Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hepatorenal Syndrome (hepatorenal + syndrome)
Selected AbstractsPrognosis of hepatorenal syndrome , has it changed with current practice?ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2004P. Angeli Summary The Consensus Conference on Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) organized by the International Ascites Club in 1994 redefined HRS, introduced new diagnostic criteria that are now widely accepted, and proposed the distinction between two types of HRS: type 1 and type 2. Before the introduction of the new therapeutic options, the median survival of patients with type 1 HRS was only 1.7 weeks, and 6,12 months in patients with type 2 HRS. Liver transplantation (LT) was the first therapeutic option to change the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with HRS and 5-year survival after LT in patients with HRS is only slightly less than that of transplanted patients without HRS and markedly increased when compared to survival in nontransplanted patients with HRS. Nevertheless, a large proportion of patients die before LT is possible because of the poor prognosis of HRS and the prolonged waiting times in most transplant centres. Other therapeutic approaches were therefore developed to increase survival in patients with HRS. Vasoconstrictors and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are the most promising. The administration of vasoconstrictors together with albumin has been shown to reverse type 1 HRS and even to completely normalize renal function in 60,70% of treated patients. To date, four studies assessing TIPS in the management of type 1 HRS have been reported and TIPS insertion was technically successful in all of them. Given the shortage of donors for LT, vasoconstrictor therapy and TIPS strategies may be considered as a bridge to LT in patients with type 1 HRS. [source] Which patients benefit from hemodialysis therapy in hepatorenal syndrome?JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 12 2004OLIVER WITZKE Abstract Background and Aim:, Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) occurs in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and has a poor outcome. The aim of the present study was to investigate which patients with HRS are likely to benefit from hemodialysis. Methods:, Data were collected prospectively from 30 patients with Child-Pugh C liver cirrhosis and HRS. Patients were either treated with continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) if they were mechanically ventilated, or with intermittent hemodialysis (HD) if they were not mechanically ventilated. Prognosis was assessed by the Child-Pugh and by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The primary aim of the study was the analysis of overall and 30-day patient survival during hemodialysis therapy. To identify predictive factors of survival, variables obtained before the initiation of dialysis therapy were evaluated. Results:, Patients' 30-day survival was 8/30 (median survival time 21 days). Among patients treated with mechanical ventilation, 30-day survival time was 0/15 while 8/15 patients without mechanical ventilation survived more than 30 days (P < 0.001). Using a multivariate model, the relative hazards for serum albumin, international normalized ratio (INR) and catecholamine therapy were not different from one another (P > 0.05), indicating that these parameters were not independent predictors of survival. Mechanical ventilation was an independent risk factor for 30-day (relative hazard 6.6 [1.6,27.7], P < 0.001) and overall survival (relative hazard 6.3 [1.5,26.5], P = 0.01). Child-Pugh (P < 0.01) and the MELD (P < 0.01) score were predictive for overall survival independent of mechanical ventilation. Conclusions:, Patients with HRS without mechanical ventilation may benefit from hemodialysis, whereas hemodialysis seems to be futile in patients with mechanical ventilation. [source] Prediction of the prognosis of patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure using the model for end-stage liver disease scoring system and a novel logistic regression modelJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 7 2009Q.-F. Sun Summary., The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACLF-HBV), and to establish a new model for predicting the prognosis of ACLF-HBV. A total of 204 adult patients with ACLF-HBV were retrospectively recruited between July 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004. The MELD scores were calculated according to the widely accepted formula. The 3-month mortality was calculated. The validity of the MELD model was determined by means of the concordance (c) statistic. Clinical data and biochemical values were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis based on which the regression model for predicting prognosis was established. The receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn for the MELD scoring system and the new regression model and the areas under the curves (AUC) were compared by the z -test. The 3-month mortality rate was 57.8%. The mean MELD score for the patients who died was significantly greater than those who survived beyond 3 months (28.7 vs 22.4, P = 0.003). The concordance (c) statistic (equivalent to the AUC) for the MELD scoring system predicting 3-month mortality was 0.709 (SE = 0.036, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.638,0.780). The independent factors predicting prognosis were hepatorenal syndrome (P < 0.001), liver cirrhosis (P = 0.009), HBeAg (P = 0.013), albumin (P = 0.028) and prothrombin activity (P = 0.011) as identified in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The regression model that was constructed by the logistic regression analysis produced a greater prognostic value (c = 0.891) than the MELD scoring system (z = 4.333, P < 0.001). The MELD scoring system is a promising and useful predictor for 3-month mortality of ACLF-HBV patients. Hepatorenal syndrome, liver cirrhosis, HBeAg, albumin and prothrombin activity are independent factors affecting the 3-month mortality. The newly established logistic regression model appears to be superior to the MELD scoring system in predicting 3-month mortality in patients with ACLF-HBV. [source] Prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis and kidney dysfunction in the era of MELD: results of a prospective studyLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 7 2006Michael Schepke Abstract: Background/Aim: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence and prognostic impact of kidney dysfunction due to other causes in cirrhotic patients are less well known. The current study prospectively evaluated the incidence and the prognostic relevance of different etiologies of kidney failure in cirrhotic patients. Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive patients with cirrhosis and serum creatinine ,1.5 mg/dl were enrolled. The etiologies of kidney dysfunction were analyzed, and prognostic factors including Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score were evaluated in a multivariate Cox model. Results: HRS was present in 35 (40%) patients (15 HRS 1, 20 HRS 2), followed by renal parenchymal disease (23%), drug-induced kidney dysfunction (19%) and prerenal failure due to bleeding or infections (15%). HRS patients had a significantly higher MELD score and shorter survival. In addition to the MELD score, only HRS 1 was independently predictive for survival. HRS 2 patients had a similar outcome as patients with non-HRS kidney dysfunction. Conclusions: In patients with cirrhosis and renal failure, hepatorenal syndrome is associated with a worse prognosis than kidney dysfunction due to other conditions but only HRS type 1 has independent prognostic relevance in addition to the MELD score in these patients. [source] Hepatorenal syndrome: A proposal for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT)LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2007Richard Ruiz Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a well-recognized complication of end-stage liver disease. Once thought to be a reversible condition with liver transplantation (LT) alone, HRS may directly contribute to the requirement for long-term dialysis posttransplant. As a result, discussion has now focused on whether or when a kidney allograft should be considered for these patients. Using the International Ascites Club guidelines with a pretransplant serum creatinine (SCr) >2.0 mg/dL to define HRS, 130 patients undergoing LT over a 10-yr period were identified, for an overall incidence of 9%. Patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 74%, and 68%, and 62%, respectively. Survival was significantly worse when compared to non-HRS patients undergoing LT over the same study period (P = 0.0001). For patients presenting with type 2 HRS, 7 patients (6%) developed irreversible kidney failure posttransplant compared to 0.34% in the non-HRS population (P < 0.0001). Five of these patients died within 1 yr with a median survival time of 139 days. Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) for patients with HRS is not recommended. However, an improvement in outcome can be accomplished by addressing those patients who require dialysis greater than 60 days posttransplant. We propose a role for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT) in select HRS patients. Liver Transpl 13:838,843, 2007. © 2007 AASLD. [source] Hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and now, hepatospinal syndrome?LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2003Vincent G. Bain MD Background & Aims: Hepatic myelopathy is a rare complication of chronic liver disease, causing progressive spastic paraparesis. Today, no therapy of this disorder has been established. Commonly used therapeutic strategies for hepatic encephalopathy aiming at the reduction of plasma ammonia levels such as protein restriction, oral neomycin, lactulose, or ornithine aspartate fail to improve the symptoms of hepatic myelopathy. The aim of this study was to find out whether orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may improve hepatic myelopathy. Methods: Follow-up examinations of 3 patients with severe hepatic myelopathy before and after OLT. Results: In all 3 patients, the neurologic status improved significantly after liver transplantation. The grade of improvement was related to the time interval between onset of the first symptoms of hepatic myelopathy and liver transplantation. Conclusions: Early recognition of hepatic myelopathy is important because timely liver transplantation as an established therapy for end-stage liver disease offers the chance of complete recovery from hepatic paraparesis. (Gastroenterology 2003;124:346-351.) [source] Predictors of response to therapy with terlipressin and albumin in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 1 2010André Nazar Terlipressin plus albumin is an effective treatment for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), but approximately only half of the patients respond to this therapy. The aim of this study was to assess predictive factors of response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin in patients with type 1 HRS. Thirty-nine patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS were treated prospectively with terlipressin and albumin. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables obtained before the initiation of treatment as well as changes in arterial pressure during treatment were analyzed for their predictive value. Response to therapy (reduction in serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL at the end of treatment) was observed in 18 patients (46%) and was associated with an improvement in circulatory function. Independent predictive factors of response to therapy were baseline serum bilirubin and an increase in mean arterial pressure of ,5 mm Hg at day 3 of treatment. The cutoff level of serum bilirubin that best predicted response to treatment was 10 mg/dL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77; P < 0.0001; sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 61%). Response rates in patients with serum bilirubin <10 mg/dL or ,10 mg/dL were 67% and 13%, respectively (P = 0.001). Corresponding values in patients with an increase in mean arterial pressure ,5 mm Hg