Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Analytical Review (analytical + review)
Selected AbstractsFacial Soft Tissue Depths in Craniofacial Identification (Part I): An Analytical Review of the Published Adult Data,JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, Issue 6 2008Carl N. Stephan Ph.D. Abstract:, With the ever increasing production of average soft tissue depth studies, data are becoming increasingly complex, less standardized, and more unwieldy. So far, no overarching review has been attempted to determine: the validity of continued data collection; the usefulness of the existing data subcategorizations; or if a synthesis is possible to produce a manageable soft tissue depth library. While a principal components analysis would provide the best foundation for such an assessment, this type of investigation is not currently possible because of a lack of easily accessible raw data (first, many studies are narrow; second, raw data are infrequently published and/or stored and are not always shared by some authors). This paper provides an alternate means of investigation using an hierarchical approach to review and compare the effects of single variables on published mean values for adults whilst acknowledging measurement errors and within-group variation. The results revealed: (i) no clear secular trends at frequently investigated landmarks; (ii) wide variation in soft tissue depth measures between different measurement techniques irrespective of whether living persons or cadavers were considered; (iii) no clear clustering of non-Caucasoid data far from the Caucasoid means; and (iv) minor differences between males and females. Consequently, the data were pooled across studies using weighted means and standard deviations to cancel out random and opposing study-specific errors, and to produce a single soft tissue depth table with increased sample sizes (e.g., 6786 individuals at pogonion). [source] Facial Soft Tissue Depths in Craniofacial Identification (Part II): An Analytical Review of the Published Sub-Adult Data,JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, Issue 6 2008Carl N. Stephan Ph.D. Abstract:, Prior research indicates that while statistically significant differences exist between subcategories of the adult soft tissue depth data, magnitudes of difference are small and possess little practical meaning when measurement errors and variations between measurement methods are considered. These findings raise questions as to what variables may or may not hold meaning for the sub-adult data. Of primary interest is the effect of age, as these differences have the potential to surpass the magnitude of measurement error. Data from the five studies in the literature on sub-adults which describe values for single integer age groups were pooled and differences across the ages examined. From 1 to 18 years, most soft tissue depth measurements increased by less than 3 mm. These results suggest that dividing the data for children into more than two age groups is unlikely to hold many advantages. Data were therefore split into two groups with the division point corresponding to the mid-point of the observed trends and main data density (0,11 and 12,18 years; division point = 11.5 years). Published sub-adult data for seven further studies which reported broader age groups were pooled with the data above to produce the final tallied soft tissue depth tables. These tables hold the advantages of increased sample sizes (pogonion has greater than 1770 individuals for either age group) and increased levels of certainty (as random and opposing systematic errors specific to each independent study should average out when the data are combined). [source] International Dimensions of the Audit Fee Determinants LiteratureINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, Issue 1 2002Phillip E. Cobbin A review of the literature in the area of audit fee determinants includes fifty-six studies drawn from seventeen countries over the period 1980 to 2000. The review starts with work initially based in the US market and then shows that attention spread almost immediately to a number of other markets, some of which were similar in structure to that of the US including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand and Ireland. A second extension of this work has seen studies based on data drawn from markets including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, South Africa, The Netherlands and Norway. The comparative, analytical review highlights the use of a core audit fee determinants model that is used and adapted in a limited way, to reflect market specific circumstances and to address market specific issues. The review indicates some consistency across markets in respect of generic variables identified as core determinants of the level of audit fees. There is little evidence in the literature to indicate historical, cultural, institutional or other market-specific factors being addressed in a systematic way, particularly in respect of developing countries. [source] Importance of long-term research in classical biological control: an analytical review of a release against the cabbage seedpod weevil in North AmericaJOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 8 2006D. R. Gillespie Abstract:, Cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham) (Col., Curculionidae), is an invasive alien pest that is spreading in North America. To aid with planning for introductions of European parasitoids in North America, we examined the status of the only classical biological control release against this pest in North America, which in 1949 introduced Mesopolobus morys, Stenomalina gracilis and Trichomalus perfectus (Hym., Pteromalidae). Weevils and parasitoids were reared in 2005 from mass collections of seedpods of Brassica napus, Brassica rapa and Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae) from 18 sites in the Fraser Valley, near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Of the three European parasitoid species that were originally released, only S. gracilis was found. The predominant hymenopterous parasitoid species were Trichomalus lucidus, S. gracilis, Mesopolobus moryoides (Pteromalidae), Necremnus tidius (Eulophidae) and Eupelmus vesicularis (Eupelmidae). These constituted over 97% of the parasitoids reared, although overall parasitism was low. Only M. moryoides is clearly North American in distribution; other than S. gracilis, the remaining species were either accidentally introduced or are Holarctic in distribution. Based on these results, re-releases of M. morys and T. perfectus in North America should be considered as part of a classical biological control programme. However, redistribution of S. gracilis is not recommended at present because of potential conflicts with biological control programmes against weeds. Ongoing re-examination of classical biological control programmes can further our understanding of failure of release programmes, particularly when re-examination can be made in the light of improved taxonomy and systematics of the target and agent species. [source] An Experimental Study of Auditor Analytical Review JudgementsJOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, Issue 9-10 2000Kenny Z. Lin This paper provides evidence as to how five factors highlighted in the current UK auditing standard are taken into account by auditors in analytical review (AR) judgements. While the relative importance of particular cues was generally found to be consistent with the standard, certain factors were taken into account only to a marginal extent. Little evidence of configural cue usage was identified. The study also provides evidence of a tendency towards conservatism in the way auditors approach AR. The results suggest both that the potential to substitute AR for other substantive procedures may be realised only imperfectly and that the issue of configural reasoning should be addressed in the auditing standard. [source] An Experimental Study of Auditor Analytical Review JudgementsJOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, Issue 7-8 2000Kenny Z. Lin This paper provides evidence as to how five factors highlighted in the current UK auditing standard are taken into account by auditors in analytical review (AR) judgements. While the relative importance of particular cues was generally found to be consistent with the standard, certain factors were taken into account only to a marginal extent. Little evidence of configural cue usage was identified. The study also provides evidence of a tendency towards conservatism in the way auditors approach AR. The results suggest both that the potential to substitute AR for other substantive procedures may be realised only imperfectly and that the issue of configural reasoning should be addressed in the auditing standard. [source] Methodological issues in papers on IFN therapy: time for reappraisalJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 3 2000Kondili We conducted an analytical review of 194 full papers on interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C to evaluate current methodology (i.e. study design, criteria for evaluating the efficacy of therapy and predictors of response). Of the papers evaluated, 64 were randomized controlled trials (RCT), 40 were non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) and 90 were observational studies (OS). The methodological analysis was focused mainly on clinical trials. The number of patients enrolled in RCT was higher compared with the number enrolled in NRCT. Uniform enrolment criteria were used in less than 50% of the trials. Only 20% of RCT and 2.5% of NRCT used criteria for defining sample size. The response rate was calculated on an intention-to-treat basis in 36 of the RCT and in 14 of the NRCT. The outcome of treatment and the criteria employed to define the response to treatment were found to be far from standardized. In 51.5% of the RCT and 42.5% of the NRCT, normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level at the end of follow-up was the only marker of response studied. Only 57.6% of the trials considered histological evidence as an important outcome. Among the clinical trials, 71.1% evaluated predictors of good response to IFN therapy. In 51% of the OS, ALT normalization by the end of follow-up was the only criterion for defining response. In conclusion, to ensure a high level of reliability in comparing or combining the results of different studies, some basic general requirements must be followed when planning trials on antiviral therapy. [source] | ||||||||||