Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Analgesic Consumption (analgesic + consumption)
Selected AbstractsDextropropoxyphene withdrawal from a French university hospital: impact on analgesic drug consumptionFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Sabine Gaubert Abstract Dextropropoxyphene is a weak opioid analgesic, widely used as a step 2 analgesic (according to WHO classification) in combination with peripheral analgesics, mainly paracetamol. Recent data have underlined its poor analgesic efficacy (in comparison with paracetamol), risks of serious adverse drug reactions (i.e. hepatic reactions, hallucinations, abuse, withdrawal symptoms, hypoglycaemia), possible lethality after overdose, its risk of accumulation in patients with renal failure or in elderly people and some pharmacokinetic insufficiencies (i.e. different half-lives for dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol). Taking into account these data, the drug committee of the Toulouse University Hospital (France) decided to withdraw dextropropoxyphene from the hospital formulary since 1 June 2005. The aim of our study was to investigate the consequences of this withdrawal by comparing use of analgesic drugs in Toulouse University Hospital before (2004) and after (2006) dextropropoxyphene withdrawal (using defined daily dose for 1000 hospitalization-days as the unit measure). Before withdrawal, dextropropoxyphene (in combination with paracetamol) was the second most used analgesic drug after paracetamol alone. After dextropropoxyphene withdrawal, total consumption of analgesic drugs decreased by 4.6% (2006 vs. 2004). There was a 28% decrease in consumption of step 2 analgesics [with an increase in oral tramadol and a slight decrease in codeine (in combination with paracetamol)]. During the same period, step 1 analgesic consumption increased by 11% (mainly paracetamol) and that of step 3 analgesics slightly decreased (,8%). These results show that dextropropoxyphene withdrawal was not associated with a marked switch in prescriptions towards other analgesic drugs. This paper underlines the interest of a hospital-based drug committee to promote rational drug use. Finally, the present data allow us to discuss putative misuse of dextropropoxyphene. [source] Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusionACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2009G. DANELLI Background: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post-operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume,low concentration with a small-volume,high-concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine. Methods: Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post-operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events. Results: No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability. Conclusions: Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade. [source] Analgesic and antiemetic effect of ketorolac vs. betamethasone or dexamethasone after ambulatory surgeryACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2007K. S. Thagaard Background:, Glucocorticoids are known to provide slower onset and more prolonged duration of analgesic effect than ketorolac. In the present study, we wanted to evaluate the effect over time from a single dose of either intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone or an intramuscular (i.m.) depot formulation of betamethasone compared with i.v. ketorolac. Materials and methods:, One hundred and seventy-nine patients admitted for mixed ambulatory surgery were included in the study. After induction of general i.v. anaesthesia, the patients were randomized to receive double-blindly either dexamethasone 4 mg i.v. (Group D) or betamethasone depot formulation 12 mg i.m. (Group B) or ketorolac 30 mg i.v. (Group K). Fentanyl was used for rescue analgesic medication in the post-operative care unit (PACU) and codeine with paracetamol after discharge, for a study period of 3 days. Results:, There was significantly less post-operative pain in the ketorolac group during the stay in the unit (88% with minor or less pain in Group K vs. 74% and 67% in Groups D and B, respectively, P < 0.05), significantly less need for rescue medication (P < 0.05) and significantly less nausea or vomiting (12% in Group K vs. 30% in the other groups pooled, P < 0.05). The ketorolac patients were significantly faster for ready discharge, median 165 min vs. 192 min and 203 min in Groups D and B, respectively (P < 0.01). There were no differences between the groups in perceived pain, nausea, vomiting or rescue analgesic consumption in the 4- to 72-h period. Conclusion:, Dexamethasone 4 mg or bethamethasone 12 mg did not provide prolonged post-operative analgesic effect compared with ketorolac 30 mg, which was superior for analgesia and antiemesis in the PACU. [source] A qualitative systematic review of peri-operative dextromethorphan in post-operative painACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2006T. H. Duedahl Background:, The N -methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, dextromethorphan (DM), has received interest as an adjunctive agent in post-operative pain management. Clinical trials have been contradictory. This systematic review aims to evaluate the available literature examining the analgesic efficacy of DM in post-operative patients. Methods:, Twenty-eight randomized, double-blind, clinical studies, with 40 comparisons, including a variety of dosing regimens comparing DM treatment with placebo, were included. Meta-analysis was intended but deemed to be inappropriate because of the substantial difference in methodology and reporting between trials. The outcome measures (pain scores at rest, time to first analgesic request and supplemental analgesic consumption) were evaluated qualitatively by significant difference (P < 0.05) as reported in the original investigations. Results:, DM did not reduce the post-operative pain score with a clinically significant magnitude. The time to first analgesic request was significantly prolonged in most comparisons with DM. Significant decreases in supplemental opioid consumption were observed in the majority of parenteral DM studies and in about one-half of the oral studies. The decreases were of questionable clinical importance in most comparisons, although a relationship between a decrease in opioid consumption and opioid-related side-effects was established in some studies. Conclusion:, Based on the studies available, DM has the potential to be a safe adjunctive agent to opioid analgesia in post-operative pain management, but the consistency of the potential opioid-sparing and pain-reducing effect must be questioned. Consequently, it is not possible to recommend dose regimens or routine clinical use of DM in post-operative pain. The route of administration may be important for the beneficial effect. [source] Chronic pain in Parkinson's disease: The cross-sectional French DoPaMiP surveyMOVEMENT DISORDERS, Issue 10 2008Laurence Nègre-Pagès PhD Abstract Pain is a frequent, but poorly studied symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). DoPaMiP survey aimed to assess the prevalence of chronic pain in PD, to describe PD patients with chronic pain, and to record analgesic consumption. About 450 parkinsonian patients underwent structured standardized clinical examination and completed self-reported questionnaires in a cross sectional survey. Pains related or unrelated to PD were identified according to predefined criteria. About 98 patients with other chronic disorders than PD were examined to assess if pain was more frequent in PD than in this population. Two thirds parkinsonian patients (278 of 450) had chronic pain. Twenty-five patients with non-chronic pain (<3-month duration) were excluded from subsequent analysis. Twenty six percent (111 of 425) parkinsonian patients had pain unrelated to PD ("non-PD-pain", caused mainly by osteoarthritis), while 39.3% (167 of 425) had chronic pain related to PD ("PD-pain"). In this last group, PD was the sole cause of pain in 103 and indirectly aggravated pain of another origin (mainly osteoarthritis) in 64. Parkinsonian patients with "PD-pain" were younger at PD onset, had more motor complications, more severe depressive symptoms than those without pain or with "non-PD pain." "PD-pain" was more intense (P = 0.03), but was less frequently reported to doctors (P = 0.02), and was associated with less frequent analgesic consumption than "non-PD-pain." Pain was twice more frequent in PD patients than in patients without PD after adjustment for osteo-articular comorbidities (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.2,3.2). Chronic pain is frequent but underreported in PD. Awareness of this problem should be increased and the assessment of analgesic strategies improved. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society [source] Two different doses of caudal neostigmine co-administered with levobupivacaine produces analgesia in childrenPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 5 2009KAZIM KARAASLAN MD Summary Background:, This study was aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, duration of analgesia, and side effects of two different doses of caudal neostigmine used with levobupivacaine in children. Methods:, Sixty boys, between 5 months and 5 years, undergoing genito-urinary surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups (n = 20 each). Group I patients received caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine (1 ml·kg,1) alone. Groups II and III patients received neostigmine (2 and 4 ,g·kg,1 respectively) together with levobupivacaine used in the same dose as Group I. Pain scores were assessed using Children's and Infant's Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) at 15th (t1) min after arrival to postanesthetic care unit, and 1st (t2), 2nd (t3), 3rd (t4), 4th (t5), 8th (t6), 16th (t7), and 24th (t8) hour postoperatively. Duration of analgesia, amount of additional analgesic (paracetamol), score of motor blockade and complications were recorded for 24 h postoperatively, and compared between groups. Results:, CHIPPS scores were higher during