or <5 mm Hg at day 3 were 73% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.037). Conclusion: Serum bilirubin and an early increase in arterial pressure predict response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin in type 1 HRS. Alternative treatment strategies to terlipressin and albumin should be investigated for patients with type 1 HRS and low likelihood of response to vasoconstrictor therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.) [source] Acute kidney injury in cirrhosis,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 6 2008Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao Acute renal failure (ARF), recently renamed acute kidney injury (AKI), is a relatively frequent problem, occurring in approximately 20% of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Although serum creatinine may underestimate the degree of renal dysfunction in cirrhosis, measures to diagnose and treat AKI should be made in patients in whom serum creatinine rises abruptly by 0.3 mg/dL or more (,26.4 ,mol/L) or increases by 150% or more (1.5-fold) from baseline. The most common causes of ARF (the term is used interchangeably with AKI) in cirrhosis are prerenal azotemia (volume-responsive prerenal AKI), acute tubular necrosis, and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a functional type of prerenal AKI exclusive of cirrhosis that does not respond to volume repletion. Because of the progressive vasodilatory state of cirrhosis that leads to relative hypovolemia and decreased renal blood flow, patients with decompensated cirrhosis are very susceptible to developing AKI with events associated with a decrease in effective arterial blood volume. HRS can occur spontaneously but is more frequently precipitated by events that worsen vasodilatation, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Conclusion: Specific therapies of AKI depend on the most likely cause and mechanism. Vasoconstrictors are useful bridging therapies in HRS. Ultimately, liver transplantation is indicated in otherwise reasonable candidates in whom AKI does not resolve with specific therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2008;48:2064-2077.) [source] Lack of renal improvement with nonselective endothelin antagonism with tezosentan in type 2 hepatorenal syndrome,,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 1 2008Florence Wong Renal vasoconstriction is a key factor in the development of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and may be secondary to increased activities of endothelin-1, a potent renal vasoconstrictor. To assess the effects of tezosentan, a nonselective endothelin receptor antagonist, on renal function in patients with type 2 HRS, six male patients, 56.3 ± 2.5 years old, with cirrhosis and type 2 HRS were treated with tezosentan; ascending doses of 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/hour, each for 24 hours, were used for the initial 2 patients, but a constant dose of 0.3 mg/hour for up to 7 days was used for the remaining 4 patients. The glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, 24-hour urinary volume, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, tezosentan levels, and vasoactive hormones were measured daily. Albumin was given as required. The study was stopped early because of concerns about the safety of tezosentan in type 2 HRS. Five patients discontinued the study early; one stopped within 4 hours because of systemic hypotension (MAP < 70 mm Hg), and 4 patients stopped at ,4 days because of concerns about worsening renal function (serum creatinine increased from 180 ± 21 to 222 ± 58 ,mol/L, P > 0.05) and decreasing urine volume (P = 0.03) but without a significant change in MAP. The plasma tezosentan concentrations were 79 ± 34 ng/mL at a steady state during infusion at 0.3 mg/hour. The plasma endothelin-1 concentrations increased from 2.7 ± 0.3 pg/mL at the baseline to 19.1 ± 7.3 pg/mL (P < 0.05). Conclusion: An endothelin receptor blockade potentially can cause a deterioration in renal function in patients with cirrhosis and type 2 HRS. Caution should be taken in future studies using endothelin receptor antagonists in these patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2007.) [source] Terlipressin improves renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites without hepatorenal syndrome,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 6 2007Aleksander Krag Patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites are characterized by circulatory dysfunction with splanchnic vasodilatation and renal vasoconstriction, which often lead to ascites. The vasoconstrictor terlipressin improves renal function in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate if terlipressin also improves renal function in patients with ascites without HRS. Twenty-three patients with cirrhosis participated; 15 with nonrefractory ascites were randomized to either terlipressin (N group, n = 11) or a placebo (P group, n = 4), and 8 had refractory ascites and received terlipressin (R group). The glomerular filtration rate (GFR), sodium clearance (CNa), lithium clearance (CLi), osmolal clearance (COsm), and urine sodium concentration (UNa) were assessed before and after the injection of 2 mg of terlipressin or the placebo. GFR increased in the N group (69 ± 19 versus 92 ± 25 mL/min, P < 0.005) and in the R group (31 ± 19 versus 41 ± 31 mL/min, P < 0.05) after terlipressin. In the N group, terlipressin induced an increase in CNa (0.89 ± 0.21 versus 1.52 ± 1.45 mL/min, P < 0.05), CLi (17.3 ± 8.9 versus 21.5 ± 11.6 mL/min, P < 0.05), and COsm (2.10 ± 0.81 versus 3.06 ± 2.0 mL/min, P < 0.05). In the R group, terlipressin induced an increase in CNa (0.11 ± 0.18 versus 0.35 ± 0.40 mL/min, P < 0.05) and CLi (5.5 ± 4.2 versus 9.5 ± 8.55 mL/min, P < 0.05). UNa increased in both groups after terlipressin (P < 0.005). Plasma norepinephrine (P < 0.05) and renin (P < 0.05) decreased after terlipressin. All parameters remained unchanged after the placebo. Conclusion: The vasopressin 1 receptor agonist terlipressin improves renal function and induces natriuresis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites without HRS. Vasoconstrictors may represent a novel future treatment modality for these patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2007.) [source] Aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 urinary excretion in cirrhosis: Relationship with ascites and hepatorenal syndrome,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 6 2006Christina Esteva-Font Several experimental models of cirrhosis have shown dysregulation of renal aquaporins in different phases of liver disease. We investigated the urinary excretion of both aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 in patients with cirrhosis at different stages of the disease. Twenty-four-hour urine was collected from 11 healthy volunteers, 13 patients with compensated cirrhosis (without ascites), and 20 patients with decompensated cirrhosis (11 with ascites without renal failure and 9 with hepatorenal syndrome). Aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 excretion was analyzed by immunoblotting. Urinary aquaporin-2 excretion was reduced in patients with cirrhosis compared to healthy subjects. A progressive decrease in urinary aquaporin-2 excretion was observed as the severity of cirrhosis increased, from compensated cirrhosis to cirrhosis with ascites and hepatorenal syndrome. Patients with hyponatremia had lower urinary aquaporin-2 excretion than patients without hyponatremia. Vasopressin plasma level did not correlate with aquaporin-2 excretion. There were no differences between healthy subjects and patients with cirrhosis with or without ascites in urinary excretion of aquaporin-1, but urinary aquaporin-1 excretion of those with hepatorenal syndrome was extremely low. In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis appear to exhibit a decreased abundance of renal aquaporin-2 and therefore lower water permeability in the collecting tubules. This may represent an adaptive renal response to sodium retention, with expansion of extracellular fluid volume and dilutional hyponatremia observed in those who have cirrhosis with ascites. Finally, aquaporin-1 does not appear to play a role in the progressive dysregulation of extracellular fluid volume in cirrhosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1555,1563.) [source] Acute renal failure in patients with cirrhosis: Perspectives in the age of MELDHEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2003Richard Moreau In patients with cirrhosis, acute renal failure is mainly due to prerenal failure (caused by renal hypoperfusion) and tubular necrosis. The main causes of prerenal failure are "true hypovolemia" (induced by hemorrhage or gastrointestinal or renal fluid losses), sepsis, or type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The frequency of prerenal failure due to the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or intravascular radiocontrast agents is unknown. Prerenal failure is rapidly reversible after restoration of renal blood flow. Treatment is directed to the cause of hypoperfusion, and fluid replacement is used to treat most cases of "non-HRS" prerenal failure. In patients with type 1 HRS with very low short-term survival rate, liver transplantation is the ideal treatment. Systemic vasoconstrictor therapy (with terlipressin, noradrenaline, or midodrine [combined with octreotide]) may improve renal function in patients with type 1 HRS waiting for liver transplantation. MARS (for molecular adsorbent recirculating system) and the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may also improve renal function in these patients. In patients with cirrhosis, acute tubular necrosis is mainly due to an ischemic insult to the renal tubules. The most common condition leading to ischemic acute tubular necrosis is severe and sustained prerenal failure. Little is known about the natural course and treatment (i.e., renal replacement therapy) of cirrhosis-associated acute tubular necrosis. [source] Terlipressin therapy with and without albumin for patients with hepatorenal syndrome: Results of a prospective, nonrandomized studyHEPATOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Rolando Ortega Vasopressin analogues associated with albumin improve renal function in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The current study was aimed at assessing the efficacy of the treatment, predictive factors of response, recurrence of HRS, and survival after therapy. Twenty-one consecutive patients with HRS (16 with type 1 HRS, 5 with type 2 HRS) received terlipressin (0.5-2 mg/4 hours intravenously) until complete response was achieved (serum creatinine level < 1.5 mg/dL) or for 15 days; 13 patients received intravenous albumin together with terlipressin. Twelve of the 21 patients (57%) showed complete response. Albumin administration was the only predictive factor of complete response (77% in patients receiving terlipressin and albumin vs. 25% in those receiving terlipressin alone, P = .03). Treatment with terlipressin and albumin was associated with a remarkable decrease in serum creatinine level, increase in arterial pressure, and suppression of the renin-aldosterone system. By contrast, no significant changes in these parameters were found in patients treated with terlipressin alone. Only 1 patient showed ischemic adverse effects. Recurrence of HRS occurred in 17% of patients with complete response. The occurrence of complete response was associated with an improved survival. In conclusion, terlipressin therapy reverses HRS in a high proportion of patients. Recurrence rate after treatment withdrawal is uncommon. Albumin appears to improve markedly the beneficial effects of terlipressin. [source] Novel approaches to assessing renal function in cirrhotic liver diseaseHEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, Issue 9 2007Andrew J. Portal Renal dysfunction is common in patients with end-stage liver disease. Etiological factors include conditions as diverse as acute tubular necrosis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy and hepatorenal syndrome. Current standard tests of renal function, such as measurement of serum urea and creatinine levels, are inaccurate as the synthesis of these markers is affected by the native