			Home About us Contact

Duct Injury (duct + injury)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Kinds of Duct Injury

bile duct injury

Selected Abstracts

Complex bile duct injuries: management

HPB, Issue 1 2008
E. DE SANTIBÁÑES
Abstract Background. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the present treatment of choice for patients with gallbladder stones, despite its being associated with a higher incidence of biliary injuries compared with the open procedure. Injuries occurring during the laparoscopic approach seem to be more complex. A complex biliary injury is a disease that is difficult to diagnose and treat. We considered complex injuries: 1) injuries that involve the confluence; 2) injuries in which repair attempts have failed; 3) any bile duct injury associated with a vascular injury; 4) or any biliary injury in association with portal hypertension or secondary biliary cirrhosis. The present review is an evaluation of our experience in the treatment of these complex biliary injuries and an analysis of the international literature on the management of patients. [source]

Liver transplantation for the sequelae of intra-operative bile duct injury

HPB, Issue 3 2002
E De Santibañes
Background Intra-operative bile duct injuries (IBDI) are potentially severe complications of the treatment of benign conditions, with unpredictable long-term results. Multiple procedures are frequently needed to correct these complications. In spite of the application of these procedures, patients with severe injuries can develop irreversible liver disease. Liver transplantation (LT) is currently the only treatment available for such patients, but little information has been published concerning the results of LT. Methods Eight patients with LT for end-stage liver disease for IBDI were studied retrospectively. They had failure of multiple previous treatments and experienced recurrent episodes of cholangitis, oesophageal variceal bleeding, severe pruritus, refractory ascites and spontaneous peritonitis. Results Mean recipient hepatectomy time was of 243 minutes (range 140,295 min), the complete procedure averages 545 minutes (260,720) and intraoperative red-blood-cells consumption was 6.5 units (1,7). One patient required reoperation due to perforation of a Roux-en-Y loop, and three developed minor complications (2 wound infections, 1 inguinal lymphocele). One patient died due to nosocomial pneumonia (mortality rate 12.5%). One patient required retransplantation due to delayed hepatic artery thrombosis. At follow-up 75% of patients are alive with normal graft function and an excellent quality of life. Conclusions LT represents a safe curative treatment for end-stage liver disease after IBDI, albeit a major undertaking in the context of a surgical complication in the treatment of benign disease. The complications of the surgical procedure and the long-standing immunosupression impart a high cost for resolutions of these sequelae but LT represents the only long-term effective treatment for these selected patients. [source]

Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 8 2002
Kaja Ludwig
Background: The purpose of the present study was to examine the current approach and different strategies adopted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany. Methods: A retrospective survey was conducted at 859 (n = 1200; 67.6%) hospitals in Germany. Data from 123 090 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy were analysed. Results: 71.9% of the operations were finished laparoscopically (n= 88 537) whereas 22.5% were carried out using the open technique. Conversion to open surgery was required in 7.1% of the laparoscopically started operations. When common bile duct stones were diagnosed preoperatively, 74.4% of the participants favoured the primary endoscopic extraction, following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In cases of intraoperative diagnoses, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was finished and postoperative primary endoscopic extraction was carried out in more than half of the hospitals (58.4%). Sixteen per cent converted to an open operation with simultaneous exploration of the common duct. Laparoscopic desobstruction of the common bile duct was extremely rare (4.4%). Compared with open cholecystectomy, the results show a lower incidence of postoperative reinterventions (0.9 vs 1.8%) and fatal outcomes (0.04 vs 0.53%) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In contrast, common bile duct injuries were more frequent in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (0.32 vs 0.12%). The median duration of hospitalization was 6.1 days (range: 2.8,12) in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group compared with 10.4 days (range: 3,28) in the open cholecystectomy group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard procedure for the treatment of uncomplicated gallstone disease. There are reasonable differences between the hospitals in type of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, management of common duct stones and intraoperative diagnostics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even after adjustment for differences in patient comorbidities. [source]