t2, t3, t6, t7 and t8 periods, duration of analgesia was shorter, and total analgesic consumption was higher in Group I compare to neostigmine groups (P < 0.05). Duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesic consumption were similar in Groups II and III (P > 0.05). Adverse effects were not different between three groups. Conclusions:, Caudal neostigmine in doses of 2 and 4 ,g·kg,1 with levobupivacaine extends the duration of analgesia without increasing the incidence of adverse effects, and 2 ,g·kg,1 seems to be the optimal dose, as higher dose has no further advantages. [source] Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with and without a background infusion after appendicectomy in childrenPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 5 2003Karamehmet Yildiz MD Summary Background: There have been many studies using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and opioids for postoperative analgesia in children. In this study, we investigated the efficacy, usefulness and analgesic consumption of two different PCA programmes [bolus dose alone (BD) or bolus dose with background infusion (BD + BI)] to evaluate postoperative analgesia for children after emergency appendicectomy. Methods: Forty children, aged between 6 and 15 years and ASA class I or II, undergoing emergency appendicectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. The children were given a loading dose of pethidine 0.3 mg·kg,1 and 150 ,g·kg,1 bolus intravenously in group BD (n = 20) and pethidine 0.3 mg·kg,1 loading dose, 75 ,g·kg,1 bolus and 15 ,g·kg,1·h,1 background infusion in group BD + BI (n = 20). The lockout interval was 20 min in both groups. Results: There were no significant differences in pain, sedation and nausea scores during the 24-h postoperative period between the groups (P > 0.05). Pethidine consumption was significantly lower in group BD + BI than that in group BD for the first 24-h period (P < 0.05). Conclusions: We demonstrated that both these PCA programmes were effective and reliable for postoperative pain relief in children. We believe that giving information about PCA to the children and their parents is useful during the preoperative period. However, the background infusion with lower bolus dose in PCA did not increase pethidine consumption. [source] Analgesia for paediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy with intramuscular clonidinePEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 7 2002Katherine O. Freeman MD SummaryBackground: After undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), children may experience significant pain. Clonidine, an ,2 agonist, exhibits significant analgesic properties. The current investigation sought to determine whether intramuscular (I.M.) clonidine would decrease pain in paediatric patients undergoing T&A. Methods: Thirty-nine children undergoing elective T&A were studied. Following inhalational anaesthetic induction, fentanyl (2 ,g·kg,1) was given intravenously, acetaminophen (paracetamol) (30 mg·kg,1) was given rectally and the children then randomly received an i.m. injection of either normal saline or clonidine (2,g·kg,1). Perioperative analgesic requirements in the postanaesthesia care unit and at home following hospital discharge were evaluated. Results: There were no significant demographic, analgesic consumption, haemodynamic or pain score differences between the groups. Conclusions: We do not recommend adding i.m. clonidine (2 ,g·kg,1) to the analgesic regimen of children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. [source] A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery,ANAESTHESIA, Issue 11 2007C. W. Cheung Summary This randomised, double-blind study compared dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intravenous sedation during third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. Sixty patients received either dexmedetomidine (up to 1 ,g.kg,1) or midazolam (up to 5 mg), which was infused until the Ramsay Sedation Score was four or the maximum dose limit was reached. Intra-operative vital signs, postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption, amnesia, and satisfaction scores for patients and surgeons, were recorded. Sedation was achieved by median (IQR (range)) doses of 47 ,g (39,52 (25,76)) or 0.88 ,g.kg,1 (0.75,1.0 (0.6,1.0)) dexmedetomidine, and 3.6 mg (3.3,4.4 (1.9,5.0)) or 0.07 mg.kg,1 (0.055,0.085 (0.017,0.12)) midazolam. Heart rate and blood pressure during surgery were lower in dexmedetomidine group. There was no significant difference in satisfaction or pain scores. Midazolam was associated with greater amnesia. Dexmedetomidine produces comparable sedation to midazolam. [source] Intra-uterine bupivacaine and levobupivacaineAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 1 2010Ayse MIZRAK Aim:, The study aimed to compare the effect of intrauterine bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with placebo in reducing the post-procedure discomfort owing to pain caused by suction endometrial sampling. Methods:, This study was conducted on randomly selected 45 women with