			Home About us Contact

Alginate Impression Materials (alginate + impression_material)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Effect of Mixing Methods on Mechanical Properties of Alginate Impression Materials

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, Issue 4 2005
Gary Frey DDS
Background: A commercial mechanical mixer is available to make the mixing of alginate more convenient and more consistent for the practitioner; however, there is very little information on the mechanical properties of alginate mixed with this device as compared with hand mixing. Purpose: To compare the mechanical properties of alginate impression materials mixed with a mechanical mixer (Alginator II, Cadco) and hand mixing. Material and Methods: Three alginate impression materials (Identic, Jeltrate, and Kromopan) were tested. Strain in compression, elastic recovery, and compressive strength were measured according to ANSI/ADA specification no. 18-1992; tear energy was measured using a pants tear test. Five specimens were prepared for each group with 12 groups for the mechanical mixer and 12 groups for hand mixing, for a total of 120 specimens. A two-way analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD test at the 0.05 level of significance were used to analyze the data. Results: There were statistically significant differences in properties among the materials, but mixing technique had no statistically significant effect on strain in compression and tear energy. Conclusion: The mechanical mixer improved elastic recovery and compressive strength of the alginate impression materials tested and had no effect on strain in compression and tear energy. A mechanical mixer facilitates the mixing of alginate impression materials and improves some mechanical properties. [source]

Physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of current alginate impression materials

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 11 2004
H. Murata
summary, This study examined physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of two types of alginate impression materials. Five powder-type alginate impression materials (Alginoplast EM, Aroma Fine, Algiace Z, Coe Alginate, Jeltrate Plus) and a paste-type alginate impression material (Tokuso AP-1) were used. The dynamic viscosity immediately after mixing was measured by means of a controlled-stress rheometer. The gelation times were determined according to Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) T6505, and recovery from deformation, strain in compression and compressive strength were determined according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) specification 1563. Detail reproduction and surface roughness of type III dental stones (New Plastone, New Sunstone) and a type IV dental stone (Die Stone) were evaluated using a ruled test block as specified in the ISO specification 1563 and a profilometer, respectively. The alginate impression materials evaluated in this study were all in compliance with the ISO specification 1563 and JIS T6505. The alginate impression materials had similar mechanical properties after gelation, whilst a wide range of dynamic viscosity immediately after being mixed, gelation times and compatibility with dental stones were found among the materials. The paste-type material had a higher dynamic viscosity and a shorter gelation time than the powder-type materials. The best surface quality was obtained with the paste-type material/type III dental stone cast combinations. The materials should be selected in consideration of initial flow, setting characteristics and compatibility with dental stones. The results suggested that a paste-type material would better meet the requirements of an alginate impression material. [source]

Effect of mixing method on rheological properties of alginate impression materials

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 7 2002
K. Inoue
The apparent viscosity of alginate impression paste prepared by three mixing methods (hand-mixing technique (HM), semiautomatic instrument (SM) and automatic mixing instrument (AM)), and the gel strength and surface depression of the respective set materials were measured. The materials used were eight commercially available products mixed at a temperature of 23 ± 0.5 °C and allowed to set. The AM had a high mixing speed, which reduced the working time 4.4,31.5%, compared with HM. This was the result of an increase in paste temperature during mixing. In the case of impression materials mixed with the AM, the gel strength and the surface depression at the gel fracture increased significantly, in accordance with Fisher's protected least significant difference (PLSD) analysis. This phenomenon is caused by a decrease of air bubbles in the set material. [source]