All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 12 2002
Mr M. H. Thompson
Background: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is associated with substantial variation in results suggesting that different patient populations are being reported. This report observes the results in a defined population and on an intention-to-treat basis. Methods: All patients with suspected bile duct stones who were fit for surgery from April 1994 were offered laparoscopic bile duct exploration. There were 224 patients of mean age 56 years, of whom 174 were women. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was used in 149 patients deemed unfit for surgery. All data were recorded prospectively and checked at the time of discharge. Patients were followed up after 6 months and beyond after the operation. Results: Stones were removed transcystically in 56 patients, transductally in 158 and by flushing in nine. The duct clearance rate was 96 per cent overall, 98 per cent for transcystic and 94 per cent for transductal exploration. Intracorporeal lithotripsy safely reduced the failure rate of exploration from seven of the first 28 to four of the subsequent 196 procedures. Biliary complications occurred in 16 per cent of procedures in which a T tube was used but only 4 per cent if the duct was closed by suturing. Conversion to open operation for severe gallbladder inflammation was necessary in 6 per cent of patients. There were no deaths, bile duct injuries or pancreatitis but complications occurred in 19 per cent, associated with use of T tubes and advancing age. Laparoscopic duct exploration succeeded in seven patients after previous cholecystectomy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic bile duct exploration is effective and safe when used for all patients. For young and fit patients it should replace endoscopic sphincterotomy. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source]

Role of hepatectomy in the management of bile duct injuries

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2001
C. H. Wakefield
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with bile duct injuries of a more severe nature than open cholecystectomy. This study examined the emerging role of hepatectomy in the management of major iatrogenic bile duct injuries in the laparoscopic era. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to a tertiary hepatobiliary unit with bile duct injuries over a 16-year period until April 2000. Data are expressed as median (range). Results: Eighty-eight patients (34 men, 54 women) were referred during this interval; their median age was 55 (19,83) years. Injuries resulted from 50 laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 35 open cholecystectomies, with three occurring during gastroduodenal procedures. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with injuries of greater severity than open cholecystectomy: Bismuth type I,II, 32 per cent versus 69 per cent for the open operation; type III,IV, 66 per cent versus 31 per cent for the open procedure (P = 0·02, ,2 test). After referral 73 patients underwent definitive surgical interventions: 57 hepaticojejunostomies, 11 revisions of hepaticojejunostomy, two orthotopic liver transplants and three right hepatectomies. Two patients had subsequent hepatectomy following initial hepaticojejunostomy. Four of the five hepatectomies were for the management of injuries perpetrated at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Criteria necessitating hepatectomy were liver atrophy on computed tomography (80 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·0001, ,2 test) and a greater incidence of angiographically proven vascular injury (40 versus 6 per cent; P = 0·006, ,2 test); in addition, type III,IV injuries were more frequent (60 versus 42 per cent) in the hepatectomy group. There were no procedure-related deaths. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 13 per cent. Median hospital stay was 10 days. Conclusion: Major hepatectomy allows the successful and safe repair of cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries complicated by concomitant vascular injury, unilateral lobar atrophy and destruction of the biliary confluence. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source]

Cellular and humoral autoimmunity directed at bile duct epithelia in murine biliary atresia,,

HEPATOLOGY, Issue 5 2006
Cara L. Mack
Biliary atresia is an inflammatory fibrosclerosing lesion of the bile ducts that leads to biliary cirrhosis and is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in children. The pathogenesis of biliary atresia is not known; one theory is that of a virus-induced, subsequent autoimmune-mediated injury of bile ducts. The aim of this study was to determine whether autoreactive T cells and autoantibodies specific to bile duct epithelia are present in the rotavirus (RRV)- induced murine model of biliary atresia and whether the T cells are sufficient to result in bile duct inflammation. In vitro analyses showed significant increases in IFN-,,producing T cells from RRV-diseased mice in response to bile duct epithelial autoantigen. Adoptive transfer of the T cells from RRV-diseased mice into naïve syngeneic SCID recipients resulted in bile duct,specific inflammation. This induction of bile duct pathology occurred in the absence of detectable virus, indicating a definite response to bile duct autoantigens. Furthermore, periductal immunoglobulin deposits and serum antibodies reactive to bile duct epithelial protein were detected in RRV-diseased mice. In conclusion, both cellular and humoral components of autoimmunity exist in murine biliary atresia, and the progressive bile duct injury is due in part to a bile duct epithelia,specific T cell,mediated immune response. The role of cellular and humoral autoimmunity in human biliary atresia and possible interventional strategies therefore should be the focus of future research. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1231,1239.) [source]

