			Home About us Contact

External Approach (external + approach)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Long-Term Results of Endonasal Sinus Surgery in Sinonasal Papillomas

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 9 2003
Marcel Kraft MD
Abstract Objective To assess the value of endonasal sinus surgery in the management of sinonasal papillomas. Study Design Retrospective study including 43 patients operated on for sinonasal papilloma in a long-term follow-up. Methods In 26 cases (60%) an endonasal approach, in eight cases (19%) an external approach, and in four cases (9%) a combined procedure was performed to remove these tumors. Five septal lesions (12%) were resected under direct vision. The original sections and charts of all patients were reviewed to assess clinical data. Follow-up information was available for 42 of our patients (98%) with a mean follow-up of 62 months. Results Histologic examination revealed 34 cases of inverted papilloma (79%), five cases of exophytic papilloma (12%), and four cases of columnar cell papilloma (9%). Malignancy occurred in 4 of 43 patients (9%), and recurrences developed in 8 of 42 patients (19%). Two of these recurrences happened after endoscopic sinus surgery (two inverted papillomas), three after lateral rhinotomy (three inverted papillomas), one after a combined procedure (one inverted papilloma), and two after simple resection (two exophytic papilloma). Conclusions In keeping with our experience, the endonasal endoscopic approach, often in combination with a medial maxillectomy, is favored for the treatment of sinonasal papilloma because of a lower recurrence rate and a better cosmetic result. In some larger tumors and lesions in difficult locations, better visualization can be obtained by a combined external and endonasal approach. [source]

Endoscopic Staple Diverticulostomy for Recurrent Zenker's Diverticulum,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 1 2003
Richard L. Scher MD
Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, effectiveness, and morbidity of using endoscopic staple diverticulostomy (ESD) as treatment for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) recurring after either prior endoscopic treatment or external diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy. Study Design A retrospective review of a case series of 18 patients with recurrent ZD. Methods All patients cared for with ZD were evaluated to identify those patients with recurrent ZD. The clinical records of patients with recurrent ZD were reviewed for: demographics, prior treatment, time to recurrence, factors associated with recurrence, technical feasibility of treatment, complications, effectiveness and duration of symptom relief. Results Between March 1995 and July 2001, a total of 127 consecutive patients with ZD received care. Eighteen of these patients were treated for recurrent ZD: nine treated originally by ESD, and nine by external approach (seven by diverticulectomy and two by diverticulopexy), with three of these patients treated twice. Seventeen patients had partial or complete relief of symptoms after their initial treatment, with recurrence of symptoms noted 0 to 60 months later. Specific factors associated with recurrence of symptoms were identified in only one patient. Treatment of recurrent ZD by ESD was technically feasible in 16 of the patients. Complete or improved symptom relief has been reported by 16 of the patients after revision ESD, with follow-up from 9 to 69 months. No significant treatment complications occurred. Fifteen patients resumed clear liquid diet on the day of surgery, and one on the day after surgery. All patients were discharged from the hospital by the second postoperative day (mean = 0.6 d). Conclusions ESD is an effective, technically feasible, and safe treatment for patients with ZD recurring after prior endoscopic or external treatment, and it should be the initial treatment of choice for these patients. [source]

A retrospective comparison of endonasal KTP laser dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 5 2002
S. Mirza
We retrospectively reviewed all primary external dacryocystorhinostomies (DCRs) and endonasal KTP laser DCRs performed for epiphora as a result of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in our unit between 1993 and 2000. Forty-nine patients underwent an external approach and 76 endonasal laser procedures were performed. The success rate of the external group was 94% with a mean follow-up of 9 months. In contrast, the endonasal group's success rate was 64% with a mean follow-up of 12 months. This difference reached statistical significance (P = 0.0002). However, when including revision procedures, the success rate in the endonasal group increased from 64% to 82%. The success rate in the endonasal group improved from 50% in the first 38 cases to 79% in the last 38 cases (P = 0.0084), thereby demonstrating a learning curve. Our study confirms external DCR as the ,gold standard' for a successful outcome. However, the endonasal technique has significant advantages, including being a quicker procedure with less morbidity, no cutaneous scar, and being more amenable to a bilateral procedure, daycase surgery and local anaesthetic. We are persisting with the endonasal technique because of its advantages but have moved towards more ,cold steel' techniques in an effort to improve results and emulate other series. In conclusion, for nasolacrimal duct obstruction, the endonasal technique is our approach of choice, with revision surgery if necessary, and the external technique is held in reserve. [source]

Modern Concepts of Frontal Sinus Surgery

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 1 2001
Rainer Weber MD
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis To validate the endonasal surgical approach to frontal sinus in inflammatory sinus disease, trauma, and selective tumor surgery, and to define the role of external approaches to the frontal sinus. Endonasal frontal sinusotomy can range from endoscopic removal of obstructing frontal recess cells or uncinate process to the more complex unilateral or bilateral removal of the frontal sinus floor as described in the Draf II,III drainage procedures. In contrast, the osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy remains the "gold standard" for external approaches to frontal sinus disease. Methods A retrospective review of 1286 patients undergoing either endonasal or external frontal sinusotomy by the authors at four university teaching programs from 1977. Prior author reports were updated and previously unreported patient series were combined. Results Six hundred thirty-five patients underwent type I frontal sinusotomy, 312 type II sinusotomy, and 156 type III sinusotomy. A successful result was seen in these groups, 85.2% to 99.3%, 79% to 93.3%, and 91.5% to 95%, respectively. External frontal sinusotomy or osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy was successfully performed in 187 of 194 patients. Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance image scanning, and reoperation rate measured postoperative success. Conclusions A stepwise approach to the surgical treatment of frontal sinusitis, trauma, and selective benign tumors yields successful results as defined by specific criteria which vary from 79% to 97.8%. The details of specific techniques are discussed, essential points emphasized, and author variations noted. [source]