Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Effect Assessment (effect + assessment)
Selected Abstracts,Objective-led' SEA in a Scottish local authorityENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, Issue 3 2004Graham Esson Scottish planners have expanded environmental effect assessment of development plans into the policy appraisal of their sustainability impacts. The application of this methodology is demonstrated in our review of the appraisal of the Perth and Kinross structure plan, which demonstrates the strengths and limitations of this objective-led approach to strategic environmental assessment when compared with a baseline-led one. Scottish Executive interim planning guidance for the European Union directive on strategic environmental assessment integrates the two approaches. This requires the local baseline to be clearly established and plan-induced movements in it to be predicted, monitored and evaluated. It also requires the use of techniques capable of assessing all forms of impact, and better engagement with the public and environmental authorities. Implementation of the directive will tax the capacity of Scottish planning authorities to meet these requirements whilst retaining their preference for an objective-led policy-based approach to assessment. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. [source] Significance testing of synergistic/antagonistic, dose level-dependent, or dose ratio-dependent effects in mixture dose-response analysisENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY, Issue 10 2005Martijs J. Jonker Abstract In ecotoxicology, the state of the art for effect assessment of chemical mixtures is through multiple dose,response analysis of single compounds and their combinations. Investigating whether such data deviate from the reference models of concentration addition and/or independent action to identify overall synergism or antagonism is becoming routine. However, recent data show that more complex deviation patterns, such as dose ratio,dependent deviation and dose level,dependent deviation, need to be addressed. For concentration addition, methods to detect such deviation patterns exist, but they are stand-alone methods developed separately in literature, and conclusions derived from these analyses are therefore difficult to compare. For independent action, hardly any methods to detect such deviations from this reference model exist. This paper describes how these well-established mixture toxicity principles have been incorporated in a coherent data analysis procedure enabling detection and quantification of dose level,and dose ratio,specific synergism or antagonism from both the concentration addition and the independent action models. Significance testing of which deviation pattern describes the data best is carried out through maximum likelihood analysis. This analysis procedure is demonstrated through various data sets, and its applicability and limitations in mixture research are discussed. [source] Aquatic risks of pesticides, ecological protection goals, and common aims in european union legislationINTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, Issue 4 2006Theo CM Brock Abstract This discussion paper presents a framework for spatiotemporal differentiation in ecological protection goals to assess the risks of pesticides in surface waters. It also provides a proposal to harmonize the different scientific approaches for ecotoxicological effect assessment adopted in guidance documents that support different legislative directives in the European Union (Water Framework Directive and Uniform Principles). Decision schemes to derive maximum permissible concentrations in surface water are presented. These schemes are based on approaches recommended in regulatory guidance documents and are scientifically underpinned by critical review papers concerning the impact of pesticides on freshwater organisms and communities. Special attention is given to the approaches based on standard test species, species sensitivity distribution curves, and model ecosystem experiments. The decision schemes presented here may play a role in the "acceptability" debate and can be used as options in the process of communication between risk assessors and risk managers as well as between these risk experts and other stakeholders. [source] Alternative Methods for Developmental Toxicity TestingBASIC AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, Issue 5 2006Aldert H. Piersma The aims of these investigations have been to reduce animal experimentation, to refine effect assessment and mechanistic studies, and to accelerate and simplify safety testing in an area of toxicology that uses relatively many animals. Many alternatives have been developed over the years with different compexities, using biologic material ranging from continuous cell lines to complete embryos. The validation of alternatives and their application in testing strategies is still in its infancy, although significant steps towards these aims are currently being made. The introduction of the genomics technology is a promising emerging area in developmental toxicity testing in vitro. Future application of alternatives in testing strategies for developmental toxicity may significantly gain from the inclusion of gene expression studies, given the unique programme of gene expression changes in embryonic and foetal development. [source] Intraoperative loading attenuates nausea and vomiting of tramadol patient-controlled analgesia. (Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan) Can J Anaesth 2000;47:968,973.PAIN PRACTICE, Issue 2 2001Wei-Wu Pang Sixty adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. The patients were anesthetized in a similar manner. At the beginning of wound closure, the patients were randomly allocated to receive tramadol (Group 1) or normal saline (Group 2). Pain control and adverse effect assessments were done in the PACU and every 6 h for 48 h post drug by an independent observer. The loading dose was 290 ± 45 mg in Group 1 and 315 ± 148 mg in Group 2. In PACU, more nausea and vomiting both in terms of incidence and severity were observed in patients with postoperative loading than in those with intraoperative loading of tramadol. Conclude that administering the loading dose of tramadol during surgery decreases the nausea and vomiting associated with a high dose of tramadol and improves the quality of tramadol PCA in the relief of postoperative pain. Comment by Lian-Kah Ti, M.D. The clinical application and conclusions of this study have to be questioned. It was not surprising that a loading dose of tramadol could effectively be given intraoperatively. What was surprising was that the authors chose not to give any analgesics either preoperatively or intraoperatively for relatively major surgery in an older population, potentially risking morbidity. Indeed, analgesics were withheld in the control group until the patients were extubated, awake, responsive, and complained of pain. Another source of concern was the large loading dose used. Based on their own experience, the authors gave doses of 300 mg of tramadol, which far exceeded the maximum recommended single dose of 100 mg as stated in the manufacturer's instruction for use. The authors did not report any intraoperative hemodynamic consequences from the loading dose, although they noted that the amount of isoflurane required was decreased. The authors concluded that the decreased nausea and vomiting seen in the patients receiving tramadol intraoperatively resulted from the patients being anesthetized at the point when peak plasma levels were achieved. An alternative explanation could be that the patients in the control group had greater postoperative pain (initial VAS of 5.9), and that pain itself resulted in the increased nausea and vomiting. Therefore, the value of this study is doubtful. [source] | ||||||||||