liver pathology. This article reviews novel markers of renal function and their potential use in patients with liver disease. [source] Major adverse events, pretransplant assessment and outcome predictionJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 11 2009Hui-Chun Huang Abstract Liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension pose enormous loss of lives and resources throughout the world, especially in endemic areas of chronic viral hepatitis. Although the pathophysiology of cirrhosis is not completely understood, the accumulating evidence has paved the way for better control of the complications, including gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension. Modern pharmacological and interventional therapies have been designed to treat these complications. However, liver transplantation (LT) is the only definite treatment for patients with preterminal end-stage liver disease. To pursue successful LT, the meticulous evaluation of potential recipients and donors is pivotal, especially for living donor transplantation. The critical shortage of cadaveric donor livers is another concern. In many Asian countries, cultural and religious concerns further limit the number of the donors, which lags far behind that of the recipients. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system has recently become the prevailing criterion for organ allocation. Initial results showed clear benefits of moving from the Child,Turcotte,Pugh-based system toward the MELD-based organ allocation system. In addition to the MELD, serum sodium is another important prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis. The incorporation of serum sodium into the MELD could enhance the performance of the MELD and could become an indispensable strategy in refining the priority for LT. However, the feasibility of the MELD in combination with sodium in predicting the outcome for patients on transplant waiting list awaits actual outcome data before this becomes standard practice in the Asia,Pacific region. [source] Which patients benefit from hemodialysis therapy in hepatorenal syndrome?JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 12 2004OLIVER WITZKE Abstract Background and Aim:, Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) occurs in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and has a poor outcome. The aim of the present study was to investigate which patients with HRS are likely to benefit from hemodialysis. Methods:, Data were collected prospectively from 30 patients with Child-Pugh C liver cirrhosis and HRS. Patients were either treated with continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) if they were mechanically ventilated, or with intermittent hemodialysis (HD) if they were not mechanically ventilated. Prognosis was assessed by the Child-Pugh and by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The primary aim of the study was the analysis of overall and 30-day patient survival during hemodialysis therapy. To identify predictive factors of survival, variables obtained before the initiation of dialysis therapy were evaluated. Results:, Patients' 30-day survival was 8/30 (median survival time 21 days). Among patients treated with mechanical ventilation, 30-day survival time was 0/15 while 8/15 patients without mechanical ventilation survived more than 30 days (P < 0.001). Using a multivariate model, the relative hazards for serum albumin, international normalized ratio (INR) and catecholamine therapy were not different from one another (P > 0.05), indicating that these parameters were not independent predictors of survival. Mechanical ventilation was an independent risk factor for 30-day (relative hazard 6.6 [1.6,27.7], P < 0.001) and overall survival (relative hazard 6.3 [1.5,26.5], P = 0.01). Child-Pugh (P < 0.01) and the MELD (P < 0.01) score were predictive for overall survival independent of mechanical ventilation. Conclusions:, Patients with HRS without mechanical ventilation may benefit from hemodialysis, whereas hemodialysis seems to be futile in patients with mechanical ventilation. [source] Management of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndromeJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Anuchit Chutaputti Abstract, Refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are the late complications of the terminal stages of cirrhosis. The definitions of refractory ascites and HRS proposed by the International Ascites Club in 1996 are now widely accepted, and are useful in diagnosis, treatment and research in this field. In both conditions, the only treatment of proven value for improved survival is liver transplantation. However, because of better understanding about the pathophysiology of HRS, including the roles of portal hypertension, ascites formation and hemodynamic derangements, treatments such as transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) and new pharmacological agents may be considered to alleviate the problem prior to transplantation. Symptomatic treatment of refractory ascites includes TIPS and repeated large volume paracentesis. Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt can improve survival while waiting for liver transplantation. Practical management guidelines for TIPS and large volume paracentesis, including the prevention and management of further complications, are considered in this review. © 2002 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd [source] Clinical features of acute renal failure associated with hepatitis A virus infectionJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 9 2010Y. J. Jung Summary., Acute hepatitis A (AHA) is one of the most common infectious diseases; it is usually a self-limiting disease affecting the liver. Although extrahepatic manifestations are not common, some cases have been reported associated with acute renal failure. We reviewed the clinical features of patients with AHA complicated by acute renal failure (ARF group) and compared them with patients with noncomplicated AHA (non-ARF group). The medical records of 208 consecutive patients with AHA who were diagnosed between January 2003 and October 2008 were reviewed. We identified 