; LVEF 0.44 ± 0.16; New York Heart Association [NYHA] 2.4 ± 0.4, previous open heart surgery in all patients). The operation time was 79 ± 29 minutes, the fluoroscopy time 4.7 ± 3.1 minutes. No perioperative complications occurred. The intraoperative atrial sensing was 1.7 ± 0.5 mV, the atrial pacing threshold product was 0.20 ± 0.14 V/ms (range 0.03,0.50 V/ms). The defibrillation threshold was 8.8 ± 2.7 J. At prehospital discharge and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, atrial sensing was 1.9 ± 0.9, 2.1 ± 0.5, and 2.7 ± 0.6 mV, respectively, (P = NS, P < 0.05, P < 0.05 to implant, respectively), the mean atrial threshold product 0.79, 1.65, and 1.29 V/ms, respectively. In two patients, an intermittent exit block occurred in different body postures. All spontaneous and induced ventricular arrhythmias were detected and terminated appropriately. Thus, in a highly selected patient group, atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing with a single lead is possible under consideration of an atrial pacing dysfunction in 17% of patients. [source] A Prospective Randomized-Controlled Trial of Ventricular Fibrillation Detection Time in a DDDR Ventricular DefibrillatorPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2000KENNETH A. ELLENBOGEN Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with dual chamber and dual chamber rate responsive pacing may offer hemodynamic advantages for some ICD patients. Separate ICDs and DDDR pacemakers can result in device to device interactions, inappropriate shocks, and underdetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The objectives of this study were to compare the VF detection times between the Ventak AV II DR and the Ventak AV during high rate DDDR and DDD pacing and to test the safety of dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. Patients receiving an ICD were randomized in a paired comparison to pacing at 150 beats/min (DDD pacing) or 175 beats/min (DDDR pacing) during ICD threshold testing to create a "worst case scenario" for VF detection. The VF detection rate was set to 180 beats/min, and VF was induced during high rate pacing with alternating current. The device was then allowed to detect and treat VF. The induction was repeated for each patient at each programmed setting so that all patients were tested at both programmed settings. Paired analysis was performed. Patient characteristics were a mean age of 69 ± 11 years, 78% were men, coronary artery disease was present in 85%, and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34 ± 0.11. Fifty-two episodes of VF were induced in 26 patients. Despite the high pacing rate, all VF episodes were appropriately detected. The mean VF detection time was 2.4 ± 1.0 seconds during DDD pacing and 2.9 ± 1.9 seconds during DDDR pacing (P = NS). DDD and DDDR programming resulted in appropriate detection of all episodes of VF with similar detection times despite the "worst case scenario" tested. Delays in detection may be seen with long programmed ventricular refractory periods which shorten the VF sensing window and may be avoided with dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. [source] | ||||||||||