Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
G Protein Activation (g + protein_activation)
Selected AbstractsThe guanine nucleotide binding protein , polypeptide 3 gene C825T polymorphism is associated with elite endurance athletesEXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2009Nir Eynon A functional C825T polymorphism in the human guanine nucleotide binding protein , polypeptide 3 (GNB3) gene has been associated with enhanced G protein activation. Since reports regarding the interaction between physical activity and the GNB3 C825T polymorphism are limited and inconsistent, the aim of this study was to determine the frequency of C825T alleles among 155 elite Israeli athletes (endurance athletes and sprinters) and 234 healthy control subjects. Genotyping for GNB3 C825T was performed using polymerase chain reaction on DNA from leucocytes. Results showed that there was a significant difference in GNB3 C825T polymorphism genotype frequencies between endurance athletes and sprinters (P= 0.045) as well as between endurance athletes and control subjects (P= 0.046). We also observed a significantly higher proportion of the GNB3 TT genotype in the group of endurance athletes (19%) compared with the sprinters (5%, P= 0.014) and the control subjects (8.5%, P= 0.026). In the group of athletes, the odds ratio of GNB3 TT genotype being an endurance athlete was 4.49 (95% confidence interval 1.4,14.3) and of GNB3 CC genotype was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.47,1.77). These results were even more pronounced when we compared between the subgroups of 20 top-level endurance athletes and 24 top-level sprinters. We conclude that in Israeli athletes the GNB3 TT genotype is higher in elite endurance athletes than it is in sprinters, and within the endurance group it is higher in top-level athletes, suggesting a positive association between the TT genotype and the likelihood of being an elite endurance athlete. [source] Alanine screening of the intracellular loops of the human bradykinin B2 receptor , effects on receptor maintenance, G protein activation and internalizationFEBS JOURNAL, Issue 13 2009Alexander Faussner The bradykinin B2 receptor is coupled to G protein Gq/11 and becomes sequestered into intracellular compartments after activation. To more closely define the receptor sequences involved in these processes and their functions, we systematically mutated all three intracellular loops (ICLs), either as point mutations or in groups of three to five amino acids to Ala, obtaining a total of 14 mutants. All constructs were stably expressed in HEK 293 cells and, with the exception of triple mutant DRY , AAA, retained the ability to specifically bind [3H]bradykinin. The binding affinities at 4 or 37 °C of several mutants differed considerably from those determined for the wild-type receptor, indicating an allosteric connection between the conformation of the binding site and that of the ICLs. Mutations in ICL-1 strongly reduced surface expression without affecting G protein signaling or [3H]bradykinin internalization. Two cluster mutants in the middle of ICL-2 containing basic residues displayed considerably reduced potencies, whereas two mutations in ICL-3 resulted in receptor conformations that were considered to be semi-active, based on the observation that they responded with phosphoinositide hydrolysis to compounds normally considered to be antagonists. This, and the fact that a cluster mutant at the C-terminal end of ICL-3 was signaling incompetent, hint at the involvement of ICL-2 and ICL-3 in Gq/11 activation, albeit with different functions. None of the mutants displayed reduced ligand-induced receptor internalization, indicating that the loops are not essential for this process. No conclusion could be drawn, however, with regard to the role of the DRY sequence, as the corresponding triplet mutation lacked binding capability. [source] Hypoxia modulates cholinergic but not opioid activation of G proteins in rat hippocampusHIPPOCAMPUS, Issue 10 2007V.S. Hambrecht Abstract Intermittent hypoxia, such as that associated with obstructive sleep apnea, can cause neuronal death and neurobehavioral dysfunction. The cellular and molecular mechanisms through which hypoxia alter hippocampal function are incompletely understood. This study used in vitro [35S]guanylyl-5,- O -(,-thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTP,S) autoradiography to test the hypothesis that carbachol and DAMGO activate hippocampal G proteins. In addition, this study tested the hypothesis that in vivo exposure to different oxygen (O2) concentrations causes a differential activation of G proteins in the CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) regions of the hippocampus. G protein activation was quantified as nCi/g tissue in CA1, CA3, and DG from rats housed for 14 days under one of three different oxygen conditions: normoxic (21% O2) room air, or hypoxia (10% O2) that was intermittent or sustained. Across all regions of the hippocampus, activation of G proteins