15 patients (7.2%) with ARF associated with AHA. There were no differences between the ARF and non-ARF group with regard to gender and age. The peak value of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (median: 6060 IU/L vs 1792 IU/L, P < 0.001), prothrombin time (PT) (International normalized ratio, median 1.72 vs 1.10, P < 0.001), and total bilirubin level (median: 9.6 mg/dL vs 6.3 mg/dL, P = 0.04) were significantly higher in the ARF than in the non-ARF group. Twelve patients (80%) recovered completely with haemodialysis (seven patients, 46.7%) or only conservative management (five patients, 33.3%), while one patient underwent liver transplantation because of fulminant hepatic failure, and two patients died because of fulminant hepatic failure. There were no deaths among patients with noncomplicated AHA in the non-ARF group. Five patients underwent kidney biopsy; two patients were diagnosed with acute tubular necrosis, two patients with acute interstitial nephritis with IgA nephropathy and one patient with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. All patients in the ARF group had microscopic haematuria and proteinuria (100%vs 31.1%, P < 0.001). Urine sodium levels were more than 10 mEq/L in 10 patients. The findings of high urinary sodium concentrations, microscopic haematuria and proteinuria did not support the diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Patients with AHA with ARF had higher ALT levels, more prolonged PTs, and higher total bilirubin levels. The prognosis for these patients was poorer than for those without ARF. However, the patients with ARF and nonfulminant AHA had recovered with proper treatment and should not be confused with patients that have HRS. [source] Prediction of the prognosis of patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure using the model for end-stage liver disease scoring system and a novel logistic regression modelJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 7 2009Q.-F. Sun Summary., The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACLF-HBV), and to establish a new model for predicting the prognosis of ACLF-HBV. A total of 204 adult patients with ACLF-HBV were retrospectively recruited between July 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004. The MELD scores were calculated according to the widely accepted formula. The 3-month mortality was calculated. The validity of the MELD model was determined by means of the concordance (c) statistic. Clinical data and biochemical values were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis based on which the regression model for predicting prognosis was established. The receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn for the MELD scoring system and the new regression model and the areas under the curves (AUC) were compared by the z -test. The 3-month mortality rate was 57.8%. The mean MELD score for the patients who died was significantly greater than those who survived beyond 3 months (28.7 vs 22.4, P = 0.003). The concordance (c) statistic (equivalent to the AUC) for the MELD scoring system predicting 3-month mortality was 0.709 (SE = 0.036, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.638,0.780). The independent factors predicting prognosis were hepatorenal syndrome (P < 0.001), liver cirrhosis (P = 0.009), HBeAg (P = 0.013), albumin (P = 0.028) and prothrombin activity (P = 0.011) as identified in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The regression model that was constructed by the logistic regression analysis produced a greater prognostic value (c = 0.891) than the MELD scoring system (z = 4.333, P < 0.001). The MELD scoring system is a promising and useful predictor for 3-month mortality of ACLF-HBV patients. Hepatorenal syndrome, liver cirrhosis, HBeAg, albumin and prothrombin activity are independent factors affecting the 3-month mortality. The newly established logistic regression model appears to be superior to the MELD scoring system in predicting 3-month mortality in patients with ACLF-HBV. [source] Prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis and kidney dysfunction in the era of MELD: results of a prospective studyLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 7 2006Michael Schepke Abstract: Background/Aim: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence and prognostic impact of kidney dysfunction due to other causes in cirrhotic patients are less well known. The current study prospectively evaluated the incidence and the prognostic relevance of different etiologies of kidney failure in cirrhotic patients. Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive patients with cirrhosis and serum creatinine ,1.5 mg/dl were enrolled. The etiologies of kidney dysfunction were analyzed, and prognostic factors including Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score were evaluated in a multivariate Cox model. Results: HRS was present in 35 (40%) patients (15 HRS 1, 20 HRS 2), followed by renal parenchymal disease (23%), drug-induced kidney dysfunction (19%) and prerenal failure due to bleeding or infections (15%). HRS patients had a significantly higher MELD score and shorter survival. In addition to the MELD score, only HRS 1 was independently predictive for survival. HRS 2 patients had a similar outcome as patients with non-HRS kidney dysfunction. Conclusions: In patients with cirrhosis and renal failure, hepatorenal syndrome is associated with a worse prognosis than kidney dysfunction due to other conditions but only HRS type 1 has independent prognostic relevance in addition to the MELD score in these patients. [source] Scope for prevention of hepatorenal syndromeALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2004Article first published online: 27 AUG 200 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Prognosis of hepatorenal syndrome , has it changed with current practice?ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2004P. Angeli Summary The Consensus Conference on Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) organized by the International Ascites Club in 1994 redefined HRS, introduced new diagnostic criteria that are now widely accepted, and proposed the distinction between two types of HRS: type 1 and type 2. Before the introduction of the new therapeutic options, the median survival of patients with type 1 HRS was only 1.7 weeks, and 6,12 months in patients with type 2 HRS. Liver transplantation (LT) was the first therapeutic option to change the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with HRS and 5-year survival after LT in patients with HRS is only slightly less than that of transplanted patients without HRS and markedly increased when compared to survival in nontransplanted patients with HRS. Nevertheless, a large proportion of patients die before LT is possible because of the poor prognosis of HRS and the prolonged waiting times in most transplant centres. Other therapeutic approaches were therefore developed to increase survival in patients with HRS. Vasoconstrictors and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are the most promising. The administration of vasoconstrictors together with albumin has been shown to reverse type 1 HRS and even to completely normalize renal function in 60,70% of treated patients. To date, four studies assessing TIPS in the management of type 1 HRS have been reported and TIPS insertion was technically successful in all of them. Given the shortage of donors for LT, vasoconstrictor therapy and TIPS strategies may be considered as a bridge to LT in patients with type 1 HRS. [source] Five-year follow-up of a hepatitis B virus-positive recipient of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive living donor liver graftLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2006Shin Hwang The shortage of cadaveric donor organs has led to the use of living donors and marginal cadaveric donors. To date, there have been only 2 reports on the use of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive liver grafts. Here we describe the 5-yr posttransplantation sequence of a hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive recipient who received an HBsAg-positive living donor liver graft. A 43-yr-old HBV-positive patient with hepatorenal syndrome received a living donor liver graft in October 2000 from a 27-yr-old HBsAg-positive carrier with no clinical evidence of HBV infection other than the serologic markers. The recipient recovered slowly after liver transplantation (LT). Recipient serum HBsAg was continuously positive despite anti-HBV therapy with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine. The patient was also treated with famciclovir and interferon; to date, a final regimen of lamivudine and adefovir has kept liver function stable for 20 months. The recipient has lived for 64 months after transplantation. The donor has not revealed any clinical evidence of active hepatitis during follow-up. In conclusion, our result implicates that a recipient of liver graft from an HBsAg-positive carrier may survive for a long period following antiviral therapy with lamivudine and adefovir. Considering this living donor case and previously reported cases, the use of an HBsAg-positive cadaveric liver graft may deserve attention when no other donor is available. Liver Transpl 12:993,997, 2006. © 2006 AASLD. [source] Review article: albumin in the treatment of liver diseases,new features of a classical treatmentALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2002V Arroyo Summary Albumin was introduced initially in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and ascites to increase serum albumin concentration due to its oncotic effect. Although its administration declined some years later, at present it constitutes an essential treatment in clinical hepatology. Several studies have clearly demonstrated its efficacy in the prevention and treatment of circulatory dysfunction and hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis. These effects can be due not only to its properties as a plasma expander but also to its capacity to bind numerous substances such as bile acids, nitric oxide and cytokines. Based on this capacity an albumin dialysis system (MARS) has recently been developed. The usefulness of this system in the management of patients with acute and chronic liver failure is, at present, under evaluation. [source] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: an updateLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2003Barbara Rosado Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been used in the treatment of complications of portal hypertension. TIPS is used for the control of acute variceal bleeding and for the prevention of vericeal rebleeding when pharmacologic therapy and endoscopic therapy have failed. Patients with refractory ascites with adequate hepatic reserve and renal function who fail to respond to large volume paracentesis may be reasonable candidates for TIPS. Promising indications for TIPS are Budd-Chiari syndrome uncontrolled by medical therapy, severe portal hypertensive gastropathy, refractory hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatorenal syndrome. TIPS cannot be recommended for preoperative portal decompression solely to facilitate liver transplantation. Special care should be taken to insure proper placement of the stent to avoid increasing the technical difficulty of the transplantation procedure. The major limiting factors for TIPS success are shunt dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy. Because shunt stenosis is the most important cause of recurrent complications of portal hypertension, a surveillance program to monitor shunt patency is mandatory. The MELD score may be useful in predicting post-TIPS survival, and also in counseling patients and their families. [source] Pathophysiology of renal disease associated with liver disorders: Implications for liver transplantation.LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2002Part I Renal and hepatic function are often intertwined through both the existence of associated primary organ diseases and hemodynamic interrelationships. This connection occasionally results in the chronic failure of both organs, necessitating combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). Since 1988, more than 850 patients in the United States