Home About us Contact | |||
Implant Loss (implant + loss)
Selected AbstractsA systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 2008Part I: Lateral approach Abstract Objectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of grafts and implants placed with sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify studies on sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Results: The search provided 839 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 175 articles resulting in 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 12,020 implants. Meta-analysis indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 3.48% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.48%,4.88%] translating into a 3-year implant survival of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.4%,92.8%). However, when failure rates was analyzed on the subject level, the estimated annual failure was 6.04% (95% CI: 3.87%,9.43%) translating into 16.6% (95% CI: 10.9%,24.6%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: The insertion of dental implants in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation is a predictable treatment method showing high implant survival rates and low incidences of surgical complications. The best results (98.3% implant survival after 3 years) were obtained using rough surface implants with membrane coverage of the lateral window. [source] A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar techniqueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 2008Wah Ching Tan Abstract Objectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of implants placed in sites with transalveolar sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on transalveolar sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates/ year proportions. Results: The search provided 849 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 176 articles, resulting in 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 2.48% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.37,4.49%) translating to an estimated survival rate of 92.8% (95% CI): 87.4,96.0%) for implants placed in transalveolarly augmented sinuses, after 3 years in function. Furthermore, subject-based analysis revealed an estimated annual failure of 3.71% (95% CI: 1.21,11.38%), translating to 10.5% (95% CI: 3.6,28.9%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: Survival rates of implants placed in transalveolar sinus floor augmentation sites are comparable to those in non-augmented sites. This technique is predictable with a low incidence of complications during and post-operatively. [source] Clinical Experiences of CNC-Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1-Year Prospective StudyCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2000Anders Örtorp LDS ABSTRACT Background: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality. Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant-supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)-milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function. Material and Methods: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC-milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1-year data were collected for both the test and control groups. Results: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow-up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant-supported over-denture due to implant loss. The 1-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group. Conclusion: CNC-milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function. [source] Modified implant surfaces show different biofilm compositions under in vivo conditionsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 8 2009Birte Größner-Schreiber Abstract Objective: Plaque accumulation on implant surfaces can result in peri-implantitis with potential implant loss. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of zirconium nitride (ZrN) as a potential implant surface on the biofilm composition and diversity in vivo. Material and methods: ZrN- or titanium (Ti)-coated glass specimens and ZrN or roughened Ti discs were used as substrates. Pure glass and polished titanium served as controls. The specimens were mounted on removable intraoral splints in five adults. After 24 h of intraoral exposure, the biofilms were analyzed applying single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP analysis) of 16S rRNA genes. Sequence analysis of the dominant bands excised from the SSCP fingerprints allowed to taxonomically describe bacteria derived from biofilm samples. Results: The highest number of bands was counted on pure glass and Ti 800. ZrN-coated glass and ZrN-coated titanium discs showed the lowest values for species richness. However, no significant differences were observed regarding the diversity of the identified bacterial species among all the surfaces examined. A total of 46 different bacteria were identified. The dominant bands within the fingerprints indicated bacteria belonging to the Streptococcus group as identified by their 16S rDNA sequence. Conclusion: A coating of glass surfaces with ZrN significantly reduced the species richness in early bacterial colonization but the diversity was not significantly changed. In consideration of the results obtained by this and former studies a ZrN coating appears to rather modify the quantity of early bacterial adherence than the quality of the microbial community structure. [source] Turned, Machined Versus Double-Etched Dental Implants In VivoCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2007B. Al-Nawas Priv.-Doz., DrMed, DrMedDent ABSTRACT Background:, Positive effects on the clinical outcome of moderately rough implant surfaces are described. Intercomparison of clinical data, however, is rarely found. Purpose:, The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of two macroscopically identical implants, the one with a turned, machined and the other with an etched surface. Materials and Methods:, In a retrospective cohort study, the included implants followed the criteria: standard surgical protocol, >12 months in situ; minimally rough self-threading implants with a turned, machined surface (Mk IITM Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden], n=210); etched implants of the same macrodesign (3iTM Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA], n=151), length , 10 mm. Clinical data and implant success were rated. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest® (Siemens AG, Bensheim, Germany) were measured and related to the corresponding implant survival rate in the respective group. Results:, The total number of implants was 361, of which 264 (73%) were subject to clinical reexamination. RFA and Periotest could be recorded in 25% of the implants. Neither clinically relevant nor statistically significant differences between the surface designs were found in the RFA (64 ± 8.6 vs 63 ± 9.7), in Periotest (,2 ± 3.3 vs ,1 ± 5.1), and in mean survival periods (49 months, 95% confidence interval CI]: 46,51 months, for the turned vs 46 months, 95% CI: 43,49 months, for the double-etched implant). After osteoplastic procedures, a significantly higher rate of implant losses in the turned, machined implant group was observed (17 vs 1) with a mean survival period of 43 (40,46) months for the turned and 46 (45,48) months for the double-etched implants. Conclusion:, No difference between implants with two different minimally rough surfaces was found. A positive effect of surface roughness is observed in poor quality bone, but the pivotal proof of this effect is still lacking. [source] |