Complex bile duct injuries: management

Handling of biliary complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the setting of Tripoli Central Hospital

HPB, Issue 3 2002
A Elhamel
Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has an increased incidence of bile duct injury and bile leak when compared with open cholecystectomy. This study reviews management of these complications in a general hospital setting. Data collected from patients diagnosed and treated in one surgical unit for biliary complications after LC between 1992 and 1996 were analysed. Method A total of 14 patients were examined. Diagnosis was defined mainly by Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and undetected choledocholitiasis was discovered in association with two of these complications. 43% of patients presented after LC with early postoperative bile leak or jaundice due to partial or complete bile duct excision or slippage of clips from the cystic duct. 57% presented with late biliary strictures. Thirteen patients were treated surgically, with biliary reconstruction (11 patients), direct repair (one) and cystic duct ligation in combination with clearance of bile duct from large multiple stones (one). One patient, who had clip displacement from cystic duct in combination with misplaced clip on right hepatic duct, was treated elsewhere. Postoperatively, one patient developed anastomotic leak and another died from sequellaie of bile duct transection requiring staged operations. Conclusions It is concluded that, in an environment similar to that where the authors had to work, LC should be performed in hospitals with facility to perform ERCP or when access for this technique is available in a nearby institution. Early recognition and immediate management of biliary injuries is dependent on individual resources and circumstances but, if required, consultation with colleagues or referral of patients with suspected or established biliary complications should not be delayed. [source]

Liver transplantation for the sequelae of intra-operative bile duct injury

Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print?

HPB, Issue 3 2001
PW Plaisier
Background In 1995 the concept of a ,critical view of safety' (CVS) in Calot's triangle was introduced to prevent bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to determine the most reliable method for recording CVS. Methods Operation notes, video images and photo prints from 50 consecutive elective non-converted laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analysed. Results Operation notes alone did not suffice to record CVS. As an adjunct, video proved superior to photo print with regard to quality. Nevertheless, photo prints were practically and logistically much easier to produce than video. Moreover, when good quality images were achieved, photo print recorded CVS more conclusively than video. Discussion Operation notes, video and photo print are complementary, and the combination records CVS conclusively in nearly every case. [source]

Minimally invasive management of bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

HPB, Issue 2 2001
G Tzovaras
Background Bile leakage is an uncommon complication of cholecystectomy. The bile may originate from the gallbladder bed, the cystic duct or rarely from injury to a major bile duct. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of minimal access endoscopic and percutaneous techniques in treating symptomatic bile leak. Patients and methods Twenty-one patients with symptomatic bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent assessment of the extent of the bile leak via ultrasound/CT and ERCP. Following diagnosis, the patients were treated by sphincterotomy and biliary drainage and, if necessary, percutaneous drainage of the bile collection. Results Only one patient required primary surgical treatment following diagnosis of a major duct injury. The other 20 were treated by a combination of sphincterotomy (including a stent in most) plus percutaneous drainage in six. In 19 of 20, this minimal access approach stopped the leak. Discussion Most patients who present with bile leakage after cholecystectomy can be managed successfully by means of ERCP with percutaneous drainage of any large bile collection. [source]

