Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hepatic Sinusoids (hepatic + sinusoid)
Selected AbstractsVascular Development and Differentiation During Human Liver OrganogenesisTHE ANATOMICAL RECORD : ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, Issue 6 2008Sophie Collardeau-Frachon Abstract The vascular architecture of the human liver is established at the end of a complex embryological history. The hepatic primordium emerges at the 4th week and is in contact with two major venous systems of the fetal circulation: the vitelline veins and the umbilical veins. The fetal architecture of the afferent venous circulation of the liver is acquired between the 4th and the 6th week. At the end of this process, the portal vein is formed from several distinct segments of the vitelline veins; the portal sinus, deriving from the subhepatic intervitelline anastomosis, connects the umbilical vein, which is the predominant vessel of the fetal liver, to the portal system; the ductus venosus connects the portal sinus to the vena cava inferior. At birth, the umbilical vein and the ductus venosus collapse; the portal vein becomes the only afferent vein of the liver. The efferent venous vessels of the liver derive from the vitelline veins and are formed between the 4th and the 6th week. The hepatic artery forms at the 8th week; intrahepatic arterial branches progressively extend from the central to the peripheral areas of the liver between the 10th and the 15th week. Hepatic sinusoids appear very early, as soon as hepatic cords invade the septum transversum at the 4th week. They then progressively acquire their distinctive structural and functional characters, through a multistage process. Vascular development and differentiation during liver organogenesis is, therefore, a unique process; many of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Anat Rec, 291:614,627, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Laser-guided direct writing for three-dimensional tissue engineeringBIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOENGINEERING, Issue 2 2005Yaakov Nahmias Abstract One of the principal limitations to the size of an engineered tissue is oxygen and nutrient transport. Lacking a vascular bed, cells embedded in an engineered tissue will consume all available oxygen within hours while out branching blood vessels will take days to vascularize the implanted tissue. One possible solution is to directly write vascular structures within the engineered tissue prior to implantation, reconstructing the tissue according to its native architecture. The cell patterning technique, laser-guided direct writing (LGDW), can pattern multiple cells types with micrometer resolution on arbitrary surfaces, including biological gels. Here we show that LGDW can pattern human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in two- and three-dimensions with micrometer accuracy. By patterning HUVEC on Matrigel, we can direct their self-assembly into vascular structures along the desired pattern. Finally, co-culturing the vascular structures with hepatocytes resulted in an aggregated tubular structure similar in organization to a hepatic sinusoid. This capability can facilitate studies of tissue architecture at the single cell level, and of heterotypic interactions underlying processes such as liver and pancreas morphogenesis, differentiation, and angiogenesis. Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] Development of murine hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells characterized by the expression of hyaluronan receptorsDEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS, Issue 8 2007Hidenori Nonaka Abstract Endothelial cells (ECs) display distinct structural and functional characteristics depending on the tissue and developmental stage; however, the development of tissue-specific ECs remains poorly understood. Here, we describe the development of hepatic sinusoids in mice based on the expression of hyaluronan receptors Stab2 and Lyve-1. Flk-1+ cells in and around the liver bud begin to express Stab2 at embryonic day (E) 9.5, before the formation of vascular lumen. Hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (HSECs) begin to express Lyve-1 at E10.5, and both markers continue to be expressed in HSECs thereafter. Although HSECs and lymphatic ECs (LECs) are known to share functional and phenotypic characteristics, we clearly show that HSECs can be distinguished from LECs by the expression of molecular markers and higher endocytotic activity. Our results provide new insight into the development of tissue-specific ECs and phenotypic criteria to distinguish HSECs from other types of ECs, including LECs. Developmental Dynamics 236:2258,2267, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Contribution of mesothelium-derived cells to liver sinusoids in avian embryosDEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS, Issue 3 2004J.M. Pérez-Pomares Abstract The developing liver is vascularized through a complex process of vasculogenesis that leads to the differentiation of the sinusoids. The main structural elements of the sinusoidal wall are endothelial and stellate (Ito) cells. We have studied the differentiation of the hepatic sinusoids in avian embryos through confocal colocalization of differentiation markers, in ovo direct labeling of the liver mesothelium, induced invasion of the developing chick liver by quail proepicardial cells, and in vitro culture of chimeric aggregates. Our results show that liver mesothelial cells give rise to mesenchymal cells which intermingle between the growing hepatoblast cords and become incorporated to the sinusoidal wall, contributing to both endothelial and stellate cell populations. We have also shown that the proepicardium, a mesothelial tissue anatomically continuous with liver mesothelium, is able to form sinusoid-like vessels into the hepatic primordium as well as in cultured aggregates of hepatoblasts. Thus, both intrinsic or extrinsic mesothelium-derived cells have the developmental potential to contribute to the establishment of liver sinusoids. Developmental Dynamics 229:465,474, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Local control of the immune response in the liverIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2000Percy A. Knolle Summary: The physiological function of the liver , such as removal of pathogens and antigens from the blood, protein synthesis and metabolism , requires an immune response that is adapted to these tasks and is locally regulated. Pathogenic microorganisms must be efficiently eliminated while the large number of antigens derived from the gastrointestinal tract must be tolerized. From experimental observations it is evident that the liver favours the induction of tolerance rather than the induction of immunity. The liver probably not only is involved in transplantation tolerance but contributes as well to tolerance to orally ingested antigens (entering the liver with portal-venous blood) and to containment of systemic immune responses (antigen from the systemic circulation entering the liver with arterial blood). This review summarizes the experimental data that shed light on the molecular mechanisms and the cell populations of the liver involved in local immune regulation in the liver. Although hepatocytes constitute the major cell population of the liver, direct interaction of hepatocytes with leukocytes in the blood is unlikely. Sinusoidal endothelial cells, which line the hepatic sinusoids and separate hepatocytes from leukocytes in the sinusoidal lumen, and Kupffer cells, the resident macrophage population of the liver, can directly interact with passenger leukocytes. In the liver, clearance of antigen from the blood occurs mainly by sinusoidal endothelial cells through very efficient receptor-mediated endocytosis. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells constitutively express all molecules necessary for antigen presentation (CD54, CD80, CD86, MHC class I and class II and CD40) and can function as antigen-presenting cells for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, these cells probably contribute to hepatic immune surveillance by activation of effector T cells. Antigen-specific T-cell activation is influenced by the local microenvironment. This microenvironment is characterized by the physiological presence of bacterial constituents such as endotoxin and by the local release of immunosuppressive mediators such as interleukin-10, prostaglandin E2 and transforming growth factor-b. Different hepatic cell populations may contribute in different ways to tolerance induction in the liver. In vitro experiments revealed that naive T cells are activated by resident sinusoidal endothelial cells but do not differentiate into effector T cells. These T cells show a cytokine profile and a functional phenotype that is compatible with the induction of tolerance. Besides sinusoidal endothelial cells, other cell populations of the liver, such as dendritic cells, Kupffer cells and perhaps also hepatocytes, may contribute to tolerance induction by deletion of T cells through induction of apoptosis. [source] Role of neutrophils in sinusoidal endothelial cell injury after extensive hepatectomy in cholestatic ratsJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 8 2000Masayuki Ohtsuka Abstract Background and Aims: The authors have shown previously that sinusoidal endothelial cell injury developed concomitantly with the accumulation of neutrophils in the hepatic sinusoidal space in cholestatic rats after extensive hepatectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of neutrophils in the development of this kind of endothelial cell injury. Methods: Rats underwent 78% partial hepatectomy after 2 weeks of cholestasis, and subsequent external biliary drainage for 5 days. To decrease the number of neutrophils, antirat neutrophil serum was administered intraperitoneally. Some serum parameters and histological specimens were examined 48 h after partial hepatectomy. Results: Anti-neutrophil serum significantly reduced the number of accumulated neutrophils in the hepatic sinusoids. Although the purine nucleoside phosphorylase : alanine aminotransferase ratio, a marker of non-parenchymal cell injury, was increased in cholestatic-hepatectomized rats, this abnormality was significantly attenuated by the treatment with antineutrophil serum. Electron microscopically, focal detachment of cytoplasms of sinusoidal endothelial cells was observed occasionally in cholestatic-hepatectomized rats, but was not found in the antirat neutrophil serum-treated rats. Conclusion: These results indicate that accumulated neutrophils might be important effector cells in the pathogenesis of sinusoidal endothelial cell injury after extensive hepatectomy in cholestatic rats, even after appropriate external biliary drainage. [source] Morphological mechanisms for regulating blood flow through hepatic sinusoidsLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2000Robert S. McCuskey Abstract: This review summarizes what is known about the various morphological sites that regulate the distribution of blood flow to and from the sinusoids in the hepatic microvascular system. These sites potentially include the various segments of the afferent portal venules and hepatic arterioles, the sinusoids themselves, and central and hepatic venules. Given the paucity of smooth muscle in the walls of these vessels, various sinusoidal lining cells have been suggested to play a role in regulating the diameters of sinusoids and influencing the distribution and velocity of blood flow in these vessels. While sinusoidal endothelial cells have been demonstrated to be contractile and to exhibit sphincter function, attention has recently focused on the perisinusoidal stellate cell as the cell responsible for controlling the sinusoidal diameter. A very recent study, however, suggested that the principal site of vasoconstriction elicited by ET-1 was the pre-terminal portal venule. This raised the question of whether or not the diameters of sinusoids might decrease due to passive recoil when inflow is reduced or eliminated and intra-sinusoidal pressure falls. In more recent in vivo microscopic studies, clamping of the portal vein dramatically reduced sinusoidal blood flow as well as the diameters of sinusoids. The sinusoidal lumens rapidly returned to their initial diameters upon restoration of portal blood flow suggesting that sinusoidal blood pressure normally distends the sinusoidal wall which can recoil when the pressure drops. Stellate cells may be responsible for this reaction given the nature of their attachment to parenchymal cells by obliquely oriented microprojections from the lateral edges of their subendothelial processes. This suggests that care must be exercised when interpreting the mechanism for the reduction of sinusoidal diameters following drug administration without knowledge of changes occurring to the portal venous and hepatic inflow. [source] | |||||||||||||