Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Glucose Disposal Rate (glucose + disposal_rate)
Selected AbstractsThe different mechanisms of insulin sensitizers to prevent type 2 diabetes in OLETF ratsDIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 5 2007Sung Hee Choi Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of pioglitazone and metformin treatment during pre-diabetic period for the prevention of diabetes in a rat model. Methods OLETF rats aged 18-weeks, were treated with pioglitazone (10 mg/kg/day) and metformin (300 mg/kg/day) for 10 weeks from their pre-diabetic period. We measured weight, lipid profiles, fat distribution, glucose tolerance, and pancreatic insulin content. Results Prominent weight gain (mostly subcutaneous fat area) was observed in the pioglitazone-treated OLETF (O-P) rats versus significant weight loss was observed in the metformin-treated OLETF (O-M) rats. Pioglitazone reversed the serum triglyceride (TG) and FFAs levels to normal (TG 0.46 ± 0.04 vs 0.88 ± 0.05 mmol/l in LETO). At the age of 28 weeks, the O-P rats showed completely normal glucose tolerance, and the glucose disposal rate (GDR) was markedly improved (25.6 ± 0.4 vs 20.6 ± 0.5 mg/min/kg in O-C, p < 0.05). The O-M rats also showed an improved fasting glucose and GDR level, but not as much as those with O-P rats. The pancreas insulin contents were much improved in the O-P rats (22.9 ± 1.2 vs 18.8 ± 1.3 nmol/pancreas in O-M rats, p < 0.05) with histological improvement. Conclusion The pre-diabetic treatment with pioglitazone, despite significant weight gain, completely prevents to develop diabetes and enhances beta cell function with preservation of islet cell changes. Metformin treatment was also effective, but mainly by ameliorating the insulin resistance with marked reduction in body weight. The reversal of dyslipidaemia and the fat redistribution might contribute to the greater improvement of pioglitazone treatment compared to metformin in OLETF rats. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Heterogeneity of non-insulin-dependent diabetes expressed as variability in insulin sensitivity, ,-cell function and cardiovascular risk profileDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 1 2003K. I. Birkeland Abstract Aims The present study investigated the variability in insulin sensitivity and ,-cell function and their relationship to anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) positivity and the metabolic syndrome in a group of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Methods Fifty-four subjects aged 59.5 ± 6.1 (mean ± sd) years with NIDDM for 7.9 ± 3.9 years referred to hospital due to poor glycaemic control, were investigated. Insulin sensitivity was determined by the euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp technique as the glucose disposal rate relative to the insulin level obtained (GDRI), and also estimated with the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-S). ,-cell function was measured by assaying the fasting and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide levels and with the HOMA-B. Results The insulin sensitivity varied 18-fold between subjects when estimated with the clamp and six-fold when estimated with HOMA-S, and was lower the more criteria for the metabolic syndrome present (P = 0.0001 by anova). The ,-cell function varied four-fold when measured as stimulated C-peptide, and eight-fold when estimated with the HOMA-B. The levels of fasting C-peptide and HOMA-B values tended to be lower in anti-GAD+ (n = 11) than in anti-GAD,subjects (P = 0.06 and P = 0.08, respectively). From previously published coronary risk charts, we estimated the 10-year risk of a coronary heart disease (CHD) event to be > 20% in 17 of 39 patients free from cardiovascular disease at the time of study, 16 of whom qualified for a diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome. Conclusions The wide variations in insulin sensitivity and ,-cell function found among subjects with NIDDM support the notion that the disorder is highly heterogeneous. Reduced insulin sensitivity was clearly related to the metabolic syndrome and an increased risk for CHD. [source] A common variant in the patatin-like phospholipase 3 gene (PNPLA3) is associated with fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents,,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 4 2010Nicola Santoro The genetic factors associated with susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in pediatric obesity remain largely unknown. Recently, a nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs738409), in the patatin-like phospholipase 3 gene (PNPLA3) has been associated with hepatic steatosis in adults. In a multiethnic group of 85 obese youths, we genotyped the PNLPA3 single-nucleotide polymorphism, measured hepatic fat content by magnetic resonance imaging and insulin sensitivity by the insulin clamp. Because PNPLA3 might affect adipogenesis/lipogenesis, we explored the putative association with the distribution of adipose cell size and the expression of some adipogenic/lipogenic genes in a subset of subjects who underwent a subcutaneous fat biopsy. Steatosis was present in 41% of Caucasians, 23% of African Americans, and 66% of Hispanics. The frequency of PNPLA3(rs738409) G allele was 0.324 in Caucasians, 0.183 in African Americans, and 0.483 in Hispanics. The prevalence of the G allele was higher in subjects showing hepatic steatosis. Surprisingly, subjects carrying the G allele showed comparable hepatic glucose production rates, peripheral glucose disposal rate, and glycerol turnover as the CC homozygotes. Carriers of the G allele showed smaller adipocytes than those with CC genotype (P = 0.005). Although the expression of PNPLA3, PNPLA2, PPAR,2(peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2), SREBP1c(sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c), and ACACA(acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase) was not different between genotypes, carriers of the G allele showed lower leptin (LEP)(P = 0.03) and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression (P = 0.04). Conclusion: A common variant of the PNPLA3 gene confers susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in obese youths without increasing the level of hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance. The rs738409 PNPLA3 G allele is associated with morphological changes in adipocyte cell size. (HEPATOLOGY 2010.) [source] Losartan modifies glomerular hyperfiltration and insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetesDIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 6 2001S. Nielsen Aim: The effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on renal haemodynamics and insulin-mediated glucose disposal was examined in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design. Methods: Diurnal blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR, determined using [125I]-iothalamate), renal plasma flow (RPF, determined using [131I]-hippuran) and urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE) were measured, and a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp with indirect calorimetry was performed in nine patients (age 30 ± 7 years (mean ±,s.d.), HbA1c 8.1 ± 1.1%) following 6 weeks' administration of either losartan 50 mg/day or placebo. Results: Diurnal blood pressure was significantly reduced after losartan compared with placebo (122/70 ± 11/8 vs. 130/76 ± 12/6 mmHg, p <,0.05). A significant decline in GFR (133 ± 23 vs. 140 ± 22 ml/min, p < 0.05) and filtration fraction (FF; GFR/RPF) (24.6 ± 3.5 vs. 26.2 ± 3.6%, p <,0.05) was observed in the losartan vs. placebo groups. RPF and UAE did not change. Isotopically determined glucose disposal rates were similar after losartan and placebo in the basal (2.61 ± 0.53 vs. 2.98 ± 0.93 mg/kg/min) and insulin-stimulated states (6.84 ± 2.52 vs. 6.97 ± 3.11 mg/kg/min). However, the glucose oxidation rate increased significantly after losartan vs. placebo in the basal state (1.72 ± 0.34 vs. 1.33 ± 0.18, mg/kg/min, p <,0.01) and during insulin stimulation (2.89 ± 0.75 vs. 2.40 ± 0.62 mg/kg/min, p <,0.03). Basal and insulin-stimulated non-oxidative glucose disposal tended to decrease after losartan; however, this was not significant. Endogenous glucose production and lipid oxidation were unchanged after treatment and similarly suppressed during hyperinsulinaemia. Glycaemic control, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides were stable in both losartan and placebo groups. Conclusions: Losartan reduces blood pressure, glomerular hyperfiltration and FF, and improves basal and insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation in normotensive, normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients. [source] | ||||||||||