Intraductal chilled saline perfusion to prevent bile duct injury during percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 8pt2 2008
Takaya Ohnishi
Abstract Background and Aim:, Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a promising, minimally invasive treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, thermal injury sometimes occurs in the bile duct, potentially leading to a critical situation. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether bile duct injury is reduced by an intraductal chilled saline perfusion (ICSP) through a nasobiliary tube during RFA for HCC. Patients and Methods:, The baseline incidence of bile duct injury at Gifu Municipal Hospital was 3.1% (13 patients) in 424 patients with HCC treated by percutaneous RFA. In all patients, the tumor was within 5 mm of the central bile duct on CT images. The incidence of bile duct injury was 46% among the 28 selected patients whose tumor was close to the central bile duct. To prevent complications in such high-risk patients, we placed a nasobiliary tube endoscopically before RFA, and performed ICSP during RFA. Forty consecutive patients with tumors close to the central bile duct were enrolled in this study. Results:, Of the 40 enrolled patients, only one had biliary injury, whereas the remaining 39 patients were able to avoid it. The incidence of biliary injury was significantly reduced in the ICSP group (1/40, 2.5%) compared to that in the control group (13/28, 46%) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the liver function 6 months after RFA was also better preserved in the ICSP group according to Child,Pugh grading, thus resulting in a better clinical outcome. Conclusions:, ICSP through a nasobiliary tube is a potential intervention method to prevent biliary injury by percutaneous RFA. [source]

MRCP in the diagnosis of iatrogenic bile duct injury

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, Issue 8 2003
Luis Bujanda
Abstract Postoperative biliary tract lesions are becoming increasingly common. The diagnosis is made by direct cholangiography via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). The present comparative study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in application to iatrogenic bile duct injury. A prospective blind study was performed, contrasting MRCP and ERCP in 10 patients with suspected postoperative biliary tract lesions. MRCP was performed less than 72,h before ERCP. Final diagnosis was made on the basis of findings at surgery and ERCP. The presence of biliary dilatation, excision injury, stricture, fluid collection and free fluid was analyzed. The mean patient age was 66.5 years. There were three males and seven females. The type of postoperative lesion (Bergman classification) are five patients type C, three type D, one type B and one type A. Diagnostic failure was recorded in two cases with ERCP, while in five patients it was unable to define a therapeutic approach. In contrast, MRCP correctly diagnosed all patients. MRCP is effective in diagnosing postoperative biliary tract lesions, and can help decide the best therapeutic approach. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Osteopontin is involved in the formation of epithelioid granuloma and bile duct injury in primary biliary cirrhosis

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2003
Kenichi Harada
Recently, it was shown that osteopontin (OPN) is involved as a chemoattractant cytokine in the recruitment of macrophages and T lymphocytes in the granulomas of diverse etiologies and also plays an important role in the production of autoantibodies and development of autoimmune diseases. Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is characterized by immune-mediated bile duct damage with frequent epithelioid granulomas. In this study, the expression of OPN was immunohistochemically examined in 25 PBC and 52 control livers. Epithelioid cells within granuloma in PBC expressed OPN variably. These cells were also positive for CD68, suggesting their histiocyte/macrophage lineage. In addition, strong expression of OPN was seen in the cytoplasm of mononuclear cells infiltrating around granulomas and also damaged bile ducts in PBC. The number of such positive mononuclear cells and the ratio of OPN-positive cells/total infiltrating cells in portal tracts were higher in PBC than in controls. The majority of these OPN-positive cells were found to be IgG- or IgM-producing plasma cells. These suggest that in PBC, OPN is an important immune molecule in portal tracts, and contributes to the recruitment of mononuclear cells into epithelioid granuloma and also participates in bile duct injury via B-cell differentiation and plasma cell expansion. [source]

Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1-2 2010
Wan Yee Lau
Abstract Background:, Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe which is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, reduced long-term survival and quality of life, and high rates of subsequent litigation. The aim of this article was to review the management of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. Methods:, Medline and PubMed database search was undertaken to identify articles in English from 1970 to 2008 using the key words ,bile duct injury', ,cholecystectomy' and ,classification'. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. Case report was excluded. Results:, Early recognition of bile duct injury is of paramount importance. Only 25%,32.4% of injuries are recognized during operation. The majority of patients present initially with non-specific symptoms. Management depends on the timing of recognition, the type, extent and level of the injury. Immediate recognition and repair are associated with improved outcome, and the minimum standard of care after recognition of bile duct injury is immediate referral to a surgeon experienced in bile duct injury repair. There is a growing body of literature supporting the importance of early referral to a tertiary care hospital which can provide a multidisciplinary approach to treat bile duct injury. Inadequate management may lead to severe complications. Conclusions:, None of the classification system is universally accepted as each has its own limitation. The optimal management depends on the timing of recognition of injury, the extent of bile duct injury, the patient's condition and the availability of experienced hepatobiliary surgeons. [source]