abnormal uterine bleeding and who had undergone outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy under sedation with propofol 0.5 mg/kg. The study was performed using 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (Group B, n = 15) or levobupivacaine 0.5% (Group L, n = 15) or placebo solution (Group C, n = 15) intrauterine via a catheter over a 5 min period after suction endometrial sampling. The number of patients with visual analogue scale >3, total postoperative analgesic requirements, satisfaction of patients and adverse events were measured. Nonparametric and parametric data were analysed using Kruskal,Wallis and one-way anova tests respectively. Results:, Women in Groups L and B had statistically significantly less pain than the women in Group C (P = 0.03). When compared with placebo, five ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaine 0.5% respectively were recorded to decrease the incidence of postoperative analgesic consumption from 41 to 35% (P = 0.01). The satisfaction score of the patients in Group L was significantly higher than that of the patients in Group C (P = 0.03). Conclusion:, Intrauterine levobupivacaine or bupivacaine is effective in decreasing the pain associated with the endometrial biopsy and curettage under propofol sedation. [source] A second cycle of tamsulosin in patients with distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized trialBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 12 2009Francesco Porpiglia OBJECTIVE To evaluate, in a prospective randomized pilot study, the effectiveness and safety of tamsulosin, administered in patients with distal ureteric stones and who have already undergone an unsuccessful first cycle of medical expulsive therapy (MET). PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of tamsulosin, administered as a further therapy, in patients previously unsuccessfully treated with combined expulsive 10-day therapy (tamsulosin + deflazacort) for distal ureteric stones. Ninety-one patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups, each receiving a different therapy for 10 days. Group A (46 patients) received a further cycle of tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily), and group B (45) did not. Age, gender, stone size, time to expulsion, number of acute episodes of colic during treatment and analgesic consumption were recorded. Patients who were not stone-free after the study period had ureteroscopy. The results were compared statistically using Student's t -, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS The groups were comparable inage, gender and stone size (5.93 mm for group A and 6.03 mm for group B). The expulsion rate was significantly higher in group A (80%) than in group B (49%) (P < 0.01), whilst there were no differences between the groups in the number of colic episodes and analgesic use. There were no reported side-effects of medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS A second cycle of 10 days of MET with tamsulosin in nonresponders to a 10-day first cycle of MET with tamsulosin and deflazacort is safe and effective, and therefore should be considered as an option in the management of uncomplicated distal ureteric stones. [source] Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with CO2 laser and Milligan,Morgan cold scalpel techniqueCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 7 2006L. C. Pandini Abstract Objective, To prospectively compare immediate postoperative results of the surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease (HD) by Milligan,Morgan technique using either the CO2 laser or cold scalpel. Methods, Forty patients with grade III/IV HD were prospectively randomized to undergo surgical treatment (Milligan,Morgan) using either the CO2 laser (group A) or the cold scalpel method (group B). Data were compared regarding postoperative pain, complications, healing time, return to normal activity and patient satisfaction. Patients were blinded to treatment method until the completion of the study. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by patient questionnaire and outpatient follow-up visits. Pain was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale and analgesic consumption. Results, Twenty patients were randomized into each group and were comparable relative to mean age, gender and grade of HD. There were no statistically significant differences regarding postoperative pain measured (P =0.17) or consumption of oral (P = 0.741) and parenteral analgesics (P = 0.18) between the two groups. Mean pain score at the first bowel movement was significantly higher in group A (P = 0.035), although the use of analgesics was similar in both the groups. There were no differences regarding complications, mean healing time, return to normal activities and patient satisfaction. Conclusion, There were no differences in the immediate results after Milligan,Morgan haemorrhoidectomy using either the CO2 laser or cold scalpel regarding postoperative pain, complications, healing time, return to normal activities or patient satisfaction. [source] | ||||||||||