Home About us Contact | |||
II LC (ii + lc)
Kinds of II LC Selected AbstractsCrack closure on rehydration of glass-ionomer materialsEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, Issue 5 2004Sharanbir K. Sidhu Moisture-sensitivity of immature glass-ionomer cements suggests that hydration-induced volumetric expansion might close and potentially heal established cracks. Crack closure in glass-ionomer cements (GICs) was observed following rehydration. Circular cavities were prepared in 15 teeth: 10 were restored with resin-modified GICs (5 with Fuji II LC and 5 with Photac-Fil) and 5 were restored with a conventional GIC (Fuji IX); all were dehydrated for 1 min with air and imaged immediately by confocal microscopy. Crack formation in each was located, after which water was placed on the surface and observed for 15 min via a CCD camera. Dehydration caused cracks with measurable gaps, while rehydration resulted in varying degrees of closure: closure was limited in the conventional GIC, and complete or near complete along part/s of the crack in the resin-modified GICs. In all, closure movement became imperceptible after the first 10 min. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference between the closure behavior of all materials. However, the resin-modified GICs appeared to show a greater potential for closure of established cracks than the conventional GIC upon rehydration. [source] Identification of organic eluates from four polymer-based dental filling materialsEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, Issue 3 2003Vibeke Barman Michelsen Elution from polymer-based dental filling materials may have a potential impact on the biocompatibility of the materials. Since information from the manufacturers about ingredients in the materials often is incomplete, analyses of eluates from the materials are necessary for a better knowledge about possible harmful compounds. The aim of this study was to identify organic eluates from polymerized samples of two composites, one compomer and one resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. Samples were immersed in ethanol or Ringer's solution. Organic leachables were analyzed by gas chromatography,mass spectrometry. Identification was confirmed with reference substances, if available. Among components detected were monomers, co-monomers, initiators, stabilizers, decomposition products and contaminants. Thirty-two substances were identified and 17 were confirmed with reference substances. From elution in Ringer's we identified 13 eluates from Tetric Ceram, 10 from Z250, 21 from Dyract and six from Fuji II LC; HEMA, HC and CQ were found in all samples. From elution in ethanol 12 eluates from Tetric Ceram, 18 eluates from Z250, 19 from Dyract and 10 from Fuji II LC were identified. The diversity of eluates from the four materials under study is demonstrated. Owing to variation between the materials, the biocompatibility including the allergenic potential may be different. [source] Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materialsJOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, Issue 2 2003Cecilia Pedroso Turssi Abstract This investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of storage conditions prior to brushing simulation on surface texture of restorative materials. One resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC Improved/GC Corp.), one polyacid-modified composite resin (Dyract AP/Denstply), one microfill composite (Durafill VS/Kulzer), and one hybrid (Filtek,Z250/3M) composite were tested. Forty-five standardized cylindrical specimens of each material were made and randomly divided into three groups according to their subsequent storage conditions: distilled deionized water, artificial saliva, or pH-cycling regime. After 24 h, the experimental units were finished and polished and the surface roughness was measured to obtain Ra baseline values (Bv). Samples were subjected to their assigned storage regime and brushed afterwards. By the end of 10 repetitions of this protocol, final surface roughness readings (Fv) were taken. The analysis of covariance (, = 0.05), considering the covariate Bv showed a significant interaction between restorative material and storage condition (pvalue = 0.0002). Tukey's test revealed that the pH-cycling model provided a significantly lower surface roughness for Fuji II LC and Dyract AP than did the other media. For both composites no significant difference among storage regimes was detected. Under a condition simulating dynamic variation in pH prior to abrasion, the resultant surface texture may be either smoothed down or unchanged, depending on the restorative material, when compared to the effect provided by artificial saliva and distilled deionized water. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 227,232, 2003 [source] Hardness of Three Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials as a Function of Depth and TimeJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2009HOWARD W. ROBERTS DMD ABSTRACT Statement of the Problem:, The polymerization of bulk-placed resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) restoratives is compromised when penetration of the curing light is limited because of the materials' thickness. It is unknown if additional post light-curing resin polymerization and/or glass-ionomer setting occurs over time to ensure adequate polymerization. Purpose:, The primary objective was to evaluate the depth of cure of various thicknesses of RMGI restorative products over 1 year using Knoop hardness (KH) testing. Materials and Methods:, The materials were placed in Delrin molds having an internal diameter of 5.0 mm and heights of 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm and were photopolymerized with a halogen light-curing unit. Five specimens of each depth were prepared for each time period evaluated. Specimens were stored in darkness at 37 ± 2°C and 98 ± 2% humidity until being tested at 24 hours, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after fabrication. Mean KH