Anal Sphincter Trauma (anal + sphincter_trauma)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Asymmetric sphincter innervation is associated with fecal incontinence after anal sphincter trauma during childbirth

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 1 2007
Beate M. Wietek
Abstract Aims Functional asymmetry of pelvic floor innervation has been shown to exist in healthy subjects, and has been proposed to be a predictor of increased risk for fecal incontinence in case of trauma. However, this remains to be shown for different clinical conditions such as traumatic childbirth. Methods A conventional surface EMG system was used to assess the innervation of the external anal sphincter. A symmetry index was used to define the relative EMG amplitude asymmetry of the external anal sphincter between 0 (symmetric) and 1 (asymmetric). Three cohorts were studied: 40 nulliparous women in the third trimester (Study 1), 15 primiparous women within 6 months following vaginal delivery without clinically apparent anal sphincter trauma (Study 2), and 50 women after childbirth-related third or fourth degree perineal tear 6,12 months postpartum (Study 3). Furthermore, all women underwent conventional anorectal manometry. Results Sixteen or forty nulliparous women reported signs of fecal incontinence; however, relative asymmetry was not correlated to symptom severity (P,=,0.345), and not to manometric measures (Study 1). In Study 2, Women who had suffered clinically apparent anal sphincter trauma (P,=,0.07) tended to have a stronger association between incontinence and asymmetry. In Study 3, 19/50 women reported moderate to severe incontinence. Asymmetry and symptom severity were significantly correlated (P,<,0.001). Patients with incontinence had a significantly higher asymmetry score than their continent counterparts. Conclusion Functional asymmetry of anal sphincter innervation is significantly associated with incontinence symptoms, but only after childbirth-related sphincter injuries and therefore, should be regarded as an additional risk factor. Neurourol. Urodynam. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Recent impact of anal sphincter injury on overall Caesarean section incidence

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 3 2006
Rhona MAHONY
Abstract Introduction:, Because of increasing recognition of obstetric anal sphincter injury and faecal incontinence, we examined the recent impact of these indications on our institutional Caesarean section incidence. Methods:, Retrospective review of the indications for multiparous Caesarean section was performed at the National Maternity Hospital for the 4 years 2000,2003, inclusive, to identify women in whom previous anal sphincter injury was an indication. Individual charts were reviewed and data regarding the nature and extent of previous anal sphincter injury were obtained. Results:, Among 17 586 consecutive multiparous deliveries, previous anal sphincter trauma constituted the indication for Caesarean delivery in 67 women, representing 0.4% of all multiparae, 2.9% of multiparous Caesarean sections and 1.3% of all Caesarean sections performed. Fifty (85%) of the 67 women who opted for prelabour Caesarean delivery following previous obstetric anal sphincter injury had symptoms of faecal incontinence (mean continence score 5, range 1,17). Conclusion:, Notwithstanding recent increased awareness and documentation, anal sphincter problems represent a small influence on total Caesarean incidence. [source]


Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2008
T. C. Dudding
Abstract Objective, Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence. We aimed to identify specific factors that could predict the outcome of temporary and permanent stimulation. Method, A cohort analysis was performed to identify potential predictive factors in 81 patients who underwent temporary SNS at a single institution over a 10-year period (June 1996 to June 2006). Data were obtained from prospectively collected patient symptom diaries and quality of life questionnaires, operation reports, anorectal physiological studies, endoanal ultrasound images and radiology of lead placement. Results, Clinical outcome of temporary screening was not affected by patient gender, age, body mass index, severity or length of symptoms. The need for a repeated temporary procedure was associated with subsequent failure during screening (P = 0.008). A low threshold to obtain a motor response during temporary lead insertion was associated with improved outcome (P = 0.048). Evidence of anal sphincter trauma was associated with a greater risk of failure (P = 0.040). However, there was no difference in medium-term outcome between patients with external anal sphincter (EAS) defects and patients with intact anal sphincter muscles. Conclusion, Variables have been identified that help to predict the outcome of SNS. The presence of an EAS defect should not preclude treatment. [source]