Foetus in fetu with common bile duct injury: a case report and review of literature

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 9 2009
MCH(PAEDIATRIC SURGERY), Milind Joshi MB BS
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: AN AUDIT OF OUR TRAINING PROGRAMME

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 4 2005
Swee Ho Lim
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed procedure in general surgical practice but it also has an inherently steep learning curve. The training of surgeons in this procedure presents a challenge to teaching hospitals, which essentially have to strike a balance between effective training and safety of the patient. The present study aims first to assess the safety of the structured training programme for this procedure at the Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore. Secondly, it seeks to audit the conversion and bile duct injury rates among the laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by the department, and the factors which influence these. Methods: Notes of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the department over an 18-month period were reviewed retrospectively and the relevant data prospectively collected. Demographics, as well as details of cases of conversion to open operation and of bile duct injury were identified and the reasons for each recorded. Results: A total of 443 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the 18-month period. The most common indication for surgery was biliary colic/dyspepsia (61.4%), followed by cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis and common bile duct stone. The overall conversion rate was 11.5%. Three hundred and fifty-five patients were operated on by consultant surgeons, while 88 were by registrars who had been through the structured training programme. There was no statistically significant difference found in the conversion rates between these two groups (P = 0.284). Twenty-two of the 268 female (8.2%) patients had conversion to open operation, while 29 of the 175 male patients (16.6%) underwent conversion (P = 0.007). Amongst cases of cholecystitis and cholangitis, the conversion rate for patients operated on within 7 days of onset of symptoms was 35%, while those operated on 8 or more days later had a conversion rate of 29.7% (P = 0.639). There was a solitary case of bile duct injury among the 443 cases, equating to a bile duct injury rate of 0.23%. Conclusion: A structured training programme involving stepwise progression of training, with close supervision by consultant surgeons and a built-in system of audit can effectively train junior surgeons in laparoscopic cholecystectomy without exposing patients to undue risks. [source]

Biliary tract injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a single unit

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 12 2002
Michael Miroshnik
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into Australia in early 1990. Its rapid increase in acceptance was, however, tempered by reports of an increased incidence of bile duct injury. The aim of this study was to report on the incidence of biliary tract injuries in a single unit, comment on the way they were managed and look at strategies to prevent them. Methods: A retrospective audit was conducted on laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between January 1992 and March 2001. The data was collated from patient medical record files and yielded a total of 1216 procedures. Results: There were 899 women (74%) and 317 men (26%), with an age range of 13,92 years. Most of the procedures were performed on an elective (94%) rather than emergent basis (6%). There was one bile duct injury (0.09%) and seven bile leaks (0.63%). The single injury involved common bile duct obstruction by a misplaced clip and was successfully managed by cholangio-enteric bypass. Of the seven bile leaks, three were from the cystic duct stump, two from the gallbladder bed, and two were unidentified, settling conservatively. Of the five patients actively treated, two underwent therapeutic laparoscopy, two proceeded to laparotomy, and one was managed successfully by endoscopic stenting. Conclusions: Single-centre studies such as this are important in ensuring that standards of surgery are maintained in a community setting. [source]

Myths surrounding bile duct injury

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 2 2002
Alfred Cuschieri
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH CLINICAL INDICATORS IN SURGERY