values were calculated for the bottom and top surfaces of each thickness group and used to determine bottom/top hardness ratios. Data were compared using two-way analysis of variance (factors of time, thickness) at a 0.05 significance level with Scheffé's post hoc analysis, where required. Results:, The materials had relatively stable top surface KH, which permitted valid assessment of changes in bottom surface KH over time. The bottom surface KH of some RMGIs changed significantly over time (p < 0.001), but degrees of change were material dependent. Certain RMGIs demonstrated a potential for statistically significant post light-activation hardening; however, that too was material dependent. As compared with top surface KH, deeper layers of the thicker RMGI specimens consistently failed to achieve an adequate degree of polymerization. Conclusion:, Although certain RMGI materials demonstrate a potential for post light-activation chemically initiated resin polymerization and/or polyalkenoate acid/base reaction, these reactions may not be sufficient to ensure that the material is adequately polymerized for long-term success. This is particularly true when RMGI materials are placed in thicker layers where curing light penetration may be compromised. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE RMGI materials should not be placed in bulk but photopolymerized in layers to ensure adequate light activation. The results of this study suggest that Photac-Fil Quick be placed in layers no thicker than 2 mm while Fuji II LC and Vitremer may be placed in layers up to 3 mm in thickness. [source] The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass,ionomers and ,compomers'JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 11 2004M. Aliping-McKenzie summary, The interaction of tooth-coloured dental restorative materials (a conventional glass,ionomer, two resin-modified glass,ionomers and two compomers) with acidic beverages has been studied with the aim of investigating how long-term contact affects solution pH and specimen surface hardness. For each material (ChemFil Superior, ChemFlex, Vitremer Core Build-Up/Restorative, Fuji II LC, Dyract AP and F2000) disc-shaped specimens were prepared and stored in sets of six in the following storage media: 0·9% NaCl (control), Coca-Cola, apple juice and orange juice. After time intervals of 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months and 1 year, solution pH and Vickers Hardness Number were determined for each individual specimen. Differences were analysed by anova followed by Student,Newman,Keuls post hoc analysis. All materials were found to reduce the pH of the 0·9% NaCl, but to increase the pH of the acidic beverages. The conventional glass,ionomers dissolved completely in apple juice and orange juice, but survived in Coca-Cola, albeit with a significantly reduced hardness after 1 year. The other materials survived in apple juice and orange juice, but showed greater reductions in surface hardness in these beverages than in Coca-Cola. Fruit juices were thus shown to pose a greater erosive threat to tooth coloured materials than Coca-Cola, a finding which is similar to those concerning dentine and enamel towards these drinks. [source] Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure techniqueAUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, Issue 2 2006GM Knight Abstract Background: The clinical technique for sandwich restorations prescribes etching initially set auto cure glass ionomer cement (GIC) prior to placing a layer of resin bond to develop a weak mechanical bond between composite resin and GIC. Co-curing a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) bond and composite resin to GIC may create a chemical bond and improve the bond strengths between these two materials. Methods: A total of 48 specimens were prepared, 12 in each of four categories. Capsulated GIC was placed into a mould and allowed to set for four minutes, etched for five seconds followed by placement of a resin bond and photo cured for five seconds over which a composite resin was puddled onto the resin bond and photo cured for 10 seconds. Capsulated GIC was placed into a mould and allowed to set for four minutes after which a sample of RMGIC (Riva LC) was prepared using twice the liquid powder ratio and painted over the surface of the set GIC using a micro brush. An increment of composite resin was added over the RMGIC and both materials were photo co-cured for 10 seconds. Capsulated GIC was placed into a mould and RMGIC (Riva LC) that had been prepared using twice the liquid powder was brushed over the GIC (prior to initial set) followed by the placement of a layer of composite resin and photo co-cured for 10 seconds. Capsulated GIC was placed into a mould and RMGIC (Fuji II LC) that had been prepared using twice the liquid powder was brushed over the GIC (prior to initial set) followed by the placement of a layer of composite resin and photo co-cured for 10 seconds. Shear testing of each of the samples was carried out and specimens were examined to determine the nature of the fracture. Selected samples were prepared for SEM investigation to observe the interfaces between the GIC and composite resin. Results: There were significantly lower bond strengths (P < 0.05) amongst samples that had been etched and bonded (2.42MPa) compared to the other samples that had been co-cure bonded with RMGIC (6.48,7.05MPa). There were no significant differences amongst the bond strengths of the samples co-cure bonded with RMGIC. Specimens prepared by the ,etch and bond' technique failed adhesively and co-cured specimens failed cohesively within the GIC. SEM investigation showed chemical bonds between RMGIC bond and GIC and composite resin. Conclusions: The co-cured RMGIC bonding system eliminates several placement steps and produces a significantly stronger chemical bond between GIC and composite resin than the ,etch and bond' technique. RMGIC bond and composite resin may be co-cured to GIC either before or after initial set has occurred. [source] |