Home About us Contact | |||
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation (implantable + cardioverter_defibrillator_implantation)
Selected AbstractsAre MADIT II Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation Appropriate for Chinese Patients?JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2010CHUNG-WAH SIU M.B.B.S. MADIT II Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter.,Background: MADIT-II demonstrated that prophylactic implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) device prevents sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). It remains unclear whether the MADIT-II criteria for ICD implantation are appropriate for Chinese patients. Methods and Results: We compared the clinical characteristics and outcome for a cohort of consecutive Chinese patients who satisfied MADIT-II criteria for ICD implantation with the original published MADIT-II population. Seventy consecutive patients who satisfied MADIT-II criteria but did not undergo ICD implantation (age: 67 years, male: 77%) were studied. Their baseline demographics were comparable with the original MADIT-II cohort with the exception of a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus. After follow-up of 35 months, most deaths (78%) were due to cardiac causes (72% due to SCD). The 2-year SCD rate (10.0%) was comparable with that of the MADIT-II conventional group (12.1%), but higher than the MADIT-II defibrillator group (4.9%). Similarly, the 2-year non-SCD rate was 3.0%, also comparable with the MADIT-II conventional group (4.6%), but lower than the MADIT-II defibrillator group (7.0%). Cox regression analysis revealed that advance NYHA function class (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 3.5, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.48,8.24, P = 0.004) and the lack of statin therapy (HR: 3.7, 95%CI: 1.35,10.17, P = 0.011) were independent predictors for mortality in the MADIT-II eligible patients. Conclusion: Chinese patients who satisfy MADIT-II criteria for ICD implantation are at similar risk of SCD and non-SCD as the original MADIT-II subjects. Implantation of an ICD in Chinese patients is appropriate. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 231,235, March 2010) [source] The Effect of Induction Method on Defibrillation Threshold and Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle LengthJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2006ENDRE ZIMA M.D. Introduction: Since no clinical data are available on the comparison of the "shock on T-wave" and "high frequency burst" ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction modes during defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing, we aimed to compare these two methods during implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Methods: The DFT was determined with a step-down protocol using biphasic, anodal polarity (100%, 40%, 20% voltage control) shocks. Patients were randomized: VF was induced by 50 Hz burst in group B (n = 45) and T-wave shock in group T (n = 41). The DFT was defined as the lowest energy level that terminated VF; confirmed DFT (DFTc) was defined as the minimal energy level that consecutively terminated VF twice. Success rate of DFTc was calculated during an intraindividual test for the alternate induction method. Results: A total of 546 episodes of VF were induced: n = 278 (B) vs n = 268 (T). Incidence of VT during inductions was 9.9% (B) vs 2.7% (T), P < 0.05. Neither the DFT, 8.8 ± 4.0 J (B) vs 9.7 ± 4.2 J (T), nor the DFTc, 10.6 ± 5.1 J (B) vs 10.8 ± 4.2 J (T), proved to be significantly different. A significant correlation was found between VF cycle length (CL) and the concomitant DFT (r = 0.298, P < 0.05) in group T only. Subgroup analysis of patients under chronic class III antiarrhythmic treatment showed no increase of the DFT in either group and significantly lower incidence of VT induction in group T regardless of antiarrhythmic treatment. Conclusion: The DFT and the VFCL proved to be independent of the VF induction method. The T-wave shock was more unlikely to induce VT during DFT testing. These results suggest that both methods are reliable in DFT determination, though T-wave shock application is a more reliable method for DFT testing. [source] Supraventricular Arrhythmia Induction by an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in a Patient with Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2010FARIBORZ AKBARZADEH M.D. A 23-year-old woman with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and history of frequent unexplained syncope had undergone implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. She had experienced frequent inappropriate shocks since implantation due to T-wave oversensing. After one of the syncopal attacks, she was found to have an atrioventricular (AV)-reentrant tachycardia, induced by a high-voltage shock, with rapid degeneration to atrial fibrillation and then ventricular fibrillation. The AV-reentrant tachycardia was believed to be the cause of both syncopal attacks and inappropriate shocks. The patient has been asymptomatic after ablation of the accessory pathway. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of induction of an AV-reentrant tachycardia by a high-voltage implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. (PACE 2010; 33:372,376) [source] Pacemaker Malfunctions in Danon's DiseasePACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 1 2008ELENA MARRAS M.D. We describe a case of a 30-year-old man with Danon's disease, an X-linked genetic disorder due to deficiency of lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2 with secondary intracytoplasmatic glycogen and autophagic material storage. This disease is characterized by skeletal muscle involvement, mental retardation, ophthalmic abnormalities, and cardiac disease. In this patient, cardiac involvement was characterized by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young age, preexcitation, and parossistic atrioventriular block. The patient underwent to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation for conduction disorders and for primary prevention of sudden death, a frequent event in Danon's disease. This case report describes cardiac involvement with conduction disorders and multiple pacemaker malfunctions in Danon's disease. [source] |