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2000
B. T. Collopy
Background: In 1997 a set of 53 clinical indicators developed by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) and the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) Care Evaluation Programme (CEP), was introduced into the ACHS Evaluation and Quality Improvement Programme (EQuIP). The clinical indicators covered 20 different conditions or procedures for eight specialty groups and were designed to act as flags to possible problems in surgical care. Methods: The development process took several years and included a literature review, field testing, and revision of the indicators prior to approval by the College council. In their first year 155 health-care organizations (HCO) addressed the indicators and this rose to 210 in 1998. Data were received from all states and both public and private facilities. Results: The collected data for 1997 and 1998 for some of the indicators revealed rates which were comparable with those reported in the international literature. For example, the rates of bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy were 0.7 and 0.53%, respectively; the mortality rates for coronary artery graft surgery were 2.5 and 2.1%, respectively; the mortality rates after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were 2.5 and 3.7%, respectively; and the post-tonsillectomy reactionary haemorrhage rates were 0.9 and 1.3%, respectively. Results for some indicators differed appreciably from other reports, flagging the need for further investigation; for example, the negative histology rates for appendectomy in children were 18.6 and 21.2%, respectively, and the rates for completeness of excision of malignant skin tumours were 90.7 and 90%, respectively. The significance of these figures, however, depends upon validation of the data and their reliability and reproducibility. Because reliability can be finally determined only at the hospital level they are of limited value for broader comparison. Conclusion: The process of review established for the indicator set has led to refinement of some indicators through improvement of definitions, and to a considerable reduction in the number of indicators to 29 (covering 18 procedures), for the second version of the indicators (which was introduced for use from January 1999). The clinical indicator programme, as it has with other disciplines, hopefully will provide a stimulus to the modification and improvement of surgical practice. Clinician ownership should enhance the collection of reliable data and hence their usefulness. [source]

Current management of bile duct injury,

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2008
K. D. Lillemoe
Excellent results are achievable [source]

Management of concomitant hepatic artery injury in patients with iatrogenic major bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2008
J. Li
Background: Concomitant hepatic artery injury is a rare but severe complication associated with bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Sixty patients referred with biliary injury after LC between April 1998 and December 2005 were divided into two groups according to the time elapsed between injury and definitive surgical revision; patients in group 1 were referred early (within 4 days) after operation and those in group 2 were referred later. Hepatic rearterialization was performed in addition to biliary reconstruction when technically possible. Results: Damage to the hepatic artery was detected in ten patients. Hepatic rearterialization was carried out in five patients by end-to-end anastomosis (one), or by using an autologous graft (three) or allogeneic vascular graft (one). Three patients in group 2 underwent right hemihepatectomy without arterial reconstruction owing to liver necrosis or lobar atrophy. Three of ten patients died from postoperative complications. Conclusion: Combined bile duct and hepatic artery injury during LC led to a complicated clinical course, with a high mortality rate. Reconstruction of the right hepatic artery might be helpful in reducing hepatic ischaemia, but is usually feasible only if the injury is identified early. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Quality of life after repair of bile duct injury

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2002
D. J. Gouma
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in the evaluation of bile duct strictures after cholecystectomy

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2002
Dr A. Chaudhary
Background: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) has been the preferred investigation to delineate the anatomy of the biliary tract in a patient with a bile duct stricture after cholecystectomy. Recently magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) has been described to evaluate the obstructed biliary tract. This paper reports a comparison of MRC with PTC in evaluating patients with an iatrogenic bile duct stricture. Methods: This was a prospective study of 26 patients who had surgery for a bile duct stricture after cholecystectomy. Before operation all patients underwent both MRC and PTC, the results of which were compared with the intraoperative findings. Results: Both PTC and MRC were comparable with regard to image quality, detection of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, assessment of the level of injury and detection of abnormalities such as intraduct calculi, cholangitic liver abscesses and atrophy of liver lobes. MRC provided additional information in four patients, including detection of associated fluid collections (n = 3) and portal hypertension (n = 1). In eight patients more than one puncture had to be performed during PTC to delineate the complete anatomy. Conclusion: MRC is an accurate and non-invasive imaging procedure for preoperative evaluation of patients with a bile duct injury after cholecystectomy, and is capable of providing additional information which may not be available with PTC. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source]