by the cholinergic agonist carbachol and the mu opioid agonist [D-Ala2, N-Met-Phe4, Gly5] enkephalin (DAMGO) was ordered by the degree of hypoxia such that sustained hypoxia > intermittent hypoxia > room air. Carbachol increased G protein activation during sustained hypoxia (38%), intermittent hypoxia (29%), and room air (27%). DAMGO also activated G proteins during sustained hypoxia (52%), intermittent hypoxia (48%), and room air (43%). Region-specific comparisons of G protein activation revealed that the DG showed significantly less activation by carbachol following intermittent hypoxia and sustained hypoxia than the CA1. Considered together, the results suggest the potential for hypoxia to alter hippocampal function by blunting the cholinergic activation of G proteins within the DG. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The use of membrane translocating peptides to identify sites of interaction between the C5a receptor and downstream effector proteinsIMMUNOLOGY, Issue 4 2004Graham A. Auger Summary The complement fragment C5a is a potent leucocyte chemoattractant and activator, mediating its effects through a G-protein-coupled receptor. Whilst the C-terminal domain of this receptor has been shown to be essential for receptor desensitization and internalization, it is not known which domains couple to the receptor's heterotrimeric G proteins. In this report we have used a membrane translocating sequence (MTS) to examine the effects of the four intracellular domains of the human C5a receptor (C5aR) on the receptor's signalling via G,i family heterotrimeric G proteins in intact RBL-2H3 cells. The results indicate that all of the intracellular domains couple to downstream signalling, with the proximal region of the C terminus being a major binding site and intracellular loop 3 playing a role in G protein activation or receptor desensitization. [source] Molecular Modeling of Meta II RhodopsinMOLECULAR INFORMATICS, Issue 2 2006lusarz Abstract A model believed to be representative for activated class A G protein-coupled receptors is proposed. It consists of rhodopsin and the transducin , C-terminal peptide [Gt,(338,350)] docked to it. The model utilizes the resolved interactions/distances, found to be essential in the activated rhodopsin (RD*) and the structure of Gt,(338,350) that is known to stabilize RD*. Long-term molecular dynamics (14.8,ns) in fully hydrated lipid bilayer model is applied to the system to refine and verify conformational changes in rhodopsin itself and the structure of the complex. A concomitant role of Gt, and Gt, C-termini in stabilizing RD* could possibly be resolved assuming a receptor dimer as a requisite for G protein activation. [source] First Cytoplasmic Loop of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Can Function at the Third Cytoplasmic Loop Position of Rhodopsin,PHOTOCHEMISTRY & PHOTOBIOLOGY, Issue 4 2008Takahiro Yamashita G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are classified into several families based on their amino acid sequences. In family 1, GPCRs such as rhodopsin and adrenergic receptor, the structure,function relationship has been extensively investigated to demonstrate that exposure of the third cytoplasmic loop is essential for selective G protein activation. In contrast, much less is known about other families. Here we prepared chimeric mutants between Gt-coupled rhodopsin and Gi/Go- and Gs-coupled glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor of family 2 and tried to identify the loop region that functions at the third cytoplasmic loop position of rhodopsin. We succeeded in expressing a mutant having the first cytoplasmic loop of GLP-1 receptor and found that this mutant activated Gi and Go efficiently but did not activate Gt. Moreover, the rhodopsin mutant having the first loop of Gs-coupled secretin receptor of family 2 decreased the Gi and Go activation efficiencies. Therefore, the first loop of GLP-1 receptor would share a similar role to the third loop of rhodopsin in G protein activation. This result strongly suggested that different families of GPCRs have maintained molecular architectures of their ancestral types to generate a common mechanism, namely exposure of the cytoplasmic loop, to activate peripheral G protein. [source] Engineering a G protein-coupled receptor for structural studies: Stabilization of the BLT1 receptor ground statePROTEIN SCIENCE, Issue 4 2009Aimée Martin Abstract Structural characterization of membrane proteins is hampered by their instability in detergent solutions. We modified here a G protein-coupled receptor, the BLT1 receptor of leukotriene B4, to stabilize it in vitro. For this, we introduced a metal-binding site connecting the third and sixth transmembrane domains of the receptor. This modification was intended to restrain the activation-associated relative movement of these helices that results in a less stable packing in the isolated receptor. The modified receptor binds its agonist with low-affinity and can no longer trigger G protein activation, indicating that it is stabilized in its ground state conformation. Of importance, the modified BLT1 receptor displays an increased temperature-, detergent-, and time-dependent stability compared with the wild-type receptor. These data indicate that stabilizing the ground state of this GPCR by limiting the activation-associated movements of the transmembrane helices is a way to increase its stability in detergent solutions; this could represent a forward step on the way of its crystallization. [source] The ,allosteric modulator' SCH-202676 disrupts G protein-coupled receptor function via sulphydryl-sensitive mechanismsBRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 4 2006Anna M Lewandowicz Previous studies suggest that the thiadiazole compound SCH-202676 (N -(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-(2H)-ylidene)methanamine) acts as an allosteric modulator of a variety of structurally distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It was postulated that SCH-202676 would directly bind a structural motif in the receptor molecule common to divergent members of the GPCR family. The molecular mechanisms of such a promiscuous action, however, remain obscure. To clarify the mechanism of SCH-202676 action, we used the functional approach of [35S]GTP,S autoradiography with rat brain cryostat sections together with classical membrane [35S]GTP,S binding assays to evaluate how the thiadiazole affects G protein activity mediated by various receptors linked to the Gi -family of G proteins. We found that in the absence of dithiotreitol (DTT), SCH-202676 (10,7,10,5 M) elicits nonspecific effects in the [35S]GTP,S-based G protein activation assays, thereby severely compromising interpretations on the compounds ability to allosterically inhibit receptor-mediated G protein activity. Such a nonspecific behaviour was fully reversed upon addition of DTT (1 mM), revealing thiol-based mechanism of action. In routine incubations containing DTT, SCH-202676 had no effect on receptor-driven G protein activity, as assessed for adenosine A1, ,2 -adrenergic, cannabinoid CB1, lysophosphatidic acid LPA1, muscarinic M2/M4, purinergic P2Y12 or sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, suggesting that the thiadiazole does not act as an allosteric modulator of GPCR function. 1H NMR analysis indicated that SCH-202676 underwent structural changes after incubation with the reducing agent DTT or with brain tissue. We conclude that SCH-202676 modulates GPCRs via thiol modification rather than via true allosteric mechanisms. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, 422,429. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706624 [source] Gq/11 and Gi/o activation profiles in CHO cells expressing human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: dependence on agonist as well as receptor-subtypeBRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 4 2001Elizabeth C Akam Profiles of G protein activation have been assessed using a [35S]-GTP,S binding/immunoprecipitation strategy in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing either M1, M2, M3 or M4 muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor subtypes, where expression levels of M1 and M3, or M2 and M4 receptors were approximately equal. Maximal [35S]-GTP,S binding to Gq/11, stimulated by M1/M3 receptors, or Gi1 , 3, stimulated by M2/M4 receptors occurred within approximately 2 min of agonist addition. The increases in Gq/11,-[35S]-GTP,S binding after M1 and M3 receptor stimulation differed substantially, with M1 receptors causing a 2 , 3 fold greater increase in [35S]-GTP,S binding and requiring 5 fold lower concentrations of methacholine to stimulate a half-maximal response. Comparison of M2 and M4 receptor-mediated Gi1 , 3,-[35S]-GTP,S binding also revealed differences, with M2 receptors causing a greater increase in Gi1 , 3, activation and requiring 10 fold lower concentrations of methacholine to stimulate a half-maximal response. Comparison of methacholine- and pilocarpine-mediated effects revealed that the latter partial agonist is more effective in activating Gi3, compared to Gi1/2, for both M2 and M4 receptors. More marked agonist/partial agonist differences were observed with respect to M1/M3 -mediated stimulations of Gq/11,- and Gi1 , 3,-[35S]-GTP,S binding. Whereas coupling to these G, subclasses decreased proportionately for M1 receptor stimulation by these agonists, pilocarpine possesses a greater intrinsic activity at M3 receptors for Gi, versus Gq/11, activation. These data demonstrate that mACh receptor subtype and the nature of the agonist used govern the repertoire of G proteins activated. They also provide insights into how the diversity of coupling can be pharmacologically exploited, and provide a basis for a better understanding of how multiple receptor subtypes can be differentially regulated. British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 132, 950,958; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703892 [source] | ||||||||||||||||