have received such transplants, with patient survival somewhat less than that for patients receiving either organ alone. Patients with renal failure caused by acute injury or hepatorenal syndrome have classically not been included as candidates for combined transplantation because of the reversibility of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation. However, the rate and duration of renal failure before liver transplantation is increasing in association with prolonged waiting list times. Thus, the issue of acquired permanent renal damage in the setting of hepatic failure continues to confront the transplant community. The following article and its sequel (Part II, to be published in vol 8, no 3 of this journal) attempt to review the problem of primary and secondary renal disease in patients with end-stage liver disease, elements involved in renal disease progression and recovery, the impact of renal disease on liver transplant outcome, and results of combined LKT; outline the steps in the pretransplantation renal evaluation; and provide the beginnings of an algorithm for making the decision for combined LKT. [source] Use of albumin in three French university hospitals: is prescription monitoring still useful in 2004?,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 1 2007Vincent Pradel MD Abstract Purpose Use of albumin (indications and quantities involved) has not been assessed in France since major changes occurred after the publication of Cochrane group meta-analysis. The objectives of this study were to measure the repartition of albumin indications in three French university hospitals in 2004 and to assess the feasibility and usefulness to implement a prescription-monitoring program. Methods Exhaustive record of albumin prescription during 2 months in three French university hospitals of Marseille. Inclusion of all patients with a first prescription of albumin between 15 March 2004 and 15 May 2004. Indication, formulation and quantity prescribed were recorded for each prescription. Results One hundred and eighty-seven patients received a total of 426 prescriptions for a total quantity of 21,094 g of albumin during the study. The first indications were hypoalbuminemia (33% of total quantity), plasmapheresis (30.2%) and ascites or hepatorenal syndrome (13.7%). Fifty per cent of total quantity was used by 14 patients (7.5% of included patients). Conclusions Most of albumin consumption in our study is concentrated on recognized indications or indications without alternative to albumin. The different levels of analysis (number of patient treated, number of prescription and quantities used) must be taken into account when analyzing medications such as albumin. Only a marginal proportion of consumption is expected to be saved with close monitoring of indications. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Alleviating the Burden of Small-for-Size Graft in Right Liver Living Donor Liver Transplantation Through Accumulation of ExperienceAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2010S. C. Chan The issue of small-for-size graft (SFSG) containing the middle hepatic vein in right liver living donor liver transplantation from 1996 to 2008 (n = 320) was studied. Characteristics of donors, grafts and recipients were comparable between Era I (first 50 cases) and Era II (next 270 cases) except that the median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was higher in Era I (29 vs. 24; p = 0.024). The median graft to standard liver volume ratio (G/SLV) in Era I was 49.0% (range, 32.8,86.2%), versus 49.3% (range, 28.4,89.4%) in Era II (p = 0.498). Hospital mortality rate, the study endpoint, dropped from 16.0% (8/50) in Era I to 2.2% (6/270) in Era II (p = 0.000). Univariate analysis showed that MELD score (p = 0.002), pretransplant hepatorenal syndrome (p = 0.000) and Era I (p = 0.000) were significant in hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed that only Era I (relative risk 9.758; 95% confidence interval, 2.885,33.002; p = 0.000) was significant. In Era I, G/SLV<40% had a relative risk of 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.225,49.677; p = 0.030). The hospital mortality rates for G/SLV<40% were 50% (3/6) and 1.9% (1/52) in Era I and II respectively. In conclusion, through accumulation of experience, SFSG became less important as a factor in hospital mortality. [source] Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: an analysis of outcomesANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 10 2009Timothy P. Kurmis Abstract Background:, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are utilized for the management of complications of portal hypertension, particularly diuretic-resistant ascites and recurrent variceal bleeding. It has also been applied in Budd,Chiari syndrome and hepatorenal syndrome. We report the results in a small series, over 9 years, from a single centre, and compare these to those published in the literature. Methods:, A retrospective case note review of 20 consecutive TIPS procedures performed at Flinders Medical Centre from January 1997 to December 2005 was completed. All indications were included in the analysis. Underlying liver disease, peri-procedure complications, relief of symptoms and patient survival were recorded. Data on type of TIPS, shunt patency and method of follow-up were recorded. Results:, Thirty-six TIPS were performed in 20 subjects. All initial TIPS attempts were successful. Indications were: refractory ascites (18), acute variceal bleeding (12) and hepatorenal syndrome (2). There were no peri-procedure deaths, however. Ninety-day mortality was 20%. Outcomes in model of end-stage liver disease score and biochemical characteristics post-TIPS were comparable to those reported. Overall, TIPS dysfunction rate was 35% at 1 year. TIPS follow-up and patency surveillance was an ad hoc combination of Doppler ultrasound and venography. Conclusion:, TIPS procedure outcomes in our centre are similar to those reported in the literature from large centres. TIPS patency rates may be improved with regular monitoring and early intervention when stenosis occurs. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||