Home About us Contact | |||
Glucose Area (glucose + area)
Selected AbstractsImproved glycaemic control with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro: a multicentre, randomized, cross-over trial in people with Type 1 diabetesDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 3 2006S. G. Ashwell Abstract Aims To compare blood glucose control using insulin glargine + insulin lispro with that on NPH insulin + unmodified human insulin in adults with Type 1 diabetes managed with a multiple injection regimen. Methods In this 32-week, five-centre, two-way cross-over study, people with Type 1 diabetes (n = 56, baseline HbA1c 8.0 ± 0.8%) were randomized to evening insulin glargine + mealtime insulin lispro or to NPH insulin (once- or twice-daily) + mealtime unmodified human insulin. Each 16-week period concluded with a 24-h inpatient plasma glucose profile. Results HbA1c was lower with glargine + lispro than with NPH + human insulin [7.5 vs. 8.0%, difference ,0.5 (95% CI ,0.7, ,0.3) %, P < 0.001]. This was confirmed by an 8% lower 24-h plasma glucose area under the curve (AUC) (187 vs. 203 mmol l,1 h,1, P = 0.037), a 24% reduction in plasma glucose AUC > 7.0 mmol/l1 (47 vs. 62 mmol l,1 h,1, P = 0.017) and a 15% lower post-prandial plasma glucose AUC (75 vs. 88 mmol l,1 h,1, P = 0.002). There was no reduction in night-time plasma glucose AUC or increase in plasma glucose area < 3.5 mmol/l. Monthly rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reduced by 44% with glargine + lispro (0.66 vs. 1.18 episodes/month, P < 0.001). Conclusions Compared with NPH insulin + unmodified human insulin, the combination of insulin glargine with a rapid-acting insulin analogue as multiple-injection therapy for Type 1 diabetes improves overall glycaemic control as assessed by HbA1c and 24-h plasma glucose monitoring to a clinically significant degree, together with a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycaemia. [source] Aging per se does not influence postprandial glucose levels in type 2 diabetesGERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 3 2005Yumiko Magata Background: It is well known that postprandial glucose increases with aging in non-diabetic subjects. The question we addressed is whether elderly type 2 diabetic patients with definite fasting hyperglycemia (, 126 mg/dL) also display increased postprandial hyperglycemia relative to their younger counterparts. Methods: Diurnal plasma glucose profiles were measured in 162 overt type 2 diabetic patients treated by diet alone (diet group) or with sulfonylureas as monotherapy (SU group). Plasma glucose concentrations were measured at 08.00 hours (before breakfast), 10.00, 12.00 (before lunch), 14.00, 18.00 (before dinner), 20.00, 24.00, 03.00, 06.00 and 08.00 hours the next morning. The postprandial glucose area under the curve (AUC) from 08.00 to 24.00 hours was calculated above the baseline level equal to the 08.00-hours plasma glucose value, and the relationships with clinical variables, including age, were assessed. Results: There were no differences in diurnal plasma glucose profiles between the middle-aged (< 65 years) and elderly (, 65 years) groups either the diet group or the SU group. Univariate analysis showed that the postprandial glucose area under the curve was related to the 08:00-hours plasma glucose value (R = 0.583, P < 0.001) in the diet alone group and to the duration of diabetes (R = 0.220, P < 0.05), SU dose (R = 0.330, P = 0.001) and urine CPR (R = ,0.229, P < 0.05) in the SU group. In multivariate analysis, postprandial glucose area under the curve was only related to 08.00 hours plasma glucose value in the diet group (R2 of the model = 0.340, P < 0.001) and to the SU dose in SU group (R2 of the model = 0.145, P < 0.001). Conclusion: These results suggest that aging, per se, does not influence postprandial glucose levels in overt type 2 diabetic patients. [source] Original Paper: Telmisartan Effects on Insulin Resistance in Obese or Overweight Adults Without Diabetes or HypertensionJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 9 2010Willa Hsueh MD J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:746,752. ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are antihypertensive agents associated with reduced risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus. The ARB telmisartan is a partial agonist of peroxisome proliferator,activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-,). This study evaluated the effect of telmisartan on insulin resistance, a known target of PPAR-, agonism. Overweight/obese persons with body mass index ,28 kg/m2, waist circumference ,35 inches, and components of the metabolic syndrome without hypertension or diabetes who were not preselected for insulin resistance were enrolled. Patients were randomized to telmisartan or matching placebo for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was changed from baseline in the insulin sensitivity index (SI), calculated from oral glucose tolerance testing. SI was also evaluated in a subset of patients using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Secondary end points included measures of insulin sensitivity and glucose and lipid metabolism. A total of 138 patients were randomized and received ,1 dose of study medication; 128 completed the study. At end point, no significant difference was found between telmisartan and placebo groups regarding change from baseline in SI or in glucose area under the curve. No significant between-group differences were found regarding glucose metabolism or lipoprotein levels. In the population with abdominal obesity and components of the metabolic syndrome, telmisartan did not increase insulin sensitivity. [source] High prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in adults with Williams syndrome,AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, Issue 2 2010B.R. Pober Abstract A standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered to 28 adults with Williams syndrome (WS). Three quarters of the WS subjects showed abnormal glucose curves, meeting diagnostic criteria for either diabetes or the pre-diabetic state of impaired glucose tolerance. Fasting mean glucose and median insulin levels did not differ significantly in the total WS cohort versus age,gender,BMI matched controls, though the glucose area under the curve was greater in the WS subjects. HbA1c levels were not as reliable as the OGTT in diagnosing the presence of diabetes. Given the high prevalence of impaired glucose regulation, adults with WS should be screened for diabetes, and when present should be treated in accordance with standard medical practice. Hemizygosity for a gene mapping to the Williams syndrome chromosome region (WSCR) is likely the major factor responsible for the high frequency of diabetes in WS. Syntaxin-1A is a prime candidate gene based on its location in the WSCR, its role in insulin release, and the presence of abnormal glucose metabolism in mouse models with aberrantly expressed Stx-1a. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |