Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
HER2 Overexpression (her2 + overexpression)
Selected AbstractsHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncoprotein expression in breast cancer patients from central Anatolia, TurkeyASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 3 2009Hasan Senol COSKUN Abstract Aim: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is associated with poor prognosis and the frequency of HER2 positivity in breast cancer patients varies among different regions of the world. We studied HER2 expression in Turkish breast cancer patients. Methods: HER 2 expression was evaluated immunohistochemically in 107 breast cancer patients. HER2 expression was reported as negative or positive (3+) according to cellular membrane staining characteristics. The frequency of HER2 overexpression, distribution according to clinical characteristics, effect on survival and effect of chemotherapy on survival in relation to HER2 overexpression was evaluated. Results: The median age of patients was 49 years (range 27,76). HER2 was 3+ in 34 patients (31.8%). There was no significant difference in age, menopausal status, histopathology, lymph node involvement, stage and estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positivity in relation to HER2 expression. Forty-three patients (40.2%) relapsed and 21 patients (19.6%) died during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate, distribution of relapse sites and death rate in relation to HER2 expression. The 3- and 5-year disease free survival rates were 67.1 and 40.5%, and the overall survival rates were 87.5 and 66.1%, respectively. Survival rate and calculated survival time were relatively shorter in HER2 3+ patients than in non-HER2 3+ patients, but these differences were not statistically significant. HER2 status did not affect survival period according to chemotherapy group. Conclusion: Immunohistochemistry findings of HER2 expression in Turkish breast cancer patients were similar to those found in the published reports. A shorter survival period was observed in HER2 3+ patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. [source] Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer association with biologic phenotype and clinical outcomesCANCER, Issue 5 2010Mothaffar F. Rimawi Abstract BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression is associated with aggressive phenotypes in preclinical breast cancer models, but in clinical studies, EGFR has been inconsistently linked to poor outcome. We hypothesized that EGFR expression in human breast tumors, when centrally and uniformly assessed, is associated with an aggressive phenotype and resistance to systemic therapy. METHODS: In a database of 47,286 patients with breast cancer, EGFR status was known on 2567 tumors. EGFR levels were measured centrally by ligand binding assay, and tumors with ,10 fmol/mg were prospectively deemed positive. Clinical and biological features of EGFR-positive and EGFR-negative tumors were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed by systemic therapy status. RESULTS: Of 2567 tumors, 475 (18%) were EGFR positive. EGFR-positive tumors were more common in younger and in black women, were larger, had a higher S-phase fraction, and were more likely to be aneuploid. EGFR-positive tumors were more likely to be HER2-positive (26% vs 16%, P < .0001), but less likely to be estrogen receptor-positive (60% vs 88%, P < .0001) or progesterone receptor-positive (26% vs 65%, P < .0001). In multivariate analyses, EGFR expression independently correlated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.41, P = .007) and overall survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI, 1.36-2.88, P = .0004) in treated patients, but not in untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR expression is more common in breast tumors in younger and black women. It is associated with lower hormone receptor levels, higher proliferation, genomic instability, and HER2 overexpression. It is correlated with higher risk of relapse in patients receiving adjuvant treatment. Blocking EGFR may improve outcome in selected patients. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. [source] HER2 status in patients with breast carcinoma is not modified selectively by preoperative chemotherapy and is stable during the metastatic processCANCER, Issue 8 2002Anne Vincent-Salomon M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to determine whether HER2 expression levels in breast carcinomas were modified by chemotherapy or during the metastatic process. METHODS HER2 expression was analyzed on sequential tissue specimens taken from the primary tumor before patients received preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and from post-CT residual breast tumor or at a metastatic site. The first group of patients included 59 women who presented with T2,T4,N1,N2 breast carcinoma and were treated by preoperative anthracycline-based CT and then underwent surgery. The second group included 44 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma localized to the lung (27 patients) or to the liver (17 patients). HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry using an anti-p185HER/neu monoclonal antibody and was classified as overexpressed or not overexpressed. RESULTS Among the patients who received preoperative CT, HER2 overexpression was observed in 15 of 59 patients (25%). A complete pathologic response was observed in 2 of these 15 patients. HER2 still was overexpressed in 11 of 13 remaining residual tumors and was no longer detectable in 2 tumors. In addition, the 29 tumors with no HER2 overexpression before CT remained negative after treatment. In patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, HER2 was overexpressed in 11 of 44 primary tumors (25%). In 9 of these 11 tumors, HER2 overexpression was maintained in the metastases (9 pulmonary metastases and 4 hepatic metastases). In two patients who had low levels of HER2 overexpression in their primary tumors, no staining was observed in the secondary tumor (one pulmonary tumor and one liver tumor). There were no tumors in which the overexpression of HER2 was found only in the metastasis. CONCLUSIONS The current study showed that, in most patients, HER2 overexpression was unchanged after CT and in metastatic sites. No HER2 negative primary tumors became HER2 positive after patients received CT or during the metastatic process. In a few patients, a diminution in the level of HER2 expression was observed after CT or in secondary tumors. This may have been due to a transitory state of altered tumor cells or to the selection of HER2 negative tumor cells clones. Cancer 2002;94:2169,73. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10456 [source] Cell blocks allow reliable evaluation of expression of basal (CK5/6) and luminal (CK8/18) cytokeratins and smooth muscle actin (SMA) in breast carcinomaCYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 4 2010W. D. Delgallo W. D. Delgallo, J. R. P. Rodrigues, S. P. Bueno, R. M. Viero and C. T. Soares Cell blocks allow reliable evaluation of expression of basal (CK5/6) and luminal (CK8/18) cytokeratins and smooth muscle actin (SMA) in breast carcinoma Objective:, Gene expression studies have revealed several molecular subtypes of breast carcinoma with distinct clinical and biological behaviours. DNA microarray studies correlated with immunohistochemical profiling of breast carcinomas using cytokeratin (CK) markers, Her2/neu, oestrogen receptor (ER), and basal myoepithelial cell markers have identified five breast tumour subtypes: (i) luminal A (ER+; Her2/neu,), (ii) luminal B (ER+; Her2/neu+), (iii) Her2 overexpression (ER,; Her2/neu+), (iv) basal-like (ER,; Her2/neu,, CK5/6 and 14+), and (v) negative for all markers. Luminal carcinomas express cytokeratins in a luminal pattern (CK8/18), and the basal-like type expresses CK5/6 and CK14 or basal epithelial cell markers. CK5/6, CK8/18, and smooth muscle actin (SMA) expression were assessed in cell blocks and compared with expression in surgical specimens. Methods:, Sixty-two cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology with cell blocks and available surgical specimens were included. Cell blocks containing at least 10 high-power fields each with at least 10 tumour cells and surgical specimens were immunostained for CK5/6, CK8/18 and SMA. Results:, Percentage sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were, respectively, 77, 100, 100, 92 and 94 for CK5/6; 98, 66, 96, 80 and 95 for CK8/18; and 92, 96, 85, 98 and 95 for SMA. Conclusion:, The identification of CK5/6, CK8/18 and SMA by immunohistochemistry in cell blocks can be a reliable method that yields results close to those obtained in surgical specimens, and can contribute to the classification of breast carcinomas with luminal and basal expression patterns, providing helpful information in the choice of treatment and in the evaluation of prognostic and predictive factors. [source] | ||||||||||