End Stoma (end + stoma)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Use of a continent colonic conduit for treatment of refractory evacuatory disorder following construction of an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 11 2003
J. R. Saunders
Background: This study reports the outcome from the addition of a continent colonic conduit (CCC) to an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter in patients with severe evacuatory disorder following formation of a neosphincter for end-stage faecal incontinence. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients had an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter constructed for end-stage faecal incontinence. Seven patients developed severe evacuatory disorders; construction of a CCC was required in six patients and an antegrade continence enema procedure in one. Results: Median follow-up of the seven patients was 77 (range 6,96) months. Six patients with evacuatory disorders had a successful outcome, defined as continence to solid and liquid stool as well as correction of the evacuatory disorder. A stoma was formed in one patient. Patients who had previously undergone anorectal reconstructive surgery were more likely to develop an evacuatory disorder following construction of an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter than patients operated on for other reasons (,2 = 28·13, 1 d.f., P < 0·001). Conclusion: Construction of a CCC is a useful technique for the majority of patients with severe evacuatory disorders following the formation of an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter, for whom the only alternative would be an end stoma. A CCC may be incorporated with construction of an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter in patients at significant risk of postoperative severe evacuatory disorders. Copyright © 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]


Surgical strategies for faecal incontinence , a decision analysis between dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter and end stoma

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 6 2008
E. K. Tan
Abstract Background Artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) and dynamic graciloplasty (DG) are surgical treatments for faecal incontinence (FI). FI may affect quality of life (QOL) so severely that patients are often willing to consider a permanent end stoma (ES). It is unclear which is the more cost-effective strategy. Method Probability estimates for patients with FI were obtained from published data (ABS, n = 319; DG, n = 301), supplemented by expert opinion. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from each strategy. Factors considered were the risk of failure of the primary and redo operation and the consequent risk of permanent stoma. Results were assessed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results Over the 5-year time horizon, ES gave a QALY gain of 3.45 for £16 280, giving an ICER of £4719/QALY. ABS produced a gain of 4.38 QALYs for £23 569, giving an ICER of £5387/QALY. DG produced a gain of 4.00 QALYs for £25 035, giving an ICER of £6257/QALY. With the willingness-to-pay threshold set at £30 000/QALY, ES was the most cost-effective intervention. The ABS was most cost-effective after 10 years. Conclusion All three procedures were found to be cost-effective. The ES was most cost-effective over 5 years, while the ABS was most cost-effective in excess of 10. DG maybe considered as an alternative in specialist centres. [source]


Long-term results of the antegrade continent enema procedure for constipation in adults

COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 5 2004
N. P. Lees
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of the Antegrade Continent Enema (ACE) procedure for treating severe constipation in adults. Methods Over 10 years 37 ACE conduits were created in 32 patients (median age 35 years, 26 women) with constipation caused by slow transit, obstructed defaecation or both. Conduits were created from the appendix (n = 20, 54%), ileum (n = 10, 27%), neoappendix caecostomy (n = 5, 14%) or colon (n = 2, 5%). Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed to determine outcome. Results After a median follow up of 36 (range 13,140) months, 28 (88%) required at least one further procedure on a primary conduit, including reversal in 19 (59%). Five patients had a second conduit fashioned, two successfully. Conduit type and constipation cause did not significantly influence the rates of ACE reversal or major revision. Ileal conduits were associated with fewer minor revision procedures for stenosis (1 in 7 patients) than appendix conduits (21 in 20 patients). There was one (3%) serious complication. Satisfactory ACE function was ultimately achieved in 47% of patients, at last follow up. After ACE reversal, 9 (28%) patients underwent formation of an end stoma and 3 patients had a colectomy. Conclusions Revision procedures are common, but approximately half of patients can expect satisfactory long-term ACE function. ACE conduit reversal does not preclude subsequent alternative surgical strategies to treat this difficult condition. [source]