Home About us Contact | |||
Group Validity (group + validity)
Selected AbstractsSix-minute walk test in obese children and adolescents: Reproducibility and validity,PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2009Gunilla Morinder Abstract Background and Purpose.,The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is increasingly used in clinical practice. The aims of this study were to determine the reproducibility of the 6MWT in obese children and adolescents, to describe walking capacity in this population and compare the results with values from normal-weight children (known group validity), and, finally, to describe the correlation between distance walked and estimated maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max).,Methods.,Reproducibility was determined by a test,retest design and known group validity by a comparative design. The 6MWT was first test,retested in 49 obese children (30 boys, 19 girls, 8,16 years, body mass index [BMI] 24.9,52.1,kg?m,2). Then, for validation, 250 obese children (126 boys, 124 girls, 8,16 years, BMI 23.2,57,kg/m2) and 97 normal-weight children (48 boys, 49 girls, 8,16 years, BMI 13.3,23.2,kg·m,2) performed the 6MWT. The obese children also performed a sub-maximal bicycle ergometry test.,Results.,In the test,retest, the obese children walked 571,m the first test and 57,m the second (p = 0.578). The measurement error (Sw) was 24,m, coefficient of variation (CV): 4.3% and the intraclass correlation (ICC1:1): 0.84. Repeatability was 68,m, and limits of agreement were +71 and ,65,m. In comparison mean (standard deviation), six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in the obese children was 571,m (65.5), and in the normal-weight children, 663,m (61.1) (p < 0.001). The correlation between 6MWD and estimated VO2max (r = 0.34) was low.,Conclusions.,The 6MWT showed good reproducibility and known group validity, and can be recommended for use in clinical practice in the studied population. To evaluate individual outcomes after intervention, the 6MWD needs to change by >68,m to be statistically significant. The 6MWD performed by obese children averaged 86% of the distance normal-weight children walked. In obese children, the correlation between 6MWD and estimated VO2max was low, hence the 6MWT cannot substitute a bicycle ergometry test. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The six-minute walk test in outpatients with obesity: reproducibility and known group validityPHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2008Ulla Evers Larsson Abstract Background and Purpose.,To assess the reproducibility and validity of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) in men and women with obesity in order to facilitate evaluation of treatment outcome.,Method.,A test,retest design was used to test reproducibility and a comparative design to test known group validity. Forty-three obese outpatients (16 male), mean age 47 (21,62) years, mean body mass index (BMI) 40 (3,62)kg-m,2 performed the 6MWT twice within one week. Intraclass correlation (ICC1.1) and measurement error (Sw) were calculated from the mean square values derived from a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA (fixed effect model). The reproducibility was also analysed by means of coefficient of variation (CV) and the Bland Altman method including 95% limits of agreement. The variance of the distance walked was analysed by means of regressions. The known group validity of the 6MWT (distance walked and the work of walking) in obese participants was shown by comparisons with 41 lean participants (18 male), mean age 47 (24,65) years, mean BMI 22.7kg-m,2 (19,25).,Results.,The obese group walked 534,m (confidence interval [CI] 508,560 the first and 552,m (CI 523,580) the second walk (p < 0.001). Sw was 25,m, CV 4.7%, ICC1.1 was 0.96. The limits of agreement were ,46,m+80,m. The validity tests showed that they walked 162,m shorter (p < 0.001) and performed much heavier work (p < 0.001) than the lean group. In the obese group, BMI alone explained 38% of the variance of the distance walked.,Conclusions.,The 6MWT showed good reproducibility and known group validity and can be recommended for evaluating walking ability in subjects with obesity. For individual evaluation, however, an improved walking distance of at least 80,m was required to make the difference clinically significant. Despite shorter walking distance the obese participants performed heavier work than the lean. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The 14-item Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test: translation and validation study of the Malaysian versionPRACTICAL DIABETES INTERNATIONAL (INCORPORATING CARDIABETES), Issue 6 2010HK Al-Qazaz MSc Abstract The aims of this study were to translate the Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test (MDKT) into the Malaysian language, and to examine the psychometric properties of the Malaysian version. A standard translation procedure was used to create the Malaysian version of the MDKT from the original English version. A convenience sample of 307 outpatients with type 2 diabetes was identified between May and October 2009. All data were collected from the Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia. Instruments consisted of the Malaysian version of the MDKT and a socio-demographic questionnaire. Medical records were reviewed for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and other clinical data. Reliability was tested for internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Employing the recommended scoring method, the mean±SD of MDKT scores was 7.88±3.01. Good internal consistency was found (Cronbach's alpha = 0.702); the test-retest reliability value was 0.894 (p<0.001). For known group validity, a significant relationship between MDKT categories and HbA1c categories (chi-square = 21.626; p,0.001) was found. The findings of this validation study indicate that the Malaysian version of the MDKT is a reliable and valid measure of diabetes knowledge which can now be used in clinical and research practice. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons. [source] |